The notion of boundedness/unboundedness in the foreign language classroom

Cognitive Linguistic Approaches to Teaching Vocabulary and Phraseology

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 309-327

  Niemeier, Susanne ^a  

^a University of Koblenz   (Germany)

Author keywords

Boundedness vs. unboundedness; Count vs. mass nouns; Lexis grammar continuum; Perspective; Prototype; Simple vs. progressive aspect; Viewing arrangements

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867009684     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (21)

1. Bach, Gerhard, and Johannes-Pieter Timm (eds.) 2004 Englischunterricht. Tabingen: Francke.
2. Bloomfield, Leonard 1933 Language. London: George Allen & Unwin.
3. Dirven, Rena, and Marjolijn Verspoor 2004 Cognitive Exploration of Language and Linguistics. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
4. Froese, Wolfgang 2000 Grammatik lernen mit allen Sinnen im Englischunterricht. Eine Unterrichtsstudie far die Jahrgangsstufe 6. Praxis des neusprachlichen Unterrichts 47: 137-143.
5. Givan, Talmy 1993 English Grammar. A Function-Based Introduction. 2 Vols. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
6. Klippel, Frederike 2000 aœberlegungen zum ganzheitlichen Fremdsprachenunterricht. Fremdsprachenunterricht 44: 242-248.
7. Lamb, Sydney M. 1999 Pathways of the Brain. The Neurocognitive Basis of Language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
8. Lamb, Sydney M. 2001 Learning syntax - a neurocognitive approach. In Applied Cognitive Linguistics, Vol. I, Martin Patz, Susanne Niemeier and Rena Dirven (eds.), 167-191. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
9. Langacker, Ronald W. 1991 Concept, Image, and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
10. Langacker, Ronald W. 2001 Cognitive linguistics, language pedagogy, and the English present tense. In Applied Cognitive Linguistics, Vol. I, Martin Patz, Susanne Niemeier and Rena Dirven (eds.), 3-39. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
11. Lee, Penny 1997 Language in thinking and learning: Pedagogy and the New Whorfian framework. Harvard Educational Review 67: 430-471.
12. Mayer, Nikola 2002 Ganzheitlichkeit und Sprache. Frankfurt: Lang.
13. Niemeier, Susanne, and Rena Dirven(eds.) 2000 Evidence for Linguistic Relativity. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
14. Niemeier, Susanne, and Monika Reif Forth. Progress isn't simple - teaching English tense and aspect to German learners. In A Pedagogical Grammar - Applied Cognitive Linguistics, Sabine de Knop, Antoon de Rijcker, Birgitta Meex and Tanja Mortelmans (eds.), Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
15. Patz, Martin, Susanne Niemeier, and Rena Dirven (eds.) 2001 Applied Cognitive Linguistics, 2 vols. 1: Theory and Language Acquisition; 2: Language Pedagogy. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
16. Patz, Martin, and Marjolijn Verspoor (eds.) 2000 Explorations in Linguistic Relativity. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
17. Radden, Ganter 1992 The cognitive approach to natural language. In Thirty Years of Linguistic Evolution, Martin Patz (ed.), 513-541. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
18. Ungerer, Friedrich, Gerhard E.H. Meier, Klaus Schafer, and Shirley B. Lechler 1990 A Grammar of Present-Day English. Stuttgart: Klett.
19. Ungerer, Friedrich, Peter Pasch, Peter Lampater, Rosemary Hellyer-Jones 1992 Learning English: A Guide to Grammar. Stuttgart: Klett.
20. Wendt, Michael 1996 Konstruktivistische Fremdsprachendidaktik. Lerner- und handlungsorientierter Fremdsprachenunterricht aus neuer Sicht. Tabingen: Narr.
21. Wierzbicka, Anna 1985 Oats and wheat: The fallacy of arbitrariness. In Iconicity in Syntax, John Haiman (ed.), 311-342. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.