Ethical and legal issues associated with using response-to-intervention to assess learning disabilities

Journal of School Psychology

Volumn 46, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 263-279

  Burns, Matthew K ^a   Jacob, Susan ^b   Wagner, Angela R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment; Ethics; Response to intervention

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; LEARNING DISORDER; LEGAL ASPECT; MEDICAL ETHICS; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCHOOL; UNITED STATES;

ETHICS, PROFESSIONAL; HUMANS; LEARNING DISORDERS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SCHOOLS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 41149158199     PISSN: 00224405     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsp.2007.06.001     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. Aaron P.G. The impending demise of the discrepancy formula. Review of Educational Research 67 (1997) 461-502
2. Alexander, A. M. (2006, March 28). Latest legal issues impacting general education interventions. Workshop presented at the National Association of School Psychologists meeting, Anaheim, CA.
3. Algozzine B., and Ysseldyke J. Classification decisions in learning disabilities. Educational and Psychological Research 2 (1982) 117-129
4. Algozzine B., and Ysseldyke J. Learning disabilities as a subset of school failure: The over sophistication of a concept. Exceptional Children 50 (1983) 242-246
5. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education. Standards for educational and psychological testing. (2nd ed.). (1999), American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC
6. American Psychological Association. Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist 57 (2002) 1060-1073
7. Barnett D.W., Bell S.H., Gilkey C.M., Lentz F.E., Graden J.L., Stone C.M., et al. The promise of meaningful eligibility determination: Functional intervention-based multifactored preschool evaluation. Journal of Special Education 33 (1999) 112-124
8. Barnett D.W., Elliott N., Graden J., Ihlo T., Macmann G., Nantais M., and Prasse D. Technical adequacy for response to intervention practices. Assessment for Effective Intervention 32 (2006) 20-31
9. Batsche G., Elliott J., Graden J.L., Grimes J., Kovaleski J.F., Prasse D., et al. Response to intervention: Policy considerations and implementation (2005), National Association of State Directors of Special Education, Alexandria, VA
10. Bransford J.D., Delcos V.R., Vye N.J., Burns S., and Hasselbring T.S. State of the art and future directions. In: Lidz C.S. (Ed). Dynamic assessment (1987), Guilford Press, New York 479-497
11. Burns M.K. Using curriculum-based assessment in the consultative process: A useful innovation or an educational fad. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation 15 (2004) 63-78
12. Burns M.K. RTI will fail, unless .... Communiqué 35 5 (2007) 38-40
13. Burns, M. K. (in press). Reading at the instructional level with children identified as learning disabled: Potential implications for response-to-intervention. School Psychology Quarterly.
14. Burns M.K., Appleton J.J., and Stehouwer J.D. Meta-analysis of response-to-intervention research: Examining field-based and research-implemented models. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment 23 (2005) 381-394
15. Burns M.K., Dean V.J., and Klar S. Using curriculum-based assessment in the responsiveness to intervention diagnostic model for learning disabilities. Assessment for Effective Intervention 29 3 (2004) 47-56
16. Burns, M. K., Deno, S. L., & Jimerson, S. R. (in press). Toward a unified response-to-intervention model. In S. R. Jimerson, M. K. Burns, & A. M. VanDerHeyden (Eds.), Handbook of response to intervention: The science and practice of assessment and intervention. New York: Springer.
