Computational design of ligand binding is not a solved problem

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 106, Issue 44, 2009, Pages 18491-18496

  Schreier, Bettina ^a   Stumpp, Christian ^a   Wiesner, Silke ^a   Höcker, Birte ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Arabinose binding protein; Biosensor; Glucose binding protein; Ribose binding protein; Serotonin receptor

Indexed keywords

ARABINOSE; SEROTONIN RECEPTOR;

ARTICLE; CIRCULAR DICHROISM; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; ISOTHERMAL TITRATION CALORIMETRY; LIGAND BINDING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS;

BINDING SITES; BIOPHYSICAL PHENOMENA; CALORIMETRY; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; GLYCOPROTEINS; LIGANDS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; RECEPTORS, CELL SURFACE;

EID: 73249124179     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0907950106     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Kuhlman B, et al. (2003) Design of a novel globular protein fold with atomic-level accuracy. Science 302:1364-1368.
2. Looger LL, et al. (2003) Computational design of receptor and sensor proteins with novel functions. Nature 423:185-190.
3. Bolon DN, Mayo SL (2001) Enzyme-like proteins by computational design. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:14274-14279.
4. Kaplan J, DeGrado WF (2004) De novo design of catalytic proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:11566-11570.
5. Jiang L, et al. (2008) De novo computational design of retro-aldol enzymes. Science 319:1387-1391.
6. Röthlisberger D, et al. (2008) Kemp elimination catalysts by computational enzyme design. Nature 453:190-195.
7. Allert M, et al. (2004) Computational design of receptors for an organophosphate surrogate of the nerve agent soman. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:7907-7912.
8. Quiocho FA, et al. (1989) Substrate specificity and affinity of a protein modulated by bound water molecules. Nature 340:404-407.
9. Cuneo MJ, et al. (2008) Ligand-induced conformational changes in a thermophilic ribose-binding protein. BMC Struct Biol 8:50.
10. Bjorkman AJ, Mowbray SL (1998) Multiple open forms of ribose-binding protein trace the path of its conformational change. J Mol Biol 279:651-664.
11. Magnusson U, et al. (2002) Hinge-bending motion of D-allose-binding protein from Escherichia coli: three open conformations. J Biol Chem 277:14077-14084.
12. Telmer PG, Shilton BH (2005) Structural studies of an engineered zinc biosensor reveal an unanticipated mode of zinc binding. J Mol Biol 354:829-840.
13. Marvin JS, Hellinga HW (2001) Conversion of a maltose receptor into a zinc biosensor by computational design. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:4955-4960.
14. Vercillo NC, et al. (2007) Analysis of ligand binding to a ribose biosensor using site-directed mutagenesis and fluorescence spectroscopy. Protein Sci 16:362-368.
15. D'Auria S, et al. (2004) Structural and thermal stability characterization of Escherichia coli D-galactose/D-glucose-binding protein. Biotechnol Prog 20:330-337.
16. Kehres DG, Hogg RW (1992) Escherichia coli K12 arabinose-binding protein mutants with altered transport properties. Protein Sci 1:1652-1660.
17. Willis RC, Furlong CE (1974) Purification and properties of a ribose-binding protein from Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 249:6926-6929.
18. Vyas NK, et al. (1988) Sugar and signal-transducer binding sites of the Escherichia coli galactose chemoreceptor protein. Science 242:1290-1295.
19. de Lorimier RM, et al. (2002) Construction of a fluorescent biosensor family. Protein Sci 11:2655-2675.
20. Millet O, et al. (2003) The energetic cost of domain reorientation in maltose-binding protein as studied by NMR and fluorescence spectroscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:12700-12705.
21. Boas FE, Harbury PB (2008) Design of protein-ligand binding based on the molecular-mechanics energy model. J Mol Biol 380:415-424.
22. Pervushin K, et al. (1997) Attenuated T2 relaxation by mutual cancellation of dipole-dipole coupling and chemical shift anisotropy indicates an avenue to NMR structures of very large biological macromolecules in solution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:12366-12371.
23. Delaglio F, et al. (1995) NMRPipe: Amultidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes. J Biomol NMR 6:277-293.
24. Johnson BA (2004) Using NMRView to visualize and analyze the NMR spectra of macromolecules. Methods Mol Biol 278:313-352.
25. Kabsch W (1988) Automatic-indexing of rotation diffraction patterns. J Appl Crystallogr 21:67-71.
26. McCoy AJ, et al. (2005) Likelihood-enhanced fast translation functions. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 61:458-464.
27. Murshudov GN, et al. (1997) Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 53:240-255.
28. Emsley P, Cowtan K (2004) Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 60:2126-2132.
29. Davis IW, et al. (2007) MolProbity: all-atom contacts and structure validation for proteins and nucleic acids. Nucleic Acids Res 35:W375-W383.
30. Hooft RW, et al. (1996) Errors in protein structures. Nature 381:272.
31. Hayward S, Berendsen HJ (1998) Systematic analysis of domain motions in proteins from conformational change:new results on citrate synthase and T4 lysozyme. Proteins 30:144-154.
32. DeLano WL (2002) The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System. DeLano Scientific (Palo Alto, CA).