Different phylogenomic approaches to resolve the evolutionary relationships among model fish species

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 27, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 2757-2774

  Negrisolo, Enrico ^a   Kuhl, Heiner ^b   Forcato, Claudio ^a   Vitulo, Nicola ^a   Reinhardt, Richard ^b   Patarnello, Tomaso ^a   Bargelloni, Luca ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR MOLECULAR GENETICS   (Germany)

Author keywords

electronic chromosome painting; model fish species; phylogenomics; teleosts

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ARTICLE; BASE PAIRING; BAYES THEOREM; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FISH; GENE SEQUENCE; GENOME; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; ORYZIAS; PHYLOGENETIC TREE; PHYLOGENY; PROMOTER REGION; PUFFER FISH; TAXON; TELEOST; TETRAODONTIFORMES; ZEBRA FISH;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; CHROMOSOME PAINTING; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENOMICS; MUTATION; ORYZIAS; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; TAKIFUGU; ZEBRAFISH;

ACANTHOMORPHA; ATHERINOMORPHA; BELONIFORMES; DANIO RERIO; DICENTRARCHUS LABRAX; GASTEROSTEIDAE; GASTEROSTEUS ACULEATUS; MORONIDAE; ORYZIAS LATIPES; PISCES; TAKIFUGU RUBRIPES; TELEOSTEI; TETRAODON NIGROVIRIDIS; TETRAODONTIFORMES; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 78649341954     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: 15371719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msq165     Document Type: Article

References (102)

1. Abascal F, Zardoya R, Posada D. 2005. ProtTest: selection of best-fitmodels of protein evolution. Bioinformatics 21:2104-2105.
2. Allen JE, Salzberg SL. 2005. JIGSAW: integration of multiple sourcesof evidence for gene prediction. Bioinformatics 21:3596-3603.
3. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basiclocal alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 215:403-410.
4. Azuma Y, Kumazawa Y, Miya M, Mabuchi K, Nishida M. 2008.Mitogenomic evaluation of the historical biogeography ofcichlids toward reliable dating of teleostean divergences. BMCEvol Biol. 8:215.
5. Baldauf SL, Roger AJ, Wenk-Siefert I, Doolittle WF. 2000. A kingdom-level phylogeny of Eukaryotes based on combined protein data.Science 290:972-977.
6. Birney E, Clamp M, Durbin R. 2004. GeneWise and Genomewise.Genome Res. 14:988-995.
7. Blair JE, Hedges SB. 2005. Molecular phylogeny and divergence timesof deuterostome animals. Mol Biol Evol. 22:2275-2284.
8. Bourlat SJ, Juliusdottir T, Lowe CJ, et al. (14 co-authors). 2006.Deuterostome phylogeny reveals monophyletic chordates andthe new phylum Xenoturbellida. Nature 444:85-88.
9. Bradley RK, Roberts A, Smoot M, Juvekar S, Do J, Dewey C, Holmes I,Pachter L. 2009. Fast statistical alignment. PLoS Comput Biol.5:e1000392.
10. Brudno M, Do CB, Cooper GM, Kim MF, Davydov E, Green ED,Sidow A, Batzoglou S. 2003. LAGAN and Multi-LAGAN: efficienttools for large-scale multiple alignment of genomic DNA.Genome Res. 13:721-731.
11. Burge C, Karlin S. 1997. Prediction of complete gene structures inhuman genomic DNA. J Mol Biol. 268:78-94.
12. Carroll H, Beckstead W, O'Connor T, Ebbert M, Clement M, Snell Q,McClellan D. 2007. DNA reference alignment benchmarks basedon tertiary structure of encoded proteins. Bioinformatics 23:2648-2649.
13. Castresana J. 2000. Selection of conserved blocks from multiplealignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol.17:540-552.
14. Chen WJ, Bonillo C, Lecointre G. 2003. Repeatability of clades asa criterion of reliability: a case study for molecular phylogeny ofAcanthomorpha (Teleostei) with larger number of taxa. MolPhylogenet Evol. 26:262-288.
