Learning as students to become better teachers: Pre-service teachers' IWB learning experience

Australasian Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 553-570

  Divaharan, Shanti ^a   Koh, Joyce Hwee Ling ^a  

^a NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956725302     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14495554     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14742/ajet.1072     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Albalat, J.Q. i. & Tarrago, F.R. (1995). Interpreting internal school factors on the educational integration of IT. In D. Watson & D. Tinsley (Eds.), Integrating information technology into education. UK, London: Chapman & Hall.
2. Ball, B. (2003). Teaching and learning mathematics with an interactive whiteboard. Micromath, 19(1), 4-7. http://www.atm.org.uk/journal/micromath/mm191ball.pdf.
3. Beyerbach, B., Walsh, C. & Vannatta, R. (2001). From teaching technology to using technology to enhance student learning: Preservice teachers' changing perceptions of technology infusion. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 105-127.
4. Blase, J. & Blase, J. (1999). Principals' instructional leadership and teacher development: Teachers' perspectives. Educational Adminstration Quarterly, 35(3), 349-378.
5. Braak, J. v. (2001). Individual characteristics influencing teachers' class use of computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 25(2), 141-157.
6. Brush, T., Glazewiski, K., Rutowiski, K., Berg, K., Stromfors, C., Van-Nest, M.H., Stock, L. & Stutton, J. (2003). Integrating technology in a field-based teacher training program: The PT3@ASU project. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51(1), 57-72.
7. Chu, J.L. (2000). Assessment of the integration of technology into the curriculum by middle and high school teachers. Unpublished EdD, Pepperdine University.
8. Coupal, L.V. (2004). Constructivist learning theory and human capital theory: Shifting political and educational frameworks for teachers' ICT professional development. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(5), 587-596.
9. Crison, C., Lerman, S. & Winbourne, P. (2007). Mathematics and ICT: A framework for conceptualising secondary school mathematics teachers' classroom practices. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 16(1), 21-39.
10. Davis, N., Preston, C., & Sahin, I. (2009). Training teachers to use new technologies impacts multiple ecologies: Evidence from a national initiative. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(5), 861-878.
11. Demetriadis, S., Barbas, A., Molohides, A., Palaigeorgiou, G., Psillos, D., Vlahavas, I., et al. (2003). Cultures in negotiation: Teachers acceptance/resistance attitudes considering the infusion of teachnology into schools. Computers & Education, 41, 19-37.
12. Ertmer, P.A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for Technology Integration. Educational Technology Research & Development, 47(4), 47-61.
13. Flanagan, L. & Jacobsen, M. (2003). Technology leadership for the twenty-first century principal. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(2), 124-142.
14. Gillen, J., Staarman, J.K., Littleton, K., Mercer, N. & Twiner, A. (2007). A 'learning revolution'? Investigating pedagogic practice around interactive whiteboards in British primary classrooms. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 243-256.
15. Guskey, T.R. (2002). Does it make a difference? Evaluating professional development. Educational Leadership, 59(6), 45-51.
16. Haldane, M. (2007). Interactivity and the digital whiteboard: Weaving the fabric of learning. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 257-270.
17. Handler, M.G. (1993). Preparing new teachers to use computer technology: Perceptions and suggestions for teacher educators. Computers & Education, 20(2), 147-156.
18. Hodge, S. & Anderson, B. (2007). Teaching and learning with an interactive whiteboard: A teacher's journey. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 271-282.
19. Hodgson, B.R. (1995). The roles and needs of mathematics teachers using IT. In D. Watson & D. Tinsley (Eds.), Integrating information technology into education (pp. 27-37). London: Chapman & Hall.
20. Holmes, K. (2009). Planning to teach with digital tools: Introducing the interactive whiteboard to pre-service secondary mathematics teachers. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(3), 351-365. http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet25/holmes.html.
21. Jaber, W.E. & Moore, D.M. (1999). A survey of factors which influence teachers' use of computer-based technology. International Journal of Instructional Media, 26(3), 253-266. [thesis version verified 14 Jun 2010 at http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-71997-02347/unrestricted/WJABER2.PDF].
22. Jacobsen, D.M. (2001). Building different bridges: Technology integration, engaged student learning, and new approaches to professional development. Paper presented at the 82nd Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, Washington. [verified 14 Jun 2010] http://www.eric.ed.gov:80/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED453232.
