Development and model-based transparency analysis of an Internet-distributed hardware-in-the-loop simulation platform

Mechatronics

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 22-29

  Ersal, Tulga ^a   Brudnak, Mark ^b   Salvi, Ashwin ^a   Stein, Jeffrey L ^a   Filipi, Zoran ^a   Fathy, Hosam K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b Development and Engineering Center   (United States)

Author keywords

Internet distributed simulation; Real time hardware in the loop simulation; Transparency

Indexed keywords

HARDWARE-IN-THE-LOOP SIMULATION; SIMULATION PLATFORM; SYNTHETIC APERTURES; TRANSPARENCY;

AUTOMOTIVE APPLICATIONS; DISTRIBUTED HARDWARE; DISTRIBUTED SIMULATIONS; MODEL BASED APPROACH; MODEL-BASED OPC; MOTION SIMULATOR; REAL-TIME HARDWARE; UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN;

TRACTION (FRICTION);

EID: 79551500949     PISSN: 09574158     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechatronics.2010.08.002     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Fathy HK, Filipi ZS, Hagena J, Stein JL. Review of hardware-in-the-loop simulation and its prospects in the automotive area. In: Proceedings of the SPIE - modeling and simulation for military applications, Kissimmee, FL, United States; 2006. p. 1-20.
2. M. Bacic, S. Neild, and P. Gawthrop Introduction to the special issue on hardware-in-the-loop simulation Mechatronics 19 7 2009 1041 1042
3. Kimura A, Maeda I. Development of engine control system using real time simulator. In: Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE international symposium on computer-aided control system design; 1996. p. 157-63.
4. O.J. Gietelink, J. Ploeg, B. De Schutter, and M. Verhaegen Development of a driver information and warning system with vehicle hardware-in-the-loop simulations Mechatronics 19 7 2009 1091 1104
5. M.D. Petersheim, and S.N. Brennan Scaling of hybrid-electric vehicle powertrain components for hardware-in-the-loop simulation Mechatronics 19 7 2009 1078 1090
6. T.-J. Park, C.-S. Han, and S.-H. Lee Development of the electronic control unit for the rack-actuating steer-by-wire using the hardware-in-the-loop simulation system Mechatronics 15 8 2005 899 918
7. K. Ji-Hoon, and S. Jae-Bok Control logic for an electric power steering system using assist motor Mechatronics 12 3 2002 447 459
8. F. Rovira-Mas, Q. Zhang, and A.C. Hansen Dynamic behavior of an electrohydraulic valve: typology of characteristic curves Mechatronics 17 10 2007 551 561
9. P. Mercorelli Robust feedback linearization using an adaptive PD regulator for a sensorless control of a throttle valve Mechatronics 19 8 2009 1334 1345
10. H.-J. Kim, and Y.-P. Park Investigation of robust roll motion control considering varying speed and actuator dynamics Mechatronics 14 1 2004 35 54
11. M. Hafner, O. Jost, and R. Isermann Mechatronic design approach for engine management systems Mechatronics 12 8 2002 1035 1046
12. Leitner J. A hardware-in-the-loop testbed for spacecraft formation flying applications. In: Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE aerospace conference; 2001. p. 615-20.
13. G. Cai, B.M. Chen, T.H. Lee, and M. Dong Design and implementation of a hardware-in-the-loop simulation system for small-scale UAV helicopters Mechatronics 19 7 2009 1057 1066
14. N.R. Gans, W.E. Dixon, R. Lind, and A. Kurdila A hardware in the loop simulation platform for vision-based control of unmanned air vehicles Mechatronics 19 7 2009 1043 1056
15. M. Karpenko, and N. Sepehri Hardware-in-the-loop simulator for research on fault tolerant control of electrohydraulic actuators in a flight control application Mechatronics 19 7 2009 1067 1077
16. A. Ganguli, A. Deraemaeker, M. Horodinca, and A. Preumont Active damping of chatter in machine tools - demonstration with a 'hardware-in-the-loop' simulator J Syst Control Eng 219 5 2005 359 369
