Discourse-based approaches: A new framework for second language teaching and learning

Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 729-741

  Celce Murcia, Marianne ^a   Olshtain, Elite ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84901007289     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410612700-54     Document Type: Chapter

References (78)

1. Atkinson, J. M., & Heritage, J. (Eds.) (1984). Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
2. Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1999). Exploring the interlanguage of interlanguage pragmatics: A research agenda for acquisitional pragmatics. Language Learning, 49, 677-713.
3. Brumfit, C., & Johnson, K. (1979). The communicative approach to language teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
4. Butler, Y. G. (2002). Metalinguistic knowledge and English article use. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(3), 451-480.
5. Canale, M. (1983). From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy. In J. Richards & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 2-27). London: Longman.
6. Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language testing and teaching. Applied Linguistics, 1(1): 1-47.
7. Celce-Murcia, M. (1985). Making informed decisions about the role of grammar in language teaching. TESOL Newsletter, 29(1): 9-12.
8. Celce-Murcia, M. (1991). Discourse analysis and grammar instruction. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 11,135-151.
9. Celce-Murcia, M. (1995a). Discourse analysis and the teaching of listening. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honor of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 363-377). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
10. Celce-Murcia, M. (1995b). On the need for discourse analysis in curriculum development. In P. Hashemipour, R. Maldonado, & M. van Naerssen (Eds.), Studies in language learning and Spanish linguistics: Festschrift in honor of Tracy D. Terrell (pp. 200-213). New York: McGraw-Hill.
11. Celce-Murcia, M. (2002). Why it makes sense to teach grammar in context and through discourse. In E. Hinkel & S. Fotos (Eds.), New perspectives on grammar teaching in second language classrooms (pp. 119-134). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Celce-Murcia, M., Dornyei, Z., & Thurrell, S. (1995). Communicative competence: A pedagogically motivated model with content specifications. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6, 5-35.
13. Celce-Murcia, M., & Hilles, S. (1988). Techniques and resources in teaching grammar. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
14. Celce-Murcia, M., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (1999). The grammar book: An ESL/EFL teacher's course, (2nd ed.) Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
15. Celce-Murcia, M., & Olshtain, E. (2000). Discourse and context in language teaching: A guide for language teachers. New York: Cambridge University Press.
16. Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton.
17. Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Chomsky, N. (1972). Language and mind, (2nd ed.) San Diego: Harcourt Brace.
19. Connor, U., & Mbaye, A. (2002). Discourse approaches to writing assessment. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 263-278. New York: Cambridge University Press.
20. Coulthard, M. (Ed.). (1994). Advances in written text analysis. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
21. DeKeyser, R. M. (1995). Learning second language grammar rules: An experiment with a miniature linguistic system. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17(3), 379-403.
22. Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (Eds.). (1998). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23. Ellis, R. (2000). Making the classroom acquisition rich. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Learning a second language through interaction, (pp. 211-230). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
24. Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2001). Preemptive focus on form in the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 35(3), 407-432.
25. Eyring, J. (2001). Experiential and negotiated language learning. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language, (3rd ed). (pp. 333-344). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
26. Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London: Longman.
27. Flower, L. S. (1972). Reader-based prose: A cognitive basis for problems in writing. College English, 41(1), 19-37.
28. Grabe, W. (1991). Current developments in second language reading research. TESOL Quarterly, 25(3), 375-406.
29. Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar, (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
30. Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
31. Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1989). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a sociosemiotic perspective. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
32. Harley, B. (1989). Functional grammar in French immersion: A classroom experiment. Applied Linguistics, 10(3), 331-359.
33. Hatch, E. (1992). Discourse and language education. New York: Cambridge University Press.
34. Hinkel, E., & Fotos, S. (Eds.). (2002). New perspectives on grammar teaching in second language classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
35. Hoey, M. (1991). Patterns of lexis in text. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
