Generalized conservative approximations of split convective derivative operators

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 229, Issue 19, 2010, Pages 7180-7190

  Pirozzoli, Sergio ^a  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

Compressible flows; Energy conservation; Finite difference schemes; Split convective operators

Indexed keywords

ATMOSPHERIC THERMODYNAMICS; BOUNDARY LAYER FLOW; BOUNDARY LAYERS; COMPRESSIBLE FLOW; COMPUTATIONAL EFFICIENCY; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; INCOMPRESSIBLE FLOW; NUMERICAL METHODS; TURBULENCE; TURBULENT FLOW;

APPLICATION OF STANDARDS; ARBITRARY ORDER; BUILDING BLOCKES; CENTRAL DIFFERENCE; DERIVATIVE OPERATORS; FINITE DIFFERENCE APPROXIMATIONS; FINITE DIFFERENCE SCHEME; ORDER OF ACCURACY; SHOCK-CAPTURING METHOD; SPLIT CONVECTIVE OPERATOR;

ENERGY CONSERVATION;

EID: 77955275756     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: 10902716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2010.06.006     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Ducros F., Laporte F., Soulères T., Guinot V., Moinat P., Caruelle B. High-order fluxes for conservative skew-symmetric-like schemes in structures meshes: application to compressible flows. J. Comput. Phys. 2000, 161:114-139.
2. Kennedy C.A., Gruber A. Reduced aliasing formulations of the convective terms within the Navier-Stokes equations. J. Comput. Phys. 2008, 227:1676-1700.
3. Phillips N.A. An example of nonlinear computational instability. The Atmosphere and the Sea in Motion 1959, 501-504. Rockefeller Institute Press, Oxford University Press.
4. Lilly D.K. On the computational stability of numerical solutions of time-dependent non-linear geophysical fluid dynamics problems. J. Comput. Phys. 1965, 93:11-26.
5. Orlandi P. Fluid Flow Phenomena: A Numerical Toolkit 2000, Kluwer, Dordrecht.
6. Kravchenko A.G., Moin P. On the effect of numerical errors in large eddy simulations of turbulent flows. J. Comput. Phys. 1997, 131:310-322.
7. Morinishi Y., Lund T.S., Vasiliev O.V., Moin P. Fully conservative higher order finite difference schemes for incompressible flow. J. Comput. Phys. 1998, 143:90-124.
8. Morinishi Y. Skew-symmetric form of convective terms and fully conservative finite difference schemes for variable density low-Mach number flows. J. Comput. Phys. 2010, 229:276-300.
9. Jameson A. Formulation of kinetic energy preserving conservative schemes for gas dynamics and direct numerical simulation of one-dimensional viscous compressible flow in a shock tube using entropy and kinetic energy preserving schemes. J. Sci. Comput. 2008, 34:188-208.
10. Subbareddy P.K., Candler G.V. A fully discrete, kinetic energy consistent finite-volume scheme for compressible flows. J. Comput. Phys. 2009, 228:1347-1364.
11. Lax P.D., Wendroff B. Systems of conservation laws. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 1960, 13:217-237.
12. J. Larsson, S.K. Lele, P. Moin, Effect of numerical dissipation on the predicted spectra for compressible turbulence, Annu. Res. Briefs, Center for Turbulence Research, Stanford University, 2007.
13. Johnsen E., Larsson J., Bhagatwala A.V., Cabot W.H., Moin P., Olson B.J., Rawat P.S., Shankar S.K., Sjgreen B., Yee H.C., Zhong X., Lele S.K. Assessment of high-resolution methods for numerical simulations of compressible turbulence with shock waves. J. Comput. Phys. 2010, 229:1213-1237.
14. W.J. Feiereisen, W.C. Reynolds, J.H. Ferziger, Numerical simulation of a compressible, homogeneous, turbulent shear flow, Report TF 13, Thermosci. Div., Mech. Eng., Stanford University, 1981.
15. Blaisdell G.A., Spyropoulos E.T., Qin J.H. The effect of the formulation of non-linear terms on aliasing errors in spectral methods. Appl. Numer. Math. 1996, 21:207-219.
16. Honein A.E., Moin P. Higher entropy conservation and numerical stability of compressible turbulence simulations. J. Comput. Phys. 2004, 201:531-545.
17. Tam C.K.W., Webb J.C. Dispersion-relation-preserving finite difference scheme for computational acoustics. J. Comput. Phys. 1993, 107:262-281.
18. Shu C.-W., Osher S. Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock-capturing schemes II. J. Comput. Phys. 1989, 83:32-78.
19. Kraichnan R.H. On the statistical mechanics of an adiabatically compressible fluid. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1955, 27:438-441.
20. Wu X., Moin P. Direct numerical simulation of turbulence in a nominally zero-pressure-gradient flat-plate boundary layer. J. Fluid Mech. 2009, 630:5-41.
21. Erm L.P., Joubert J. Low Reynolds number turbulent boundary layers. J. Fluid Mech. 1991, 230:1-44.
22. S. Pirozzoli, M. Bernardini, F. Grasso, Direct numerical simulation of transonic shock/boundary layer interaction under conditions of incipient separation, J. Fluid Mech., in press.
23. Poinsot T.S., Lele S.K. Boundary conditions for direct simulations of compressible viscous flows. J. Comput. Phys. 1992, 101:104-129.
24. Lele S.K. Compact finite difference schemes with spectral-like resolution. J. Comput. Phys. 1992, 103:16-42.
25. Smits A.J., Dussauge J.P. Turbulent Shear Layers in Supersonic Flow 2006, American Institute of Physics, New York.