15. Chen WJ, Ort́ G, Meyer A. 2004. Novel evolutionary relationshipamong four fish model systems. Trends Genet. 20:424-431.
16. Clark MS, Edwards YJ, Peterson D, et al. (13 co-authors). 2003. FuguESTs: new resources for transcription analysis and genomeannotation. Genome Res. 13:2747-2753.
17. Darling ACE, Mau B, Blatter FR, Perna NT. 2004. Mauve: multiplealignment of conserved genomic sequence with rearrangements.Genome Res. 14:1394-1403.
18. Delsuc F, Brinkmann H, Chourrout D, Philippe H. 2006. Tunicatesand not cephalochordates are the closest living relatives ofvertebrates. Nature 439:965-968.
19. Dettai A, Lecointre G. 2005. Further support for the clades obtainedby multiple molecular phylogenies in the acanthomorph bush. CR Biologies. 328:674-689.
20. Dunn CW, Hejnol A, Matus DQ, et al. (18 co-authors). 2008. Broadphylogenomic sampling improves resolution of the animal treeof life. Nature 452:745-749.
21. Felsenstein J. 1978. Cases in which parsimony or compatibilitymethods will be positively misleading. Syst Zool. 27:401-410.
22. Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approachusing bootstrap. Evolution 39:783-791.
23. Felsenstein J. 2004. Inferring phylogenies. Sunderland (MA): SinauerAssociates.
24. Field KG, Olsen GJ, Lane DJ, Giovannoni SJ, Ghiselin MT, Raff EC,Pace NR, Raff RA. 1988. Molecular phylogeny of the animalkingdom. Science 239:748-753.
25. Frazer KA, Pachter L, Poliakov A, Rubin EM, Dubchak I. 2004. VISTA:computational tools for comparative genomics. Nucleic AcidsRes. 32:W273-W279.
26. Gribaldo S, Cammarano P. 1998. The root of the universal tree of lifeinferred from anciently duplicated genes encoding componentsof the protein-targeting machinery. J Mol Evol. 47:508-516.
27. Guindon S, Delsuc F, Dufayard JF, Gascuel O. 2009. Estimatingmaximum likelihood phylogenies with PhyML. Methods Mol Biol.537:113-137.
28. Guindon S, Gascuel O. 2003. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithmto estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol.52:696-704.
29. Heat TC, Zwickl DJ, Kim J, Hillis DM. 2008. Taxon sampling affectsinferences of macroevolutionary processes from phylogenetictrees. Syst Biol. 57:160-166.
30. Hillis DM. 1998. Taxonomic sampling, phylogenetic accuracy, andinvestigator bias. Syst Biol. 47:3-8.
31. Hulsen T, Huynen MA, De Vlieg J, Groenen PMA. 2006. Benchmarking ortholog identification methods using functionalgenomics data. Genome Biol. 7:R31.
32. Iwabe N, Kuma K, Hasegawa M, Osawa S, Miyata T. 1989. Evolutionary relationship of archaebacteria, eubacteria, andeukaryotes inferred from phylogenetic trees of duplicated genes.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 86:9355-9359.
33. Jaillon O, Aury JM, Brunet F, et al. (61 co-authors). 2004. Genomeduplication in the teleost fish Tetraodon nigroviridis reveals theearly vertebrate proto-karyotype. Nature 431:946-957.
34. Jeffroy O, Brinkmann H, Delsuc F, Philippe H. 2006. Phylogenomics:the beginning of incongruence? Trends Genet. 22:225-231.
35. Jobb G, von Haeseler A, Strimmer K. 2004. TREEFINDER: a powerfulgraphical analysis environment for molecular phylogenetics.BMC Evol Biol. 4:18.
36. Johnson GD, Patterson C. 1993. Percomorph phylogeny: a survey ofacanthomorphs and a new proposal. Bull Mar Sci. 52:554-626.
