Homologous recombination conserves DNA sequence integrity throughout the cell cycle in embryonic stem cells

Stem Cells and Development

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 363-374

  Serrano, Lourdes ^a   Liang, Li ^a   Chang, Yiming ^a   Deng, Li ^a   Maulion, Christopher ^a   Nguyen, Son ^a   Tischfield, Jay A ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA; RAD51 PROTEIN;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CHROMATIN; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; DNA SEQUENCE; DNA TEMPLATE; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; FIBROBLAST; FLOW CYTOMETRY; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; MOUSE; NONHOMOLOGOUS END JOINING; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DNA BINDING; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; X RAY;

ANIMALS; CELL CYCLE; CELLS, CULTURED; DEOXYURIDINE; DNA; DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; FIBROBLASTS; HISTONES; MICE; RAD51 RECOMBINASE; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC;

EID: 78951484462     PISSN: 15473287     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/scd.2010.0159     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Szostak JW, TL Orr-Weaver, RJ Rothstein, et al. (1983). The double-strand-break repair model for recombination. Cell 33:25-35.
2. Paques F and JE Haber. (1999). Multiple pathways of re-combination induced by double-strand breaks in Sacchar-omyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 63:349-404.
3. Cervantes RB, JR Stringer, C Shao, et al. (2002). Embryonic stem cells and somatic cells differ in mutation frequency and type. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:3586-3590.
4. Hong Y, RB Cervantes, E Tichy, et al. (2007). Protecting genomic integrity in somatic cells and embryonic stem cells. Mutat Res 614:48-55.
5. Shao C, L Deng, O Henegariu, et al. (1999). Mitotic recom-bination produces the majority of recessive fibroblast vari-ants in heterozygous mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:9230-9235.
6. Gupta PK, C Shao, Y Zhu, et al. (1997). Loss of heterozy-gosity analysis in a human fibrosarcoma cell line. Cytogenet Cell Genet 76:214-218.
7. Gupta PK, A Sahota, SA Boyadjiev, et al. (1997). High frequency in vivo loss of heterozygosity is primarily a con-sequence of mitotic recombination. Cancer Res 57:1188-1193.
8. Nickoloff JA. (2002). Recombination: mechanisms and roles in tumorigenesis. In: Encyclopedia of Cancer, 2nd edition. Bertino JR, ed. Elsevier Science, San Diego, pp 49-59.
9. Tischfield JA. (1997). Loss of heterozygosity or: how I learned to stop worrying and love mitotic recombination. Am J Hum Genet 61:995-999.
10. Pierce AJ and M Jasin. (2005). Measuring recombination proficiency in mouse embryonic stem cells. Methods Mol Biol 291:373-384.
11. Orii KE, Y Lee, N Kondo, et al. (2006). Selective utilization of nonhomologous end-joining and homologous recombina-tion DNA repair pathways during nervous system devel-opment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:10017-10022.
12. Griffin C, H Waard, B Deans, et al. (2005). The involvement of key DNA repair pathways in the formation of chromo-some rearrangements in embryonic stem cells. DNA Repair (AMST) 4:1019-1027.
13. Kanaar R, JH Hoeijmakers and DC van Gent. (1998). Mole-cular mechanisms of DNA double strand break repair. Trends Cell Biol 8:483-489.
14. Rothkamm K, I Kruger, LH Thompson, et al. (2003). Path-ways of DNA double-strand break repair during the mam-malian cell cycle. Mol Cell Biol 23:5706-5715.
15. Shrivastav M, LP De Haro and JA Nickoloff. (2008). Reg-ulation of DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice. Cell Res 18:134-147.
16. Shrivastav M, CA Miller, LP De Haro, et al. (2009). DNA-PKcs and ATM co-regulate DNA double-strand break re-pair. DNA Repair (AMST) 8:920-929.
