On the Use of Shock-Capturing Schemes for Large-Eddy Simulation

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 153, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 273-311

  Garnier, Eric ^a   Mossi, Michele ^b   Sagaut, Pierre ^a   Comte, Pierre ^a,c   Deville, Michel ^a,b  

^a ONERA   (France)

^b EPFL   (Switzerland)

^c LEGI   (France)

Author keywords

Large eddy simulation; Shock capturing schemes

Indexed keywords

REYNOLDS NUMBER;

AERONAUTICAL APPLICATIONS; EULER SCHEME; FLUID TURBULENCE; ISOTROPIC FLUIDS; LARGE-EDDY SIMULATIONS; MONOTONE INTEGRATED LARGE EDDY SIMULATIONS; NUMERICAL DISSIPATION; SHOCK CAPTURING SCHEME; SHOCK-CAPTURING; SMAGORINSKY CONSTANTS;

LARGE EDDY SIMULATION;

EID: 0000645382     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jcph.1999.6268     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. S. Ghosal, An analysis of numerical errors in large-eddy simulations of turbulence, J. Comput. Phys. 125, 187 (1996).
2. A. G. Kravchenko and P. Moin, On the effect of numerical errors in large eddy simulations of turbulent flows, J. Comput. Phys. 131, 310 (1997).
3. B. Vreman, B. Geurts, and H. Kuerten, Discretization error dominance over subgrid terms in large eddy simulation of compressible shear layers in 2D, Comm. Numer. Methods Eng. 10, 785 (1994).
4. T. Kawamura and K. Kuwahara, Computation of High Reynolds Number Flow around a Circular Cylinder with Surface Roughness, AIAA 22nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting (1984).
5. D. H. Porter, A. Pouquet, and P. R. Woodward, Kolmogorov-like spectra in decaying three-dimensional supersonic flows, Phys. Fluids 6(6), 2133 (1994).
6. J. P. Boris, F. F. Grinstein, E. S. Oran, and R. L. Kolbe, New insights into large eddy simulation, Fluid Dynam. Res. 10, 199 (1992).
7. C. Fureby, G. Tabor, H. G. Weller, and D. Gosman, A comparative study of subgrid scale models in homogeneous isotropic turbulence, Phys. Fluids 9(5), 1416 (1997).
8. M. Mossi, Analysis of Accuracy of Second- and Third-Order Shock-Capturing Schemes by Testing the Taylor-Green Vortex-Decay, IMHEF-EPFL Technical Report T-97-18, 1997 (unpublished).
9. M. E. Brachet, D. I. Meiron, S. A. Orszag, B. G. Nickel, R. H. Morf, and U. Frisch, Small-scale structure of Taylor-Green vortex, J. Fluid Mech. 130, 411 (1983).
10. O. Métais and M. Lesieur, Spectral large-eddy simulation of isotropic and stably stratified turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 239, 157 (1992).
11. A. Vincent and M. Meneguzzi, The spatial structure and statistical properties of homogeneous turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 225, 1 (1991).
12. Z.-S. She, Intermittency and non-gaussian statistics in turbulence, Fluid Dynam. Res. 8, 143 (1991).
13. C. W. Shu and S. Osher, Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory shock-capturing schemes, II, J. Comput. Phys. 83, 32 (1989).
14. T. Passot and A. Pouquet, Numerical simulation of compressible homogeneous flows in the turbulent regime, J. Fluid Mech. 181, 441 (1987).
15. G. A. Blaisdell, N. N. Mansour, and W. C. Reynolds, Compressibility effects on the growth and structure of homogeneous turbulent shear flow, J. Fluid Mech. 256, 443 (1993).
16. G. Erlebacher, M. Y. Hussaini, C. G. Speziale, and T. A. Zang, Toward the large-eddy simulation of compressible flows, J. Fluid Mech. 238, 155 (1992).
17. M. Lesieur, Turbulence in Fluids (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1990).
18. G.-S. Jiang and C. W. Shu, Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes, J. Comput. Phys. 126, 202 (1996).
19. X. D. Liu, S. Osher, and T. Chan, Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes, J. Comput. Phys. 115, 200 (1994).
20. J. Jiménez, A. A. Wray, Ph. G. Saffman, and R. S. Rogallo, The structure of intense vorticity in isotropic turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 255, 65 (1993).