37. Kasahara M, Naruse K, Sasaki S, et al. (38 co-authors). 2007. Themedaka draft genome and insights into vertebrate genomeevolution. Nature 447:714-719.
38. Kassahn KS, Dang VT, Wilkins SJ, Perkins AC, Ragan MA. 2009.Evolution of gene function and regulatory control after whole-genome duplication: comparative analyses in vertebrates.Genome Res. 19:1404-1418.
39. Katoh K, Kuma K, Toh H, Miyata T. 2005. MAFFT version 5:improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment.Nucleic Acids Res. 33:511-518.
40. Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K, Miyata T. 2002. MAFFT: a novelmethod for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fastFourier transformation. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:3059-3066.
41. Kawahara R, Miya M, Mabuchi K, Lavoué S, Inoue JG, Satoh TP,Kawaguchi A, Nishida M. 2008. Interrelationships of the 11gasterosteiform families (sticklebacks, pipefishes, and their relatives): a new perspective based on whole mitogenome sequencesfrom 75 higher teleosts. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 46:224-236.
42. Kent WJ. 2002. BLAT-the BLAST-like alignment tool. Genome Res.12:656-664.
43. Kollman JM, Doolittle RF. 2000. Determining the relative rates ofchange for prokaryotic and eukaryotic proteins with ancientlyduplicated paralogs. J Mol Evol. 51:173-181.
44. Koski LB, Golding GB. 2001. The closest BLAST hit is often not the nearest neighbor. J Mol Evol. 52:540-542.
45. Kuhl H, Beck A, Wozniak G, Canario AV, Volckaert FA, Reinhardt R. 2010. The European sea bass Dicentrarchus labrax genome puzzle: comparative BAC-mapping and low coverage shotgun sequencing. BMC Genomics. 11:68.
46. Kumar S, Filipski A. 2007. Multiple sequence alignment: in pursuit of homologous DNA positions. Genome Res. 17:127-135.
47. Kurtz S, Phillippy A, Delcher AL, Smoot M, Shumway M, Antonescu C, Salzberg SL. 2004. Versatile and open software for comparing large genomes. Genome Biol. 5:R12.
48. Kuzniar A, van Ham RCHJ, Pongor S, Leunissen JAM. 2008. The quest for orthologs: finding the corresponding gene across genomes. Trends Genet. 24:539-551.
49. Lartillot N, Lepage T, Blanquart S. 2009. PhyloBayes 3: a Bayesian software package for phylogenetic reconstruction and molecular dating. Bioinformatics 25:2286-2288.
50. Lartillot N, Philippe H. 2004. A Bayesian mixture model for across-site heterogeneities in the amino-acid replacement process. Mol Biol Evol. 21:1095-1109.
51. Li B, Dettai A, Cruaud C, Couloux A, Desoutter-Meniger M, Lecointre G. 2009. RNF213, a new nuclear marker for acanthomorph phylogeny. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 50:345-363.
52. Mabuchi K, Miya M, Azuma Y, Nishida M. 2007. Independent evolution of the specialized pharyngeal jaw apparatus in cichlid and labrid fishes. BMC Evol Biol. 7:10.
53. Margulies EH, Chen CW, Green ED. 2006. Differences between pair-wise and multi-sequence alignment methods affect vertebrate genome comparisons. Trends Genet. 22:187-193.
54. Mitchell A, Mitter C, Regier JC. 2000. More taxa or more characters revisited: combining data from nuclear protein-encoding genes for phylogenetic analyses of Noctuoidea (Insecta: Lepidoptera). Syst Biol. 49:202-224.
55. Miya M, Kawaguchi A, Nishida M. 2001. Mitogenomic exploration of higher Teleostean phylogenies: a case study for moderate-scale evolutionary genomics with 38 newly determined complete mitochondrial DNA sequences. Mol Biol Evol. 18:1993-2009.
