The effect of the formulation of nonlinear terms on aliasing errors in spectral methods

Applied Numerical Mathematics

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 207-219

  Blaisdell, G A ^a   Spyropoulos, E T ^a   Qin, J H ^a  

^a Purdue University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; ERROR ANALYSIS; FOURIER TRANSFORMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS; NONLINEAR EQUATIONS; TURBULENCE;

ALIASING ERRORS; BURGERS' EQUATION; NONLINEAR TERMS; SKEW SYMMETRIC FORM; SPECTRAL METHODS;

COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS;

EID: 0030196091     PISSN: 01689274     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0168-9274(96)00005-0     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. J.R. Anderson, A local, minimum aliasing method for use in nonlinear numerical models, Monthly Weather Review 117 (1989) 1369-1379.
2. A. Arakawa, Computational design for long-term numerical integration of the equations of fluid motion: two-dimensional incompressible flow, Part I, J. Comput. Phys. 1 (1966) 119-143.
3. E.R. Benton and G.W. Platzman, A table of solutions of the one-dimensional Burgers' equation, Quart. Appl. Math. 30 (1972) 195-212.
4. G.A. Blaisdell, N.N. Mansour and W.C. Reynolds, Numerical simulations of compressible homogeneous turbulence, Report TF-50, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA (1991).
5. C. Canuto, M.Y. Hussaini, A. Quarteroni and T.A. Zang, Spectral Methods in Fluid Dynamics (Springer, Berlin, 1988).
6. G. Compte-Bellot and S. Corrsin, Simple Eulerian time correlation of full and narrow band velocity signals in grid generated isotropic turbulence, J. Fluid Mech. 48 (1971) 273-337.
7. G. Erlebacher, M.Y. Hussaini, C.G. Speziale and T.A. Zang, Toward the large-eddy simulation of compressible turbulent flows, J. Fluid Mech. 238 (1992) 155-185.
8. W.J. Feiereisen, W.C. Reynolds and J.H. Ferziger, Numerical simulation of a compressible, homogeneous, turbulent shear flow, Report TF-13, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA (1981).
9. J.D. Hoffman, Numerical Methods for Engineers and Scientists (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1992).
10. K. Horiuti, Comparison of conservative and rotational forms in large eddy simulation of turbulent channel flow, J. Comput. Phys. 71 (1987) 343-370.
11. D. Kwak, Three-dimensional time dependent computation of turbulent flow, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA (1975).
12. N.N. Mansour, P. Moin, W.C. Reynolds and J.H. Ferziger, Improved methods for large eddy simulation of turbulence, in: F. Durst, B.E. Launder, F.W. Schmidt and J.H. Whitelaw, eds., Turbulent Shear Flows I (Springer, Berlin, 1979) 386-401.
13. S.A. Orszag, On the elimination of aliasing in finite-diferencing schemes by filtering high-wavenumber components, J. Atmospheric Sci. 28 (1971) 1074.
14. N.A. Philips, An example of nonlinear computational instability, in: The Atmosphere and the Sea in Motion (Rockefeller Institute Press and the Oxford University Press, New York, 1959) 501-504.
15. E.T. Spyropoulos and G.A. Blaisdell, Evaluation of the dynamic subgrid-scale model for large eddy simulations of compressible turbulent flows, AIAA Paper 95-0355, 33rd Aerospace Sciences Meeting (1995).
16. T.A. Zang, On the rotational and skew-symmetric forms for incompressible flow simulations, Appl. Numer. Math. 7 (1991) 27-40.