Conformational diversity and computational enzyme design

Current Opinion in Chemical Biology

Volumn 14, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 676-682

  Lassila, Jonathan K ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENZYME; GRAMICIDIN S SYNTHETASE; RETROALDOLASE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

BINDING SITE; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; ENZYME ACTIVE SITE; ENZYME CONFORMATION; ENZYME ENGINEERING; ENZYME SPECIFICITY; ENZYME STABILITY; ENZYME STRUCTURE, FUNCTION AND VARIABILITY; ENZYME SUBSTRATE COMPLEX; HUMAN; LIGAND BINDING; MOLECULAR LIBRARY; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN MOTIF; REVIEW;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DRUG DESIGN; ENZYMES; HUMANS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS;

EID: 77957750795     PISSN: 13675931     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2010.08.010     Document Type: Review

References (69)

1. Ponder J.W., Richards F.M. Tertiary templates for proteins: use of packing criteria in the enumeration of allowed sequences for different structural classes. J Mol Biol 1987, 193:775-791.
2. Dahiyat B.I., Mayo S.L. De novo protein design: fully automated sequence selection. Science 1997, 278:82-87.
3. Pokala N., Handel T.M. Protein design-where we were, where we are, where we're going. J Struct Biol 2001, 134:269-281.
4. Lippow S.M., Tidor B. Progress in computational protein design. Curr Opin Biotech 2007, 18:305-311.
5. Suarez M., Jaramillo A. Challenges in the computational design of proteins. J Roy Soc Interface 2009, 6:S477-S491.
6. Gordon D.B., Marshall S.A., Mayo S.L. Energy functions for protein design. Curr Opin Struct Biol 1999, 9:509-513.
7. Mendes J., Guerois R., Serrano L. Energy estimation in protein design. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2002, 12:441-446.
8. Vizcarra C.L., Mayo S.L. Electrostatics in computational protein design. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2005, 9:622-626.
9. Boas F.E., Harbury P.B. Potential energy functions for protein design. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2007, 17:199-204.
10. Voigt C.A., Gordon D.B., Mayo S.L. Trading accuracy for speed: a quantitative comparison of search algorithms in protein sequence design. J Mol Biol 2000, 299:789-803.
11. Desmet J., Spriet J., Lasters I. Fast and Accurate Side-Chain Topology and Energy Refinement (FASTER) as a new method for protein structure optimization. Proteins 2002, 48:31-43.
12. Hellinga H.W., Richards F.M. Construction of new ligand binding sites in proteins of known structure. J Mol Biol 1991, 222:763-785.
13. Bolon D.N., Mayo S.L. Enzyme-like proteins by computational design. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001, 98:14274-14279.
14. Lassila J.K., Privett H.K., Allen B.D., Mayo S.L. Combinatorial methods for small-molecule placement in computational enzyme design. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006, 103:16710-16715.
15. Zanghellini A., Jiang L., Wollacott A.M., Cheng G., Meiler J., Althoff E.A., Rothlisberger D., Baker D. New algorithms and an in silico benchmark for computational enzyme design. Protein Sci 2006, 15:2785-2794.
16. Jiang L., Althoff E.A., Clemente F.R., Doyle L., Rothlisberger D., Zanghellini A., Gallaher J.L., Betker J.L., Tanaka F., Barbas C.F., et al. De novo computational design of retro-aldol enzymes. Science 2008, 319:1387-1391.
17. Röthlisberger D., Khersonsky O., Wollacott A.M., Jiang L., DeChancie J., Betker J., Gallaher J.L., Althoff E.A., Zanghellini A., Dym O., et al. Kemp elimination catalysts by computational enzyme design. Nature 2008, 453:190-195.
18. Siegel J.B., Zanghellini A., Lovick H.M., Kiss G., Lambert A.R., StClair J.L., Gallaher J.L., Hilvert D., Gelb M.H., Stoddard B., Houk K.N., Michael F.E., Baker D. Computational design of an enzyme catalyst for a stereoselective bimolecular Diels-Alder reaction. Science 2010, 329:309-313.
19. Dahiyat B.I., Mayo S.L. Probing the role of packing specificity in protein design. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997, 94:10172-10177.