56. Miya M, Satoh TP, Nishida M. 2005. The phylogenetic position of toadfishes (order Batrachoidiformes) in the higher ray-finned fish as inferred from partitioned Baysian analysis of 102 whole mitochondrial genome sequences. Biol J Linn Soc Lond. 85:289-306.
57. Miya M, Takeshima H, Endo H, et al. (12 co-authors). 2003. Major patterns of higher teleostean phylogenies: a new perspective based on 100 complete mitochondrial DNA sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 26:121-138.
58. Mott R. 1997. EST-GENOME: a program to align spliced DNA sequences to unspliced genomic DNA. Comput Applic. 13:477-478.
59. Nakatani Y, Takeda H, Kohara Y, Morishita S. 2007. Reconstruction of the vertebrate ancestral genome reveals dynamic genome reorganization in early vertebrates. Genome Res. 17:1254-1265.
60. Nei M. 2005. Selectionism and neutralism in molecular evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 22:2318-2342.
61. Nelson JS. 2006. Fishes of the world, 4th ed. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons.
62. Nishihara H, Okada N, Hasegawa M. 2007. Rooting the eutherian tree: the power and pitfalls of phylogenomics. Genome Biol. 8:R199.
63. Nuin PA, Wang Z, Tillier ER. 2006. The accuracy of several multiple sequence alignment programs for proteins. BMC Bioinformatics 7:471.
64. Pagel M, Meade A. 2004. A phylogenetic mixture model for detecting pattern-heterogeneity in gene sequence or character-state data. Syst Biol. 53:571-581.
65. Parra G, Blanco E, Guigó R. 2000. GeneID in Drosophila. Genome Res. 10:511-515.
66. Philippe H, Delsuc F, Brinkmann H, Lartillot N. 2005. Phylogenomics. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 36:541-562.
67. Philippe H, Lartillot N, Brinkmann H. 2005. Multigene analyses of bilaterian animals corroborate the monophyly of Ecdysozoa, Lophotrochozoa, and Protostomia. Mol Biol Evol. 22: 1246-1253.
68. Philippe H, Telford MJ. 2006. Large-scale sequencing and the new animal phylogeny. Trends Ecol Evol. 21:614-620.
69. Phillips MJ, Delsuc F, Penny D. 2004. Genome-scale phylogeny and the detection of systematic biases. Mol Biol Evol. 21:1455-1458.
70. Pollard DA, Iyer VN, Moses AM, Eisen MB. 2006. Widespread discordance of gene trees with species tree in Drosophila: evidence for incomplete lineage sorting. PLoS Genet. 2: e173.
71. Posada D, Crandall KA. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817-818.
72. Rodriguez-Ezpeleta N, Brinkman H, Roure B, Lartillot N, Philippe H. 2007. Detecting and overcoming systematic errors in genome-scale phylogenies. Syst Biol. 56:389-399.
73. Rokas A, Carroll SB. 2005. More genes or more taxa? The relative contribution of gene number and taxon number to phyloge-netic accuracy. Mol Biol Evol. 22:1337-1344.
74. Rokas A, Kruger D, Carroll SB. 2005. Animal evolution and the molecular signature of radiations compressed in time. Science 310:1933-1938.
75. Rokas A, Williams BL, King K, Carroll SB. 2003. Genome scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies. Nature 425:798-804.
76. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572-1574.
77. Rosen DE. 1973. Interrelationships of higher euteleostean fishes. In: Greenwood PH, Miles RS, Patterson CP, editors. Interrelationships of fishes. New York: J Lin Soc (Zool). 53 (Suppl 1) p. 397-513.
78. Rosenberg MS. 2009. Sequence alignment. Methods, models, concepts and strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.
79. Rosenberg MS, Kumar S. 2001. Incomplete taxon sampling is not a problem for phylogenetic inference. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 98:10751-10756.
80. Rosenberg MS, Kumar S. 2003. Taxon sampling, bioinformatics, and phylogenomics. Syst Biol. 52:119-124.
81. Ruiz-Trillo I, Riutort M, Littlewood DTJ, Herniou EA, Baguñà J. 1999. Acoel flatworms: earliest extant bilaterian metazoans, not members of Platyhelminthes. Science 283:1919-1923.