17. Aghili F, Piedboeuf J-C. Contact dynamics emulation for hardware-in-loop simulation of robots interacting with environment. In: Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation; 2002. p. 523-9.
18. Lane DM, Falconer GJ, Randall G, Edwards I, Evans J, Smith J, et al. Interoperability and synchronisation of distributed hardware-in-the-loop simulation for underwater robot development: issues and experiments. In: Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA); 2001. p. 909-14.
19. Buford Jr JA, Jolly AC, Mobley SB, Sholes WJ. Advancements in hardware-in-the-loop simulations at the US army aviation and missile command. In: Proceedings of the SPIE - technologies for synthetic environments: hardware-in-the-loop testing V; 2000. p. 2-10.
20. Huber Jr EG, Courtney RA. Hardware-in-the-loop simulation at Wright laboratory's dynamic infrared missile evaluator (DIME) facility. In: Proceedings of the 1997 technologies for synthetic environments: hardware-in-the-loop testing II; 1997. p. 2-8.
21. Campbell S, Stojadinovic B. A system for simultaneous pseudodynamic testing of multiple substructures. In: Proceedings of the 6th US national conference on earthquake engineering; 1998.
22. P.J. Gawthrop, S.A. Neild, A. Gonzalez-Buelga, and D.J. Wagg Causality in real-time dynamic substructure testing Mechatronics 19 7 2009 1105 1115
23. Kelf MA. Hardware-in-the-loop simulation for undersea vehicle applications. In: Proceedings of the SPIE - technologies for synthetic environments: hardware-in-the-loop testing VI; 2001. p. 1-12.
24. Niemeyer G, Slotine J-JE. Towards force-reflecting teleoperation over the internet. In: Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, Leuven, Belgium; 1998. p. 1909-15.
25. Compere M, Goodell J, Simon M, Smith W, Brudnak M. Robust control techniques enabling duty cycle experiments utilizing a 6-DOF crewstation motion base, a full scale combat hybrid electric power system, and long distance internet communications. SAE technical paper 2006-01-3077; 2006.
26. Mahin S, Nigbor R, Pancake C, Reitherman R, Wood S. The establishment of the nees consortium. In: Proceedings of the 2003 ASCE/SEI structures congress and exposition: engineering smarter; 2003. p. 181-2.
27. Watanabe E, Kitada T, Kunitomo S, Nagata K. Parallel pseudodynamic seismic loading test on elevated bridge system through the internet. In: Proceedings of the 8th East Asia-Pacific conference on structural engineering and construction, Singapore; 2001.
28. Tsai K-C, Yeh C-C, Yang Y-S, Wang K-J, Wang S-J, Chen P-C. Seismic hazard mitigation: internet-based hybrid testing framework and examples. In: Proceedings of the international colloquium on natural hazard mitigation: methods and applications, France; 2003.
29. Spencer BF, Elnashai A, Nakata N, Saliem H, Yang G, Futrelle J, et al. The most experiment: earthquake engineering on the grid. Report technical report NEESgrid-2004-41, NEESgrid; 2004
30. P. Pan, M. Tada, and M. Nakashima Online hybrid test by internet linkage of distributed test-analysis domains Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 34 11 2005 1407 1425
31. B. Stojadinovic, G. Mosqueda, and S.A. Mahin Event-driven control system for geographically distributed hybrid simulation J Struct Eng 132 1 2006 68 77
32. G. Mosqueda, B. Stojadinovic, J. Hanley, M. Sivaselvan, and A.M. Reinhorn Hybrid seismic response simulation on a geographically distributed bridge model J Struct Eng 134 4 2008 535 543
33. N. Xi, and T.J. Tarn Stability analysis of non-time referenced internet-based telerobotic systems Robot Auton Syst 32 2 2000 173 178
34. R.L. Kress, W.R. Hamel, P. Murray, and K. Bills Control strategies for teleoperated internet assembly IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 6 4 2001 410 416
35. S. Munir, and W.J. Book Internet-based teleoperation using wave variables with prediction IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 7 2 2002 124 133
