Benchmarking ortholog identification methods using functional genomics data

Genome Biology

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2006, Pages

  Hulsen, Tim ^a   Huynen, Martijn A ^a   de Vlieg, Jacob ^a,b   Groenen, Peter M A ^b  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b NV ORGANON   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; FUNCTIONAL GENOMICS; HUMAN; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; ORTHOLOGY; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; QUALITY CONTROL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; EVALUATION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE ORDER; GENETIC DATABASE; GENETICS; GENOMICS; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MULTIGENE FAMILY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY;

PROTEIN;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; DATABASES, GENETIC; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE ORDER; GENOMICS; HUMANS; MICE; MULTIGENE FAMILY; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, AMINO ACID; SOFTWARE;

EID: 33745022802     PISSN: 1474760X     EISSN: 1474760X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/gb-2006-7-4-r31     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Fitch WM: Distinguishing homologous from analogous proteins. Syst Zool 1970, 19:99-113.
2. Li WH, Yang J, Gu X: Expression divergence between duplicate genes. Trends Genet 2005, 21:602-607.
3. Mirny LA, Gelfand MS: Using orthologous and paralogous proteins to identify specificity determining residues. Genome Biol 2002, 3:PREPRINT0002.
4. Chimpanzee sequencing whitepaper [http://genome.wustl.edu/ ancillary/data/whitepapers/ Pan_troglodytes_WP2.pdf]
5. Tatusov RL, Galperin MY, Natale DA, Koonin EV: The COG database: a tool for genome-scale analysis of protein functions and evolution. Nucleic Acids Res 2000, 28:33-36.
6. Remm M, Storm CE. Sonnhammer EL: Automatic clustering of orthologs and in-paralogs from pairwise species comparisons. J Mol Biol 2001, 314:1041-1052.
7. Li L, Stoeckert CJ Jr, Roos DS: OrthoMCL: identification of ortholog groups for eukaryotic genomes. Genome Res 2003, 13:2178-2189.
8. Huynen MA, Bork P: Measuring genome evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998, 95:5849-5856.
9. Tatusov RL, Fedorova ND, Jackson JD, Jacobs AR, Kiryutin B, Koonin EV, Krylov DM, Mazumder R, Mekhedov SL, Nikolskaya AN, et al.: The COG database: an updated version includes eukaryotes. BMC Bioinformatics 2003, 4:41.
10. van Noort V, Snel B, Huynen MA: Predicting gene function by conserved co-expression. Trends Genet 2003, 19:238-242.
11. Wright MW, Eyre TA, Lush MJ, Povey S, Bruford EA: HCOP: the HGNC comparison of orthology predictions search tool. Mamm Genome 2005, 16:827-828.
12. Zmasek CM, Eddy SR: RIO: analyzing proteomes by automated phylogenomics using resampled inference of orthologs. BMC Bioinformatics 2002, 3:14.
13. Huynen MA, Snel B, van Noort V: Comparative genomics for reliable protein-function prediction from genomic data. Trends Genet 2004, 20:340-344.
14. Sjolander K: Phylogenomic inference of protein molecular function: advances and challenges. Bioinformatics 2004, 20:170-179.
15. Stuart JM, Segal E, Koller D, Kim SK: A gene-coexpression network for global discovery of conserved genetic modules. Science 2003, 302:249-255.
16. Harris MA, Clark J, Ireland A, Lomax J, Ashburner M, Foulger R, Eilbeck K, Lewis S, Marshall B, Mungall C, et al: The Gene Ontology (GO) database and informatics resource. Nucleic Acids Res 2004, 32(Database):D258-261.
17. Fraser HB, Hirsh AE, Wall DP, Eisen MB: Coevolution of gene expression among interacting proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004, 101:9033-9038.
18. Protein World Webserver [http://www.cmbi.ru.nl/pw]
19. Boeckmann B, Bairoch A, Apweiler R, Blatter MC, Estreicher A, Gasteiger E, Martin MJ, Michoud K, O'Donovan C, Phan I, et al.: The SWISS-PROT protein knowledgebase and its supplement TrEMBL in 2003. Nucleic Acids Res 2003, 31:365-370.
