Numerical methods for high-speed flows

Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics

Volumn 43, Issue , 2011, Pages 163-194

  Pirozzoli, Sergio ^a  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

energy conservation; numerical dissipation; shock waves; shock capturing schemes

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL DISSIPATION; DISSIPATION METHODS; EDDY SIMULATION; EXPLICIT FORM; GEOMETRICAL PROPERTY; HIGH SPEED FLOWS; NONLINEAR INSTABILITY; NONOSCILLATORY; NUMERICAL DISSIPATION; NUMERICAL SCHEME; NUMERICAL STABILITIES; SHOCK-CAPTURING; SHOCK-CAPTURING SCHEMES; STRONGLY NONLINEAR;

ATMOSPHERIC BOUNDARY LAYER; COMPRESSIBLE FLOW; ENERGY CONSERVATION; INCOMPRESSIBLE FLOW; SHOCK WAVES; WAVES;

NUMERICAL METHODS;

ALGORITHM; COMPRESSIBLE FLOW; DISSIPATION; EDDY COVARIANCE; ENTROPY; KINETIC ENERGY; NONLINEARITY; NUMERICAL MODEL; TURBULENT FLOW; VISCOSITY; WAVE PROPAGATION;

EID: 79951986469     PISSN: 00664189     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-fluid-122109-160718     Document Type: Article

References (153)