20. Kuhlman B., Baker D. Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000, 97:10383-10388.
21. Grigoryan G., Ochoa A., Keating A.E. Computing van der Waals energies in the context of the rotamer approximation. Proteins 2007, 68:863-878.
22. Schmid F.X., Blaschek H. A native-like intermediate on the ribonuclease A folding pathway. Eur J Biochem 1981, 114:111-117.
23. Lu H.P., Xun L., Xie S. Single-molecule enzymatic dynamics. Science 1998, 282:1877-1882.
24. Flomenbom O., Velonia K., Loos D., Masuo S., Cotlet M., Engelborghs Y., Hofkens J., Rowan A.E., Nolte R.J.M., Van Der Auweraer M., et al. Stretched exponential decay and correlations in the catalytic activity of fluctuating single lipase molecules. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005, 102:2368-2372.
25. Hammes-Schiffer S., Benkovic S.J. Relating protein motion to catalysis. Annu Rev Biochem 2006, 75:519-541.
26. Boehr D.D., Dyson H.J., Wright P.E. An NMR perspective on enzyme dynamics. Chem Rev 2006, 106:3055-3079.
27. Jencks W.P. Binding energy, specificity, and enzymic catalysis: circe effect. Adv Enzymol 1975, 43:219-410.
28. Benkovic S.J., Hammes-Schiffer S. A perspective on enzyme catalysis. Science 2003, 301:1196-1202.
29. Garcia-Viloca M., Gao J., Karplus M., Truhlar D.G. How enzymes work: analysis by modern rate theory and computer simulations. Science 2004, 303:186-195.
30. Klinman J.P. An integrated model for enzyme catalysis emerges from studies on hydrogen tunneling. Chem Phys Lett 2009, 471:179-193.
31. Hedstrom L., Szilagyi L., Rutter W.J. Converting trypsin to chymotrypsin: the role of surface loops. Science 1992, 255:1249-1253.
32. Ma B., Shatsky M., Wolfson H.J., Nussinov R. Multiple diverse ligands binding at a single protein site: a matter of pre-existing populations. Protein Sci 2002, 11:184-197.
33. James L.C., Tawfik D.S. Conformational diversity and protein evolution-a 60-year-old hypothesis revisited. Trends Biochem Sci 2003, 28:361-368.
34. Kuhlman B., Dantas G., Ireton G.C., Varani G., Stoddard B.L., Baker D. Design of a novel globular protein fold with atomic-level accuracy. Science 2003, 302:1364-1368.
35. Dobson N., Dantas G., Baker D., Varani G. High-resolution structural validation of the computational redesign of human U1A protein. Structure 2006, 14:847-856.
36. Dantas G., Corrent C., Reichow S.L., Havranek J.J., Eletr Z.M., Isern N.G., Kuhlman B., Varani G., Merritt E.A., Baker D. High-resolution structural and thermodynamic analysis of extreme stabilization of human procarboxypeptidase by computational protein design. J Mol Biol 2007, 366:1209-1221.
37. Shah P.S., Hom G.K., Ross S.A., Lassila J.K., Crowhurst K.A., Mayo S.L. Full-sequence computational design and solution structure of a thermostable protein variant. J Mol Biol 2007, 372:1-6.
38. Johnson E.C., Lazar G.A., Desjarlais J.R., Handel T.M. Solution structure and dynamics of a designed hydrophobic core variant of ubiquitin. Structure 1999, 7:967-976.
39. Johnson E.C., Handel T.M. Effect of hydrophobic core packing on sidechain dynamics. J Biomol NMR 1999, 15:135-143.
40. Walsh S.T.R., Lee A.L., DeGrado W.F., Wand A.J. Dynamics of a de novo designed three-helix bundle protein studied by 15N, 13C, and 2H NMR relaxation methods. Biochemistry 2001, 40:9560-9569.
41. Crowhurst K.A., Mayo S.L. NMR-detected conformational exchange observed in a computationally designed variant of protein GB1. Prot Eng Des Sel 2008, 21:577-587.
42. Ambroggio X.I., Kuhlman B. Computational design of a single amino acid sequence that can switch between two distinct folds. J Am Chem Soc 2006, 128:1154-1161.
43. Hom G.K., Lassila J.K., Thomas L.M., Mayo S.L. Dioxane contributes to the altered conformation and oligomerization state of a designed engrailed homeodomain variant. Protein Sci 2005, 14:1115-1119.
44. Khersonsky O., Röthlisberger D., Dym O., Albeck S., Jackson C.J., Baker D., Tawfik D.S. Evoltionary optimization of computationally designed enzymes: Kemp eliminases of the KE07 series. J Mol Biol 2010, 396:1025-1042.
