Synonymous but not the same: The causes and consequences of codon bias

Nature Reviews Genetics

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 32-42

  Plotkin, Joshua B ^a   Kudla, Grzegorz ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MESSENGER RNA;

BIOTECHNOLOGY; CODON BIAS; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE MUTATION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HETEROLOGOUS EXPRESSION; HUMAN; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS; REVIEW; RIBOSOME; RNA TRANSLATION; SAMPLING ERROR; SYNONYMOUS MUTATION; TRANSGENICS;

ANIMALS; CODON; DROSOPHILA PROTEINS; GENE EXPRESSION; GENOME; HUMANS; MICE; MUTATION; PROTEIN BIOSYNTHESIS;

EID: 78650304100     PISSN: 14710056     EISSN: 14710064     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nrg2899     Document Type: Review

References (144)

1. Zuckerkandl, E. & Pauling, L. Molecules as documents of evolutionary history. J. Theor. Biol. 8, 357-366 (1965).
2. Gustafsson, C., Govindarajan, S. & Minshull, J. Codon bias and heterologous protein expression. Trends Biotechnol. 22, 346-353 (2004).
3. Hershberg, R. & Petrov, D. A. Selection on codon bias. Annu. Rev. Genet. 42, 287-299 (2008).
4. Chamary, J. V., Parmley, J. L. & Hurst, L. D. Hearing silence: non-neutral evolution at synonymous sites in mammals. Nature Rev. Genet. 7, 98-108 (2006).
5. Duret, L. Evolution of synonymous codon usage in metazoans. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 12, 640-649 (2002).
6. Sharp, P. M., Averof, M., Lloyd, A. T., Matassi, G. & Peden, J. F. DNA sequence evolution: the sounds of silence. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 349, 241-247 (1995).
7. Andersson, S. G. & Kurland, C. G. Codon preferences in free-living microorganisms. Microbiol. Rev. 54, 198-210 (1990).
8. Kimura, M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 16, 111-120 (1980).
9. Bulmer, M. The selection-mutation-drift theory of synonymous codon usage. Genetics 129, 897-907 (1991).
10. Chen, S. L., Lee, W., Hottes, A. K., Shapiro, L. & McAdams, H. H. Codon usage between genomes is constrained by genome-wide mutational processes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 3480-3485 (2004).
11. Hurst, L. D. & Merchant, A. R. High guanine-cytosine content is not an adaptation to high temperature: a comparative analysis amongst prokaryotes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268, 493-497 (2001).
12. Fedorov, A., Saxonov, S. & Gilbert, W. Regularities of context-dependent codon bias in eukaryotic genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 1192-1197 (2002).
13. Hildebrand, F., Meyer, A. & Eyre-Walker, A. Evidence of selection upon genomic GC-content in bacteria. PLoS Genet. 6, e1001107 (2010).
14. Morton, B. R. Selection at the amino acid level can influence synonymous codon usage: implications for the study of codon adaptation in plastid genes. Genetics 159, 347-358 (2001).
15. Cambray, G. & Mazel, D. Synonymous genes explore different evolutionary landscapes. PLoS Genet. 4, e1000256 (2008).
16. Plotkin, J. B. & Dushoff, J. Codon bias and frequency-dependent selection on the hemagglutinin epitopes of influenza A virus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 7152-7157 (2003).
17. Sharp, P. M. & Li, W. H. The rate of synonymous substitution in enterobacterial genes is inversely related to codon usage bias. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4, 222-230 (1987).
18. Eyre-Walker, A. & Bulmer, M. Synonymous substitution rates in enterobacteria. Genetics 140, 1407-1412 (1995).
19. Francino, M. P. & Ochman, H. Deamination as the basis of strand-asymmetric evolution in transcribed Escherichia coli sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18, 1147-1150 (2001).
20. Majewski, J. Dependence of mutational asymmetry on gene-expression levels in the human genome. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 73, 688-692 (2003).
21. Duret, L. & Mouchiroud, D. Expression pattern and, surprisingly, gene length shape codon usage in Caenorhabditis, Drosophila, and Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 4482-4487 (1999).
22. Akashi, H. Synonymous codon usage in Drosophila melanogaster: natural selection and translational accuracy. Genetics 136, 927-935 (1994).
23. Akashi, H. & Schaeffer, S. W. Natural selection and the frequency distributions of "silent" DNA polymorphism in Drosophila. Genetics 146, 295-307 (1997).