23. Jacobsen, D.M. (2002). Building different bridges two: A case study of transformative professional development for student learning with technology. Paper presented at the 83rd Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, Louisiana. [verified 14 Jun 2010] http://people.ucalgary.ca/~dmjacobs/aera/building_bridges_two.html.
24. Jewitt, C., Moss, G. & Cardini, A. (2007). Pace, interactivity and multimodality in teachers' design of texts for interactive whiteboards in the secondary classroom. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 303-317.
25. Kennewell, S. (2005). Researching the influence of interactive presentation tools on teacher pedagogy. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Conference. http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/151717.doc.
26. Kennewell, S. & Beauchamp, G. (2007). The features of interactive whiteboards and their influence on learning. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 227-241.
27. Knight, P., Pennant, J. & Piggott, J. (2004). What does it mean to 'use the interactive whiteboard' in the daily mathematics lesson? Micromath, 20(2), 14-16.
28. López, O. S. (2010). The digital learning classroom: Improving English language learners' academic success in mathematics and reading using interactive whiteboard technology. Computers & Education, 54, 901-915.
29. Manternach-Wigans, L.K. (1999). Computer technology integration in Iowa high schools: Perceptions of teachers. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Iowa State University, Iowa. [verified 14 Jun 2010; 11.5 MB] http://www.eric.ed.gov:80/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b/80/16/09/ae.pdf.
30. Martin, W.B. (2000). Learning from the Colwell school: An ethnographic case study of an educational technology culture. Unpublished PhD, Cornell University.
31. Miller, D. (2003). Developing interactive whiteboard activity. Micromath, 19(33-35).
32. Miller, D. & Glover, D. (2007). Into the unknown: the professional development induction experience of secondary mathematics teachers using interactive whiteboard technology. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 319-331.
33. Pellegrino, J.W. & Altman, J.E. (1997). Information technology and teacher preparation: Some critical issues and illustrative solutions. Peabody Journal of Education, 72(1), 89-121.
34. Pierson, M.E. (2001). Technology integration practice as a function of pedagogical expertise. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(4), 413-430.
35. Polyzou, A. (2005). Growth in teachers' knowledge while learning to teach with multimedia: What has been learned from concrete educational experiences? Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 14(2), 205-223.
36. Pope, M., Hare, D. & Howard, E. (2005). Technology integration: Closing the gap between what preservice teachers are taught to do and what they can do. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(2), 191-203.
37. Prain, V. & Hand, B. (2003). Using new technologies for learning: A case study of a whole-school approach. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35(4), 441-458.
38. Shuldman, M. (2004). Superintendent conceptions of institutional conditions that impact teacher technology integration. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(4), 319-343.
39. Smith, H., Higgins, S., Wall, K. & Miller, J. (2005). Interactive whiteboards: Boon or bandwagon? A critical review of literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 91-101.
40. Snider, S.L. (2002). Exploring technology integration in a field-based teacher education program: Implementation efforts and findings. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(3), 230-249.
41. Soetaert, R. & van Belle, G.C.J. (2001). Breakdown into the virtual user-involved design and learning. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 31-42. [conference version verified 14 Jun 2010 at http://www.eric.ed.gov:80/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED421147].
42. Solvie, P.A. (2004). The digital whiteboard: A tool in early literacy instruction. The Reading Teacher, 57(5).
43. Strudler, N.B. & Wetzel, K. (1999). Lessons from exemplary colleges of education: Factors affecting technology integration in preservice programs. Educational Technology Research & Development, 47(4), 63-81.
44. Taber, K.S. (2003). Responding to alternative conceptions in the classroom. School Science Review, 84(308), 84-108.
45. Venezky, R.L. (2004). Technology in the classroom: Steps toward a new vision. Education, Communication and Information, 4(1), 3-21.
46. Wang, P. & Chan, P.S. (1995). Advantages, disadvantages, facilitators and inhibitors of computer-aided instruction in Singapore's secondary schools. Computers & Education, 25(3), 151-162.
47. Wood, R. & Ashfield, J. (2008). The use of interactive whiteboard for creative teaching and leanring in literacy and mathematics: A case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(1), 84-96.