1. θ = 1685. J. Fluid Mech. 420:47-83
2. Adams NA, Shariff K. 1996. A high-resolution hybrid compact-ENO scheme for shock-turbulence interaction problems. J. Comput. Phys. 127:27-51 (Pubitemid 126168727)
3. Adams NA, Stolz S. 2002. A subgrid-scale deconvolution approach for shock-capturing. J. Comput. Phys. 178:391-426
4. Arora M, Roe PL. 1997. On postshock oscillations due to shock capturing schemes in unsteady flows. J. Comput. Phys. 130:25-40 (Pubitemid 127175739)
5. Balsara D, Shu CW. 2000. Monotonicity preserving weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes with increasingly high order of accuracy. J. Comput. Phys. 160:405-52
6. Berland J, Bogey C, Bailly C. 2006. Low-dissipation and low-dispersion fourth-order Runge-Kutta algorithm. Comp. Fluids 35:1459-63 (Pubitemid 44283521)
7. Bernardini M, Pirozzoli S. 2009. A general strategy for the optimization of Runge-Kutta schemes for wave propagation phenomena. J. Comput. Phys. 228:4182-99
8. Bertin JJ, Cummings RM. 2006. Critical hypersonic aerothermodynamic phenomena. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 38:129-57 (Pubitemid 43240173)
9. Bhagatwala A, Lele SK. 2009. A modified artificial viscosity approach for compressible turbulence simulations. J. Comput. Phys. 228:4965-69
10. Blaisdell GA, Spyropoulos ET, Qin JH. 1996. The effect of the formulation of non-linear terms on aliasing errors in spectral methods. Appl. Numer. Math. 21:207-19 (Pubitemid 126359824)
11. Bogey C, Bailly C. 2004. A family of low dispersive and low dissipative explicit schemes for flow and noise computations. J. Comput. Phys. 194:481-91
12. Bogey C, de Cacqueray N, Bailly C. 2009. A shock-capturing methodology based on adaptive spatial filtering for high-order non-linear computations. J. Comput. Phys. 228:1447-65
13. Casper J, Carpenter MH. 1998. Computational considerations for the simulation of shock-induced sound. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 19:813-28 (Pubitemid 128622534)
14. Colonius T. 2004. Modeling artificial boundary conditions for compressible flow. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 36:315-45 (Pubitemid 38381914)
15. Colonius T, Lele SK. 2004. Computational aeroacoustics: progress on nonlinear problems of sound generation. Progr. Aerosp. Sci. 40:345-416
16. Cook AW. 2007. Artificial fluid properties for large-eddy simulation of compressible turbulent mixing. Phys. Fluids 19:055103
17. Cook AW, Cabot WH. 2004. A high-wavenumber viscosity for high-resolution numerical methods. J. Comput. Phys. 195:594-601 (Pubitemid 38482794)
18. Cook AW, Cabot WH. 2005. Hyperviscosity for shock-turbulence interactions. J. Comput. Phys. 203:379-85 (Pubitemid 40233508)
19. Courant R, Isaacson E, Rees M. 1952. On the solution of non-linear hyperbolic differential equations. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 5:243-55
20. de Tullio MD, Palma PD, Iaccarino G, Pascazio G, Napolitano M. 2007. An immersed boundary method for compressible flows using local grid refinement. J. Comput. Phys. 225:2098-117
21. Délery J, Marvin JG. 1986. Shock-wave boundary layer interactions. AGARDograph 280.
22. AGARD Deng X, Zhang H. 2000. Developing high-order weighted compact nonlinear schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 165:22-44
23. Ducros F, Ferrand V, Nicoud F, Weber C, Darracq D, et al. 1999. Large-eddy simulation of the shock/turbulence interaction. J. Comput. Phys. 152:517-49
24. Ducros F, Laporte F, Soulères T, Guinot V, Moinat P, Caruelle B. 2000. High-order fluxes for conservative skew-symmetric-like schemes in structures meshes: application to compressible flows. J. Comput. Phys. 161:114-39
25. Dumbser M, Balsara DS, Toro EF, Munz CD. 2008. A unified framework for the construction of one-step finite-volume and discontinuous Galerkin schemes onunstructured meshes. J. Comput. Phys. 227:8209-53
26. Dumbser M, Käser M, Titarev VA, Toro EF. 2007. Quadrature-free non-oscillatory finite volume schemes on unstructured meshes for nonlinear hyperbolic systems. J. Comput. Phys. 226:204-43
27. Dupont P, Piponniau S, Sidorenko A, Debieve JF. 2008. Investigation by particle image velocimetry measurements of obliques shock reflection with separation. AIAA J. 46:1365-70
28. Efraimsson G, Kreiss G. 1999. A remark on numerical errors downstream of slightly viscous shocks. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 36:853-63 (Pubitemid 129569413)
29. Ekaterinaris JA. 2005. High-order accurate, low numerical diffusion methods for aerodynamics. Progr. Aerosp. Sci. 41:192-300 (Pubitemid 41037267)
30. Engquist B, Sjogreen B. 1998. The convergence rate of finite difference schemes in the presence of discontinuities. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 35:2464-85 (Pubitemid 128464116)
