An exploration of teacher acceptability of treatment plan implementation: Monitoring and feedback methods

Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 56-77

  Easton, Julia E ^a   Erchul, William P ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952460621     PISSN: 10474412     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10474412.2011.544949     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Alder, G. S., & Ambrose, M. L. (2005). An examination of the effect of computerized performance monitoring feedback on monitoring fairness, performance, and satisfaction. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97, 161-177.
2. Allinder, R. M. (1997). Effects of acceptability on teachers' implementation of curriculum-based measurement and student achievement in mathematics computation. Remedial and Special Education, 18, 113-120.
3. Amick, B. C., & Smith, M. J. (1992). Stress, computer-based work monitoring and measurement systems: A conceptual overview. Applied Ergonomics, 23, 6-16.
4. Atwater, L. E., & Waldman, D. A. (2008). Leadership, feedback and the open communication gap. New York, NY: Erlbaum/Taylor & Francis Group.
5. Barnett, D. W., Daly, E. J., & Jones, K. M. (2004). Response to intervention: Empirically based special service decisions from single-case designs of increasing and decreasing intensity. The Journal of Special Education, 38, 66-79.
6. Berkeley, S., Bender, W. N., Peaster, L. G., & Saunders, L. (2009). Implementation of response to intervention: A snapshot of progress. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 85-95.
7. Braden, J. P., & Joyce, L. B. (2008). Evaluation of problem-solving in North Carolina pilot and comparison schools. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University, Department of Psychology.
8. Burns, M. K., Jacob, S., & Wagner, A. R. (2008). Ethical and legal issues associated with using response-to-intervention to assess learning disabilities. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 263-279.
9. Cochrane, W. S., & Laux, J. M. (2008). A survey investigating school psychologists' measurement of treatment integrity in school-based interventions and their beliefs about its importance. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 499-507.
10. Coding, R. S., Feinberg, A. B., Dunn, E. K., & Pace, G. M. (2005). Effects of immediate performance feedback on implementation of behavior support plans. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 38, 205-219.
11. DiGennaro, F. D., Martens, B. K., & McIntyre, L. L. (2005). Increasing treatment integrity through negative reinforcement: Effects on teacher and student behavior. School Psychology Review, 34, 220-231.
12. Eckert, T. L., & Hintze, J. M. (2000). Behavioral conceptions and applications of acceptability: Issues related to service delivery and research methodology. School Psychology Quarterly, 15, 123-148.
13. Fedor, D. B., Bettenhausen, K. L., & Davis, W. (1999). Employees' dual roles as raters and recipients. Group and Organization Management, 24, 92-120.
14. Fleming, R., & Sulzer-Azaroff, B. (1992). Reciprocal peer management: Improving staff instruction in a vocational training program. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 611-620.
15. Fletcher, J. M., Francis, D. J., & Morris, R. D. (2005). Evidence-based assessment of learning disabilities in children and adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 34, 506-522.
16. Graner, P. S., Faggetta-Luby, M. N., & Fritschmann, N. S. (2005). An overview of responsiveness to intervention: What practitioners ought to know. Topics in Language Disorders, 25, 93-105.
17. Gresham, F. M., Gansle, K. A., Noell, G. H., & Cohen, S. (1993). Treatment integrity of school-based intervention studies: 1980-1990. School Psychology Review, 22, 254-272.
18. Hagermoser Sanetti, L. M., & Kratochwill, T. R. (Eds.). (2009a). Developing a science of treatment integrity [Special issue]. School Psychology Review, 38(4).
19. Hagermoser Sanetti, L. M., & Kratochwill, T. R. (2009b). Treatment integrity assessment in the schools: An evaluation of the treatment integrity planning protocol. School Psychology Quarterly, 24, 24-35.
20. Hagermoser Sanetti, L. M., Luiselli, J. K., & Handler, M. W. (2007). Effects of verbal and graphic performance feedback on behavior support plan implementation in a public elementary school. Behavior Modification, 31, 454-465.
21. Hawkins, R. P. (1991). Is social validity what we are interested in? Argument for a functional approach. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 205-213.
22. Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, Pub. L. No. 108-446, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1401-1485 (2004).
23. Jones, K. M., Wickstrom, K. F., & Friman, P. C. (1997). The effects of observational feedback on treatment integrity in school-based behavioral consultation. School Psychology Quarterly, 12, 316-326.
24. Kimball, S. M. (2002). Analysis of feedback, enabling conditions and fairness perceptions of teachers in three school districts with new standards-based evaluation systems. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 16, 241-268.
25. Lai, E. R., & Waltman, K. (2008, Summer). Test preparation: Examining teacher perceptions and practices. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, pp. 28-45.
26. Lee, F. (1993). Being polite and keeping MUM: How bad news is communicated in organizational hierarchies. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 1124-1149.
27. Lennox, D. B., & Miltenberger, R. G. (1990). On the conceptualization of treatment acceptability. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 25, 211-224.
28. London, M. (2003). Job feedback: Giving, seeking, and using feedback for performance improvement. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (2005). Feasibility and consequences of response to intervention: Examination of the issues and scientific evidence as a model for the identification of individuals with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 525-531.
