Direct numerical simulation of canonical shock/turbulence interaction

Physics of Fluids

Volumn 21, Issue 12, 2009, Pages 1-12

  Larsson, Johan ^a   Lele, Sanjiva K ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AERODYNAMICS; DIRECT NUMERICAL SIMULATION; MACH NUMBER; NUMERICAL MODELS; REYNOLDS NUMBER; SHOCK WAVES;

ISOTROPIC TURBULENCE; KOLMOGOROV SCALE; NORMAL SHOCK WAVES; OVER-COMPRESSION; QUALITATIVE DIFFERENCES; SHOCK INTERACTIONS; VISCOUS DISSIPATION; WEAK INTERACTIONS;

TURBULENCE;

EID: 76249093870     PISSN: 10706631     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.3275856     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Ribner HS. Shock-turbulence interaction and the generation of noise. 1954, NACA Report No. 1233.
2. Lee S, Lele SK, Moin P. Direct numerical simulation of isotropic turbulence interacting with a weak shock wave. J. Fluid Mech. 1993, 251:533. JFLSA7, 0022-1120, 10.1017/S0022112093003519.
3. Lee S, Lele SK, Moin P. Interaction of isotropic turbulence with shock waves: Effect of shock strength. J. Fluid Mech. 1997, 340:225. JFLSA7, 0022-1120, 10.1017/S0022112097005107.
4. Mahesh K, Lele SK, Moin P. The influence of entropy fluctuations on the interaction of turbulence with a shock wave. J. Fluid Mech. 1997, 334:353. JFLSA7, 0022-1120, 10.1017/S0022112097004576.
5. Jamme S, Cazalbou J-B, Torres F, Chassaing P. Direct numerical simulation of the interaction between a shock wave and various types of isotropic turbulence. Flow, Turbul. Combust. 2002, 68:227. FTCOF9, 1386-6184, 10.1023/A:1021197225166.
6. Barre S, Alem D, Bonnet JP. Experimental study of a normal shock/homogeneous turbulence interaction. AIAA J. 1996, 34:968. AIAJAH, 0001-1452, 10.2514/3.13175.
7. Zank GP, Zhou Y, Matthaeus WH, Rice WK M. The interaction of turbulence with shock waves: A basic model. Phys. Fluids 2002, 14:3766. PHFLE6, 1070-6631, 10.1063/1.1507772.
8. Hesselink L, Sturtevant B. Propagation of weak shocks through a random medium. J. Fluid Mech. 1988, 196:513. JFLSA7, 0022-1120, 10.1017/S0022112088002800.
9. Larsson J, Lele SK, Moin P. Effect of numerical dissipation on the predicted spectra for compressible turbulence. Annual Research Briefs 2007, 47. in (Center for Turbulence Research, Stanford, CA).
10. Ducros F, Laporte F, Souleres T, Guinot V, Moinat P, Caruelle B. High-order fluxes for conservative skew-symmetric-like schemes in structured meshes: Application to compressible flows. J. Comput. Phys. 2000, 161:114. JCTPAH, 0021-9991, 10.1006/jcph.2000.6492.
11. Pirozzoli S. Conservative hybrid compact-WENO schemes for shock-turbulence interaction. J. Comput. Phys. 2002, 178:81. JCTPAH, 0021-9991, 10.1006/jcph.2002.7021.
12. Larsson J, Gustafsson B. Stability criteria for hybrid difference methods. J. Comput. Phys. 2008, 227:2886. JCTPAH, 0021-9991, 10.1016/j.jcp.2007.11.025.
13. Xiong Z, Nagarajan S, Lele SK. Simple method for generating inflow turbulence. AIAA J. 2004, 42:2164. AIAJAH, 0001-1452, 10.2514/1.6157.
14. Ristorcelli JR, Blaisdell GA. Consistent initial conditions for the DNS of compressible turbulence. Phys. Fluids 1997, 9:4. PHFLE6, 1070-6631, 10.1063/1.869152.
15. Larsson J. Blending technique for compressible inflow turbulence: Algorithm localization and accuracy assessment. J. Comput. Phys. 2009, 228:933. JCTPAH, 0021-9991, 10.1016/j.jcp.2008.10.027.
16. Lele SK. Shock-jump relations in a turbulent flow. Phys. Fluids A 1992, 4:2900. PFADEB, 0899-8213, 10.1063/1.858343.
17. Pope SB. Turbulent Flows 2000, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge)