A shock-capturing methodology based on adaptative spatial filtering for high-order non-linear computations

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 228, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 1447-1465

  Bogey, Christophe ^a   de Cacqueray, Nicolas ^a   Bailly, Christophe ^a  

^a ECOLE CENTRALE DE LYON   (France)

Author keywords

Finite differences; High order; Shock capturing; Spatial filtering

Indexed keywords

BEAMFORMING; SHOCK WAVES;

CENTERED FINITE DIFFERENCES; FINITE DIFFERENCE; HIGH-ORDER; HIGHER-ORDER; LOW DISSIPATIONS; NON LINEAR COMPUTATIONS; SECOND ORDER FILTERS; SHOCK DETECTIONS; SHOCK-CAPTURING; SPATIAL FILTERINGS;

FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD;

EID: 58249124992     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: 10902716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2008.10.042     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Tam C.K.W. Computational aeroacoustics: issues and methods. AIAA J. 33 10 (1995) 1788-1796
2. Colonius T., and Lele S.K. Computational aeroacoustics: progress on nonlinear problems of sound generation. Prog. Aerospace Sci. 40 (2004) 345-416
3. Lele S.K. Compact finite difference schemes with spectral-like resolution. J. Comput. Phys. 103 1 (1992) 16-42
4. Tam C.K.W., Webb J.C., and Dong Z. A study of the short wave components in computation acoustics. J. Comput. Acoust. 1 1 (1993) 1-30
5. C.K.W. Tam, H. Shen, Direct computation of nonlinear acoustic pulses using high order finite difference schemes, AIAA-93-4325. 1993.
6. Visbal M.R., and Gaitonde D.V. High-order-accurate methods for complex unsteady subsonic flows. AIAA J. 37 10 (1999) 1231-1239
7. Bogey C., and Bailly C. A family of low dispersive and low dissipative explicit schemes for flow and noise computations. J. Comput. Phys. 194 1 (2004) 194-214
8. Bogey C., and Bailly C. Contributions of CAA to jet noise research and prediction. Int. J. Comput. Fluid Dynam. 18 6 (2004) 481-491
9. Wang M., Freund J.B., and Lele S.K. Computational prediction of flow-generated sound. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 38 (2006) 483-512
10. Rizzetta D.P., Visbal M.R., and Blaisdell G.A. A time-implicit high-order compact differencing and filtering scheme for large-eddy simulation. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 42 6 (2003) 665-693
11. Bogey C., and Bailly C. Large eddy simulations of transitional round jets: influence of the Reynolds number on flow development and energy dissipation. Phys. Fluids 18 6 (2006) 065101
12. Berland J., Bogey C., and Bailly C. Numerical study of screech generation in a planar supersonic jet. Phys. Fluids 19 (2007) 075105 1-14
13. Harten A. High resolution schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws. J. Comput. Phys. 49 (1983) 357-393
14. Harten A., Engquist B., Osher S., and Chakravarthy S.R. Uniformly high order accurate essentially non-oscillatory schemes III. J. Comput. Phys. 71 2 (1987) 231-303
15. Yee H.C. Construction of explicit and implicit symmetric TVD schemes and their applications. J. Comput. Phys. 68 (1987) 151-179
16. Shu C., and Osher S. Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock-capturing schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 77 (1988) 439471
17. Shu C., and Osher S. Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock-capturing schemes, II. J. Comput. Phys. 83 (1989) 3278
18. Jiang G.-S., and Shu C.-W. Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 126 1 (1996) 202-228
19. C.-W. Shu, Essentially non-oscillatory and weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws, NASA/CR-97-206253, NASA ICASE Report No. 97-65, 1997.
20. S. Pirozzoli, CAA for flow/acoustic interaction and high speed flows with shocks, in VKI Lecture Series 2005-2006, Von Karman Institute for Fluid Mechanics.
21. Hannappel R., Hauser T., and Friedrich R. A comparison of ENO and TVD schemes for the computation of shock-turbulence interaction. J. Comput. Phys. 121 1 (1995) 176-184
22. Garnier E., Mossi M., Sagaut P., Comte P., and Deville M. On the use of shock-capturing schemes for large-eddy simulations. J. Comput. Phys. 153 (1999) 273-311
23. Arora M., and Roe P.L. A well-behaved TVD limiter for high-resolution calculations of unsteady flows. J. Comput. Phys. 132 (1997) 3-11
24. Balsara D.S., and Shu C.-W. Monotonicity preserving weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes with increasingly high order of accuracy. J. Comput. Phys. 160 2 (2000) 405-452
25. Pirozzoli S. On the spectral properties of shock-capturing schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 219 (2006) 489-497
26. Daru V., and Gloerfelt X. Aeroacoustic computations using a high-order shock-capturing scheme. AIAA J. 45 10 (2007) 2474-2486
27. Karabazov S.A., and Goloviznin V.M. New efficient high-resolution method for nonlinear problems in aeroacoustics. AIAA J. 45 12 (2007) 2861-2871