45. Lassila J.K., Baker D., Herschlag D. Origins of catalysis in computationally designed retroaldolase enzymes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010, 107:4937-4942.
46. Alexandrova A.N., Röthlisberger D., Baker D., Jorgensen W.L. Catalytic mechanism and performance of computationally designed enzymes for Kemp elimination. J Am Chem Soc 2008, 130:15907-15915.
47. Ruscio J.Z., Kohn J.E., Ball K.A., Head-Gordon T. The influence of protein dynamics on the success of computational enzyme design. J Am Chem Soc 2009, 131:14111-14115.
48. Schreier B., Stumpp C., Wiesner S., Höcker B. Computational design of ligand binding is not a solved problem. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009, 106:18491-18496.
49. Hayden E.C. Key protein-design papers challenged. Nature 2009, 461:859.
50. Havranek J.J., Harbury P.B. Automated design of specificity in molecular recognition. Nat Struct Biol 2003, 10:45-52.
51. Boas F.E., Harbury P.B. Design of protein-ligand binding based on the molecular-mechanics energy model. J Mol Biol 2008, 380:415-424.
52. Mandell D.J., Kortemme T. Computer-aided design of functional protein interactions. Nat Chem Biol 2009, 5:797-807.
53. Allen B.D., Mayo S.L. An efficient algorithm for multistate protein design based on FASTER. J Comput Chem 2010, 31:904-916.
54. Allen BD, Nisthal A, Mayo SL: Computational protein design of structural ensembles: validation by automated screening of combinatorial libraries. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, In Press.
55. Grigoryan G., Zhou F., Lustig S.R., Ceder G., Morgan D., Keating A.E. Ultra-fast evaluation of protein energies directly from sequence. PLoS Comput Biol 2006, 2:551-563.
56. Apgar J.R., Hahn S., Grigoryan G., Keating A.E. Cluster expansion models for flexible-backbone protein energetics. J Comput Chem 2009, 30:2402-2413.
57. Grigoryan G., Reinke A.W., Keating A.E. Design of protein-interaction specificity gives selective bZIP-binding peptides. Nature 2009, 458:859-864.
58. Mandell D.J., Kortemme T. Backbone flexibility in computational protein design. Curr Opin Biotech 2009, 20:420-428.
59. Butterfoss G.L., Kuhlman B. Computer-based design of novel protein structures. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 2006, 35:49-65.
60. Chen C.Y., Georgiev I., Anderson A.C., Donald B.R. Computational structure-based redesign of enzyme activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009, 106:3764-3769.
61. Khoury G.A., Fazelina H., Chin J.W., Pantazes R.J., Cirino P.C., Maranas C.D. Computational design of Candida biodinii xylose reductase for altered cofactor specificity. Protein Sci 2009, 18:2125-2138.
62. Havranek J.J., Baker D. Motif-directed flexible backbone design of functional interactions. Protein Sci 2009, 18:1293-1305.
63. Murphy P.M., Bolduc J.M., Gallaher J.L., Stoddard B.L., Baker D. Alteration of enzyme specificity by computational loop remodeling and design. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009, 106:9215-9220.
64. Popatov V., Cohen M., Schreiber G. Assessing computational methods for predicting protein stability upon mutation: good on average but not in the details. Prot Eng Des Sel 2009, 22:553-560.
65. Kono H., Saven J.G. Statistical theory for protein combinatorial libraries. Packing interactions, backbone flexibility, and the sequence variability of a main-chain structure. J Mol Biol 2001, 306:607-628.
66. Hayes R.J., Bentzien J., Ary M.L., Hwang M.Y., Jacinto J.M., Vielmetter J., Kundu A., Dahiyat B.I. Combining computational and experimental screening for rapid optimization of protein properties. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002, 99:15926-15931.
67. Bolon D.N., Voigt C.A., Mayo S.L. De novo design of biocatalysts. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2002, 6:125-129.
68. Mena M.A., Daugherty P.S. Automated design of degenerate codon libraries. Prot Eng Des Sel 2005, 18:559-561.
69. Treynor T.P., Vizcarra C.L., Nedelcu D., Mayo S.L. Computationally designed libraries of fluorescent proteins evaluated by preservation and diversity of function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007, 104:48-53.