20. Pruitt KD, Tatusova T, Maglott DR: NCBI Reference Sequence (RefSeq): a curated non-redundant sequence database of genomes, transcripts and proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 2005, 33(Database):D501-504.
21. Curwen V, Eyras E, Andrews TD, Clarke L, Mongin E, Searle SM, Clamp M: The Ensembl automatic gene annotation system. Genome Res 2004, 14:942-950.
22. Smith TF, Waterman MS: Identification of common molecular subsequences. J Mol Biol 1981, 147:195-197.
23. Comet JP, Aude JC, Glemet E, Risler JL, Henaut A, Slonimski PP, Codani JJ: Significance of Z-value statistics of Smith-Waterman scores for protein alignments. Comput Chem 1999, 23:317-331.
24. Brenner SE, Chothia C, Hubbard TJ: Assessing sequence comparison methods with reliable structurally identified distant evolutionary relationships. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998, 95:6073-6078.
25. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ: Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 1990, 215:403-410.
26. Pearson WR, Lipman DJ: Improved tools for biological sequence comparison. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1988, 85:2444-2448.
27. Center for Molecular and Biomolecular informatics [http://www.cmbi.ru.nl]
28. InParanoid Program [http://inparanoid.cgb.ki.se/prog/inparanoid.tar.gz]
29. Enright AJ, Van Dongen S, Ouzounis CA: An efficient algorithm for large-scale detection of protein families. Nucleic Acids Res 2002, 30:1575-1584.
30. Kasprzyk A, Keefe D, Smedley D, London D, Spooner W, Melsopp C, Hammond M, Rocca-Serra P, Cox T, Birney E: EnsMart: a generic system for fast and flexible access to biological data. Genome Res 2004, 14:160-169.
31. EnsMart v. 19.3 [ftp://ftp.ensembl.org/pub/current_mart]
32. Chen F, Mackey AJ, Stoeckert CJ Jr, Roos DS: OrthoMCL-DB: querying a comprehensive multi-species collection of ortholog groups. Nucleic Acids Res 2006, 34(Database):D363-368.
33. Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ: CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 1994, 22:4673-4680.
34. Saitou N, Nei M: The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 1987, 4:406-425.
35. Supplementary Data: Orthology Comparison [http://www.cmbi.ru.nl/~timhulse/orthocomp]
36. Gene Logic BioExpress Database Product [http://www.genelogic.com/genomics/bioexpress/]
37. Cote RA, Robboy S: Progress in medical information management. Systematized nomenclature of medicine (SNOMED). JAMA 1980, 243:756-762.
38. Supplementary Data for Stuart et al. [15] [http://cmgm.stanford.edu/~kimlab/multiplespecies/Data]
39. Mulder NJ, Apweiler R, Attwood TK, Bairoch A, Barrell D, Bateman A. Binns D, Biswas M, Bradley P, Bork P, et al.: The InterPro Database, 2003 brings increased coverage and new features. Nucleic Acids Res 2003, 31:315-318.
40. Xenarios I, Salwinski L, Duan XJ, Higney P, Kim SM, Eisenberg D: DIP, the Database of Interacting Proteins: a research tool for studying cellular networks of protein interactions. Nucleic Acids Res 2002, 30:303-305.
41. Pollard SL, Holland PW: Evidence for 14 homeobox gene clusters in human genome ancestry. Curr Biol 2000, 10:1059-1062.
42. Lecomte JT, Vuletich DA, Lesk AM: Structural divergence and distant relationships in proteins: evolution of the globins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2005, 15:290-301.
43. Gissendanner CR, Crossgrove K, Kraus KA, Maina CV, Sluder AE: Expression and function of conserved nuclear receptor genes in Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Biol 2004, 266:399-416.
44. Zheng L, Zhang L, Lin H, McIntosh MT, Malacrida AR: Toll-like receptors in invertebrate innate immunity. Invertebrate Survival J 2005, 2:105-113.
45. Salgado-Garrido J, Bragado-Nilsson E, Kandels-Lewis S, Seraphin B: Sm and Sm-like proteins assemble in two related complexes of deep evolutionary origin. EMBO J 1999, 18:3451-3462.