Aberrant double-strand break repair resulting in half crossovers in mutants defective for Rad51 or the DNA polymerase δ complex

Molecular and Cellular Biology

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 1432-1441

  Smith, Catherine E ^a,c   Lam, Alicia F ^a   Symington, Lorraine S ^a,b  

^a New York Presbyterian Columbia University Medical Center   (United States)

^b Department of Medicine   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE DELTA; RAD51 PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME 3; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA REPAIR; DNA SYNTHESIS; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; GENE CONVERSION; HETEROZYGOSITY LOSS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

CHROMOSOME BREAKAGE; CHROMOSOMES, FUNGAL; DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; DNA POLYMERASE III; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; MUTATION; RAD51 RECOMBINASE; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 62849117547     PISSN: 02707306     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.01469-08     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Andersen, M. P., Z. W. Nelson, E. D. Hetrick, and D. E. Gottschling. 2008. A genetic screen for increased loss of heterozygosity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 179:1179-1195.
2. Aylon, Y., B. Liefshitz, and M. Kupiec. 2004. The CDK regulates repair of double-strand breaks by homologous recombination during the cell cycle. EMBO J. 23:4868-4875.
3. Barbera, M. A., and T. D. Petes. 2006. Selection and analysis of spontaneous reciprocal mitotic cross-overs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103:12819-12824.
4. Bartsch, S., L. E. Kang, and L. S. Symington. 2000. RAD51 is required for the repair of plasmid double-stranded DNA gaps from either plasmid or chromosomal templates. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:1194-1205.
5. Bosco, G., and J. E. Haber. 1998. Chromosome break-induced DNA replication leads to nonreciprocal translocations and telomere capture. Genetics 150:1037-1047.
6. Brown, M. A. 1997. Tumor suppressor genes and human cancer. Adv. Genet. 36:45-135.
7. Coic, E., T. Feldman, A. S. Landman, and J. E. Haber. 2008. Mechanisms of Rad52-independent spontaneous and UV-induced mitotic recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 179:199-211.
8. Daigaku, Y., K. Endo, E. Watanabe, T. Ono, and K. Yamamoto. 2004. Loss of heterozygosity and DNA damage repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutat. Res. 556:183-191.
9. Daley, J. M., P. L. Palmbos, D. Wu, and T. E. Wilson. 2005. Nonhomologous end joining in yeast. Annu. Rev. Genet. 39:431-451.
10. Davis, A. P., and L. S. Symington. 2004. RAD51-dependent break-induced replication in yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:2344-2351.
11. Deem, A., K. Barker, K. Vanhulle, B. Downing, A. Vayl, and A. Malkova. 2008. Defective break-induced replication leads to half-crossovers in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 179:1845-1860.
12. Ferguson, D. O., and W. K. Holloman. 1996. Recombinational repair of gaps in DNA is asymmetric in Ustilago maydis and can be explained by a migrating D-loop model. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:5419-5424.
13. Garg, P., and P. M. Burgers. 2005. DNA polymerases that propagate the eukaryotic DNA replication fork. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 40:115-128.
14. Gerik, K. J., X. Li, A. Pautz, and P. M. Burgers. 1998. Characterization of the two small subunits of Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA polymerase delta. J. Biol. Chem. 273:19747-19755.
15. Giot, L., R. Chanet, M. Simon, C. Facca, and G. Faye. 1997. Involvement of the yeast DNA polymerase delta in DNA repair in vivo. Genetics 146:1239-1251.
16. Holbeck, S. L., and J. N. Strathern. 1997. A role for REV3 in mutagenesis during double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 147:1017-1024.
17. Huxley, C., E. D. Green, and I. Dunham. 1990. Rapid assessment of S. cerevisiae mating type by PCR. Trends Genet. 6:236.
