A conservative interface method for compressible flows

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 219, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 553-578

  Hu, X Y ^a   Khoo, B C ^b   Adams, N A ^a   Huang, F L ^c  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^c BEIJING INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Complex boundary; Compressible flow; Level set function; Multi fluid problem

Indexed keywords

NUMERICAL METHODS;

BOUNDARY PROBLEMS; CARTESIAN GRID; COMPLEX BOUNDARY; COMPUTATIONAL CELL; FINITE VOLUME SCHEMES; FLUID PROBLEM; GOVERNING EQUATIONS; LEVEL-SET FUNCTION; MULTI-FLUID PROBLEM; MULTI-FLUIDS;

COMPRESSIBLE FLOW;

EID: 33750615672     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: 10902716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2006.04.001     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Abgrall R., and Karni S. Computations of compressible multifluids. J. Comput. Phys. 169 (2001) 594-623
2. Arienti R., Hung P., Morano E., and Shepherd J.E. A level set approach to Eulerian-Lagranian coupling. J. Comput. Phys. 185 (2003) 213
3. Bagabir A., and Drikakis D. Mach number effects on shock-bubble interaction. Shock Waves 11 (2001) 209-218
4. J.A. Benek, T.L. Donegan, J.L. Steger, Extended chimera grid embedding scheme with application to viscous flows, AIAA Paper No. 87-1126, 1987.
5. M.J. Berger, R.J. LeVque, An adaptive Cartesian mesh algorithm for the Euler equations in arbitrary geometries, AIAA Paper No. 89-1930, 1989.
6. Caiden R., Fedkiw R.P., and Anderson C. A numerical method for two-phase flow consisting of separate compressible and incompressible regions. J. Comput. Phys. 166 (2001) 1-27
7. Y.L. Chiang, B. van Leer, K.G. Powell, Simulation of unsteady inviscid flow on an adaptively refined Cartesian grid, AIAA Paper No. 92-0443, 1992.
8. Chung M.H. A level set approach for computing solutions to inviscid compressible flow with moving solid boundary using fixed Cartesian grids. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids 33 (2001) 1121-1151
9. Colella P. Multidimensional upwind method for hyperbolic conservation laws. J. Comput. Phys. 87 (1990) 171-200
10. Davis S.F. An interface tracking method for hyperbolic systems of conservation laws. Appl. Numer. Math. 10 (1992) 447-472
11. Falcovitz J., Alfandary G., and Hanoch G. A two-dimensional conservation laws schemes for compressible flows with moving boundaries. J. Comput. Phys. 72 (1997) 449-466
12. Fedkiw R., Aslam T., Merriman B., and Osher S. A non-oscillatory Eulerian approach to interfaces in multimaterial flows (the ghost fluid method). J. Comput. Phys. 152 (1999) 457-492
13. Forrer H., and Berger M. Flow simulation on Cartesian grids involving complex moving geometries flows. Int. Ser. Numer. Math. vol. 129 (1998), Birkhäuser, Basel
14. Forrer H., and Jeltsch. A high-order boundary treatment for Cartesian-grid method. J. Comput. Phys. 140 (1998) 259-277
15. Glimm J., Marchesin D., and McBryan O. A numerical method for two phase flow with an unstable interface. J. Comput. Phys. 39 (1981) 179-200
16. Glimm J., Li X., Liu Y., Xu Z., and Zhao N. Conservative front tracking with improved accuracy. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 39 (2003) 179-200
17. Hankin R.S. The Euler equations for multiphase compressible flow in conservation form: simulation of shock-bubble interactions. J. Comput. Phys. 172 (2001) 808-826
18. Hirt C.W., and Nichols B.D. Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries. J. Comput. Phys. 39 (1981) 201
19. Hirt C.W. Volume-fraction techniques: powerful tools for wind engineering. J. Wind Eng. Industr. Aerodyn. 46-47 (1993) 327-338
20. Hu X.Y., and Khoo B.C. An interface interaction method for compressible multifluids. J. Comput. Phys. 198 (2004) 35-64
21. X.Y. Hu, B.C. Khoo, N.A. Adams, A smoothed interface interaction method for compressible flow, in: The 25th International Symposium on Shock Waves, Bangalore, July 17-21, India, 2005.
