Development of a driver information and warning system with vehicle hardware-in-the-loop simulations

Mechatronics

Volumn 19, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 1091-1104

  Gietelink, O J ^a,b   Ploeg, J ^a   De Schutter, B ^b,c   Verhaegen, M ^b  

^a TNO   (Netherlands)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^c DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Advanced driver assistance systems; Controller validation; Hardware in the loop simulation

Indexed keywords

AUTOMOBILE DRIVERS; DYNAMOMETERS; HARDWARE-IN-THE-LOOP SIMULATION; SYNTHETIC APERTURES; TRACTION (FRICTION); VEHICLES;

CHASSIS DYNAMOMETERS; CONTROLLED ENVIRONMENT; CONTROLLER VALIDATION; DEVELOPMENT PROCESS; DRIVER INFORMATION; HARD-WARE-IN-THE-LOOP; ROBOT VEHICLES; VALIDATION PHASE;

ADVANCED DRIVER ASSISTANCE SYSTEMS;

EID: 70349878957     PISSN: 09574158     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechatronics.2009.04.012     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. International Road Traffic Database (IRTAD).
2. Shladover S. Review of the state of development of advanced vehicle control systems. Int J Vehicle Syst Dynamics 24 6-7 (1995) 551-595
3. Bishop R. Intelligent vehicle technology and trends (2005), Artech House, Norwood, MA, USA. 1-58053-911-4
4. Zador P, Krawchuk S, Voas R. Automotive collision avoidance system (ACAS) program. Final Report DOT HS 809 080, DOT/NHTSA. Washington, DC, USA; August 2000.
5. Jagtman H, Marchau V, Heijer T. Current knowledge on safety impacts of Collision Avoidance Systems (CAS). In: Herder P, Thissen W, editors. Proceedings of the 5th international conference on technology, policy and innovation. Delft; 2001, Paper No: 1152.
6. Golias J., Yannis G., and Antoniou C. Classification of driver-assistance systems according to their impact on road safety and traffic efficiency. Trans Rev 22 2 (2002) 179-196
7. Winner H, Witte S, Uhler W, Lichtenberg B. Adaptive cruise control system aspects and development trends. SAE Technical Paper Series 961010.
8. Flament M. Integrated passive and active safety solutions. In: Proceedings of the 5th European MADYMO user meeting. Cambridge, UK; 2005.
9. NHTSA, Automotive collision avoidance system field operational test (ACAS FOT), Final Program Report DOT HS 809 866, DOT/NHTSA. Washington, DC, USA; May 2005.
10. Kiefer R, LeBlanc D, Palmer M, Salinger J, Deering R, Shulman M. Development and validation of functional definitions and evaluation procedures for collision warning/avoidance systems. Final Report DOT HS 808 964, DOT/NHTSA. Washington, DC, USA; August 1999.
11. Seiler P, Song B, Hedrick J. Development of a collision avoidance system. SAE Technical Paper Series 98PC-417.
12. Doi A., Butsuen T., Niibe T., Yakagi T., Yamamoto Y., and Seni H. Development of a rear-end collision avoidance system with automatic braking control. JSAE Rev 15 4 (1994) 335-340
13. Pimentel J, editor. Safety-critical automotive systems, No. PT-103. Warrendale, PA, USA: SAE International; 2006. ISBN: 0-7680-1243-0.
14. Isermann R. Mechatronic systems (2003), Springer-Verlag, London ISBN: 1-85233-693-5
15. Schwarz J, editor. Code of practice for the design and evaluation of ADAS, RESPONSE 3 - PReVENT subproject. Brussels, Belgium; October 31, 2006.
16. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Transport information and control systems - forward vehicle collision warning systems - performance requirements and test procedures, ISO Standard 15623. 1st ed. 2002-10- 01, Geneva, Switzerland; 2002.
17. Abou-Jaoude R. ACC radar sensor technology, test requirements, and test solutions. IEEE Trans Intell Trans Syst 4 3 (2003) 115-122
18. Hote C. Abstract interpretation techniques for software testing. Bus Briefing: Global Automot Manuf Technol (2002) 1-7
19. Papp Z, Labibes K, Thean A, van Elk M. Multi-agent based HIL simulator with high fidelity virtual sensors. In: Proceedings of the IEEE intelligent vehicles symposium (IV). Columbus, OH, USA; 2003. p. 213-9.
20. Li J., Yu F., Zhang J.-W., Feng J.-Z., and Zhao H.-P. The rapid development of a vehicle electronic control system and its application to an antilock braking system based on hardware-in-the-loop simulation. J Automobile Eng 216 (2002) 95-105