18. Ip, S. C., U. Rass, M. G. Blanco, H. R. Flynn, J. M. Skehel, and S. C. West. 2008. Identification of Holliday junction resolvases from humans and yeast. Nature 456:357-361.
19. Ira, G., A. Pellicioli, A. Balijja, X. Wang, S. Fiorani, W. Carotenuto, G. Liberi, D. Bressan, L. Wan, N. M. Hollingsworth, J. E. Haber, and M. Foiani. 2004. DNA end resection, homologous recombination and DNA damage checkpoint activation require CDK1. Nature 431:1011-1017.
20. Ito, H., Y. Fukuda, K. Murata, and A. Kimura. 1983. Transformation of intact yeast cells treated with alkali cations. J. Bacteriol. 153:163-168.
21. Jinks-Robertson, S., and T. D. Petes. 1986. Chromosomal translocations generated by high-frequency meiotic recombination between repeated yeast genes. Genetics 114:731-752.
22. Kadyk, L. C., and L. H. Hartwell. 1992. Sister chromatids are preferred over homologs as substrates for recombinational repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 132:387-402.
23. Kawamoto, T., K. Araki, E. Sonoda, Y. M. Yamashita, K. Harada, K. Kikuchi, C. Masutani, F. Hanaoka, K. Nozaki, N. Hashimoto, and S. Takeda. 2005. Dual roles for DNA polymerase eta in homologous DNA recombination and translesion DNA synthesis. Mol. Cell 20:793-799.
24. Kesti, T., K. Flick, S. Keranen, J. E. Syvaoja, and C. Wittenberg. 1999. DNA polymerase epsilon catalytic domains are dispensable for DNA replication, DNA repair, and cell viability. Mol. Cell 3:679-685.
25. Krogh, B. O., and L. S. Symington. 2004. Recombination proteins in yeast. Annu. Rev. Genet. 38:233-271.
26. Langston, L. D., and L. S. Symington. 2004. Gene targeting in yeast is initiated by two independent strand invasions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:15392-15397.
27. Langston, L. D., and L. S. Symington. 2005. Opposing roles for DNA structure-specific proteins Rad1, Msh2, Msh3, and Sgs1 in yeast gene targeting. EMBO J. 24:2214-2223.
28. Lemoine, F. J., N. P. Degtyareva, K. Lobachev, and T. D. Petes. 2005. Chromosomal translocations in yeast induced by low levels of DNA polymerase a model for chromosome fragile sites. Cell 120:587-598.
29. Lundblad, V., and E. H. Blackburn. 1993. An alternative pathway for yeast telomere maintenance rescues est1 - senescence. Cell 73:347-360.
30. Lydeard, J. R., S. Jain, M. Yamaguchi, and J. E. Haber. 2007. Break-induced replication and telomerase-independent telomere maintenance require Pol32. Nature 448:820-823.
31. Malkova, A., M. L. Naylor, M. Yamaguchi, G. Ira, and J. E. Haber. 2005. RAD51-dependent break-induced replication differs in kinetics and checkpoint responses from RAD51-mediated gene conversion. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25:933-944.
32. Maloisel, L., J. Bhargava, and G. S. Roeder. 2004. A role for DNA polymerase delta in gene conversion and crossing over during meiosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 167:1133-1142.
33. Maloisel, L., F. Fabre, and S. Gangloff. 2008. DNA polymerase delta is preferentially recruited during homologous recombination to promote heteroduplex DNA extension. Mol. Cell. Biol. 28:1373-1382.
34. McDonald, J. P., A. S. Levine, and R. Woodgate. 1997. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD30 gene, a homologue of Escherichia coli dinB and umuC, is DNA damage inducible and functions in a novel error-free postreplication repair mechanism. Genetics 147:1557-1568.
35. McEachern, M. J., and J. E. Haber. 2006. Break-induced replication and recombinational telomere elongation in yeast. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 75:111-135.
36. McIlwraith, M. J., A. Vaisman, Y. Liu, E. Fanning, R. Woodgate, and S. C. West. 2005. Human DNA polymerase eta promotes DNA synthesis from strand invasion intermediates of homologous recombination. Mol. Cell 20:783-792.
37. McMurray, M. A., and D. E. Gottschling. 2003. An age-induced switch to a hyper-recombinational state. Science 301:1908-1911.
38. Merker, J. D., M. Dominska, and T. D. Petes. 2003. Patterns of heteroduplex formation associated with the initiation of meiotic recombination in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 165:47-63.