31. Feiereisen WJ, Reynolds WC, Ferziger JH. 1981. Numerical simulation of a compressible, homogeneous, turbulent shear flow. Rep. TF 13, Thermosci. Div., Mech. Eng., Stanford Univ.
32. Fiorina B, Lele SK. 2007. An artificial nonlinear diffusivity method for supersonic reacting flows with shocks. J. Comput. Phys. 222:246-64
33. Foysi H, Sarkar S, Friedrich R. 2004. Compressibility effects and turbulence scalings in supersonic channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 509:207-16 (Pubitemid 38904969)
34. Garnier E, Mossi M, Sagaut P, Comte P, Deville M. 1999. On the use of shock-capturing for large-eddy simulation. J. Comput. Phys. 153:273-311
35. Garnier E, Sagaut P, Deville M. 2001. A class of explicit ENO filters with application to unsteady flows. J. Comput. Phys. 170:184-204 (Pubitemid 33658382)
36. Garnier E, Sagaut P, Deville M. 2002. Large-eddy simulation of shock/boundary-layer interaction. AIAA J. 40:1935-44
37. Gerolymos GA, Sénéchal D, Vallet I. 2009. Very high-order WENO schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 228:8481-524
38. Gerritsen M, Olsson P. 1996. A stable high order finite difference scheme and sharp shock resolution for the Euler equations. J. Comput. Phys. 129:245-62
39. Ghias R, Mittal R, Dong H. 2007. A sharp interface immersed boundary method for compressible viscous flows. J. Comput. Phys. 225:528-53
40. Godunov SK. 1959. A difference scheme for numerical computation of discontinuous solution of hydrodynamic equations. Math. Sbornik 47:271-306
41. Gottlieb S, Shu CW, Tadmor E. 2001. Strong stability-preserving high-order time discretization methods. SIAM Rev. 43:89-112 (Pubitemid 32406893)
42. Guo BY, Ma HP, Tadmor E. 2001. Spectral vanishing viscosity method for nonlinear conservation laws. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 39:1254-68
43. Harten A. 1978. The artificial compression method for computation of shocks and contact discontinuities. III. Self-adjusting schemes. Math. Comput. 32:363-89
44. Harten A. 1983a. High resolution schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws. J. Comput. Phys. 49:357-93
45. Harten A. 1983b. On the symmetric form of systems of conservation laws with entropy. J. Comput. Phys. 49:151-64
46. Harten A. 1989. ENO schemes with subcell resolution. J. Comput. Phys. 83:148-84
47. Harten A, Engquist B, Osher S, Chakravarthy SR. 1987. Uniformly high order accurate essentially non-oscillatory schemes, III. J. Comput. Phys. 71:231-303
48. Harten A, Hyman JM, Lax PD. 1986. On finite-difference approximations and entropy conditions for shocks. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 29:297-322
49. Hill DJ, Pantano C, Pullin DI. 2006. Large-eddy simulation and multiscale modelling of a Richtmyer-Meshkov instability with reshock. J. Fluid Mech. 557:29-61 (Pubitemid 44080934)
50. Hill DJ, Pullin DI. 2004. Hybrid tuned center-difference-WENO method for large-eddy simulations in the presence of strong shocks. J. Comput. Phys. 194:435-50 (Pubitemid 38284230)
51. Hirsch C. 1988. Numerical Computation of Internal and External Flows. New York: Wiley
52. Honein AE, Moin P. 2004. Higher entropy conservation and numerical stability of compressible turbulence simulations. J. Comput. Phys. 201:531-45 (Pubitemid 39525418)
53. Hu C, Shu CW. 1999. Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes on triangular meshes. J. Comput. Phys. 150:97-127
54. Hu FQ, Hussaini MY, Manthey JL. 1996. Low-dissipation and low-dispersion Runge-Kutta schemes for computational acoustics. J. Comput. Phys. 124:177-91 (Pubitemid 126160795)
55. Hu XY, Khoo BC, Adams NA, Huang FL. 2006. A conservative interface method for compressible flows. J. Comput. Phys. 219:553-78 (Pubitemid 44688738)
56. Jameson A. 2008a. Formulation of kinetic energy preserving conservative schemes for gas dynamics and direct numerical simulation of one-dimensional viscous compressible flow in a shock tube using entropy and kinetic energy preserving schemes. J. Sci. Comput. 34:188-208
57. Jameson A. 2008b. The construction of discretely conservative finite volume schemes that also globally conserve energy or entropy. J. Sci. Comput. 34:152-87
58. Jameson A, Schmidt W, Turkel E. 1981. Numerical simulation of the Euler equations by finite volume methods using Runge-Kutta time stepping schemes. Pap. 81-1259, NASA
59. Jiang GS, Shu CW. 1996. Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 126:202-28
60. Jiang GS, Yu SH. 1996. Discrete shocks for finite difference approximations to scalar conservation laws. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 35:749-72