24. Eyre-Walker, A. Synonymous codon bias is related to gene length in Escherichia coli: selection for translational accuracy? Mol. Biol. Evol. 13, 864-872 (1996).
25. Stoletzki, N. & Eyre-Walker, A. Synonymous codon usage in Escherichia coli: selection for translational accuracy. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24, 374-381 (2007).
26. Drummond, D. A. & Wilke, C. O. Mistranslation-induced protein misfolding as a dominant constraint on coding-sequence evolution. Cell 134, 341-352 (2008).
27. Zhou, T., Weems, M. & Wilke, C. O. Translationally optimal codons associate with structurally sensitive sites in proteins. Mol. Biol. Evol. 26, 1571-1580 (2009).
28. Ikemura, T. Correlation between the abundance of Escherichia coli transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in its protein genes: a proposal for a synonymous codon choice that is optimal for the E. coli translational system. J. Mol. Biol. 151, 389-409 (1981).
29. Ikemura, T. Correlation between the abundance of yeast transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in protein genes. Differences in synonymous codon choice patterns of yeast and Escherichia coli with reference to the abundance of isoaccepting transfer RNAs. J. Mol. Biol. 158, 573-597 (1982).
30. Post, L. E. & Nomura, M. Nucleotide sequence of the intercistronic region preceding the gene for RNA polymerase subunit α in Escherichia coli. J. Biol. Chem. 254, 10604-10606 (1979). (Pubitemid 10159357)
31. Moriyama, E. N. & Powell, J. R. Codon usage bias and tRNA abundance in Drosophila. J. Mol. Evol. 45, 514-523 (1997).
32. Duret, L. tRNA gene number and codon usage in the C. elegans genome are co-adapted for optimal translation of highly expressed genes. Trends Genet. 16, 287-289 (2000).
33. Kanaya, S., Yamada, Y., Kinouchi, M., Kudo, Y. & Ikemura, T. Codon usage and tRNA genes in eukaryotes: correlation of codon usage diversity with translation efficiency and with CG-dinucleotide usage as assessed by multivariate analysis. J. Mol. Evol. 53, 290-298 (2001).
34. Sharp, P. M., Bailes, E., Grocock, R. J., Peden, J. F. & Sockett, R. E. Variation in the strength of selected codon usage bias among bacteria. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, 1141-1153 (2005).
35. Sharp, P. M. & Li, W. H. The codon Adaptation Index - a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications. Nucleic Acids Res. 15, 1281-1295 (1987).
36. Lavner, Y. & Kotlar, D. Codon bias as a factor in regulating expression via translation rate in the human genome. Gene 345, 127-138 (2005).
37. Tuller, T., Waldman, Y. Y., Kupiec, M. & Ruppin, E. Translation efficiency is determined by both codon bias and folding energy. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 3645-3650 (2010).
38. Bergmann, J. E. & Lodish, H. F. A kinetic model of protein synthesis. Application to hemoglobin synthesis and translational control. J. Biol. Chem. 254, 11927-11937 (1979).
39. Mathews, M. B., Sonenberg, N. & Hershey, J. W. B. (eds) Translational Control in Biology and Medicine (CHSL Press, New York, 2007).
40. Ozbudak, E. M., Thattai, M., Kurtser, I., Grossman, A. D. & van Oudenaarden, A. Regulation of noise in the expression of a single gene. Nature Genet. 31, 69-73 (2002).
41. Fraser, H. B., Hirsh, A. E., Giaever, G., Kumm, J. & Eisen, M. B. Noise minimization in eukaryotic gene expression. PLoS Biol. 2, e137 (2004).
42. Lawrence, J. G. & Ochman, H. Molecular archaeology of the Escherichia coli genome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 9413-9417 (1998).
43. Karlin, S., Campbell, A. M. & Mrazek, J. Comparative DNA analysis across diverse genomes. Annu. Rev. Genet. 32, 185-225 (1998).
44. Zhang, F., Saha, S., Shabalina, S. A. & Kashina, A. Differential arginylation of actin isoforms is regulated by coding sequence-dependent degradation. Science 329, 1534-1537 (2010).
45. Thanaraj, T. A. & Argos, P. Ribosome-mediated translational pause and protein domain organization. Protein Sci. 5, 1594-1612 (1996).