17. Burns M.K., and Senesac B.J. Comparison of dual discrepancy criteria for diagnosis of unresponsiveness to intervention. Journal of School Psychology 43 (2005) 393-406
18. Burns M.K., Vanderwood M., and Ruby S. Evaluating the readiness of prereferral intervention teams for use in a problem-solving model: Review of three levels of research. School Psychology Quarterly 20 (2005) 89-105
19. Burns M.K., and Ysseldyke J.E. Questions about responsiveness-to-intervention implementation: Seeking answers from existing models. California School Psychologist 10 (2005) 9-20
20. Carlson C., and Christenson S.L. Evidence-based parent and family interventions in school psychology. School Psychology Quarterly 20 4 (2005) (Special issue)
21. Christ T.J. Short-term estimates of growth using curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency: Estimating standard error of the slope to construct confidence intervals. School Psychology Review 35 (2006) 128-133
22. Coles G. Reading lessons: The debate over literacy (1998), Hill and Wang, New York
23. Corrao J., and Melton G.B. Legal issues in school-based behavior. In: Witt J.C., Elliot S.N., and Gresham F.M. (Eds). Handbook of behavior therapy in education (1988), Plenum.Press, New York 377-399
24. Cromwell R., Blashfield R., and Strauss J. Criteria for classification systems. In: Hobbs N. (Ed). Issues in the classification of children (1975), Jossey Bass, San Francisco, CA 4-25
25. Dean V.G., and Burns M.K. A critical review of including intrinsic processing difficulties in learning disabilities diagnostic models. Learning Disabilities Quarterly 25 (2002) 170-176
26. Deno S.L. Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children 52 (1985) 219-232
27. Ellis A.K. Research on educational innovations. (4th ed.). (2006), Eye on Education, Larchmont, NY
28. Fletcher J.M., Francis D.J., Shaywitz S.E., Lyon G.R., Foorman B.R., Stuebing K.K., et al. Intelligence testing and the discrepancy model for children with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice 13 (1998) 186-203
29. Fletcher J.M., Shaywitz S.E., Shankweiler D.P., Katz L., Lieberman I.Y., Stuebing K.K., et al. Cognitive profiles of reading disability: Comparisons of discrepancy and low achievement definitions. Journal of Education Psychology 86 (1994) 1-14
30. Fuchs D., Mock D., Morgan P.L., and Young C.L. Responsiveness-to-intervention: Definitions, evidence, and implications for the learning disabilities construct. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice 18 (2003) 157-171
31. Fuchs L.S. Assessing intervention responsiveness: Conceptual and technical issues. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice 18 (2003) 172-186
32. Fuchs L.S., and Fuchs D. Effects of systematic formative evaluation: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children 53 (1986) 199-208
33. Fuchs L.S., and Fuchs D. Treatment validity: A unifying concept for reconceptualizing the identification of learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice 13 (1998) 204-219
34. Gerber M.M. Teachers are still the test: Limitations of response to instruction strategies for identifying children with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities 38 (2005) 516-524
35. Gravois T.A., and Rosenfield S. A multi-dimensional framework for evaluation of instructional consultation teams. Journal of Applied School Psychology 19 (2002) 5-29
36. Gresham, F. (2001, August). Responsiveness to intervention: An alternative approach to the identification of learning disabilities. Paper presented at the Learning Disabilities Summit: Building a Foundation for the Future, Washington D.C.
37. Gresham F.M. Responsiveness to intervention: An alternative approach to the identification of learning disabilities. In: Bradley R., and Danielson L. (Eds). Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice. The LEA series on special education and disability (2002), Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 467-519
38. Gresham F.M., Reschly D.J., Tilly W.D., Fletcher J., Burns M.K., Christ T., et al. Comprehensive evaluation of learning disabilities: A response to intervention perspective. The School Psychologist 59 1 (2005) 26-30
39. Gutkin T.B. Evidence-based interventions in school psychology: The state of the art and future directions. School Psychology Quarterly 17 4 (2002) (Special issue)
40. Haager D., Gersten R., Baker S., and Graves A.W. The English-language learner classroom observation instrument for beginning readers. In: Vaughn S., and Briggs K.L. (Eds). Reading in the classroom: Systems for the observation of teaching and learning (2003), Brookes Publishing, Baltimore, MD 111-144
41. Heartland (2004). Heartland AEA 11 annual progress report. Johnston, IA: author. Available online at http://www.aea11.k12.ia.us/downloads/2004apr.pdf.
42. Hosp J.L., and Reschly D.J. Disproportionate representation of minority students in special education: Academic, demographic, and economic predictors. Exceptional Children 70 (2004) 185-199
43. Ikeda M.J., and Gustafson J.K. Heartland AEA 11's problem solving process: Impact on issues related to special education. Research report no. 2002-01 (2002), Heartland Area Education Agency 11, Johnston, IA
44. Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, Pub. L. No. 108-446,118Stat. 2647; 2004 Enacted H.R. 1350; 108 Enacted H.R. 1350. Final regulations implementing IDEA 2004 were published in the Federal Register, Monday, August 14, 2006, pp. 46540-46845.
