Automated design of specificity in molecular recognition

Nature Structural Biology

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 45-52

  Havranek, James J ^a   Harbury, Pehr B ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIMER;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CALCULATION; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; ENERGY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; THERMODYNAMICS; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ALGORITHMS; AMINO ACID MOTIFS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 0037217406     PISSN: 10728368     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nsb877     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Harbury, P.B., Plecs, J.J., Tidor, B., Alber, T. & Kim, P.S. High-resolution protein design with backbone freedom. Science 282, 1462-1467 (1998).
2. Nauli, S., Kuhlman, B. & Baker, D. Computer-based redesign of a protein folding pathway. Nat. Struct. Biol. 8, 602-605 (2001).
3. Dahiyat, B.I. & Mayo, S.L. De novo protein design: Fully automated sequence selection. Science 278, 82-87 (1997).
4. Pabo, C. Molecular technology. Designing proteins and peptides. Nature 301, 200 (1983).
5. Ponder, J.W. & Richards, F.M. Tertiary templates for proteins. Use of packing criteria in the enumeration of allowed sequences for different structural classes. J. Mol. Biol. 193, 775-791 (1987).
6. Kuhlman, B. & Baker, D. Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 10383-10388 (2000).
7. Gordon, D.B., Marshall, S.A. & Mayo, S.L. Energy functions for protein design. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 9, 509-513 (1999).
8. Hellinga, H.W. & Richards, F.M. Optimal sequence selection in proteins of known structure by simulated evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 5803-5807 (1994).
9. Desjarlais, J.R. & Handel, T.M. De novo design of the hydrophobic cores of proteins. Protein Sci. 4, 2006-2018 (1995).
10. Lazar, G.A., Desjarlais, J.R. & Handel, T.M. De novo design of the hydrophobic core of ubiquitin. Protein Sci. 6, 1167-1178 (1997).
11. Malakauskas, S.M. & Mayo, S.L. Design, structure and stability of a hyperthermophilic protein variant. Nat. Struct. Biol. 5, 470-475 (1998).
12. Marshall, S.A. & Mayo, S.L. Achieving stability and conformational specificity in designed proteins via binary patterning. J. Mol. Biol. 305, 619-631 (2001).
13. Marvin, J.S. & Hellinga, H.W. Conversion of a maltose receptor into a zinc biosensor by computational design. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 4955-4960 (2001).
14. Wilson, C., Mace, J.E. & Agard, D.A. Computational method for the design of enzymes with altered substrate specificity. J. Mol. Biol. 220, 495-506 (1991).
15. Shimaoka, M. et al. Computational design of an integrin I domain stabilized in the open high affinity conformation. Nat. Struct. Biol. 7, 674-678 (2000).
16. O'Shea, E.K., Klemm, J.D., Kim, P.S. & Alber, T. X-ray structure of the GCN4 leucine zipper, a two-stranded, parallel coiled coil. Science 254, 539-544 (1991).
17. Altschul, S.F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E.W. & Lipman, D.J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403-410 (1990).
18. O'Shea, E.K., Rutkowski, R., Stafford, W.F. III & Kim, P.S. Preferential heterodimer formation by isolated leucine zippers from Fos and Jun. Science 245, 646-648 (1989).
19. O'Shea, E.K., Lumb, K.J. & Kim, P.S. Peptide Velcro: Design of a heterodimeric coiled coil. Curr. Biol. 3, 658-667 (1993).
20. Jorgensen, W.L. & Tiradorives, J. The OPLS potential functions for proteins: Energy minimizations for crystals of cyclic-peptides and crambim. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 110, 1666-1671 (1988).
21. Brooks, B.R. et al. CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization, and dynamics calculations. J. Comput Chem. 4, 187-217 (1983).
22. Koehl, P. & Levitt, M. De novo protein design. II. Plasticity in sequence space. J. Mol. Biol. 293, 1183-1193 (1999).
23. Janin, J. Quantifying biological specificity: The statistical mechanics of molecular recognition. Proteins 25, 438-445 (1996).
24. Ghirlanda, G., Lear, J.D., Lombardi, A. & DeGrado, W.F. From synthetic coiled coils to functional proteins: Automated design of a receptor for the calmodulin-binding domain of calcineurin. J. Mol. Biol. 281, 379-391 (1998).
25. Hellinga, H.W. Rational protein design: Combining theory and experiment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 10015-10017 (1997).
26. Hellinga, H.W. Construction of a blue copper analogue through iterative rational protein design cycles demonstrates principles of molecular recognition in metal center formation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120, 10055-10066 (1998).
27. Yue, K. et al. A test of lattice protein-folding algorithms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 325-329 (1995).
28. Deutsch, J.M. & Kurosky, T. New algorithm for protein design. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 323-326 (1996).
29. Irback, A., Peterson, C., Potthast, F. & Sandelin, E. Monte Carlo procedure for protein design. Phys. Rev. E 58, R5249-R5252 (1998).