36. G. Niemeyer, and J.-J.E. Slotine Toward bilateral internet teleoperation Beyond webcams: an introduction to online robots 2002 MIT Press 193 213
37. Chopra N, Spong MW, Hirche S, Buss M. Bilateral teleoperation over the internet: the time varying delay problem. In: Proceedings of the 2003 American control conference, Denver, CO, USA; 2003. p. 155-60.
38. I. Elhajj, X. Ning, F. Wai Keung, L. Yun-Hui, Y. Hasegawa, and T. Fukuda Supermedia-enhanced internet-based telerobotics Proc IEEE 91 3 2003 396 421
39. L.-N. Sun, X.-H. Xie, L.-X. Fu, and Z.-J. Du Internet-based telerobotic surgery: problems and approaches Harbin Gongye Daxue Xuebao/J Harbin Inst Technol 35 2 2003 129 133
40. Y.-H. Shi, and Y.-C. Wang Study on internet-based force feedback technology Robot 26 4 2004 330 335
41. Rodriguez-Seda EJ, Dongjun L, Spong MW. An experimental comparison study for bilateral internet-based teleoperation. In: Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE international conference on control applications, Munich, Germany; 2006. p. 1701-6.
42. Petrovic I, Babic J, Budisic M. Teleoperation of collaborative mobile robots with force feedback over internet. In: Proceedings of the fourth international conference on informatics in control, automation and robotics (ICINCO 2007), Angers, France; 2007. p. 430-7.
43. Goodell J, Compere M, Simon M, Smith W, Wright R, Brudnak M. Robust control techniques for state tracking in the presence of variable time delays. SAE technical paper 2006-01-1163; 2006.
44. Brudnak M, Pozolo M, Paul V, Mohammad S, Smith W, Compere M, et al. Soldier/hardware-in-the-loop simulation-based combat vehicle duty cycle measurement: duty cycle experiment 2. In: Proceedings of the simulation interoperability workshop, SIW-07S-016, Norfolk, VA; 2007.
45. D.A. Lawrence Stability and transparency in bilateral teleoperation IEEE Trans Robot Automat 9 5 1993 624 637
46. P.G. Griffiths, R.B. Gillespie, and J.S. Freudenberg A fundamental trade off between performance and sensitivity within haptic rendering IEEE Trans Robot 24 3 2008 537 548
47. G. Niemeyer, and J.-J.E. Slotine Stable adaptive teleoperation IEEE J Ocean Eng 16 1 1991 152 162
48. R.J. Anderson, and M.W. Spong Bilateral control of teleoperators with time delay IEEE Trans Automat Control 34 5 1989 494 501
49. D. Lee, and M.W. Spong Passive bilateral teleoperation with constant time delay IEEE Trans Robot 22 2 2006 269 281
50. G. Magonette Development and application of large-scale continuous pseudo-dynamic testing techniques Philos Trans Roy Soc London A 359 2001 1771 1799
51. M. Nakashima Development, potential, and limitations of real-time online (pseudo-dynamic) testing Philos Trans Roy Soc London A 359 2001 1851 1867
52. M. Nakashima, H. Kato, and E. Takaoka Development of real-time pseudo dynamic testing Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 21 1 1992 79 92
53. Y. Takahashi, and L.G. Fenves Software framework for distributed experimental-computational simulation of structural systems Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 35 3 2006 267 291
54. Filipi ZS, Fathy HK, Hagena J, Knafl A, Ahlawat R, Liu J, et al. Engine-in-the-loop testing for evaluating hybrid propulsion concepts and transient emissions - HMMWV case study. In: Proceedings of the 2006 SAE world congress, 2006-01-0443, Detroit, MI; 2006.
55. Fleming M, Len G, Stryker P. Design and construction of a university-based hybrid electric powertrain test cell. SAE technical paper 2000-01-3106; 2000.
56. Jason TC, Moskwa JJ. A hardware-in-the-loop transient diesel engine test system for control and diagnostic development. In: Proceedings of the ASME international mechanical engineering congress and exposition; 2001.
57. Nabi S, Balike M, Allen J, Rzemien K. An overview of hardware-in-the-loop testing systems at visteon. SAE technical paper 2004-01-1240; 2004.
58. Pasquier M, Monnet G. Diesel hybridization and emissions, report ANL/ES/RP-113184. Argonne, IL, US: Argonne National Lab.; 2004.