46. Watts, J. M. et al. Architecture and secondary structure of an entire HIV-1 RNA genome. Nature 460, 711-716 (2009).
47. Warnecke, T., Batada, N. N. & Hurst, L. D. The impact of the nucleosome code on protein-coding sequence evolution in yeast. PLoS Genet. 4, e1000250 (2008).
48. Eskesen, S. T., Eskesen, F. N. & Ruvinsky, A. Natural selection affects frequencies of AG and GT dinucleotides at the 5′ and 3′ ends of exons. Genetics 167, 543-550 (2004).
49. Chamary, J. V. & Hurst, L. D. Biased codon usage near intron-exon junctions: selection on splicing enhancers, splice-site recognition or something else? Trends Genet. 21, 256-259 (2005).
50. Orban, T. I. & Olah, E. Purifying selection on silent sites - a constraint from splicing regulation? Trends Genet. 17, 252-253 (2001).
51. Warnecke, T. & Hurst, L. D. Evidence for a trade-off between translational efficiency and splicing regulation in determining synonymous codon usage in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24, 2755-2762 (2007).
52. Bettany, A. J. et al. 5′-secondary structure formation, in contrast to a short string of non-preferred codons, inhibits the translation of the pyruvate kinase mRNA in yeast. Yeast 5, 187-198 (1989).
53. De Smit, M. H. & van Duin, J. Secondary structure of the ribosome binding site determines translational efficiency: a quantitative analysis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 87, 7668-7672 (1990). (Pubitemid 20341778)
54. Eyre-Walker, A. & Bulmer, M. Reduced synonymous substitution rate at the start of enterobacterial genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 21, 4599-4603 (1993).
55. Kudla, G., Murray, A. W., Tollervey, D. & Plotkin, J. B. Coding-sequence determinants of gene expression in Escherichia coli. Science 324, 255-258 (2009).
56. Gu, W., Zhou, T. & Wilke, C. O. A universal trend of reduced mRNA stability near the translation-initiation site in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. PLoS Comput. Biol. 6, e1000664 (2010).
57. Tuller, T. et al. An evolutionarily conserved mechanism for controlling the efficiency of protein translation. Cell 141, 344-354 (2010).
58. Bulmer, M. Codon usage and intragenic position. J. Theor. Biol. 133, 67-71 (1988).
59. Qin, H., Wu, W. B., Comeron, J. M., Kreitman, M. & Li, W. H. Intragenic spatial patterns of codon usage bias in prokaryotic and eukaryotic genomes. Genetics 168, 2245-2260 (2004).
60. Zhang, S., Goldman, E. & Zubay, G. Clustering of low usage codons and ribosome movement. J. Theor. Biol. 170, 339-354 (1994).
61. Fredrick, K. & Ibba, M. How the sequence of a gene can tune its translation. Cell 141, 227-229 (2010).
62. Cannarozzi, G. et al. A role for codon order in translation dynamics. Cell 141, 355-367 (2010).
63. Zouridis, H. & Hatzimanikatis, V. Effects of codon distributions and tRNA competition on protein translation. Biophys. J. 95, 1018-1033 (2008).
64. Huh, W. K. et al. Global analysis of protein localization in budding yeast. Nature 425, 686-691 (2003).
65. Lu, P., Vogel, C., Wang, R., Yao, X. & Marcotte, E. M. Absolute protein expression profiling estimates the relative contributions of transcriptional and translational regulation. Nature Biotech. 25, 117-124 (2007).
66. Vogel, C. et al. Sequence signatures and mRNA concentration can explain two-thirds of protein abundance variation in a human cell line. Mol. Syst. Biol. 6, 400 (2010).
67. Ingolia, N. T., Ghaemmaghami, S., Newman, J. R. & Weissman, J. S. Genome-wide analysis in vivo of translation with nucleotide resolution using ribosome profiling. Science 324, 218-223 (2009).
68. Uemura, S. et al. Real-time tRNA transit on single translating ribosomes at codon resolution. Nature 464, 1012-1017 (2010).
69. Futcher, B., Latter, G. I., Monardo, P., McLaughlin, C. S. & Garrels, J. I. A sampling of the yeast proteome. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 7357-7368 (1999).
70. Schrimpf, S. P. et al. Comparative functional analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster proteomes. PLoS Biol. 7, e48 (2009).
71. Taniguchi, Y. et al. Quantifying E. coli proteome and transcriptome with single-molecule sensitivity in single cells. Science 329, 533-538.
