Assessment of high-resolution methods for numerical simulations of compressible turbulence with shock waves

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 229, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 1213-1237

  Johnsen, Eric ^a   Larsson, Johan ^a   Bhagatwala, Ankit V ^b   Cabot, William H ^c   Moin, Parviz ^a   Olson, Britton J ^b   Rawat, Pradeep S ^d   Shankar, Santhosh K ^b   Sjögreen, Björn ^c   Yee, H C ^e   Zhong, Xiaolin ^d   Lele, Sanjiva K ^b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics Department of Mechanical Engineering and Industrial for Computational and Mathematical Engineering   (United States)

^c LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptive characteristic based filters; Artificial diffusivity methods; Compressible turbulence; Direct numerical simulation; High resolution methods; Hybrid methods; Large eddy simulation; Shock fitting; Shock capturing

Indexed keywords

BANDPASS FILTERS; DIFFUSION; DIRECT NUMERICAL SIMULATION; LARGE EDDY SIMULATION; NUMERICAL METHODS; NUMERICAL MODELS; SHOCK WAVES; STRAIN RATE; VISCOSITY; VORTEX FLOW; VORTICITY;

ADAPTIVE CHARACTERISTIC; ADAPTIVE CHARACTERISTIC-BASED FILTER; ARTIFICIAL DIFFUSIVITY; ARTIFICIAL DIFFUSIVITY METHOD; COMPRESSIBLE TURBULENCE; DIRECT-NUMERICAL-SIMULATION; HIGH-RESOLUTION METHODS; HYBRID METHOD; LARGE-EDDY SIMULATIONS; SHOCK-CAPTURING; SHOCK-FITTING;

TURBULENCE;