61. Johnsen E, Colonius T. 2006. Implementation of WENO schemes in compressible multicomponent flow problems. J. Comput. Phys. 219:715-32 (Pubitemid 44688745)
62. Johnsen E, Larsson J, Bhagatwala AV, Cabot WH, Moin P, et al. 2010. Assessment of high-resolution methods for numerical simulations of compressible turbulence with shock waves. J. Comput. Phys. 229:1213-37
63. Kawai S, Lele SK. 2007. Localized artificial diffusivity scheme for discontinuity capturing on curvilinear meshes. J. Comput. Phys. 227:9498-526
64. Kawai S, Lele SK. 2010. Large-eddy simulation of jet mixing in supersonic crossflows. AIAA J. 48:2063-83
65. Kennedy CA, Carpenter MH, Lewis RM. 2000. Low-storage, explicit Runge-Kutta schemes for the compressible Navier-Stokes equations. Appl. Numer. Math. 35:177-219 (Pubitemid 32033829)
66. Kennedy CA, Gruber A. 2008. Reduced aliasing formulations of the convective terms within the Navier-Stokes equations. J. Comput. Phys. 227:1676-700
67. Klein M, Sadiki A, Janicka J. 2003. A digital filter based generation of inflow data for spatially developing direct numerical or large eddy simulations. J. Comput. Phys. 186:652-65 (Pubitemid 36445981)
68. Kok JC. 2009. A high-order low-dispersion symmetry-preserving finite-volume method for compressible flow on curvilinear grids. J. Comput. Phys. 228:6811-32
69. Laney CB. 1998. Computational Gasdynamics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
70. Larsson J, Gustafsson B. 2008. Stability criteria for hybrid difference methods. J. Comput. Phys. 227:2886-98
71. Larsson J, Lele SK. 2009. Direct numerical simulation of canonical shock/turbulence interaction. Phys. Fluids 21:126101
72. Larsson J, Lele SK, Moin P. 2007. Effect of numerical dissipation on the predicted spectra for compressible turbulence. In Annu. Res. Briefs, pp. 47-57. Stanford, CA: Center Turbul. Res., Stanford Univ.
73. Lax PD. 1973. Hyperbolic Systems of Conservation Laws and the Mathematical Theory of Shock Waves. Reg. Conf. Ser. Appl. Math. Philadelphia: SIAM
74. Lax PD, Liu XD. 1998. Solution of two-dimensional Riemann problems of gas dynamics by positive schemes. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 19:319-40 (Pubitemid 128605582)
75. Lax PD, Wendroff B. 1960. Systems of conservation laws. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 13:217-37
76. Lee S, Lele SK, Moin P. 1991. Eddy shocklets in decaying compressible turbulence. Phys. Fluids A 3:657-64
77. Lee S, Lele SK, Moin P. 1997. Interaction of isotropic turbulence with shock waves: effect of shock strength. J. Fluid Mech. 340:225-47
78. Lele SK. 1992. Compact finite difference schemes with spectral-like resolution. J. Comput. Phys. 103:16-42
79. LeVecque R. 1990. Numerical Methods for Conservation Laws. Basel: Birkhauser-Verlag
80. Lilly DK. 1965. On the computational stability of numerical solutions of time-dependent non-linear geophysical fluid dynamics problems. J. Comput. Phys. 93:11-26
81. Liu XD, Osher S, Chan T. 1994. Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 115:200-12
82. Lui C, Lele SK. 2002. A numerical study of shock-associated noise. Presented at AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoust. Conf. Exhib., 8th, Breckenridge, CO, AIAA Pap. 2002-2530
83. Lund T, Wu X, Squires K. 1998. Generation of turbulent inflow data for spatially-developing boundary layer simulations. J. Fluid Mech. 140:233-58 (Pubitemid 128346379)
84. Majda A. 1984. Compressible Fluid Flow and Systems of Conservation Laws in Several Space Variables. Appl. Math. Sci. 53. New York: Springer
85. Mani A, Larsson J, Moin P. 2009. Suitability of artificial bulk viscosity for large-eddy simulation of turbulent flows with shocks. J. Comput. Phys. 228:7368-74
86. Mansour NN, Moin P, Reynolds WC, Ferziger JH. 1979. Improved methods for large-eddy simulations of turbulence. In Turbulent Shear Flows I, ed. BF Launder, FW Schmidt, HH Whitelaw, pp. 386-401. Berlin: Springer-Verlag
87. Mart́?n MP, Taylor EM, Wu M, Weirs VG. 2006. A bandwidth-optimized WENO scheme for the effective direct numerical simulation of compressible turbulence. J. Comput. Phys. 220:270-89 (Pubitemid 44742734)
88. Mittal R, Iaccarino G. 2005. Immersed boundary methods. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 37:239-61 (Pubitemid 40301258)
89. Moretti G. 1979. The a;-scheme. Comput. Fluids 7:191-205
90. Moretti G. 1987. Computation of flows with shocks. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 19:313-37
91. Morinishi Y. 2010. Skew-symmetric form of convective terms and fully conservative finite difference schemes for variable density low-Mach number flows. J. Comput. Phys. 229:276-300
92. Nagarajan S, Lele SK, Ferziger JH. 2003. A robust high-order compact method for large-eddy simulation. J. Comput. Phys. 191:392-419 (Pubitemid 37340508)