72. Feng, L. & Niu, D. K. Relationship between mRNA stability and length: an old question with a new twist. Biochem. Genet. 45, 131-137 (2007).
73. Arava, Y., Boas, F. E., Brown, P. O. & Herschlag, D. Dissecting eukaryotic translation and its control by ribosome density mapping. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, 2421-2432 (2005).
74. Welch, M., Villalobos, A., Gustafsson, C. & Minshull, J. You're one in a googol: optimizing genes for protein expression. J. R. Soc. Interface 6 (Suppl. 4), S467-S476 (2009).
75. Gouy, M. & Gautier, C. Codon usage in bacteria: correlation with gene expressivity. Nucleic Acids Res. 10, 7055-7074 (1982).
76. Kertesz, M. et al. Genome-wide measurement of RNA secondary structure in yeast. Nature 467, 103-107 (2010).
77. Takyar, S., Hickerson, R. P. & Noller, H. F. mRNA helicase activity of the ribosome. Cell 120, 49-58 (2005).
78. Dittmar, K. A., Sorensen, M. A., Elf, J., Ehrenberg, M. & Pan, T. Selective charging of tRNA isoacceptors induced by amino-acid starvation. EMBO Rep. 6, 151-157 (2005).
79. Elf, J., Nilsson, D., Tenson, T. & Ehrenberg, M. Selective charging of tRNA isoacceptors explains patterns of codon usage. Science 300, 1718-1722 (2003).
80. Ghaemmaghami, S. et al. Global analysis of protein expression in yeast. Nature 425, 737-741 (2003).
81. Welch, M. et al. Design parameters to control synthetic gene expression in Escherichia coli. PLoS ONE 4, e7002 (2009).
82. Kudla, G., Lipinski, L., Caffin, F., Helwak, A. & Zylicz, M. High guanine and cytosine content increases mRNA levels in mammalian cells. PLoS Biol. 4, e180 (2006).
83. Han, J. S., Szak, S. T. & Boeke, J. D. Transcriptional disruption by the L1 retrotransposon and implications for mammalian transcriptomes. Nature 429, 268-274 (2004).
84. Nackley, A. G. et al. Human catechol-O-methyltransferase haplotypes modulate protein expression by altering mRNA secondary structure. Science 314, 1930-1933 (2006).
85. Coleman, J. R. et al. Virus attenuation by genome-scale changes in codon pair bias. Science 320, 1784-1787 (2008).
86. Hayes, C. S., Bose, B. & Sauer, R. T. Stop codons preceded by rare arginine codons are efficient determinants of SsrA tagging in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 3440-3445 (2002).
87. Spanjaard, R. A. & van Duin, J. Translation of the sequence AGG-AGG yields 50% ribosomal frameshift. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 85, 7967-7971 (1988).
88. Kramer, E. B. & Farabaugh, P. J. The frequency of translational misreading errors in E. coli is largely determined by tRNA competition. RNA 13, 87-96 (2007).
89. Sorensen, M. A., Kurland, C. G. & Pedersen, S. Codon usage determines translation rate in Escherichia coli. J. Mol. Biol. 207, 365-377 (1989).
90. Chen, G. F. & Inouye, M. Suppression of the negative effect of minor arginine codons on gene expression; preferential usage of minor codons within the first 25 codons of the Escherichia coli genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 18, 1465-1473 (1990).
91. Angov, E., Hillier, C. J., Kincaid, R. L. & Lyon, J. A. Heterologous protein expression is enhanced by harmonizing the codon usage frequencies of the target gene with those of the expression host. PLoS ONE 3, e2189 (2008).
92. Rosenberg, A. H., Goldman, E., Dunn, J. J., Studier, F. W. & Zubay, G. Effects of consecutive AGG codons on translation in Escherichia coli, demonstrated with a versatile codon test system. J. Bacteriol. 175, 716-722 (1993).
93. Gursky, Y. G. & Beabealashvilli, R. The increase in gene expression induced by introduction of rare codons into the C terminus of the template. Gene 148, 15-21 (1994).
94. Burgess-Brown, N. A. et al. Codon optimization can improve expression of human genes in Escherichia coli: a multi-gene study. Protein Expr. Purif. 59, 94-102 (2008).
95. Maertens, B. et al. Gene optimization mechanisms: a multi-gene study reveals a high success rate of full-length human proteins expressed in Escherichia coli. Protein Sci. 19, 1312-1326 (2010).