17. Mao Z, M Bozzella, A Seluanov, et al. (2008). DNA repair by nonhomologous end joining and homologous recombi-nation during cell cycle in human cells. Cell Cycle 7:2902-2906.
18. CouedelC, KD Mills, M Barchi, et al. (2004). Collaboration of homologous recombination and nonhomologous end-join-ing factors for the survival and integrity of mice and cells. Genes Dev 18:1293-1304.
19. Allen C, A Kurimasa, MA Brenneman, et al. (2002). DNA-dependent protein kinase suppresses double-strand break-induced and spontaneous homologous recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:3758-3763.
20. Pierce AJ, P Hu, M Han, et al. (2001). Ku DNA end-binding protein modulates homologous repair of double-strand breaks in mammalian cells. Genes Dev 15:3237-3242.
21. Symington LS. (2002). Role of RAD52 epistasis group genes in homologous recombination and double-strand break re-pair. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 66:630-670, table.
22. West SC (2003). Molecular views of recombination proteins and their control. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 4:435-445.
23. Sung P. (1994). Catalysis of ATP-dependent homologous DNA pairing and strand exchange by yeast RAD51 protein. Science 265:1241-1243.
24. Bekker-Jensen S, C Lukas, R Kitagawa, et al. (2006). Spatial organization of the mammalian genome surveillance ma-chinery in response to DNA strand breaks. J Cell Biol 173:195-206.
25. Rogakou EP, DR Pilch, AH Orr, et al. (1998). DNA double-stranded breaks induce histone H2AX phosphorylation on serine 139. J Biol Chem 273:5858-5868.
26. Raderschall E, EI Golub and T Haaf. (1999). Nuclear foci of mammalian recombination proteins are located at single-stranded DNA regions formed after DNA damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:1921-1926.
27. Tarsounas M, D Davies and SC West. (2003). BRCA2-de-pendent and independent formation of RAD51 nuclear foci. Oncogene 22:1115-1123.
28. Mailand N, S Bekker-Jensen, H Faustrup, et al. (2007). RNF8 ubiquitylates histones at DNA double-strand breaks and promotes assembly of repair proteins. Cell 131:887-900.
29. Lisby M and R Rothstein. (2009). Choreography of recom-bination proteins during the DNA damage response. DNA Repair (AMST) 8:1068-1076.
30. Rothstein R, B Michel and S Gangloff. (2000). Replication fork pausing and recombination or "gimme a break." Genes Dev 14:1-10.
31. Lundin C, N Schultz, C Arnaudeau, et al. (2003). RAD51 is involved in repair of damage associated with DNA repli-cation in mammalian cells. J Mol Biol 328:521-535.
32. Liu Y, AZ Stasiak, JY Masson, et al. (2004). Conformational changes modulate the activity of human RAD51 protein. J Mol Biol 337:817-827.
33. Kim JS, TB Krasieva, H Kurumizaka, et al. (2005). In-dependent and sequential recruitment of NHEJ and HR factors to DNA damage sites in mammalian cells. J Cell Biol 170:341-347.
34. Frank-Vaillant M and S Marcand. (2002). Transient stability of DNA ends allows nonhomologous end joining to precede homologous recombination. Mol Cell 10:1189-1199.
35. Ying QL, J Nichols, I Chambers, et al. (2003). BMP induction of Id proteins suppresses differentiation and sustains em-bryonic stem cell self-renewal in collaboration with STAT3. Cell 115:281-292.
36. Chambers I and A Smith. (2004). Self-renewal of terato-carcinoma and embryonic stem cells. Oncogene 23:7150-7160.
37. Hong Y and PJ Stambrook. (2004). Restoration of an absent G1 arrest and protection from apoptosis in embryonic stem cells after ionizing radiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:14443-14448.
38. Liang L, MS Mendonca, L Deng, et al. (2007). Reduced ap-optosis and increased deletion mutations at Aprt locus in vivo in mice exposed to repeated ionizing radiation. Cancer Res 67:1910-1917.