28. Adams N.A., and Shariff K. A high-resolution hybrid compact-ENO scheme for shock-turbulence interaction problems. J. Comput. Phys. 127 1 (1996) 27-51
29. Yee H.C., Sandham N.D., and Djomehri M.J. Low-dissipative high-order shock-capturing methods using characteristic-based filters. J. Comput. Phys. 150 (1999) 199-238
30. Pirozzoli S. Conservative hybrid compact-WENO schemes for shock-turbulence interaction. J. Comput. Phys. 178 (2002) 81-117
31. M.R. Visbal, D.V. Gaitonde, Shock capturing using compact-differencing-based methods, AIAA-2005-1265, 2005.
32. A. Jameson, W. Schmidt, E. Turkel, Numerical solutions of the Euler equations by finite volume methods using Runge-Kutta time-stepping schemes, AIAA-81-1259, 1981.
33. Pulliam T.H. Artificial dissipation models for the Euler equations. AIAA J. 24 12 (1986) 1931-1940
34. Swanson R.C., and Turkel E. On central-difference and upwind schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 101 (1992) 292-306
35. Lockard D.P., and Morris P.J. Radiated noise from airfoils in realistic mean flows. AIAA J. 36 6 (1998) 907-914
36. Kim J.W., and Lee D.J. Adaptative nonlinear artificial dissipation model for computational aeroacoustics. AIAA J. 39 5 (2001) 810-818
37. R. Hixon, D. Bhate, M. Nallasamy, S. Sawyer, Shock-capturing dissipation schemes for high-accuracy, Computational AeroAcoustics (CAA) codes, AIAA-2006-2413, 2006.
38. T. Emmert, P. Lafon, C. Bailly, Computation of aeroacoustic phenomena in subsonic and transonic ducted flows, AIAA-2007-3429, 2007.
39. Crumpton P.I., and Shaw G.J. A vertex-centred finite volume method with shock detection. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 18 (1994) 605-625
40. S.-C. Lo, G.A. Blaisdell, A.S. Lyrintzis, High-order shock capturing schemes for turbulence calculations, AIAA-2007-827, 2007.
41. Ducros F., Ferrand V., Nicoud F., Weber C., Darracq D., Gacherieu C., and Poinsot T. Large-eddy simulation of the shock/turbulence interaction. J. Comput. Phys. 152 2 (1999) 517-549
42. Garnier E., Sagaut P., and Deville M. A class of explicit ENO filters with application to unsteady flows. J. Comput. Phys. 170 (2001) 184-204
43. C.K.W. Tam, Benchmark problems and solutions, ICASE/LaRC Workshop on Benchmark Problems in Computational Aeroacoustics, NASA CP 3300, 1995, pp. 1-13.
44. R. Hixon, J. Wright, Solution of category 1 problem 2, Third ICASE/LaRC Workshop on Benchmark Problems in Computational Aeroacoustics, NASA CP 2000-209790, 2000, pp. 33-40.
45. Sod G.A. A survey of several finite difference methods for systems of nonlinear hyperbolic conservation law. J. Comput. Phys. 27 1 (1978) 1-31
46. Hirsh C. Numerical Computation of Internal and External Flows. Computational Methods for Inviscid and Viscous Flows vol. 2 (1990), Wiley-Interscience, Chichester
47. Whitham G.B. Linear and Nonlinear Waves (1974), Wiley, New York
48. Levêque R.J. Finite Volume Methods for Hyperbolic Problems (2002), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
49. Inoue O., and Hattori Y. Sound generation by shock-vortex interactions. J. Fluid Mech. 380 (1999) 81-116
50. Inoue O. Propagation of sound generated by weak shock-vortex interaction. Phys. Phys. 12 5 (2000) 1258-1261
51. Bogey C., and Bailly C. On the application of explicit filtering to the variables or fluxes of linear equations. J. Comput. Phys. 225 (2007) 1211-1217
52. Bogey C., and Bailly C. Investigation of downstream and sideline subsonic jet noise using large eddy simulations. Theoret. Comput. Fluid Dynam. 20 1 (2006) 23-40
53. Bogey C., and Bailly C. An analysis of the correlations between the turbulent flow and the sound pressure fields of subsonic jets. J. Fluid Mech. 583 (2007) 71-97
54. Marsden O., Bogey C., and Bailly C. Direct noise computation of the turbulent flow around a zero-incidence airfoil. AIAA J. 46 4 (2008) 874-883
55. Tam C.K.W., and Dong Z. Radiation and outflow boundary conditions for direct computation of acoustic and flow disturbances in a nonuniform mean flows. J. Comput. Acoust. 4 2 (1996) 175-201
56. Poinsot T., and Lele S. Boundary conditions for direct simulations of compressible reacting flows. J. Comput. Phys. 101 1 (1992) 104-129
57. C. Bailly, Computation of generation and radiation of acoustic waves in supersonic flows, Third ICASE/LaRC Workshop on Benchmark Problems in Computational Aeroacoustics, NASA CP 2000-209790, 2000, pp. 283-294.
58. Ellzey J.L., Henneke M.R., Picone J.M., and Oran E.S. The interaction of a shock with a vortex: shock distortion and the production of acoustic waves. Phys. Fluids 7 1 (1995) 172-184
59. Grasso F., and Pirozzoli S. Shock-wave-vortex interactions: shock and vortex deformations, and sound production. Theoret. Comput. Fluid Dynam. 13 6 (2000) 421-456
60. Zhang S., Zhang Y.-T., and Shu C.-W. Multistage interaction of a shock wave and a strong vortex. Phys. Fluids 17 11 (2005) 116101