Hardware-in-the-loop simulator for research on fault tolerant control of electrohydraulic actuators in a flight control application

Mechatronics

Volumn 19, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 1067-1077

  Karpenko, Mark ^a   Sepehri, Nariman ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Fault tolerant control design; Flight actuators; Fluid power systems; Hardware in the loop simulator

Indexed keywords

AIRCRAFT CONTROL; COMPUTER HARDWARE; CONTROL SURFACES; FAULT TOLERANCE; FLIGHT SIMULATORS; FLUID POWER; HARDWARE-IN-THE-LOOP SIMULATION; HYDRAULIC ACTUATORS; HYDRAULIC RAMS; JET AIRCRAFT; MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS; PERSONAL COMPUTERS; SYNTHETIC APERTURES; VEHICLE PERFORMANCE;

ELECTRO-HYDRAULIC ACTUATOR; FAULT TOLERANT CONTROL; FAULT TOLERANT CONTROL DESIGN; FLIGHT CONTROL ACTUATORS; HARDWARE IMPLEMENTATIONS; HARDWARE IN THE LOOP SIMULATOR; HARDWAREIN-THE-LOOP(HIL) SIMULATION; HUMAN-IN-THE-LOOP SIMULATIONS;

FLIGHT CONTROL SYSTEMS;

EID: 70349883973     PISSN: 09574158     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechatronics.2009.01.008     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Tzafestas C.G., Rigatos G.G., and Tzafestas S.G. Design of fault-tolerant control systems: passive and active approaches. Syst Sci 24 4 (1998) 5-28
2. Plummer A.R., and Vaughan N.D. Robust adaptive control for hydraulic servosystems. ASME J Dyn Syst, Measure, Control 118 (1996) 237-244
3. Bobrow J.E., and Lum K. Adaptive, high bandwidth control of a hydraulic actuator. ASME J Dyn Syst, Measure, Control 118 (1996) 714-720
4. Yao B., Bu F., and Chiu G.T.C. Non-linear adaptive robust control of electro-hydraulic systems driven by double-rod actuators. Int J Control 74 8 (2001) 761-775
5. Kim H.S., Lee K., and Cho Y.M. Robust two-stage non-linear control of a hydraulic servo-system. Int J Control 75 7 (2002) 502-516
6. Skormin V.A., Apone J., and Dunphy J.J. On-line diagnostics of a self-contained flight actuator. IEEE Trans Aerospace Electron Syst 30 1 (1994) 186-195
7. Crowther W.J., Edge K.A., Burrows C.R., Atkinson R.M., and Wollons D.J. Fault diagnosis of a hydraulic actuator circuit using neural networks - an output vector space classification approach. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part I: J Syst Control Eng 212 11 (1998) 57-68
8. Tan H., and Sepehri N. Parametric fault diagnosis for electrohydraulic cylinder drive units. IEEE Trans Ind Electron 49 1 (2002) 96-106
9. An L., and Sepehri N. Hydraulic actuator leakage fault detection using extended Kalman filter. Int J Fluid Power 6 1 (2005) 41-51
10. ∞ theory. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part I: J Syst Control Eng 205 4 (1991) 299-306
11. Thompson D.F., Pruyn J.S., and Shukla A. Feedback design for robust tracking and robust stiffness in flight control actuators using a modified QFT technique. Int J Control 72 16 (1999) 1480-1497
12. Niksefat N., and Sepehri N. A QFT fault-tolerant control for electrohydraulic positioning systems. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 10 4 (2002) 626-632
13. Karpenko M., and Sepehri N. Robust position control of an electrohydraulic actuator with a faulty actuator piston seal. ASME J Dyn Syst Measure Control 125 3 (2003) 413-423
14. Karpenko M., and Sepehri N. Fault-tolerant control of a servohydraulic positioning system with crossport leakage. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 13 1 (2005) 155-161
15. Ahmed-Zaid F., Ioannou P., Gousman K., and Rooney R. Accommodation of failures in the F-16 aircraft using adaptive control. IEEE Control Syst Mag 11 1 (1991) 73-78
16. Zhang Y.M., and Jiang J. Active fault-tolerant control system against partial actuator failures. IEE Proc: Control Theory Appl 149 1 (2002) 95-104
17. In: Goldberg K., and Siegwart R. (Eds). Beyond webcams: an introduction to online robots (2002), The MIT Press, Cambridge (MA) 193-214 Ch. Toward Bilateral Teleoperation
18. Flightgear flight simulator [cited February 22, 2009], .
19. Sehgal B, Deters RW, Selig MS. Icing encounter flight simulator. In: AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit. Reno, NV; 2002.
20. Sepehri N., Karpenko M., An L., and Karam S. A test rig for experimentation on fault tolerant control and condition monitoring algorithms in fluid power systems: from design through implementation. Trans CSME 29 3 (2005) 441-458
21. Mare J.-C. Dynamic loading systems for ground testing of high speed aerospace actuators. Aircraft Eng Aerospace Technol: An Int J 78 4 (2006) 275-282
22. Pachter M., Houpis C.H., and Kang K. Modelling and control of an electro-hydrostatic actuator. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control 7 6 (1997) 591-608
23. Plummer A.R. Robust electrohydraulic force control. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part I: J Syst Control Eng 221 4 (2007) 717-731
24. Robinson DW, Pratt GA. Force controllable hydro-elastic actuator. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, San Francisco, CA; 2000. p. 1321-7.
25. Zhang R., and Alleyne A.G. Dynamic emulation using an indirect control input. ASME J Dyn Syst, Measure, Control 127 1 (2005) 114-124
26. Jacazio G., and Balossini G. Real-time loading actuator control for an advanced aerospace test rig. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part I: J Syst Control Eng 221 2 (2007) 199-210
27. Nguyen LT, Ogburn ME, Gilbert WP, Kibler KS, Brown PW, Deal PL. Simulator study of stall/post-stall characteristics of a fighter airplane with relaxed static stability, Tech. rep., NASA TP-1538; 1979.
28. Jackson BE. Manual for a workstation-based generic flight simulation program (LaRCSim) version 1.4, Tech. rep., NASA TM-110164; April 1995.
29. Snell S.A., and Stout P.W. Quantitative feedback theory with a scheduled gain for full envelope longitudinal control. J Guid Control Dyn 19 5 (1996) 1095-1101
30. Stevens B.L., and Lewis F.L. Aircraft control and simulation (1992), John Wiley & Sons, New York
31. Roskam J. Airplane flight dynamics and automatic flight controls vol. 1 (2003), DARCorporation, Lawrence (KS)
32. Dods JB, Tinling BE. Summary of results of a wind-tunnel investigation of nine related horizontal tails, Tech. rep., NACA TN-3497; July 1955.
33. Nam Y., and Hong S.K. Force control system design of aerodynamic load simulator. Control Eng Practice 10 (2002) 549-558