21. J. O. Hinze, Turbulence (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1975).
22. D. H. Porter, A. Pouquet, and P. R. Woodward, Three-dimensional supersonic homogeneous turbulence: A numerical study, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68(21), 3156 (1992).
23. G. K. Batchelor and Townsend, Proc. R. Soc. London A 199, 238 (1949).
24. A. W. Vreman, B. J. Geurts, J. G. M. Kuerten, and P. J. Zandbergen, A finite volume approach to large eddy simulation of compressible, homogeneous, isotropic, decaying turbulence, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 15, 799 (1992).
25. T. A. Zang, R. B. Dahlburg, and J. P. Dahlburg, Direct and large-eddy simulation of three-dimensional compressible Navier-Stokes turbulence, Phys. Fluids A 4(1), 127 (1992).
26. J. Smagorinsky, General circulation experiments with the primitive equations. I. The basic experiment, Month. Wealth. Rev. 91(3), 99 (1963).
27. J. W. Deardorff, A numerical study of three-dimensional turbulent channel flow at large Reynolds numbers, J. Fluid. Mech. 41, 453 (1970).
28. D. K. Lilly, The representation of small-scale turbulence in numerical simulation experiments, in Proc. IBM Sci. Comp. Symp. on Environmental Sciences, Yorktown Heights, NY, November 14-16 1967.
29. J. W. Deardorff, On the magnitude of the subgrid scale eddy viscosity coefficient, J. Comput. Phys. 7, 120 (1971).
30. G. A. Blaisdell, E. T. Spylopoulos, and J. H. Qin, The effect of the formulation of nonlinear terms on aliasing errors in spectral methods, Appl. Numer. Math. 21, 207 (1996).
31. F. M. Najjar and D. K. Tafti, Study of discrete test filters and finite difference approximations for the dynamic subgrid-scale stress model, Phys. Fluids 8(4), 1076 (1996).
32. P. Sagaut and R. Grohens, Discrete filters for large-eddy simulation, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, in press.
33. A. Jameson, W. Schmidt, and E. Turkel, Numerical Simulation of the Euler Equations by Finite Volume Methods Using Runge-Kutta Time Stepping Schemes, AIAA Paper 81-1259, AIAA 5th Computations Fluid Dynamics Conference (1981).
34. J. B. Vos, P. Leyland, P. A. Lindberg, V. van Kemenade, C. Gacherieu, N. Duquesne, P. Lotstedt, C. Weber, and A. Ytterstrom, NSMB Handbook 4.0, EPFL-DGM-IMHEF, 1997 (unpublished).
35. L. Martinelli, Calculations of Viscous Flows with a Multigrid Method, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Princeton University, 1987 (unpublished).
36. R. C. Swanson and E. Turkel, On central-difference and upwind schemes, J. Comput. Phys. 101, 292 (1992).
37. P. L. Roe, Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors, and difference schemes, J. Comput. Phys. 43, 357 (1981).
38. P. L. Roe, Characteristic based schemes for the Euler equations, Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 18, 337 (1986).
39. B. Van Leer, Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. V. A second-order sequel to Godunov's method, J. Comput. Phys. 32, 101 (1979).
40. H. C. Yee, Construction of explicit and implicit symmetric TVD schemes and their applications, J. Comput. Phys. 68, 151 (1987).
41. C. W. Shu, Numerical experiments on the accuracy of ENO and Modified ENO schemes, J. Sci. Comput. 5(2), 127 (1990).
42. A. W. Vreman, Direct and Large-Eddy Simulation of the Compressible Turbulent Mixing Layer, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Twente, 1995 (unpublished).
43. M. Germano, U. Piomelli, P. Moin, and W. H. Cabot, A dynamic subgrid-scale eddy viscosity model, Phys. Fluids A 3(7), 1760 (1991).
44. M. Germano, Turbulence: The filtering approach, J. Fluid Mech. 238, 325 (1992).
45. D. K. Lilly, A proposed modification of the Germano subgrid-scale closure method, Phys. Fluids A 4(3), 633 (1992).