30. Dima, R.I., Banavar, J.R., Cieplak, M. & Maritan, A. Statistical mechanics of protein-like heteropolymers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 4904-4907 (1999).
31. Banavar, J.R. et al. Structure-based design of model proteins. Proteins 31, 10-20 (1998).
32. Rossi, A., Maritan, A. & Micheletti, C. A novel iterative strategy for protein design. J. Chem. Phys. 112, 2050-2055 (2000).
33. Koehl, P. & Levitt, M. De novo protein design. I. In search of stability and specificity. J. Mol. Biol. 293, 1161-1181 (1999).
34. Jones, S. & Thornton, J.M. Principles of protein-protein interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 13-20 (1996).
35. Buckle, A.M., Schreiber, G. & Fersht, A.R. Protein-protein recognition: Crystal structural analysis of a barnase-barstar complex at 2.0-Å resolution. Biochemistry 33, 8878-8889 (1994).
36. Shoichet, B.K., Baase, W.A., Kuroki, R. & Matthews, B.W. A relationship between protein stability and protein function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 452-456 (1995).
37. Derewenda, U. et al. An unusual buried polar cluster in a family of fungal lipases. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1, 36-47 (1994).
38. Warshel, A. & Aqvist, J. Electrostatic energy and macromolecular function. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biophys. Chem. 20, 267-298 (1991).
39. Lumb, K.J. & Kim, P.S. A buried polar interaction imparts structural uniqueness in a designed heterodimeric coiled coil. Biochemistry 34, 8642-8648 (1995).
40. Bolon, D.N. & Mayo, S.L. Polar residues in the protein core of Escherichia coli thioredoxin are important for fold specificity. Biochemistry 40, 10047-10053 (2001).
41. Desjarlais, J.R. & Handel, T.M. Side-chain and backbone flexibility in protein core design. J. Mol. Biol. 290, 305-318 (1999).
42. Keating, A.E., Malashkevich, V.N., Tidor, B. & Kim, P.S. Side-chain repacking calculations for predicting structures and stabilities of heterodimeric coiled coils. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 14825-14830 (2001).
43. Jencks, W.P. Catalysis in Chemistry and Enzymology (Dover, New York; 1987).
44. Harbury, P.B., Tidor, B. & Kim, P.S. Repacking protein cores with backbone freedom: Structure prediction for coiled coils. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 8408-8412 (1995).
45. Dunbrack, R.L. & Karplus, M. Backbone-dependent rotamer library for proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 230, 543-574 (1993).
46. Koehl, P. & Delarue, M. Application of a self-consistent mean field theory to predict protein side-chains conformation and estimate their conformational entropy. J. Mol. Biol. 239, 249-275 (1994).
47. Mendes, J., Soares, C.M. & Carrondo, M.A. Improvement of side-chain modeling in proteins with the self-consistent mean field theory method based on an analysis of the factors influencing prediction. Biopolymers 50, 111-131 (1999).
48. Sitkoff, D., Sharp, K.A. & Honig, B. Accurate calculation of hydration free energies using macroscopic solvent models. J. Phys. Chem. 98, 1978-1988 (1994).
49. Havranek, J.J. & Harbury, P.B. Tanford-Kirkwood electrostatics for protein modeling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 11145-11150 (1999).
50. Street, A.G. & Mayo, S.L. Pairwise calculation of protein solvent-accessible surface areas. Fold. Des. 3, 253-258 (1998).
51. Dahiyat, B.I. & Mayo, S.L. Probing the role of packing specificity in protein design. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 10172-10177 (1997).
52. Fauchère, J.-L. & Pliska, V. Hydrophobic parameters-π of amino-acid side-chains from the partitioning of N-acetyl-amino-acid amides. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 18, 369-375 (1983).
53. Wimley, W.C., Creamer, T.P. & White, S.H. Solvation energies of amino acid side chains and backbone in a family of host-guest pentapeptides. Biochemistry 35, 5109-5124 (1996).
54. Lacroix, E., Viguera, A.R. & Serrano, L. Elucidating the folding problem of α-helices: Local motifs; long-range electrostatics; ionic-strength dependence and prediction of NMR parameters. J. Mol. Biol. 284, 173-191 (1998).
55. Mitchell, M. An Introduction to Genetic Algorithms (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts; 1996).
56. Kleid, D.G. et al. Cloned viral protein vaccine for foot-and-mouth disease: Responses in cattle and swine. Science 214, 1125-1129 (1991).
57. Kunkel, T.A., Bebenek, K. & McClary, J. Efficient site-directed mutagenesis using uracil-containing DNA. Methods Enzymol. 204, 125-139 (1991).
58. Edelhoch, H. Spectroscopic determination of tryptophan and tyrosine in proteins. Biochemistry 6, 1948-1954 (1967).
59. Schagger, H. & von Jagow, G. Tricine-sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis for the separation of proteins in the range from 1 to 100 kDa. Anal. Biochem. 166, 368-379 (1987).
60. Lu, M. et al. Helix capping in the GCN4 leucine zipper. J. Mol. Biol. 288, 743-752 (1999).
61. Humphrey, W., Dalke, A. & Schulten, K. VMD: Visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 14, 33-38 (1996).