Analysis of feedback, enabling conditions and fairness perceptions of teachers in three school districts with new standards-based evaluation systems

Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 241-268

  Kimball, Steven M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33644789589     PISSN: 0920525X     EISSN: 15730425     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1021787806189     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
2. Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., & Cocking, R.R. (1999). How People learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
3. Brophy, J. (1986). Teacher Influences on Student Achievement. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1069-1077.
4. Claudet, J.G. (1999). An Interpretive Analysis of Educator Change Processes in Response to a Program Innovation: Implications for Personnel Evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 13(1) 47-69.
5. Connecticut State Department of Education (2001). The Beginning Educator Support and Training Program (BEST). Handbook for the Development of a Teaching Portfolio: Science, 2001-2002.
6. Danielson, C. (1996). Enhancing Professional Practice: A Framework for Teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
7. Danielson, C. (2001). Keynote speech before the Framework for Teaching Users' Conference, June 23-26, Cleveland, Ohio.
8. Danielson, C., & McGreal, T.L. (2000). Teacher Evaluation to Enhance Professional Practice. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
9. Darling-Hammond, L., Wise A.E., & Klein, S.P. (1999). A License to Teach: Raising Standards for Teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
10. Davis, D.R., Pool, J.E., Mits-Cash, M. (2000). Issues in Implementing a New Teacher Assessment System in a Large Urban School District: Results of a Qualitative Field Study. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 14(4), 285-306.
11. Dwyer, C.A. (1994). Development of the Knowledge Base for the PRAXIS III: Classroom Performance Assessments Assessment Criteria. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
12. Gilliland, S.W., & Langdon, J.C. (1998). Creating Performance Management Systems That Promote Perceptions of Fairness. In J.W. Smither (Ed.), Performance Appraisal: State of the Art in Practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
13. Hunter, M. (1985). What's Wrong with Madeline Hunter? Educational Leadership, 42(5), 57-60.
14. Johnson, B.L. (1997). An Organizational Analysis of Multiple Perspectives of Effective Teaching: Implications for Teacher Evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 11(1), 69-87.
15. Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation (1988). The Personnel Evaluation Standards: How to Assess Systems for Evaluating Educators. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
16. Kelley, C. (1999). The Motivational Impact of School-based Performance Awards. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 12(4), 309-326.
17. Keeping, L.M., & Levy, P.E. (2000). Performance Appraisal Reactions: Measurement, Modeling, and Method Bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5), 708-723.
18. Loup, K.S., Garland, J.S., Ellett, C.D., & Rugutt, J.K. (1996). Ten Years Later: Findings from a Replication of a Study of Teacher Evaluation Practices in Our 100 Largest School Districts. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 10, 203-226.
19. McLaughlin, M.W., & Pfeifer, R.S. (1988). Teacher Evaluation: Improvement, Accountability, and Effective Learning. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
20. Milanowski, A.T., & Heneman, H.G., III (2001). Assessment of Teacher Reactions to a Standards-Based Teacher Evaluation System: A Pilot Study. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 15(3), 193-212.
21. Natriello, G. (1984). Teachers' Perceptions of the Frequency of Evaluation and Assessments of Their Effort and Effectiveness. American Educational Research Journal, 21(3), 579-595.
22. Nelson, B.S., & Sassi, A. (2000). Shifting Approaches to Supervision: The Case of Mathematics Supervision. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(4), 553-584.
23. Peterson, C.H. (1982). A Century' s Growth in Teacher Evaluation in the United States. New York, NY: Vantage.
24. Peterson, K.D. (1995). Teacher Evaluation: A Comprehensive Guide to New Directions and Practices. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
25. Peterson, P.L., & Comeaux, M.A. (1990). Evaluating the Systems: Teachers' Perspectives on Teacher Evaluation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12(1), 3-24.
26. Sawyer, L. (2001). Revamping a Teacher Evaluation System. Educational Leadership, 58(5), 44-47.
27. Schon, D.A. (1987). Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
28. Scriven, M. (1981). Summative Teacher Evaluation. In Jason Millman (Ed.), Handbook of Teacher Evaluation. National Council on Measurement in Education. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
29. Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22.
30. Stallings, J., & Krasavage, E.M. (1986). Program Implementation and Student Achievement in a Four-Year Madeline Hunter Follow-Through Project. The Elementary School Journal, 87(2), 117-138.
31. Stiggens, R.J., & Duke, D.L. (1988). The Case for Commitment to Teacher Growth: Research on Teacher Evaluation. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
32. Stodolsky, S.S. (1990). Classroom Observation. In J. Millman & L. Darling-Hammond (Eds.), The New Handbook of Teacher Evaluation: Assessing Elementary and Secondary School Teachers. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
33. Strong, J.H., & Tucker, P.D. (1999). The Politics of Teacher Evaluation: A Case Study of New System Design and Implementation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 13(4), 339-359.
34. Wise, A.E., Darling-Hammond, L., McLaughlin, M.W., & Bernstein, H.T. (1984). Teacher Evaluation: A Study of Effective Practices, Prepared for the National Institute of Education. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
35. Yin, R.K. (1993). Applications of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36. Yin, R.K. (1994). Case Study Research: Design and Methods, (2nd edn.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.