36. Hyland, K. (2002). Genre: Language, context, and literacy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 113-135. New York: Cambridge University Press.
37. Hymes, D. (1967). Models of the interaction of language and social setting. Journal of Social Issues, 23(2), 8-38.
38. Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected readings (pp. 269-293). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
39. Johns, A. M. (1997). Text, role, and context: Developing academic literacies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
40. rd ed.) (pp. 43-54). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
41. Johns, T. (1994). The text and its message. In M. Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in written text analysis (pp. 102-116). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
42. Kasper, G., & Blum-Kulka, S. (1993). Interlanguage pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press.
43. Kasper, G., & Rose, R. (2002). Pragmatic development in a second language. Language Learning monograph series. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
44. Krashen, S. D. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
45. Langacker, R. (1974). Language and its structure. New York: Harcourt Brace.
46. Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M. (1991). An introduction to second language acquisition research. London: Longman.
47. nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
48. Long, M. H. (1983). Does second language instruction make a difference? A review of research. TESOL Quarterly, 17(3), 359-382.
49. Long, M. H. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39-52). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
50. Luke, A. (2002). Beyond science and ideology critique: Developments in critical discourse analysis. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 96-110. New York: Cambridge University Press.
51. Mann, W., & Thompson, S. A. (1988). Rhetorical structure theory: A framework for the analysis of texts. Text, 8(3), 243-281.
52. McCarthy, M. (1991). Discourse analysis for language teachers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
53. McCarthy, M., & Carter, R. (1994). Language as discourse: Perspectives for language teaching. New York: Longman.
54. McGroarty, M. (Ed.). (2002). Annual review of applied linguistics, Volume 22. New York: Cambridge University Press.
55. McKay, S. (2001). Literature as content for ESL/EFL. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language, (3rd ed). (pp. 319-332). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
56. McNamara, T., Hill, K., & May, L. (2002). Discourse and assessment. Annual review of applied linguistics, 22, 221-242. New York: Cambridge University Press.
57. Myers, M. (1987). The shared structure of oral and written language and the implications for teaching reading, writing, and literature. In J. R. Squire (Ed.), The dynamics of language learning (pp. 121-146). Urbana, IL: ERIC.
58. Nunan, D. (1993). An introduction to discourse analysis. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
59. Nystrand, M. (1982). Rhetoric's –audience— and linguistics' –speech community—: Implications for understanding writing, reading, and text. In M. Nystrand (Ed.), What writers know (pp. 1-28). New York: Academic Press.
60. Olshtain, E., & Celce-Murcia, M. (2001). Discourse analysis and language teaching. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 707-724). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
61. Olshtain, E., Feuerstein, T., & Schcolnik, M. (1988). Cloze for reading comprehension. Tel Aviv: Am Oved.
62. Olshtain, E., & Nissim-Amitai, F. (in press). Curriculum decision making in a multilingual context. International Journal of Multilingualism, 1(1), Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
63. Olson, D. R. (1977). From utterance to text. Harvard Educational Review, 47, 257-281.
64. Ong, W. (1982). Orality and literacy. London: Methuen.
65. Pennycook, A. (1995). Cultural politics of English as an international language. London: Longman.
66. Rumelhart, D. E. (1977). Toward an interactive model of reading. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance. (Vol. 6, pp. 573-603). New York: Academic Press.
67. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language, 50(4), 696-753.
68. Schegloff, E. A., Ochs, E., & Thompson, S. A. (Eds.). (1996). Interaction and grammar. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
69. rd ed). (pp. 303-318). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
70. Stanovich, K. E. (1980). Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 16(1), 32-71.
71. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. M. Gass & C. G. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-254). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
72. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Languge Journal, 82, 320-337.
73. Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
74. Ur, P. (1984). Listening and language learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
75. van Ek, J. A.(1976). The threshold level for modern language learning in schools. London: Longman.
76. Widdowson, H. G. (1978). Teaching language as communication. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
77. Wilkins, D. (1976). Notional syllabuses. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
78. Young, R. (2002). Discourse approaches to oral language assessment. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 243-262. New York: Cambridge University Press.