30. McNamara, K., Telzrow, C., & DeLamatre, J. (1999). Parent reactions to implementation of intervention-based assessment. Journal of Education and Psychological Consultation, 10, 343-362.
31. Miltenberger, R. G., Larson, J., Doerner, M., & Orvedal, L. (1992). Assessing the acceptability of staff management procedures to direct care and supervisory staff. Behavioral Residential Treatment, 7, 23-34.
32. Mortenson, B. P., & Witt, J. C. (1998). The use of weekly performance feedback to increase teacher implementation of a prereferral academic intervention. School Psychology Review, 27, 613-627.
33. Noell, G. H. (2008). Research examining the relationships among consultation process, treatment integrity, and outcomes. In W. P. Erchul & S. M. Sheridan (Eds.), Handbook of research in school consultation (pp. 323-341). New York, NY: Erlbaum/Taylor & Francis Group.
34. Noell, G. H., & Gansle, K. A. (2006). Assuring the form has substance: Treatment plan implementation as the foundation of assessing response to intervention. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 32, 32-39.
35. Noell, G. H., Witt, J. C., Slider, N. J., Connell, J. E., Gatti, S. L., Williams, K. L., & Duhon, G. J. (2005). Treatment implementation following behavioral consultation in schools: A comparison of three follow-up strategies. School Psychology Review, 34, 87-106.
36. Oats, R. G., & Allinder, R. M. (1995). Validation of the CBM acceptability scale (Tech. Rep. No. 201). Available from the second author. University of Nebraska- Lincoln.
37. Ovando, M. N. (2001). Teachers' perceptions of a learner-centered teacher evaluation system. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 15, 213-231.
38. Pravikoff, D. S., Tanner, A. B., & Pierce, S. T. (2005). Readiness of U.S. nurses for evidence-based practice: Many don't understand or value research and have had little or no training to help them find evidence on which to base their practice. American Journal of Nursing, 105, 40-52.
39. Ransford, C. R., Greenberg, M. T., Domitrovich, C. E., Small, M., & Jacobson, L. (2009). The role of teachers' psychological experiences and perceptions of curriculum supports on the implementation of a social and emotional learning curriculum. School Psychology Review, 38, 510-532.
40. Schulte, A. C., Easton, J. E., & Parker, J. (2009). Advances in treatment integrity research: Multidisciplinary perspectives on the conceptualization, measurement, and enhancement of treatment integrity. School Psychology Review, 38, 460-475.
41. Smith, W. J., Harrington, K. V., & Houghton, J. D. (2000). Predictors of performance appraisal discomfort: A preliminary examination. Public Personnel Management, 29, 21-31.
42. Stanton, J. M. (2000). Reactions to employee performance monitoring: Framework, review, and research directions. Human Performance, 13, 85-113.
43. Stephan, W. G., & Dorfman, P. W. (1989). Administrative and developmental functions in performance appraisals: Conflict or synergy? Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 10, 27-41.
44. Strizek, G. A., Pittsonberger, J. L., Riordan, K. E., Lyter, D. M., & Orlofsky, G. F. (2006). Characteristics of schools, districts, teachers, principals, and school libraries in the United States: 2003-04 Schools and Staffing Survey (Report No. NCES 2006-313 Revised). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
45. Tankersley, M., Landrum, T. J., & Cook, B. G. (2004). How research informs practice in the field of emotional and behavioral disorders. In R. B. Rutherford, M. M. Quinn, & S. R. Mathur (Eds.), Handbook of research in emotional and behavioral disorders (pp. 98-133). New York, NY: Guilford.
46. Telzrow, C. F., McNamara, K., & Hollinger, C. L. (2000). Fidelity of problem-solving implementation and relationship to student performance. School Psychology Review, 29, 443-461.
47. Thiel, L., & Ghosh, Y. (2008). Determining registered nurses' readiness for evidencebased practice. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 5, 182-192.
48. Truscott, S. D., & Cosgrove, G. (2000). The acceptability of organizational consultation with prereferral intervention teams. School Psychology Quarterly, 15, 172-206.
49. Waldersee, R., & Luthans, F. (1994). The impact of positive and corrective feedback on customer service performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 83-95.
50. Wickstrom, K. F., Jones, K. M., LaFleur, L. H., & Witt, J. C. (1998). An analysis of treatment integrity in school-based behavioral consultation. School Psychology Quarterly, 13, 141-154.
51. Wilkinson, L. A. (2006). Monitoring treatment integrity: An alternative to the "consult and hope" strategy in school-based behavioural consultation. School Psychology International, 27, 426-438.
52. Witt, J. C., Martens, B. K., & Elliott, S. N. (1984). Acceptability of behavioral interventions used in classrooms: The influence of amount of teacher time, severity of problem, and type of intervention. Behavior Therapy, 15, 204-209.
53. Woodgate-Jones, A. (2008). Training confident primary modern foreign language teachers in England: An investigation into preservice teachers' perceptions of their subject knowledge. Teacher and Teacher Education, 24, 1-13.
54. Yariv, E. (2006). "Mum effect": Principals' reluctance to submit negative feedback. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21, 533-546.