39. Mimitou, E. P., and L. S. Symington. 2008. Sae2, Exo1 and Sgs1 collaborate in DNA double-strand break processing. Nature 455:770-774.
40. Morrison, A., R. B. Christensen, J. Alley, A. K. Beck, E. G. Bernstine, J. F. Lemontt, and C. W. Lawrence. 1989. REV3, a Saccharomyces cerevisiae gene whose function is required for induced mutagenesis, is predicted to encode a nonessential DNA polymerase. J. Bacteriol. 171:5659-5667.
41. Morrow, D. M., C. Connelly, and P. Hieter. 1997. "Break copy" duplication: a model for chromosome fragment formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 147:371-382.
42. Nassif, N., J. Penney, S. Pal, W. R. Engels, and G. B. Gloor. 1994. Efficient copying of nonhomologous sequences from ectopic sites via P-element-induced gap repair. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:1613-1625.
43. Nelson, J. R., C. W. Lawrence, and D. C. Hinkle. 1996. Thymine-thymine dimer bypass by yeast DNA polymerase zeta. Science 272:1646-1649.
44. Nick McElhinny, S. A., D. A. Gordenin, C. M. Stith, P. M. Burgers, and T. A. Kunkel. 2008. Division of labor at the eukaryotic replication fork. Mol. Cell 30:137-144.
45. Osman, F., and M. C. Whitby. 2007. Exploring the roles of Mus81-Eme1/Mms4 at perturbed replication forks. DNA Repair (Amsterdam) 6:1004-1017.
46. Paques, F., and J. E. Haber. 1999. Multiple pathways of recombination induced by double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 63:349-404.
47. Pursell, Z. F., I. Isoz, E. B. Lundstrom, E. Johansson, and T. A. Kunkel. 2007. Yeast DNA polymerase epsilon participates in leading-strand DNA replication. Science 317:127-130.
48. Roseaulin, L., Y. Yamada, Y. Tsutsui, P. Russell, H. Iwasaki, and B. Arcangioli. 2008. Mus81 is essential for sister chromatid recombination at broken replication forks. EMBO J. 27:1378-1387.
49. Sanchez Garcia, J., L. F. Ciufo, X. Yang, S. E. Kearsey, and S. A. MacNeill. 2004. The C-terminal zinc finger of the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase delta is responsible for direct interaction with the B-subunit. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:3005-3016.
50. Schmidt, K. H., J. Wu, and R. D. Kolodner. 2006. Control of translocations between highly diverged genes by Sgs1, the Saccharomyces cerevisiae homolog of the Bloom's syndrome protein. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26:5406-5420.
51. Sherman, F., G. Fink, and J. Hicks. 1986. Methods in yeast genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.
52. Smith, C. E., B. Llorente, and L. S. Symington. 2007. Template switching during break-induced replication. Nature 447:102-105.
53. Stark, J. M., and M. Jasin. 2003. Extensive loss of heterozygosity is suppressed during homologous repair of chromosomal breaks. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23:733-743.
54. Symington, L. S. 2002. Role of RAD52 epistasis group genes in homologous recombination and double-strand break repair. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 66:630-670.
55. VanHulle, K., F. J. Lemoine, V. Narayanan, B. Downing, K. Hull, C. McCullough, M. Bellinger, K. Lobachev, T. D. Petes, and A. Malkova. 2007. Inverted DNA repeats channel repair of distant double-strand breaks into chromatid fusions and chromosomal rearrangements. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27:2601-2614.
56. Wang, X., G. Ira, J. A. Tercero, A. M. Holmes, J. F. Diffley, and J. E. Haber. 2004. Role of DNA replication proteins in double-strand break-induced recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:6891-6899.
57. Weinstock, D. M., C. A. Richardson, B. Elliott, and M. Jasin. 2006. Modeling oncogenic translocations: distinct roles for double-strand break repair pathways in translocation formation in mammalian cells. DNA Repair (Amsterdam) 5:1065-1074.
58. White, M. A., and T. D. Petes. 1994. Analysis of meiotic recombination events near a recombination hotspot in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr. Genet. 26:21-30.
59. Zhu, Z., W. H. Chung, E. Y. Shim, S. E. Lee, and G. Ira. 2008. Sgs1 helicase and two nucleases Dna2 and Exo1 resect DNA double-strand break ends. Cell 134:981-994.