21. Isermann R., Schaffnit J., and Sinsel S. Hardware-in-the-loop simulation for the design and testing of engine-control systems. Contr Eng Practice 7 5 (1999) 643-653
22. Isermann R. Diagnosis methods for electronic controlled vehicles. Int J Vehicle Syst Dynamics 36 2-3 (2001) 77-117
23. Athanasas K, Bonnet C, Fritz H, Scheidler C, Volk G. VALSE - validation of safety-related driver assistance systems. In: Proceedings of the IEEE intelligent vehicles symposium (IV). Columbus, OH, USA; 2003. p. 610-5.
24. Yi K., Woo M., Kim S., and Lee S. Study on a road-adaptive CW/CA algorithm for automobiles using HiL simulations. JSME Int J Series C - Mech Syst Mach Elements Manuf 42 1 (1999) 163-170
25. Reymond G, Heidet A, Canry M, Kemeny A. Validation of Renault's dynamic simulator for adaptive cruise control experiments. In: Proceedings of the driving simulation conference (DSC2000). Paris, France; 2000. p. 181-92.
26. Gietelink O. Design and validation of advanced driver assistance systems. T2007/11, TRAIL Thesis Series. Delft, The Netherlands: Delft University of Technology; November 2007.
27. Papp Z, Dorrepaal M, Verburg D. Distributed hardware-in-the-loop simulator for autonomous continuous dynamical systems with spatially constrained interactions. In: Proceedings of the 11th IEEE/ACM international workshop on parallel and distributed real-time systems. Nice, France; 2003.
28. Craig J. Introduction to robotics, mechanics and control. 3rd ed. (2004), Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA, USA
29. Ploeg J, van der Knaap A, Verburg D. ATS/AGV, design, implementation and evaluation of a high performance AGV. In: Proceedings of the IEEE intelligent vehicles symposium (IV), vol. 1. Versailles, France; 2002. p. 127-34.
30. Ploeg J, Vissers J, Nijmeijer H. Control design for an overactuated wheeled mobile robot. In: Proceedings of the 4th IFAC symposium on mechatronic systems (MECHATRONICS 2006). Heidelberg, Germany; 2006.
31. Integrated Project PReVENT - Preventive and Active Safety Applications.
32. PREVENT-SASPENCE consortium, SASPENCE project description - appendix of PReVENT technical annex, European commission, IP PReVENT, subproject SASPENCE. Brussels, Belgium; 2003.
33. Tango F, Saroldi A. System specifications, Deliverable D20.34, European Commission, IP PReVENT, Subproject SASPENCE. Brussels, Belgium; January 9, 2005.
34. Tango F, Saroldi A. Towards a new approach in supporting drivers function: specifications of the SASPENCE system. In: Proceedings of the 5th European congress and exhibition on intelligent transport systems and services (ITS). Hannover, Germany; 2005. p. 614-20.
35. Alonso M, Garayo P, Herran L. Functional requirements, Deliverable D20.33, European Commission, IP PReVENT, Subproject SASPENCE. Brussels, Belgium; November 30, 2004.
36. Weigel H, Cramer H, Wanielik G, Polychronopoulos A, Saroldi A. Accurate road geometry estimation for a safe speed application. In: Proceedings of the IEEE intelligent vehicles symposium (IV). Tokyo, Japan; 2006. p. 516-21.
37. Floudas N, Tsogas M, Amditis A, Weigel H. Positioning and path prediction for scenario assessment of safe speed system. In: Proceedings of the 14th world congress on intelligent transport systems and services (ITS). Beijing, PR China; 2007.
38. Biral F, Da Lio M, Bertolazzi E. Combining safety margins and user preferences into a driving criterion for optimal control-based computation of reference maneuvers for an ADAS of the next generation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE intelligent vehicles symposium (IV). Las Vegas, NV, USA; 2005. p. 36-41.
39. Kiefer R, Cassar M, Flannagan C, LeBlanc D, Palmer M, Deering R, et al. Forward collision warning requirements project task 1. Final Report DOT HS 809 574, DOT/NHTSA. Washington, DC, USA; January 2003.
40. Gipps P. Behavioural car-following model for computer simulation. Trans Res B 15B 2 (1981) 105-111
41. Bruel L, Colinot J-P, Adell E, Varhelyi A, Dalla Fontana M, D'Alessandro M. HMI tests in simulator, Deliverable D20.54, European Commission, IP PReVENT, Subproject SASPENCE. Brussels, Belgium; July 4, 2006.
42. Gietelink O, Lammers M, Jansen S. SASPENCE validation results, Deliverable D20.70, European commission, IP PReVENT, Subproject SASPENCE. Brussels, Belgium; February 8, 2008.