Pace, interactivity and multimodality in teachers' design of texts for interactive whiteboards in the secondary school classroom

Learning, Media and Technology

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 303-317

  Jewitt, Carey ^a,b   Moss, Gemma ^a   Cardini, Alejandra ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547844053     PISSN: 17439884     EISSN: 17439892     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17439880701511149     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Ball, B. (2003) Teaching and learning mathematics with an interactive whiteboard, Micromath, 19(1), 4-7.
2. Becta (2004) Getting the most from your interactive whiteboard: a guide for secondary schools (Coventry, Becta).
3. Coghill, J. (2002) How is the interactive whiteboard being used in the primary school and how does this affect teachers and teaching? Available online at: www.virtuallearning.org.uk/whiteboards/ IFS_Interactive_whiteboards_in_the_primary_school.pdf (accessed 4 July 2007).
4. DfES (2004) Interactive whiteboards. Available online at: www.dfes.gov.uk/ictinschools/ict_active/subject.cfm?articleid=509 (accessed on 4 March 2004).
5. Glover, D. & Miller, D. (2001) Running with technology: the pedagogic impact of the large-scale introduction of interactive whiteboards in one secondary school, Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 10(3), 257-277.
6. Hargreaves, L., Moyles, J., Merry, R., Paterson, F., Pell, A. & Esarte-Sarries, V. (2003) How do primary school teachers define and implement 'interactive teaching' in the national literacy strategy in England, Research Papers in Education, 18(3), 217-236.
7. Hinostroza, J. E. & Mellar, H. G. (2001) Pedagogy embedded in educational software design: report of a case study, Computers and Education, 37(1), 27-40.
8. Jewitt, C. (2006) Technology, literacy and learning: a multimodal approach (London, Routledge-Falmer).
9. Kemeny, H. (2004) Review of some literature and classroom research into IWB use in primary schools. Unpublished paper produced for the 'IWB pedagogy and pupil performance project'.
10. Kennewell, S. (2004) Researching the influence of interactive presentation tools on teacher pedagogy, paper presented at BERA, Manchester, 18 September.
11. Knight, P., Pennant J. & Piggott J. (2004) What does it mean to 'use the interactive whiteboard' in the daily mathematics lesson?, MicroMath, 20(2), 14-16.
12. Kress, G. & van Leeuwen, T. (2001) Multimodal discourse: the modes and media of contemporary communication (London, Arnold).
13. Levy, P. (2002) Interactive whiteboards in learning and teaching in two Sheffield schools: a developmental study, Department of Information Studies, University of Sheffield. Available online at: http://dis.shef.ac.uk/ eirg/projects/wboards.htm (accessed 16 May 2007).
14. Miller, D. (2003) Developing interactive whiteboard activity, MicroMath, 19, 33-35.
15. Moss, G., Jewitt, C., Levacic, R., Armstrong, V., Cardini, A. & Castle, F. (2007) The interactive whiteboards, pedagogy and pupil performance evaluation. Research report 816 (London, DfES).
16. Sarland, C. (1991) Young people reading: culture and response (Milton Keynes, Open University Press).
17. Smith, H. J., Higgins, S., Wall, K. & Miller, J. (2005) Interactive whiteboards: boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(2), 91-101.
18. Tanner, H., Jones, S., Kennewell, S. & Beauchamp, G. (2005) Interactive whole class teaching and interactive whiteboards (Melbourne, Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia).
19. Wall, K., Higgins, S. & Smith, H. (2005) The visual helps me understand the complicated things: pupil views of teaching and learning with interactive whiteboards, British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(5), 851-867.