An artificial nonlinear diffusivity method for supersonic reacting flows with shocks

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 222, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 246-264

  Fiorina, B ^a   Lele, S K ^b  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b 496 Lomita Mall   (United States)

Author keywords

High order scheme; Nonlinear diffusivity; Shock capturing; Supersonic combustion

Indexed keywords

COMBUSTION; DIFFUSION; NUMERICAL METHODS; SHOCK TUBES; STRAIN RATE; VISCOSITY;

COMPUTATIONAL APPROACH; CONTACT DISCONTINUITIES; CONTACT REACTION; HIGH-ORDER SCHEME; MODEL INTERACTION; NON-LINEAR DIFFUSIVITY; REACTING FLOWS; SHOCK-CAPTURING; SHOCK-WAVES; SUPERSONIC COMBUSTION;

ENTROPY;

EID: 33846837199     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: 10902716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2006.07.020     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Cook A.W., and Cabot W.H. A high-wavenumber viscosity for high resolution numerical method. J. Comput. Phys. 195 (2004) 594-601
2. Lele S.K. Compact finite difference schemes with spectral-like resolution. J. Comput. Phys. 103 (1992) 16-42
3. Colonius T., and Lele S.K. Computational aeroacoustics: progress on nonlinear problems of sound generation. Prog. Aerospace Sci. 40 (2004) 345-416
4. Adams N.A., and Shariff K. A high-resolution hybrid compact-ENO scheme for shock turbulence interaction problems. J. Comput. Phys. 127 (1996) 27-51
5. Adams N.A. Direct numerical simulation of the turbulent boundary layer along a compression ramp at M = 3 and Re = 1685. J. Fluid Mech. 420 (2000) 47-83
6. Pirozzoli S.J. Conservative hybrid compact-WENO schemes for shock-turbulence interaction. J. Comput. Phys. 178 (2002) 81-117
7. Deng X.G., and Zhang H.X. Developing high-order weighted compact nonlinear schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 165 (2000) 22-44
8. Rizzetta D.P., Visbal M.R., and Gaitonde D.V. Large-eddy simulation of supersonic compression ramp flow by high-order method. AIAA J. 39 12 (2001) 2283-2292
9. M.R. Visbal, D.V. Gaitonde, Shock capturing using compact-differentiated-bases method, in: 43rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 2005, AIAA paper 2005-1265.
10. Cook A.W., and Cabot W.H. Hyperviscosity for shock-turbulence interactions. J. Comput. Phys. 203 (2005) 379-385
11. Shu C.W., and Osher S.J. Efficient implementation of essentially nonoscillatory shock capturing schemes II. J. Comput. Phys. 83 (1989) 32-78
12. Tannehill J.C., Anderson D.A., and Pletcher R.H. Computational Fluids Mechanics and Heat Transfer. second ed. (1997), Taylor & Francis, Washington, DC
13. Adams N.A., and Stolz S. A subgrid scale deconvolution for shock capturing. J. Comput. Phys. 178 (2002) 391-426
14. Helzel C., Leveque R.J., and Warnecke G. A modified fractional step method for the accurate approximation of detonation waves. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 22 4 (2000) 1489-1510
15. D.V. Gaitonde, M.R. Visbal, High-order schemes for Navier-Stokes equations: algorithm and implementation into FDL3DI, Technical Report AFRL-VA-WP-TR-1998-3060, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB, 1998.
16. Jiang G.S., and Shu C.W. Efficient implementation of weighted ENO scheme. J. Comput. Phys. 126 (1996) 202-228
17. Woodward P., and Collela P. The numerical simulation of two-dimensional fluid flow with strong shock. J. Comput. Phys. 54 (1984) 115-173
18. Suresh A., and Huynh H.T. Accurate monotonicity-preserving schemes with Runge-Kutta time stepping. J. Comput. Phys. 136 (1997) 83-99
19. Daru V., and Tenaud C. High order one-step monotonicity-preserving schemes for unsteady compressible flow calculations. J. Comput. Phys. 193 (2004) 563-594