45. Jacob S., and Hartshorne T.S. Ethics and law for school psychologists. 5th ed. (2007), John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken, NJ
46. Johnson v. Upland, 26 Fed. Appx. 689, 2002 U.S. App. LEXUS 515 (9th Cir. 2002).
47. Kavale K.A., and Forness S.R. Policy decisions in special education: The role of meta-analysis. In: Gersten R., Schiller E.P., and Vaughn S. (Eds). Contemporary special education research: Syntheses of knowledge base on critical instructional issues (2000), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 281-326
48. Klotz, M. D. & Nealis, L. (2005). The new IDEA; A summary of significant reforms. Retrieved 5/1/2005 from http://www.nasponline.org/advocacy/IDEAfinalsummary.pdf. National Association of School Psychologists.
49. Kovaleski J.F., Gickling E.E., and Morrow H. High versus low implementation of instructional support teams: A case for maintaining program fidelity. Remedial and Special Education 20 (1999) 170-183
50. Kovaleski J.F., Tucker J.A., and Duffy D.J. School reform through instructional support: The Pennsylvania Initiative (Part I). Communiqué 23 8 (1995) (insert)
51. Kratochwill T.R., and Stoiber K.C. Empirically supported interventions in school psychology: The role of negative results in outcome research. Psychology in the Schools 37 (2000) 399-413
52. Kratochwill T.R., and Stoiber K.C. Evidence-based interventions in school psychology: Conceptual foundations of the procedural and coding manual of Division 16 and the Society for the Study of School Psychology Task Force. School Psychology Quarterly 17 (2002) 341-389
53. Lerner J. Learning disabilities: Theories, diagnosis, and teaching practices. (9th ed.). (2003), Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston
54. Lopez E.C. The cognitive assessment of limited English proficient and bilingual children. In: Flanagan D.P., Genshaft J.L., and Harrison P.L. (Eds). Contemporary intellectual assessment (1997), Guilford Press, New York 503-516
55. Marston D.B. A curriculum-based measurement approach to assessing academic performance: What it is and why do it. In: Shinn M.R. (Ed). Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (1989), Guilford, New York
56. Marston, D. (2003, December). Comments on Three Papers Addressing the Question: "How many tiers are needed within RTI to achieve acceptable prevention outcomes and to achieve acceptable patterns of LD identification?" Paper presented at the National Research Center on Learning Disabilities Responsiveness-to-Intervention Symposium, Kansas City, MO.
57. Marston D., Muyskens P., Lau M., and Canter A. Problem-solving model for decision making with high-incidence disabilities: The Minneapolis experience. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice 18 (2003) 187-200
58. McCook J.E. The RTI guide: Developing and implementing a model in your schools (2006), LRP Publications, Horsham, PA
59. McNamara K. Adoption of intervention-based assessment for special education. School Psychology International 19 (1998) 251-266
60. McNamara K., and Hollinger C. Intervention-based assessment: Evaluation rates and eligibility findings. Exceptional Children 69 (2003) 181-194
61. Messick S. Test validity and the ethics of assessment. American Psychologist 35 (1980) 1012-1027
62. Messick S. Assessment in context: Appraising student performance in relation to instructional quality. Educational Researcher 13 (1984) 3-8
63. National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (2000), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development, Washington, DC
64. Paredes Scribner A. Best assessment and intervention practices with second language learners. In: Thomas A., and Grimes J. (Eds). Best practices in school psychology IV (2002), National Association of School Psychologists, Bethesda, MD 337-351
65. Reschly, A. L., Coolong-Chaffin, M., Christenson, S., & Gutkin, T. (in press). Contextual influences and response to intervention: Critical issues and strategies. In S. Jimerson, M. K. Burns, & A. M. VanDerHeyden (Eds.) Handbook of Response-to-intervention: The science and practice of assessment and intervention. Springer Publishing.
