Employees' Dual Roles AS Raters and Recipients

Group and Organization Management

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 92-120

  Fedor, Donald B ^a   Bettenhausen, Kenneth L ^b   Davis, Walter ^c  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^c Georgia Inst Technol's Qual Ctr   (Georgia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0033479579     PISSN: 10596011     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1059601199241006     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer-Verlag.
2. Antonioni, D. (1996, Autumn). Designing an effective 360-degree appraisal process. Organizational Dynamics, 25, 24-38.
3. Ashford, S. J. (1986). Feedback seeking in individual adaptation: A resource perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 465-487.
4. Barclay, J. H., & Harland, L. K. (1995). Peer performance appraisals. Group & Organization Management, 20, 39-60.
5. Baron, R. A. (1988). Negative effects of destructive criticism: Impact on conflict, self-efficacy, and task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 199-207.
6. Baron, R. A. (1990). Counteracting the effects of destructive criticism: The relative efficacy of four interventions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 235-245.
7. Berger, P. L., & Luckman, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Anchor Press.
8. Bernardin, H. J., & Cooke, D. K. (1992). The effects of appraisal of discriminability and accuracy of ratings. Psychological Reports, 70, 1211-1215.
9. Bettenhausen, K. L., & Fedor, D. B. (1997). Peer and upward appraisal: A comparison of their benefits and problems. Group and Organization Management, 22, 236-263.
10. Bies, R., & Shapiro, D. (1988). Voice and justification: Their influence on procedural fairness judgments. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 676-685.
11. Cardy, B., & Dobbins, G. (1993). The changing face of performance appraisal: Customer evaluations and 360 appraisals. Human Resource Division News, 16, 17-18.
12. Cederblom, D., & Lounsbury, J. W. (1980). An investigation of user acceptance of peer evaluations. Personnel Psychology, 33, 567-579.
13. Cobb, A. T., Wooton, K. C., & Folger, R. (1995). Justice in the making: Toward understanding the theory and practice of justice in organizational change and development. In W. A. Pasmore & R. W. Woodman (Eds.),Research in organizational change and development (Vol. 8, pp. 243-295). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
14. Cropanzano, R., Howes, J. C., Grandey, A. A., & Toth, P. (1997). The relationship of organizational politics and support to work behaviors, attitudes, and stress. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 159-180.
15. DeNisi, A. S., & Mitchell, J. L. (1978). An analysis of peer ratings as predictors and criterion measures and a proposed new application. Academy of Management Review, 3, 369-374.
16. Eder, R. W., & Fedor, D. B. (1989). Priming performance self-evaluations: Moderating effects of rating purpose and judgment confidence. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 44, 474-493.
17. Farh, J., Cannella, A. A., & Bedeian, A. G. (1991). Peer ratings: The impact of purpose on rating quality and user acceptance. Group and Organization Studies, 16, 367-386.
18. Fazio, R. H., & Zanna, M. P. (1981). Direct experience and attitude-behavior consistency. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 161-202
19. Fedor, D. B., & Bettenhausen, K. L. (1989). The impact of purpose, participant preconceptions, and rating level on the acceptance of peer evaluations. Group & Organization Studies, 14, 182-197.
20. Guzzo, R. A., & Dickson, M. W. (1996). Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance and effectiveness. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 307-338.
21. Herold, D. M., & Parsons, C. K. (1985). Assessing the feedback environment in work organizations: Development of the job feedback survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 290-305.
22. Ilgen, D. R., Fisher, C. D., & Taylor, M. S. (1979). Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 349-377.
23. Jordan, J. L., & Nasis, D. B. (1992). Preferences for performance appraisal based on method used, type of rater, and purpose of evaluation. Psychological Reports, 70, 963-969.
24. Kane, J. S., & Lawler, E. E. (1978). Method of peer assessment. Psychological Bulletin. 85, 555-586.
25. Kelley, H. H., & Michela, J. L. (1980). Attribution theory and research. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 457-501.
26. Klimoski, R. J., & London, M. (1974). Role of the rater in performance appraisal. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 445-451.
27. Korsgaard, M. A., & Robertson, L. (1995). Procedural justice in performance evaluation: The role of instrumental and noninstrumental voice in performance appraisal discussions. Journal of Management, 21, 657-669.
28. Lawler, E. E. (1971). Pay and organizational effectiveness: A psychological view. New York: McGraw-Hill.
29. Lawler, E. E., Mohrman, S., & Ledford, G. (1992). Employee involvement and total quality management: Practices and results in Fortune 1000 companies. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
30. Lawler, E. E., Mohrman, S., & Ledford, B. (1995). Creating high performance organizations: Practices and results of employee involvement and TQM in Fortune 1000 companies. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
31. Liden, R. C., & Mitchell, T. R. (1985). Reactions to feedback: The role of attributions. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 291-308.
32. Lind, E., Kanfer, R., & Earley, P. (1990). Voice, control, and procedural justice: Instrumental and noninstrumental concerns in fairness judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 952-959.
33. Love, K. G. (1981). Comparison of peer assessment methods: Reliability, validity, friendship bias, and user reaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 451-457.
34. Maslyn, J. M., & Fedor, D. B. (in press). Perceptions of politics: Does measuring different foci matter? Journal of Applied Psychology.
35. Maurer, T. J., & Tarulli, B. A. (1996). Acceptance of peer/upward performance appraisal systems: Role of work context factors and beliefs about managers' development capability. Human Resource Management, 35, 217-241.
36. McEvoy, G. M., & Buller, P. F. (1987). User acceptance of peer appraisal in an industrial setting. Personnel Psychology, 40, 785-797.
37. Milliman, J. F., Zawacki, R. A., Norman, C., Powell, L., & Kirksey, J. (1994). Companies evaluate employees from all perspectives. Personnel Journal, 73, 99-103.
38. O'Keefe, D. J. (1990). Persuasion: Theory and practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
39. Pollack, D. M., & Pollack, L. J. (1996). Using 360-degree feedback in performance appraisal. Public Personnel Management, 25, 507-528.
40. Roadman, H. E. (1964). An industrial use of peer ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 48, 211-214.
41. Saavedra, R., & Kwun, S. K. (1993). Peer evaluations in self-managing work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 450-462.
42. Shalley, C. E. (1995). Effects of coaction, expected evaluation, and goal setting on creativity and productivity. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 483-503.
43. Westerman, J. W., & Rosse, J. G. (1997). Reducing the threat of rater nonparticipation in 360-degree feedback systems. Group & Organization Management, 22, 288-309.
44. Wexley, K. N., & Klimoski, R. (1984). Performance appraisal: An update. In K. M. Rowland & G. R. Ferris (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management (Vol. 2, pp. 35-79). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
45. Yin, R. K. (1989). Case study research: Design and methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
46. Zhou, J. (1998). Feedback valence, feedback style, task autonomy, and achievement orientation: Interactive effects on creative performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 261-276.