A digital filter based generation of inflow data for spatially developing direct numerical or large eddy simulations

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 186, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 652-665

  Klein, M ^a   Sadiki, A ^a   Janicka, J ^a  

^a DARMSTADT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Digital filter; DNS; Inflow boundary conditions; Inflow generation

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; DIGITAL FILTERS; JETS; NUMERICAL MODELS; REYNOLDS NUMBER;

DNS; FILTER-BASED; INFLOW BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; INFLOW-GENERATION; INHOMOGENEOUS FLOW; LARGE-EDDY SIMULATIONS; NEW APPROACHES; SPATIALLY INHOMOGENEOUS; VELOCITIES DATA; VELOCITY PROFILES;

LARGE EDDY SIMULATION;

EID: 0037431162     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9991(03)00090-1     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. M. Klein, A. Sadiki, J. Janicka, Influence of the boundary conditions on the direct numerical simulation of a plane turbulent jet, in: TSFP2, 2nd International Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena, vol. I, Stockholm, 2001, pp. 401-406.
2. M. Klein, A. Sadiki, J. Janicka, Influence of the inflow conditions on the direct numerical simulation of primary breakup of liquid jets, in: ILASS-Europe 2001, 17. Annual Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems, Zürich, 2001, pp. 475-480.
3. S. Stanley, S. Sarkar, Influence of nozzle conditions and discrete forcing on turbulent planar jets, AIAA J. 38 (2000) 1615-1623.
4. T. Lund, X. Wu, D. Squires, Generation of turbulent inflow data for spatially-developing boundary layer simulations, J. Comp. Phys. 140 (1998) 233-258.
5. P. Moin, K. Mahesh, Direct numerical simulation, a tool in turbulence research, Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 30 (1998) 539-578.
6. 0 = 1410, J. Fluid Mech. 187 (1988) 61-98.
7. M. Lygren, H. Andersson, Influence of boundary conditions on the large scale structures in turbulent plane couette flow, in: S. Banerjee, J. Eaton (Eds.), Turbulence and Shear Flow, vol. 1, Begell House, 1999, pp. 15-20.
8. B. Rembold, N. Adams, L. Kleiser, Direct numerical simulation of a transitional rectangular jet, in: TSFP2, 2nd International Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena, vol. I, Stockholm, 2001, pp. 55-60.
9. S. Lee, S. Lele, P. Moin, Simulation of spatially evolving compressible turbulence and the application of taylors hypothesis, Phys. Fluids A 4 (1992) 1521-1530.
10. P. Druault, E. Lamballais, J. Delville, J.-P. Bonnet, Development of experiment/simulation interfaces for hybrid turbulent results analysis via the use of DNS, in: TSFP2, 2nd International Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena, vol. II, Stockholm, 2001, pp. 5-14.
11. B. Lafaurie, C. Nardonne, R. Scardovelli, S. Zaleski, G. Zanetti, Modelling merging and fragmentation in multiphase flows with surfer, J. Comp. Phys. 113 (1994) 134-147.
12. M. Klein, A. Sadiki, J. Janicka, Effects of the surface stretching or the surface deformation rate on the breakup of a viscous drop in simple shear flow: numerical simulation, in: 5th International Symposium on Engineering Turbulence Modelling and Measurements, Mallorca, September 2002.
13. R. Scardovelli, S. Zaleski, Direct numerical simulation of free surface and interfacial flows, Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 31 (1999) 567-603.
14. D. Gueyffier, A. Nadim, J. Li, R. Scardovelli, S. Zaleski, Volume of fluid interface tracking with smoothed surface stress methods for three-dimensional flows, J. Comp. Phys. 152 (1999) 423-456.
15. P. Sagaut, Large Eddy Simulation for Incompressible Flows, Springer, Berlin, 1998.
16. M. Klein, A. Sadiki, J. Janicka, Direct numerical simulations of plane turbulent jets at moderate Reynolds numbers, in: 20th IUTAM Congress, ICTAM 2000, Chicago, 2000.
17. C. Mengler, C. Heinrich, A. Sadiki, J. Janicka, Numerical prediction of momentum and scalar fields in a jet in cross flow: comparison of les and second order turbulence closure calculations, in: TSFP2, vol. II, Stockholm, 2001, pp. 425-430.
18. A. Lefebvre, Atomization and Sprays, Taylor & Francis, London, 1989.
19. H. Le, P. Moin, Direct numerical simulation of turbulent flow over a backward-facing step, Tech. Rep. TF-58, Standford University, 1994.
20. S. Stanley, S. Sarkar, J. Mellado, A study of the flow field evolution and mixing in a planar turbulent jet using direct numerical simulation, J. Fluid Mech. 450 (2002) 377-407.
21. H. Nobach, Verarbeitung stochastisch abgetasteter signale, Ph.D. Thesis, Universität Rostock, 1997.
22. G. Batchelor, The Theory of Homogeneous Turbulence, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1953.
23. I. Wygnanski, H. Fiedler, Some measurements in the self-preserving jet, J. Fluid Mech. 38 (1975) 577-612.
24. J. Bonnet, R. Moser, W. Rodi, AGARD advisory report 345, A Selection of Test Cases for the Validation of Large Eddy Simulations of Turbulent Flows, AGARD 1998, 7 Rue Ancelle, 99200 Neuilly-sur Seine, France, 1998, Ch. 6.3 Jets, p. 35.
25. E. Gutmark, I. Wygnanski, The planar turbulent jet, J. Fluid Mech. 73 (1976) 465-495.
26. C. L. Ribault, S. Sarkar, S. Stanley, Large eddy simulation of a plane jet, Phys. Fluids 11 (1999) 3069-3083.
27. I. Namer, M. Ötügen, Velocity measurements in a plane turbulent air jet at moderate Reynolds numbers, Exp. Fluids 6 (1988) 387-399.
28. X. Li, Spatial instability of plane liquid sheets, Chem. Eng. Sci. 48 (1993) 2973-2981.
29. K. Heukelbach, C. Tropea, Influence of the inner flowfield of flat fan pressure atomizers on the disintegration of the liquid sheet, in: ILASS-Europe 2001, 17. Annual Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems, Zürich, 2001, pp. 613-618.
30. P. Wu, R. Miranda, G. Faeth, Effect of initial flow conditions on primary break-up of nonturbulent and turbulent liquid jets, Atomization and Sprays 5 (1995) 175-196.