66. Reschly D.J., Hosp J.L., and Schmied C.M. And miles to go ...: State SLD requirements and authoritative recommendations (2003), National Center for Research on Learning Disabilities, Nashville, TN. http://nrcld.org/symposium2003/reschly/reschly7.html Retrieved April 25, 2006, from: http://nrcld.org/symposium2003/reschly/reschly7.html
67. Reschly D.J., and Starkweather A.R. Evaluation of an alternative special education assessment and classification program in the Minneapolis Public Schools (1997), Minneapolis Public Schools, Minneapolis, MN
68. Sattler J.M. Assessment of children: Cognitive applications. (4th ed.). (2001), Author, San Diego, CA
69. Shinn M.R. Best practices in using curriculum-based measurement in a problem-solving model. In: Thomas A., and Grimes J. (Eds). Best practices in school psychology. (4th ed.). (2002), National Association of School Psychologists, Bethesda, MD 671-698
70. Simos P.G., Fletcher J.M., Bergman El., Breier J.I., Foorman B.R., Castillo E.M., et al. Dyslexia-specific brain activation profile becomes more normal following successful remedial training. Neurology 58 (2002) 1203-1213
71. Sornson R., Frost F., and Burns M.K. Instructional support teams in Michigan: Data from Northville Public Schools. Communiqué 33 5 (2004) 28-30
72. Speece D.L., and Case L.P. Classification in context: An alternative approach to identifying early reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology 93 (2001) 735-749
73. Speece D.L., Case L.P., and Molloy D.E. Responsiveness to general education instruction as the first gate to learning disabilities identification. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice 18 (2003) 147-156
74. Stanovich K.E., and Siegel L.S. Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Educational Psychology 86 (1994) 24-53
75. Swanson H.L. Reading research for students with LD: A meta-analysis in intervention outcomes. Journal of Learning Disabilities 32 (1999) 504-532
76. Swanson H.L. What instruction works for students with learning disabilities? Summarizing the results from a meta-analysis of intervention studies. In: Gersten R., Schiller E.P., and Vaughn S. (Eds). Contemporary special education research: Syntheses of the knowledge base on critical instructional issues (2000), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 1-30
77. Swanson H.L., Hoskyn M., and Lee C. Interventions for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes (1999), Guilford, New York
78. Thomas A., and Grimes J. Best practices in school psychology IV (2002), National Association of School Psychologists, Bethesda, MD
79. Tilly III W.D. Best practices in school psychology as a problem-solving enterprise. In: Thomas A., and Grimes J. (Eds). Best practices in school psychology. 4th ed. (2002), National Association of School Psychologists, Bethesda, MD 21-36
80. Tilly, W. D. (2003, December). How many tiers are needed for successful prevention and early intervention? Heartland Area Education Agency's evolution from four to three tiers. Paper presented at the National Research Center on Learning Disabilities Responsiveness-to-Intervention Symposium, Kansas City, MO.
81. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs. Specific learning disabilities: Finding common ground. A report developed by ten organizations participating in the Learning Disabilities Roundtable (2002). http://www.nasponline.org/pdf/LD_OSEP.pdf Retreived 5/1/05 from: http://www.nasponline.org/pdf/LD_OSEP.pdf
82. U.S. House of Representatives Report 108-77: Available from: http://www.nasponline.org/advocacy/IDEAHouse Report.pdf
83. VanDerHeyden A.M., and Burns M.K. Effective instruction for children from high-risk groups. In: Frisby C.L., and Reynolds C. (Eds). Comprehensive handbook of multicultural school psychology (2005), John Wiley & Sons, New York 483-516
84. VanDerHeyden A.M., and Witt J.C. Quantifying context in assessment: Capturing the effect of base rates on teacher referral and a problem-solving model of identification. School Psychology Review 34 (2005) 161-183
85. Vaughn S., and Fuchs L.S. Redefining learning disabilities and inadequate response to instruction: The promise and potential problems. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice 18 (2003) 137-146
86. Vellutino F.R., Scanlon D.M., Sipay E.R., Small S., Chen R., Pratt A., et al. Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experimental deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology 88 (1996) 601-638
87. Ysseldyke J.E. Assessment and decision making for students with learning disabilities: What if this is as good as it gets?. Learning Disability Quarterly 28 (2005) 125-128
88. Ysseldyke J.E., and Christenson S.L. FAAB: Functional assessment of academic behavior: Creating successful learning environments (2002), Sopris West, Longmont, CO