39. Rauth S, KY Song, D Ayares, et al. (1986). Transfection and homologous recombination involving single-stranded DNA substrates in mammalian cells and nuclear extracts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:5587-5591.
40. Liang L, L Deng, Y Chen, et al. (2005). Modulation of DNA end joining by nuclear proteins. J Biol Chem 280:31442-31449.
41. Liang L, L Deng, SC Nguyen, et al. (2008). Human DNA ligases I and III, but not ligase IV, are required for micro-homology-mediated end joining of DNA double-strand breaks. Nucleic Acids Res 36:3297-3310.
42. Becker KA, PN Ghule, JA Therrien, et al. (2006). Self-renewal of human embryonic stem cells is supported by a shortened G1 cell cycle phase. J Cell Physiol 209:883-893.
43. Chuykin IA, MS Lianguzova, TV Pospelova, et al. (2008). Activation of DNA damage response signaling in mouse embryonic stem cells. Cell Cycle 7:2922-2928.
44. Malashicheva AB, TV Kislyakova, ND Aksenov, et al. (2000). F9 embryonal carcinoma cells fail to stop at G1/S boundary of the cell cycle after gamma-irradiation due to p21WAF1/CIP1 degradation. Oncogene 19:3858-3865.
45. Tashiro S, J Walter, A Shinohara, et al. (2000). Rad51 accu-mulation at sites of DNA damage and in postreplicative chromatin. J Cell Biol 150:283-291.
46. Gudmundsdottir K and A Ashworth. (2006). The roles of BRCA1 and BRCA2 and associated proteins in the mainte-nance of genomic stability. Oncogene 25:5864-5874.
47. Lieber MR, Y Ma, U Pannicke, et al. (2003). Mechanism and regulation of human non-homologous DNA end-joining. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 4:712-720.
48. Casper AM, P Nghiem, MF Arlt, et al. (2002). ATR regulates fragile site stability. Cell 111:779-789.
49. Jeggo PA and M Lobrich. (2006). Contribution of DNA re-pair and cell cycle checkpoint arrest to the maintenance of genomic stability. DNA Repair (AMST) 5:1192-1198.
50. Filion TM, M Qiao, PN Ghule, et al. (2009). Survival re-sponses of human embryonic stem cells to DNA damage. J Cell Physiol 220:586-592.
51. Friedberg EC and LB Meira. (2006). Database of mouse strains carrying targeted mutations in genes affecting bio-logical responses to DNA damage Version 7. DNA Repair (AMST) 5:189-209.
52. Raderschall E, EI Golub and T Haaf. (1999). Nuclear foci of mammalian recombination proteins are located at single-stranded DNA regions formed after DNA damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:1921-1926.
53. Saretzki G, T Walter, S Atkinson, et al. (2008). Down-regulation of multiple stress defense mechanisms during differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 26:455-464.
54. Saretzki G, L Armstrong, A Leake, et al. (2004). Stress de-fense in murine embryonic stem cells is superior to that of various differentiated murine cells. Stem Cells 22:962-971.
55. Takata M, MS Sasaki, E Sonoda, et al. (1998). Homologous recombination and non-homologous end-joining pathways of DNA double-strand break repair have overlapping roles in the maintenance of chromosomal integrity in vertebrate cells. EMBO J 17:5497-5508.
56. Johnson RD and M Jasin. (2000). Sister chromatid gene conversion is a prominent double-strand break repair path-way in mammalian cells. EMBO J 19:3398-3407.
57. Stern C. (1936). Somatic crossing over and segregation in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 21:625-730.
58. Beumer KJ, S Pimpinelli and KG Golic (1998). Induced chromosomal exchange directs the segregation of recombi-nant chromatids in mitosis of Drosophila. Genetics 150:173-188.
59. Armakolas A and AJ Klar. (2006). Cell type regulates selec-tive segregation of mouse chromosome 7 DNA strands in mitosis. Science 311:1146-1149.
60. Esposito MS. (1978). Evidence that spontaneous mitotic re-combination occurs at the two-strand stage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 75:4436-4440.
61. Fabre F. (1978). Induced intragenic recombination in yeast can occur during the G1 mitotic phase. Nature 272:795-798.