93. Olsson P. 1993. Summation by parts, projections, and stability. RIACS Tech. Rep. TR-93-04, NASA Ames Res. Center
94. Olsson P, Oliger J. 1994. Energy and maximum norm estimates for nonlinear conservation laws. RIACS Tech. Rep. TR-94-01, NASA Ames Res. Center
95. Orlandi P. 2000. Fluid Flow Phenomena: A Numerical Toolkit. Dordrecht: Kluwer
96. Pamiès M, Weiss PE, Garnier E, Deck S, Sagaut P. 2009. Generation of synthetic turbulent inflow data for large-eddy simulation of spatially evolving wall-bounded flows. Phys. Fluids 21:045103
97. Park N, Yoo JY, Choi H. 2004. Discretization errors in large-eddy simulation: on the suitability of centered and upwind-biased compact difference schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 198:580-616 (Pubitemid 38999053)
98. Perot JB. 2011. Discrete conservation properties of unstructured mesh schemes. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 43:299-318
99. Phillips NA. 1959. An example of nonlinear computational instability. In The Atmosphere and the Sea in Motion, pp. 501-4. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Pres
100. Pirozzoli S. 2002. Conservative hybrid compact-WENO schemes for shock-turbulence interaction. J. Comput. Phys. 178:81-117
101. Pirozzoli S. 2006. On the spectral properties of shock-capturing schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 219:489-97 (Pubitemid 44688758)
102. Pirozzoli S. 2010. Generalized conservative approximations of split convective derivative operators. J. Comput. Phys. 229:7180-90
103. Pirozzoli S, Bernardini M, Grasso F. 2008. Characterization of coherent vortical structures in a supersonic turbulent boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 613:205-31
104. Pirozzoli S, Bernardini M, Grasso F. 2010. Direct numerical simulation of transonic shock/boundary layer interaction under conditions of incipient separation. J. Fluid Mech. 657:361-93
105. Pirozzoli S, Grasso F. 2006. Direct numerical simulation of impinging shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction at M = 2.25. Phys. Fluids 18:065113
106. Rai MM, Moin P. 1993. Direct numerical simulation of transition and turbulence in a spatially evolving boundary layer. J. Comput. Phys. 109:169-92
107. Ren YX, Liu M, Zhang H. 2003. A characteristic-wise hybrid compact-WENO scheme for solving hyperbolic conservation laws. J. Comput. Phys. 192:365-86 (Pubitemid 37445636)
108. Richtmyer RD, Morton KW. 1967. Difference Methods for Initial Value Problems. New York: Wiley
109. Rizzetta DP, Visbal MR, Gaitonde DV. 2001. Large-eddy simulation of supersonic compression-ramp flow by high-order method. AIAA J. 39:2283-92 (Pubitemid 34023424)
110. Roe PL. 1981. Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors, and difference schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 34:357-72
111. Rogerson AM, Meiburg E. 1990. A numerical study of the convergence properties of ENO schemes. J. Sci. Comput. 5:151-67 (Pubitemid 21651823)
112. Sagaut P, Garnier E, Tromeur E, Larcheveque L, Labourasse E. 2004. Turbulent inflow conditions for large-eddy simulation of compressible wall-bounded flows. AIAA J. 42:469-77
113. Samtaney R, Pullin DI, Kosovic B. 2001. Direct numerical simulation of decaying compressible turbulence and shocklet statistics. Phys. Fluids 13:1415-30 (Pubitemid 32454027)
114. Sandham ND, Li Q, Yee HC. 2002. Entropy splitting for high-order numerical simulation of compressible turbulence. J. Comput. Phys. 178:307-22
115. Sandham ND, Yao YF, Lawal AA. 2003. Large-eddy simulation of transonic flow over a bump. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 24:584-95 (Pubitemid 36696116)
116. Shu CW. 1990. Numerical experiments on the accuracy of ENO and modified ENO schemes. J. Sci. Comput. 5:127-49
117. Shu CW. 1997. Essentially non-oscillatory and weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws. Contract. Rep. 97-65, NASA
118. Shu CW. 2009. High order weighted essentially nonoscillatory schemes for convection dominated schemes. SIAM Rev. 51:82-126
119. Shu CW, Osher S. 1989. Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock-capturing schemes II. J. Comput. Phys. 83:32-78
120. Sjögreen B, Yee HC. 2000. Multiresolution wavelet based adaptive numerical dissipation control for shock-turbulence computation. RIACS Tech. Rep. TR-01-01, NASA Ames Res. Center
121. Stanescu D, Habashi WG. 1998. 2N-storage low dissipation and dispersion Runge-Kutta schemes for computational acoustics. J. Comput. Phys. 143:674-81 (Pubitemid 128345951)
122. Steger JL, Warming RF. 1981. Flux vector splitting of the inviscid gasdynamic equations with application to finite-difference methods. J. Comput. Phys. 40:263-93
