Accurate monotonicity-preserving schemes with Runge-Kutta time stepping

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 136, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 83-99

  Suresh, A ^a,b   Huynh, H T ^b  

^a NYMA Inc   (United States)

^b NASA GLENN RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL EFFICIENCY; RUNGE KUTTA METHODS;

CONSERVATION LAW; HIGH ORDER POLYNOMIAL; HIGH-ORDER; HIGHER-ORDER; HIGHER-ORDER POLYNOMIALS; MONOTONICITY; NUMERICAL SOLUTION; POLYNOMIAL RECONSTRUCTION; SIMPLE TESTS; TIME-STEPPING;

ADVECTION;

EID: 0031234473     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jcph.1997.5745     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Colella P. Multidimensional upwind methods for hyperbolic conservation laws. J. Comput. Phys. 87:1990;171.
2. Colella P., Woodward P. The piecewise parabolic method for gas-dynamical simulations. J. Comput. Phys. 54:1984;174.
3. Godunov S. K. A finite difference method for the numerical computation of discontinuous solutions of the equations of fluid dynamics. Mat. Sb. 47:1959;357.
4. Harten A., Engquist B., Osher S., Chakravarthy S. R. Uniformly high-order accurate essentially nonoscillatory schemes, III. J. Comput. Phys. 71:1987;231.
5. Harten A. ENO Schemes with subcell resolution. J. Comput. Phys. 83:1989;148.
6. Huynh H. T. Accurate monotone cubic interpolation. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 30:1993;57.
7. Huynh H. T. Accurate upwind methods for the Euler equations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 32:1995;1565.
8. H. T. Huynh, 1995, A piecewise-parabolic dual mesh method for the Euler equations, AIAA 12th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, San Diego, CA, 1995.
9. H. T. Huynh, 1996, Schemes and constraints for advection, International Conference on Numerical Methods in Fluid Dynamics, Monterey, CA, 1996.
10. Jiang G-S., Shu C-W. Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 126:1996;202.
11. Lax P. D. Weak solutions of nonlinear hyperbolic equations and their numerical computation. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 7:1954;159.
12. Leonard B. P. The ULTIMATE conservative difference scheme applied to unsteady one-dimensional advection. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 88:1991;17.
13. Leonard B. P., Lock A. P., Macvean M. K. The NIRVANA scheme applied to one-dimensional advection. Int. J. Num. Meth. Heat Fluid Flow. 5:1995;341.
14. Liu X., Osher S., Chan T. Weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 115:1994;200.
15. Roe P. L. Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors, and difference schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 43:1981;357.
16. Sod G. A. A survey of several finite difference methods for systems of non-linear hyperbolic conservation laws. J. Comput. Phys. 27:1978;1.
17. Shu C.-W. Numerical experiments on the accuracy of ENO and modified ENO schemes. J. Sci. Comput. 5:1990;127.
18. Shu C.-W., Osher S. Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 77:1988;439.
19. Shu C.-W. Efficient implementation of essentially non-oscillatory schemes, II. J. Comput. Phys. 83:1989;32.
20. Shu C.-W., Erlebacher G., Zang T. A., Whitaker D., Osher S. High-order ENO schemes applied to two and three-dimensional compressible flow. ICASE Report. 91-38:1991.
21. A. Suresh, 1995, Centered nonoscillatory schemes of third order, AIAA 12th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, San Diego, CA, 1995.
22. van Leer B. Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. II. Monotonicity and conservation combined in a second-order scheme. J. Comput. Phys. 14:1974;361.
23. van Leer B. Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. V. A. second-order sequel to Godunov's method. J. Comput. Phys. 32:1979;101.
24. Woodward P., Colella P. The numerical simulation of two- dimensional fluid flow with strong shocks. J. Comput. Phys. 54:1984;115.
25. Yang H. An artificial compression method for ENO schemes: The slope modification method. J. Comput. Phys. 89:1990;125.