High-Order Fluxes for Conservative Skew-Symmetric-like Schemes in Structured Meshes: Application to Compressible Flows

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 161, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 114-139

  Ducros, F ^a   Laporte, F ^a   Souleres T ^a   Guinot, V ^b   Moinat, P ^a   Caruelle, B ^a  

^a CERFACS   (France)

^b UNESCO IHE INSTITUTE FOR WATER EDUCATION   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Aliasing errors; Compressible flow; Finite difference scheme; Finite volume scheme; High order schemes

Indexed keywords

ANTI-ALIASING; BOUNDARY LAYERS; FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS; SHEAR FLOW;

ALIASING ERROR; FINITE DIFFERENCE SCHEME; FINITE VOLUME SCHEMES; HIGH-ORDER; HIGH-ORDER SCHEME; HIGHER-ORDER; PROPERTY; SECOND ORDERS; SKEW-SYMMETRIC; SKEW-SYMMETRIC FORMS;

COMPRESSIBLE FLOW;

EID: 0001395296     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jcph.2000.6492     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Kravchenko A. G., Moin P. On the effect of numerical errors in large-eddy simulations of turbulent flows. J. Comput. Phys. 131:1997;310.
2. Jameson A., Schmidt W., Turkel E. Numerical Solutions of the Euler Equations by Finite Volume Methods Using Runge-Kutta Time Stepping. 1981.
3. Shu C.-W. Essentially Non-oscillatory and Weighted Essentially Non-oscillatory Schemes for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws. 1997.
4. M. Shur, P. R. Spalart, M. Strelets, and, A. Travin, Detached-eddy simulation of an airfoil at high angle of attack, in, Int. Symp. Eng. Turb. Modelling and Measurements, Corsica, May 24-26, 1999.
5. Kaltenbach H. J., Choi H. Large-Eddy Simulation of Flow around an Airfoil on a Structured Mesh. 1995.
6. Ducros F., Ferrand V., Nicoud F., Weber C., Darracq D., Gacherieu C. Large-eddy simulation of shock-turbulence interaction. J. Comput. Phys. 152:1999;517.
7. Lilly D. K. On the computational stability of numerical solutions of time-dependent non-linear geophysical fluid dynamics problems. Monthly Weather Rev. 93:1965;11.
8. Morinishi Y. Conservative Properties of Finite Difference Schemes for Incompressible Flow. 1995.
9. Arakawa A. Computational design for long term numerical integrations of the equations of atmospheric motion. J. Comput. Phys. 1:1966;119.
10. Reynolds W. C., Feiereisen W. J., Ferziger J. H. Numerical Simulation of a Compressible Homogeneous Turbulent Shear Flow. 1981.
11. Lax P., Wendroff B. Systems of conservation laws. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 13:1960;217.
12. Morinishi Y., Lund T. S., Vasilyev O., Moin P. Fully conservative high order finite difference schemes for incompressible flow. J. Comput. Phys. 143:1998;90.
13. A. E. P. Veldman, and, R. W. C. P. Verstappen, Symmetry-conserving discretization with application to the simulation of turbulent flow, in, Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics, VI, edited by, M. J. Baines, ICFD Conference, 1998, p, 539.
14. R. W. C. P. Verstappen, and, A. E. P. Veldman, A comparison of low-order dns, high-order dns and les, in, 2nd Ercoftac Workshop on Direct and Large-Eddy Simulation, 1998.
15. Blaisdell G. A., Mansour N. N., Reynolds W. C. Compressibility effects on the growth and structure of homogeneous turbulent shear flow. J. Fluid Mech. 256:1993;443.
16. Lele K. S. Compact finite difference schemes with spectral-like resolution. J. Comput. Phys. 103:1992;16.
17. A. Stoessel, A parallel tool for the study of 3d turbulent combustion phenomena, in, Proceedings of the Parallel CFD'95 Conference, Pasadena, 1995.
18. Weber C., Ducros F., Corjon A. Large-Eddy Simulation of Complex Turbulent Flows. 1998.
19. F. Ducros, C. Soulères, F. Laporte, P. Moinat, C. Weber, and, V. Guinot, High-order skew-symmetric jameson schemes for unsteady compressible flows, in, Proceeding of the Ercoftac/Issac Newton Join Workshop, 1999.
20. Jameson A. Analysis and design of numerical schemes for gas dynamics. 1. Artificial diffusion, upwind biased, limiters and their effect on accuracy and multgrid convergence. Comput. Fluid Dynam. 4:1995;171.
21. Jameson A. Analysis and design of numerical schemes for gas dynamics. 2. Artificial diffusion and discrete schock structure. Comput. Fluid Dynam. 5:1995;1.
22. Swanson R. C., Turkel E. On central-difference and upwind schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 101:1992;292.
23. Veldman A. E. P., Rinzema K. Playing with nonuniform grids. J. Eng. Math. 26:1992;119.
24. Fletcher C. A. J. Computational Techniques for Fluid Dynamics, Scientific Computation. 2:1988.
25. Colella W., Woodward P. R. The piecewise parabolic method (ppm) for gas-dynamical simulations. J. Comput. Phys. 54:1984;174.
26. J. Vos, E. Chaput, B. Arlinger, A. Rizzi, and, A. Corjon, Recent advances in aerodynamics inside the nsmb (navier-stokes multi-block) consortium, in, 36th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, January 12-15, 1998, AIAA-98-0802.
27. Hirsh C. Numerical Computation of Internal and External Flow. 1:1988.
28. Weber C. Développement de méthodes implicites pour les équations de navier-stokes moyennées et la simulation des grandes échelles: Application à l'aérodynamique externe. 1998.
29. Hixon R. Evaluation of a High-Accuracy Maccormack-Type sche Using Benchmarck Problems. 1997.
30. Sod G. A. A survey of several finite-difference methods for systems on non linear hyperbolic conservation laws. J. Comput. Phys. 27:1978;1.
31. Bayliss A., Parikh P., Maestrello L., Turkel E. A Fourth-Order Scheme for the Unsteady Compressible Navier-Stokes Equations. 1985.
32. Normand X., Lesieur M. Direct and large eddy simulation of transition in the compressible boundary layer. Theoret. Comput. Fluid Dynam. 3:1992.
33. Schlichting H. Boundary Layer Theory. 1979.
34. Mack L. M. Boundary-Layer Stability Theory. 1969.
35. Crow S. C. Stability theory for a pair of trailing vortices. AIAA J. 8:1970;2172.
36. D. Bliss, S. E. Widnall, and, A. Zalay, Theoretical and experimental study of the stability of a vortex pair, in, Aircraft Wake Turbulence and Its Detection, edited by, J. H. Olsen, et al., Plenum, New York, 1971, p, 305.
37. Spalart P., Allmaras S. R. A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows. 1992.