82. Ruiz-Trillo I, Roger AJ, Burger G, Gray MW, Lang BF. 2008. A phylogenomic investigation into the origin of Metazoa. Mol Biol Evol. 25:664-672.
83. Savard J, Tautz D, Richards S, Weinstock GM, Gibbs RA, Werren JH, Tettelin H, Lercher MJ. 2006. Phylogenomic analysis reveals bees and wasps (Hymenoptera) at the base of the radiation of Holometabolous insects. Genome Res. 16:1334-1338.
84. Schmidt HA, Strimmer K, Vingron M, von Haeseler A. 2002. TREE-PUZZLE: maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis using quartets and parallel computing. Bioinformatics 18:502-504.
85. Setiamarga DHE, Miya M, Yamanoue Y, Mabuchi K, Satoh TP, Inoue JG, Nishida M. 2008. Interrelationships of Atherinomorpha (medakas, flyingfishes, killifishes, silversides, and their relatives):the first evidence based on whole mitogenome sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 49:598-605.
86. Shimodaira H. 2002. An approximately unbiased test of phyloge-netic tree selection. Syst Biol. 51:492-508.
87. Smith WL, Craig MT. 2007. Casting the percomorph net widely: the importance of broad taxonomic sampling in the search for the placement of serranid and percid fishes. Copeia 2007:35-55.
88. Smith WL, Wheeler WC. 2004. Polyphyly of the mail-cheeked fishes (Teleostei: Scorpaeniformes): evidence from mitochondrial and nuclear sequence data. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 32:627-646.
89. Stamatakis A. 2006. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22:2688-2690.
90. Steinke D, Salzburger W, Meyer A. 2006. Novel relationships among ten fish model species revealed based on a phylogenomic analysis using ESTs. J Mol Evol. 62:772-784.
91. Swofford DL. 2002. PAUP*, phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4.10. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates.
92. Swofford DL, Olsen GJ, Wadell PJ, Hillis DM. 1996. Phylogenetic inference. In: Hillis DM, Moritz C, Mable BK, editors. Molecular systematics, 2nd ed. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates. p. 407-514.
93. Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S. 2007. MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol. 24:1596-1599.
94. Taylor JS, Braasch I, Frickey T, Meyer A, Van de Peer Y. 2003. Genome duplication, a trait shared by 22,000 species of ray-finned fish. Genome Res. 13:382-390.
95. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. 1994. CLUSTALW: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22:4673-4680.
96. Whitaker HA, McAndrew BJ, Taggart JB. 2006. Construction and characterization of a BAC library for the European sea bass Dicentrarchus labrax. Anim Genet. 37:526.
97. Wilm A, Mainz I, Steger G. 2006. An enhanced RNA alignment benchmark for sequence alignment programs. Algorithms Mol Biol. 1:19.
98. Wong KM, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP. 2008. Alignment uncertainty and genomic analysis. Science 319:473-476.
99. Xia X, Xie Z. 2001. DAMBE: data analysis in molecular biology and evolution. J Hered. 92:371-373.
100. Yamanoue Y, Miya M, Inoue JC, Matsuura K, Nishida M. 2006. The mitochondrial genome of spotted green pufferfish Tetraodon nigroviridis (Teleostei: Tetraodontiformes) and divergence time estimation among model organisms in fishes. Genes Genet Syst. 81:29-39.
101. Yamanoue Y, Miya M, Matsuura K, Yagishita N, Mabuchi K, Sakai H, Katoh M, Nishida M. 2007. Phylogenetic position of tetraodonti-form fishes within the higher teleosts: Bayesian inferences based on 44 whole mitochondrial genome sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 45:89-101.
102. Zhaxybayeva O, Lapierre P, Gogarten JP. 2005. Ancient gene duplications and the root(s) of the tree of life. Protoplasma. 227:53-64.