The Acceptability of Organizational Consultation with Prereferral Intervention Teams

School Psychology Quarterly

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 172-206

  Truscott, Stephen D ^a   Cosgrove, Cina ^b   Meyers, Joel ^c   Eidle Barkman, Kirsten A ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^b U Cerebr Palsy Assoc Fulton/M C   (United States)

^c GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d Guilderland Central School District   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0034361306     PISSN: 10453830     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/h0088784     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Aksamit, D. L., & Rankin, J. L. (1993). Problem solving teams as a prereferral process. Special Services in the Schools, 7, 1-25.
2. Bogdan, R. C., & Bilken, S. K. (1982). Qualitative research for education. An introduction to theory and methods Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
3. Brown, D., Pryzwansky, W. B., & Schulte, A. C. (1998). Psychological consultation: Introduction to theory and practice (4th ed.) Boston: Allyn and Bacon
4. Conoley, J. C., Conoley, C. W., Ivey, D. C., & Scheel, M. J. (1991). Enhancing consultation by matching the consultee's perspectives. Journal of Counseling and Development, 69, 546-549
5. Cosgrove, G., Meyers, J., & Truscott, S. D. (1998, March) The implementation and acceptance of a pre-referral intervention team. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Association of School Psychologists, Orlando, FL
6. Cuban, L. (1988) A fundamental puzzle of school reform. Phi Delta Kappan. 69. 341-344.
7. Curtis, M. J., & Meyers, J (1985). Best practices in school-based consultauon. In A. T. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology (pp. 79-94). Kent, OH: National Association of School Psychologists.
8. Curtis, M. J., & Stollar, S. A. (1995). System-level consultation and organizational change. In A. T. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology (pp. 51-58). Washington, DC: NASP
9. Eckert, T. L., & Hintze, J. M. (1997, August). Behavioral conceptions and applications of program acceptability. Paper presented at the meeting of American Psychological Association, Chicago, IL
10. Ecken, T. L., Hintze, J. M., & Shapiro, E. S. (in press). Development of a scale to measure the acceptability of assessment procedures. Canadian Journal of School Psychology.
11. Eckert, T. L., & Shapiro, E. S. (1999) Methodological issues in analog acceptability research: Are teachers' acceptability ratings of assessment influenced by experimental design? School Psychology Review, 28, 5-16
12. Elliott, S. N., Turco, T. L., & Gresham, F. M. (1987) Consumers' and clients' pretreatment acceptability ratings of classroom-based group contingencies. Journal of School Psychology, 25, 145-154.
13. Elliott, S. N., Win, J. C., & Kratochwill, T. R. (1991). Selecting, implementing, and evaluating classroom interventions. InG. Stoner, M. R. Shinn, & H. M. Walker (Eds.), Interventions for achievement and behavior problems (pp. 99-135). Silver Springs, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
14. Fullan, M. (1985) Change processes and strategies at the local level The Elementary School Journal, 85, 391-420
15. Goldberg, R., & Shapiro, E. S. (1995). In-vivo rating of treatment acceptability by children: Effects of probability instruction on student's spelling performance under group contingency conditions. Journal of Behavioral Education, 5, 415-432.
16. Graden, J. L., Cascy, A., & Christenson. S.L. (1985) Implementing a prereferral intervention system: Part I. The model. Exceptional Children, 51, 377-384.
17. Gutkin, T. B., & Curtis, M. J. (1990) School-based consultation: Theory, techniques, and research. In T. Gutkin & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology(2nd ed., pp. 577-611) New York: Wiley.
18. Gutkin, T. B., & Reynolds, C. R. (Eds.). (1990). The handbook of school psychology (2nd ed.). NewYork: Wiley.
19. Kazdin, A. E. (1981). Acceptability of treatment techniques: The influence of treatment efficacy and adverse side effects. Behavior Therapy: 12, 493-506
20. Kratochwill, T. R., & VanSomeren, K. (1984). Assessment Rating Profile Unpublished manuscript, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
21. Kutsick, K. A., Gutkin, T. B., & Wilt, J. C. (1991). The impact of treatment development process, intervention type, and problem severity on treatment acceptability as judged by classroom teachers Psychology in the Schools, 28, 325-331.
22. Lieberman, A. (1988). Expanding the leadership team. Educational Leadership, 45, 4-9
23. Lincoln, Y. S., & Cuba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
24. Meyers, B., Valentine, C. T., Meyers, J., Boretti, M., & Brent, D. (1996). Implementing prereterral intervention teams as an approach to school based consultation in an urban school setting Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation. 7, 119-149.
25. Meyers, J. (1989). The practice of psychology in the schools for the primary prevention of learning and adjustment problems in children: A perspective from the field of education InL. A. Bond& B E. Compas (Eds.), Primary prevention and promotion in the schools (pp. 391-422). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
26. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage
27. National Association of School Psychologists. (1986). Intenention assistance teams: A model for building-level instructional problem solving. Washington DC: Author.
28. Noffke.S.E (1997) Professional, personal, and political dimensions of action research In M W.Apple (Ed.), Review of Research in Education Vol. 22 (pp. 305-343). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
29. Orne. M T (1962). On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. American Psychologist, 17, 776-783.
30. Parsons, R D., & Mcyers, J. (1984). Developing consultation skills. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
31. Reimers, T M., Wacker, D. P., & Koeppl. G (1987). Acceptability of behavioral treatments: A review of the literature. School Psychology Review, 16, 212-227.
32. Rossi, P. H., & Freeman, H. (1993). Evaluation: A systematic approach. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
33. Sarason.S.B.(1990). The predictable failure of educational reform. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
34. Schmuck, R. A (1990) Organization development in schools: Contemporary concepts and practices. In T. GutkiQ & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology (2nd ed., pp. 899-919). New York: Wiley.
35. Shapiro, E. S. (1987). Intervention research methodology in school psychology. School Psychology Review, 16, 290-305.
36. Spradley, J. P. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York: Harcourt, Brace. & Jovanovich.
37. Strauss, A., & Corbin. J (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
38. Thomas. A. T. & Grimes, J (Eds.). (1995). Best practices in school psychology. Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists
39. Trickett, E. J., & Birman, D. (1989). Taking ecology seriously: A community development approach to individually based preventive interventions in schools. In L.A. Bond & B.E. Compas (Eds.), Primary prevention and promotion in the schools (pp. 361-390) Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
40. Witt, J. C., & Elliott. S. N. (1985). Acceptability of classroom management strategies. In T.R Kiatochwill (Ed.), Advances in school psychology: Vol. 4 (pp. 251-288). Hillsdale. NJ: Erlbaum
41. Witt. J C, Martens, B. K., & Elliott, S N. (1984). Factors affecting teachers' judgments of the acceptability of behavioral interventions: Time involvement, behavior problem severity, type of intervention. Behavior Therapy, 15, 204-209.
42. Witt.J C., Moe,G.,Gutkin,T. B., & Andrews. L. (1984) The effect of say ing the same thing in different ways: The problem of language and jargon in school-based consultation Journal of School Psychology, 22, 361-367.
43. Wolf, N. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203-214.