22. Huang C.W., and Shih T.Y. On the complexity of point-in-polygon algorithms. Comput. Geosci. 23 (1997) 109-118
23. A. Jameson, T.J. Baker, N.P. Weatherill, Calculation of inviscid transonic flow over a complete aircraft, AIAA Paper No. 86-0103, 1986.
24. Jiang G.S., and Shu C.W. Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 126 (1996) 202-228
25. Kadioglu S.Y., Sussman M., Osher S., Wright J.P., and Kang M. A second order primitive preconditioner for solving all speed multi-phase flows. J. Comput. Phys. 209 (2005) 477-503
26. Leveque R.J. Numerical Method for Conservation Laws (1991), Birkhäuser, Basel
27. Liu T.G., Khoo B.C., and Yeo K.S. Ghost fluid method for strong shock impacting on material interface. J. Comput. Phys. 190 (2003) 651-681
28. R. Löhner, The efficient simulation of strong unsteady flows by finite element method, AIAA Paper No. 87-0555, 1987.
29. Luo H., Baum J.D., and Löhner R. On the computation of multi-material flows using ALE formulation. J. Comput. Phys. 194 (2004) 304-328
30. Mader C. Numerical Modeling of Detonation (1979), University of California Press, Los Angeles
31. M. Mandella, D. Bershader, Quantitative study of compressible vortices: generation, structure and interaction with airfoils, AIAA Paper No. 87-0328, 1987.
32. Miller G.H., and Colella P. A conservative three-dimensional Eulerian method for coupled solid-fluid shock capturing. J. Comput. Phys. 183 (2001) 26-82
33. Osher S., and Sethain J.A. Front propagating with curvature dependent speed: algorithm based on Hamilton-Jaccobi formulation. J. Comput. Phys. 79 (1988) 12-49
34. Pember R.B., Bell J.B., Colella P., Crutchfield W.Y., and Welcome M.L. An adaptive Cartesian grid method for unsteady compressible flow in irregular regions. J. Comput. Phys. 120 (1995)
35. Peraire J., Vahdati M., Morgan K., and Zienkiewicz O.C. Adaptive remeshing for compressible flow computations. J. Comput. Phys. 72 (1987) 449-466
36. A.R. Pishevar, An ALE method for compressible multifluid flows: application to underwater explosion, in: CFD 2003, Vancouver, May 28-30, Cananda, 2003.
37. Quirk J.J. An alternative to unstructured grid for computing gas dynamic flows around arbitrarily complex two-dimensional bodies. Comput. Fluids 23 (1994) 125-142
38. R.C. Ripley, D.R. Whitehouse, F.S. Lien, Effect of mesh topology on shock wave loading computations, in: CFD2003, Vancouver, May 28-30, Cananda, 2003.
39. Sethain J.A. Evolution, implementation, and application of level set and fast marching methods for advancing fronts. J. Comput. Phys. 169 (2001) 503-555
40. Shu C.W., and Osher S. Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock-capturing schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 77 (1988) 439-471
41. Smith R.W. AUSM(ALE): a geometrically conservative arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian flux splitting scheme. J. Comput. Phys. 150 (2001) 268-286
42. Sussman M., Fatemi E., Smereka P., and Osher S. An improved level set method for incompressible two-phase flows. Comput. Fluids 27 (1998) 663-680
43. Toro E.F. Riemann Solvers and Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics: A Practical Introduction (1997), Springer, Berlin, New York
44. Wardlaw A.B., and Mair H.U. Spherical solutions of an underwater explosion bubble. Shock Vibr. 5 (1998) 89-102
45. Yabe T., Xiao F., and Utsumi T. The constrained interpolation profile method for multiphase analysis. J. Comput. Phys. 169 (2001) 556-593
46. Yang G., Causon D.M., Ingram D.M., Saunders R., and Batten P. A Cartesian cut cell method for compressible flows. Part A: static body problems. Aeronaut. J. 101 (1997) 47-56
47. Yang G., Causon D.M., Ingram D.M., Saunders R., and Batten P. A Cartesian cut cell method for compressible flows. Part B: moving body problems. Aeronaut. J. 101 (1997) 57-65
48. Youngs D.L. Time-dependent multi-material flow with large fluid distortion. In: Morton K.W., and Baines M.J. (Eds). Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics (1982), Academic Press, New York 273