96. Supek, F. & Smuc, T. On relevance of codon usage to expression of synthetic and natural genes in Escherichia coli. Genetics 185, 1129-1134 (2010).
97. Voges, D., Watzele, M., Nemetz, C., Wizemann, S. & Buchberger, B. Analyzing and enhancing mRNA translational efficiency in an Escherichia coli in vitro expression system. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 318, 601-614 (2004).
98. El Hage, A., French, S. L., Beyer, A. L. & Tollervey, D. Loss of topoisomerase I leads to R-loop-mediated transcriptional blocks during ribosomal RNA synthesis. Genes Dev. 24, 1546-1558 (2010).
99. McDowall, K. J., Lin-Chao, S. & Cohen, S. N. A+U content rather than a particular nucleotide order determines the specificity of RNase E cleavage. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 10790-10796 (1994).
100. Nguyen, K. L. et al. Codon optimization of the HIV-1 vpu and vif genes stabilizes their mRNA and allows for highly efficient Rev-independent expression. Virology 319, 163-175 (2004).
101. Sokolowski, M., Tan, W., Jellne, M. & Schwartz, S. mRNA instability elements in the human papillomavirus type 16 L2 coding region. J. Virol. 72, 1504-1515 (1998).
102. Bauer, A. P. et al. The impact of intragenic CpG content on gene expression. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 3891-3908 (2010).
103. Gutman, G. A. & Hatfield, G. W. Nonrandom utilization of codon pairs in Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 86, 3699-3703 (1989).
104. Irwin, B., Heck, J. D. & Hatfield, G. W. Codon pair utilization biases influence translational elongation step times. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 22801-22806 (1995).
105. Cheng, L. & Goldman, E. Absence of effect of varying Thr-Leu codon pairs on protein synthesis in a T7 system. Biochemistry 40, 6102-6106 (2001).
106. Wang, D., Johnson, A. D., Papp, A. C., Kroetz, D. L. & Sadee, W. Multidrug resistance polypeptide 1 (MDR1, ABCB1) variant 3435C>T affects mRNA stability. Pharmacogenet. Genomics 15, 3693-3704 (2005).
107. Kimchi-Sarfaty, C. et al. A "silent" polymorphism in the MDR1 gene changes substrate specificity. Science 315, 525-528 (2007). (Pubitemid 46175758)
108. Foster, H. et al. Codon and mRNA sequence optimization of microdystrophin transgenes improves expression and physiological outcome in dystrophic mdx mice following AAV2/8 gene transfer. Mol. Ther. 16, 1825-1832 (2008).
109. Arruda, V. R. et al. Peripheral transvenular delivery of adeno-associated viral vectors to skeletal muscle as a novel therapy for hemophilia B. Blood 115, 4678-4688.
110. Fuglsang, A. The relationship between palindrome avoidance and intragenic codon usage variations: a Monte Carlo study. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 316, 755-762 (2004).
111. Drummond, D. A. & Wilke, C. O. The evolutionary consequences of erroneous protein synthesis. Nature Rev. Genet. 10, 715-724 (2009).
112. Akashi, H., Kliman, R. M. & Eyre-Walker, A. Mutation pressure, natural selection, and the evolution of base composition in Drosophila. Genetica 102-103, 49-60 (1998).
113. Marais, G. & Duret, L. Synonymous codon usage, accuracy of translation, and gene length in Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Mol. Evol. 52, 275-280 (2001).
114. Higgs, P. G. & Ran, W. Coevolution of codon usage and tRNA genes leads to alternative stable states of biased codon usage. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25, 2279-2291 (2008).
115. Shah, P. & Gilchrist, M. Effect of correlated tRNA abundances on translation errors and evolution of codon usage bias. PLoS Genet. 6, e1001128 (2010).
116. Bernardi, G. et al. The mosaic genome of warm-blooded vertebrates. Science 228, 953-958 (1985).
117. Galtier, N., Piganeau, G., Mouchiroud, D. & Duret, L. GC-content evolution in mammalian genomes: the biased gene conversion hypothesis. Genetics 159, 907-911 (2001).
118. Urrutia, A. O. & Hurst, L. D. The signature of selection mediated by expression on human genes. Genome Res. 13, 2260-2264 (2003).
119. Comeron, J. M. Selective and mutational patterns associated with gene expression in humans: influences on synonymous composition and intron presence. Genetics 167, 1293-1304 (2004).