EID: 72049085242     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: 10902716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2009.10.028     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Adams N.A., and Shariff K. A high-resolution hybrid compact-ENO scheme for shock-turbulence interaction problems. J. Comput. Phys. 127 (1996) 27-51
2. Arora M., and Roe P.L. On postshock oscillations due to shock-capturing schemes in unsteady flows. J. Comput. Phys. 130 (1997) 25-40
3. Bhagatwala A.V., and Lele S.K. A modified artificial nonlinear viscosity approach for compressible turbulence simulations. J. Comput. Phys. 228 (2009) 4965-4969
4. Brachet M.E., Meiron D.I., Orszag S.A., Nickel B.G., Morf R.H., and Frisch U. Small-scale structure of the Taylor-Green vortex. J. Fluid Mech. 130 (1983) 411-452
5. Cheney W., and Kincaid D. Numerical Mathematics and Computing. 4th ed. (2004), Brooks/Cole Thomson Learning, Belmont, CA
6. Cook A.W. Artificial properties for large-eddy simulation of compressible turbulent mixing. Phys. Fluids 19 (2007) 055103
7. Cook A.W., and Cabot W.H. A high-wavenumber viscosity for high-resolution numerical methods. J. Comput. Phys. 195 (2004) 594-601
8. Cook A.W., and Cabot W.H. Hyperviscosity for shock-turbulence interactions. J. Comput. Phys. 203 (2005) 379-385
9. A.W. Cook, J. Larsson, W.H. Cabot, S.K. Lele, Simulation strategies for shock-turbulence interactions, in: Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Engineering Turbulence Modelling and Measurements, European Research Collaboration on Flow Turbulence and Combustion, Limassol, Cyprus, 2008.
10. Deng X., and Zhang H. Developing high-order weighted compact nonlinear schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 203 (2005) 22-44
11. Ducros F., Ferrand V., Nicoud F., Weber C., Darracq D., Gacherieu C., and Poinsot T. Large-eddy simulation of the shock/turbulence interaction. J. Comput. Phys. 152 (1999) 517-549
12. Ducros F., Laporte F., Souleres T., Guinot V., Moinat P., and Caruelle B. High-order fluxes for conservative skew-symmetric-like schemes in structured meshes: application to compressible flows. J. Comput. Phys. 161 (2000) 114-139
13. Fiorina B., and Lele S.K. An artificial nonlinear diffusivity method for supersonic reacting flows with shocks. J. Comput. Phys. 222 (2007) 246-264
14. D.V. Gaitonde, M.R. Visbal, High-order Schemes for Navier-Stokes Equations: Algorithm and Implementation into FDL3DI, Technical Report AFRL-TR-98, US Air Force Research Lab, 1998.
15. Garnier E., Mossi M., Sagaut P., Comte P., and Deville M. On the use of shock-capturing schemes for large-eddy simulations. J. Comput. Phys. 153 (1999) 273-311
16. Greenough J.A., and Rider W.J. A quantitative comparison of numerical methods for the compressible Euler equations: fifth-order WENO and piecewise-linear Godunov. J. Comput. Phys. 196 (2004) 259-281
17. Hahn M., and Drikakis D. Large eddy simulation of compressible turbulence using high-resolution methods. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 47 (2005) 971-977
18. Hill D.J., and Pullin D.I. Hybrid tuned center-difference-WENO method for large eddy simulations in the presence of strong shocks. J. Comput. Phys. 194 (2004) 435-450
19. Hu F.Q., Hussaini M.Y., and Manthey J.L. Low-dissipation and low-dispersion Runge-Kutta schemes for computational acoustics. J. Comput. Phys. 124 (1996) 177-191
20. A. Jameson, W. Schmidt, E. Turkel, Numerical simulation of the Euler equations by finite volume methods using Runge-Kutta time stepping schemes, in: Proceedings of the AIAA Fifth Computations Fluid Dynamics Conference, 1981.
21. Jiang G.S., and Shu C.W. Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 126 (1996) 202-228
22. Kawai S., and Lele S.K. Localized artificial diffusivity scheme for discontinuity capturing on curvilinear meshes. J. Comput. Phys. 227 (2008) 9498-9526
23. S. Kawai, S.K. Shankar, S.K. Lele, Assessment of localized artificial diffusivity scheme for large-eddy simulation of compressible turbulent flows, J. Comput. Phys., submitted for publication.
24. Kosovic B., Pullin D.I., and Samtaney R. Subgrid-scale modeling for large-eddy simulations of compressible turbulence. Phys. Fluids 14 (2002) 1511-1522
25. Larsson J., and Gustafsson B. Stability criteria for hybrid difference methods. J. Comput. Phys. 227 (2008) 2886-2898
26. J. Larsson, S.K. Lele, P. Moin, Effect of Numerical Dissipation on the Predicted Spectra for Compressible Turbulence, Technical Report Ann. Res. Briefs, Center for Turbulence Research, Stanford University, 2007.
27. Lee S., Lele S.K., and Moin P. Eddy shocklets in decaying compressible turbulence. Phys. Fluids 3 (1991) 657-664
28. LeVeque R.J. Finite Volume Methods for Hyperbolic Problems (2002), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
29. Liska R., and Wendroff B. Comparison of several difference schemes on 1D and 2D test problems for the Euler equations. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 25 (2003) 995-1017
30. C. Lui, S.K. Lele, Direct Numerical Simulation of Spatially Developing, Compressible, Turbulent Mixing Layers, AIAA-2001-0291, 2001.
31. K. Mahesh, The Interaction of a Shock Wave with a Turbulent Shear Flow, Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University, 2000.
32. Mani A., Larsson J., and Moin P. Suitability of bulk viscosity for large-eddy simulation of turbulent flows with shocks. J. Comput. Phys. 228 (2009) 7368-7374
33. Martin M.P., Taylor E.M., Wu M., and Weirs V.G. A bandwidth-optimized WENO scheme for the effective direct numerical simulation of compressible turbulence. J. Comput. Phys. 220 (2006) 270-289
34. Noh W.F. Errors for calculations of strong shocks using an artificial viscosity and an artificial heat flux. J. Comput. Phys. 72 (1978) 78-120
35. Pirozzoli S. Conservative hybrid compact-WENO schemes for shock-turbulence interaction. J. Comput. Phys. 178 (2002) 81-117
36. Ristorcelli J.R., and Blaisdell G.A. Consistent initial conditions for the DNS of compressible turbulence. Phys. Fluids 9 (1997) 4-6
37. Sanders R., Morano E., and Druguet M.C. Multidimensional dissipation for upwind schemes: stability and applications to gas dynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 145 (1998) 511-537
38. J.V. Shebalin, Pseudospectral Simulation of Compressible Turbulence Using Logarithmic Variables, AIAA-93-3375-CP, 1993.
39. Shu C.W., and Osher S. Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock-capturing schemes II. J. Comput. Phys. 93 (1989) 32-78
40. C.W. Shu, Essentially Non-oscillatory and Weighted Essentially Non-oscillatory Schemes for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws, ICASE Report No. 97-65, NASA Langley Research Center, 1997.
41. Sjögreen B., and Yee H.C. Multiresolution wavelet-based adaptive numerical dissipation control for high-order methods. J. Sci. Comput. 20 (2004) 211-255
42. B. Sjögreen, H.C. Yee, On skew-symmetric splitting and entropy conservation schemes for the Euler equations, in: Proceedings of the Eighth European Conference on Numerical Mathematics and Advanced Applications, Uppsala, Sweden, submitted for publication.
43. Stanescu D., and Habashi W.G. 2N-storage low dissipation and dispersion Runge-Kutta schemes for computational acoustics. J. Comput. Phys. 143 (1998) 674-681
44. Taylor G.I., and Green A.E. Mechanism of the production of small eddies from large ones. Proc. R. Soc. London A 158 (1937) 499-521
45. Toro E.F. Riemann Solvers and Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics (1999), Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany
46. M.R. Visbal, D.V. Gaitonde, Shock Capturing Using Compact-differencing-based Methods, AIAA-2005-1265, 2005.
47. Woodward P., and Colella P. The numerical simulation of two-dimensional fluid flow with strong shocks. J. Comput. Phys. 54 (1984) 115-173
48. Yee H.C., Sandham N.D., and Djomehri M.J. Low-dissipative high-order shock-capturing methods using characteristic-based filters. J. Comput. Phys. 150 (1999) 199-238
49. Yee H.C., Vinokur M., and Djomehri M.J. Entropy splitting and numerical dissipation. J. Comput. Phys. 162 (2000) 33-81
50. Yee H.C., and Sjögreen B. Development of low dissipative high-order filter schemes for multiscale Navier-Stokes/MHD systems. J. Comput. Phys. 225 (2007) 910-934
51. Yee H.C., and Sjögreen B. Adaptive filtering and limiting in compact high-order methods for multiscale gas dynamics and MHD systems. Comput. Fluids 37 (2008) 593-619
52. Zhong X. High-order finite-difference schemes for numerical simulation of hypersonic boundary-layer transition. J. Comput. Phys. 144 (1998) 662-709