123. Strand B. 1994. Summation by parts for finite difference approximations for d/dx. J. Comput. Phys. 110:47-67 (Pubitemid 124013344)
124. Subbareddy PK, Candler GV. 2009. A fully discrete, kinetic energy consistent finite-volume scheme for compressible flows. J. Comput. Phys. 228:1347-64
125. Suresh A, Huynh HT. 1997. Accurate monotonicity-preserving schemes with Runge-Kutta time stepping. J. Comput. Phys. 136:83-99 (Pubitemid 127170092)
126. Tadmor E. 1984. Skew-self-adjoint form for systems of conservation laws. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 103:428-42 (Pubitemid 15457712)
127. Tadmor E. 1987. The numerical viscosity of entropy stable schemes for systems of conservation laws. I. Math. Comput. 49:91-103
128. Tadmor E. 1989. Convergence of spectral methods for nonlinear conservation laws. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 26:30-44
129. Tadmor E. 2003. Entropy stability theory for difference approximations of nonlinear conservation laws and related time dependent problems. Acta Numer. 12:451-512
130. Tam CKW, Webb JC. 1993. Dispersion-relation-preserving finite difference schemes for computational acoustics. J. Comput. Phys. 107:262-81
131. Taylor EM, Wu M, Mart́?n MP. 2007. Optimization of nonlinear error for weighted essentially non-oscillatory methods in direct numerical simulations of compressible turbulence. J. Comput. Phys. 223:384-97
132. Titarev VA, Toro EF. 2004. Finite-volume WENO schemes for three-dimensional conservation laws. J. Comput. Phys. 201:238-60 (Pubitemid 40256593)
133. Titarev VA, Toro EF. 2005. ADER schemes for three-dimensional non-linear hyperbolic systems. J. Comput. Phys. 204:715-36 (Pubitemid 40435828)
134. Toro EF. 2009. Riemann Solvers and Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics. New York: Springer
135. Toro EF, Millington RC, Nejad LAM. 2001. Towards very high order Godunov schemes. In Godunov Methods: Theory and Applications, ed. EF Toro, pp. 905-38. New York: Plenum
136. Touber E, Sandham ND. 2009. Large-eddy simulation of low-frequency unsteadiness in a turbulent shock-induced separation bubble. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 23:79-107
137. van Leer B. 1979. Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme V. A second order sequel to Godunov's method. J. Comput. Phys. 32:101-36
138. Vichnevetsky R, Bowles JB. 1982. Fourier Analysis of Numerical Approximations of Hyperbolic Equations. Philadelphia: SIAM
139. Vinokur M. 1974. Conservation equations of gasdynamics in curvilinear coordinate systems. J. Comput. Phys. 14:105-25
140. Visbal MR, Gaitonde DV. 1999. High-order accurate methods for complex unsteady subsonic flows. AIAA J. 37:1231-39
141. Visbal MR, Gaitonde DV. 2002. On the use of higher-order finite-difference schemes on curvilinear and deforming meshes. J. Comput. Phys. 181:155-85
142. Visbal MR, Gaitonde DV. 2005. Shock capturing using compact-differencing- based methods. Presented at AIAA Aerosp. Sci. Meet. Exhib., 43rd, Reno, AIAA Pap. 2005-1265
143. von Kaenel R, Kleiser L, Adams NA, Vos JB. 2004. Large-eddy simulation of shock-turbulence interaction. AIAA J. 42:2516-28 (Pubitemid 40010502)
144. von Neumann J, Richtmyer RD. 1950. A method for the calculation of hydrodynamical shocks. J. Appl. Phys. 21:232-37
145. Wang ZJ. 2007. High-order methods for the Euler and Navier-Stokes equations on unstructured grids. Progr. Aerosp. Sci. 43:1-41 (Pubitemid 47101993)
146. Weirs VG, Candler GV. 1997. Optimization of weighted ENO schemes for DNS of compressible turbulence. Presented at AIAA Comput. Fluid Dyn. Conf., 13th, Snowmass Village, CO, AIAA Pap. 1997-1940
147. Wu M, Mart́?n M. 2007. Direct numerical simulation of supersonic turbulent boundary layer over a compression ramp. AIAA J. 45:879-89 (Pubitemid 46643602)
148. Xu S, Mart́?n MP. 2004. Assessment of inflow boundary conditions for compressible turbulent boundary layers. Phys. Fluids 16:2623-39 (Pubitemid 38958034)
149. Yee HC. 1989. A class of high-resolution explicit and implicit shock-capturing methods. Tech. Memo. 101088, NASA
150. Yee HC, Sandham ND, Djomehri MJ. 1999. Low-dissipative high-order shock-capturing methods using characteristic-based filters. J. Comput. Phys. 150:199-238
151. Yee HC, Sjögreen B. 2007. Development of low dissipative high order filter schemes for multiscale Navier-Stokes/MHD systems. J. Comput. Phys. 225:910-34
152. Zhou J, Adrian RJ, Balachandar S, Kendall TM. 1999. Mechanisms for generating coherent packets of hairpin vortices in channel flow. J. Fluid Mech. 387:353-96
153. Zingg DW, Lomax H, Jurgens HM. 1993. An optimized finite-difference scheme for wave propagation problems. Presented at AAIA Aerosp. Sci. Meet. Exhib., Reno, AIAA Pap. 1993-0459