120. Karlin, S. & Mrazek, J. What drives codon choices in human genes? J. Mol. Biol. 262, 459-472 (1996).
121. Plotkin, J. B., Robins, H. & Levine, A. J. Tissue-specific codon usage and the expression of human genes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 12588-12591 (2004).
122. Dittmar, K. A., Goodenbour, J. M. & Pan, T. Tissue-specific differences in human transfer RNA expression. PLoS Genet. 2, e221 (2006).
123. Semon, M., Lobry, J. R. & Duret, L. No evidence for tissue-specific adaptation of synonymous codon usage in human. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23, 523-529 (2005).
124. Chamary, J. V. & Hurst, L. D. Evidence for selection on synonymous mutations affecting stability of mRNA secondary structure in mammals. Genome Biol. 6, R75 (2005).
125. Seffens, W. & Digby, D. mRNAs have greater negative folding free energies than shuffled or codon choice randomized sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 27, 1578-1584 (1999).
126. Duan, J. et al. Synonymous mutations in the human dopamine receptor D2 (DRD2) affect mRNA stability and synthesis of the receptor. Hum. Mol. Genet. 12, 205-216 (2003).
127. Sharp, P. M., Tuohy, T. M. & Mosurski, K. R. Codon usage in yeast: cluster analysis clearly differentiates highly and lowly expressed genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 14, 5125-5143 (1986).
128. Dos Reis, M., Savva, R. & Wernisch, L. Solving the riddle of codon usage preferences: a test for translational selection. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 5036-5044 (2004).
129. Nivinskas, R., Malys, N., Klausa, V., Vaiskunaite, R. & Gineikiene, E. Post-transcriptional control of bacteriophage T4 gene 25 expression: mRNA secondary structure that enhances translational initiation. J. Mol. Biol. 288, 291-304 (1999).
130. Kozak, M. Downstream secondary structure facilitates recognition of initiator codons by eukaryotic ribosomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 87, 8301-8305 (1990).
131. Paulus, M., Haslbeck, M. & Watzele, M. RNA stem-loop enhanced expression of previously non-expressible genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, e78 (2004).
132. Zhang, G., Hubalewska, M. & Ignatova, Z. Transient ribosomal attenuation coordinates protein synthesis and co-translational folding. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 274-280 (2009).
133. Nakamura, Y., Gojobori, T. & Ikemura, T. Codon usage tabulated from international DNA sequence databases: status for the year 2000. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 292 (2000).
134. Zolotukhin, S., Potter, M., Hauswirth, W. W., Guy, J. & Muzyczka, N. A "humanized" green fluorescent protein cDNA adapted for high-level expression in mammalian cells. J. Virol. 70, 4646-4654 (1996).
135. Markham, N. R. & Zuker, M. DINAMelt web server for nucleic acid melting prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 33, W577-W581 (2005).
136. Lesnik, E. A. et al. Prediction of rho-independent transcriptional terminators in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, 3583-3594 (2001).
137. Bernstein, J. A., Khodursky, A. B., Lin, P. H., Lin-Chao, S. & Cohen, S. N. Global analysis of mRNA decay and abundance in Escherichia coli at single-gene resolution using two-color fluorescent DNA microarrays. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 9697-9702 (2002).
138. Lewis, B. P., Shih, I. H., Jones-Rhoades, M. W., Bartel, D. P. & Burge, C. B. Prediction of mammalian microRNA targets. Cell 11 5, 787-798 (2003).
139. Jacobs, G. H. et al. Transterm: a database to aid the analysis of regulatory sequences in mRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, D72-D76 (2009).
140. Peden, J. F. Analysis of Codon Usage. Thesis, Dept of Genetics, Univ. Nottingham (1999).
141. Supek, F. & Vlahovicek, K. INCA: synonymous codon usage analysis and clustering by means of self-organizing map. Bioinformatics 20, 2329-2330 (2004).
142. Pagani, F., Raponi, M. & Baralle, F. E. Synonymous mutations in CFTR exon 12 affect splicing and are not neutral in evolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 6368-6372 (2005).
143. Burge, C., Campbell, A. M. & Karlin, S. Over- and under-representation of short oligonucleotides in DNA sequences. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89, 1358-1362 (1992).
144. Villalobos, A., Ness, J. E., Gustafsson, C., Minshull, J. & Govindarajan, S. Gene Designer: a synthetic biology tool for constructing artificial DNA segments. BMC Bioinformatics 7, 285 (2006).