Fads and facts of E-government: A review of impacts of E-government (2003-2009)

International Journal of Public Administration

Volumn 33, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 564-579

  Andersen, Kim N ^a   Henriksen, Helle Z ^a   Medaglia, Rony ^a   Danziger, James N ^b   Sannarnes, Møyfrid K ^c   Enemærke, Mette ^d  

^a Copenhagen Business School ^*  (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AGDER   (Norway)

^d ROYAL SCHOOL OF LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE   (Denmark)

Author keywords

E government; ICT impacts; Literature review; Public sector

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956703894     PISSN: 01900692     EISSN: 15324265     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2010.517724     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Andersen, T. B. (2009). E-Government as an anti-corruption strategy. Information Economics and Policy, 21(3), 201-210.
2. Andersen, K. V., & Danziger, J. N. (1995). Information Technology and the Political World: The Impacts of IT on Capabilities, Interactions, Orientations and Values. International Journal of Public Administration, 18(11),1693-1724.
3. Bowonder, B., Jain, A., & Narendra Kumar, G. (2005). E-governance in a fishermen community: a case study of Pondicherry. International Journal of Services Technology and Management, 6(3-5), 294-321.
4. Castells, M. (1996). The Rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell.
5. Chadwick, A., & May, C. (2003). Interaction between States and Citizens in the Age of the Internet: "e-Government" in the United States, Britain, and the European Union. Governance: An International Journal Of Policy, Administration and Institutions, 16(2), 271-300.
6. Chiang, L., & Liao, C. (2009). The influence of digital standardization on administrative efficiency in e-government: A view of standards development organizations. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 26(4), 455-468.
7. Cho, Y. H., & Choi, B.-D. (2004). E-Government to Combat Corruption: The Case of Seoul Metropolitan Government. International Journal of Public Administration, 27(10), 719-735.
8. Cullen, R. (2009). Culture, identity and information privacy in the age of digital government. Online Information Review, 33(3), 405-421.
9. Danziger, J. N. (1985). Social science and the social impacts of computer technology. Social Science Quarterly, 66, 3-21.
10. Danziger, J. N., & Andersen, K. V. (2002). The Impacts of Information Technology on Public Administration: An Analysis of Empirical Research from the "Golden Age" of Transformation. International Journal of Public Administration, 25(5), 591-627.
11. Davenport, D. D., Richey, J., & Westbrook, L. (2008). E-government access to social service information: State web resources for domestic violence survivors. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(6), 903-915.
12. Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006). New Public Management Is Dead Long Live Digital-Era Governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3), 467-494.
13. Easton, D. (1965). A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York: Wiley.
14. Flak, L. S., Sæbø, Ø., & Sein, M. K. (2007). Towards a Cumulative Tradition in E-Government Research: Going Beyond the Gs and Cs. In M.A. Wimmer et al. (Eds.), EGOV 2007. Lecture Notes on Computer Science, 4656, 13-22.
15. Frissen, P. H. A. (1999). Politics, Governance, and Technology: A Postmodern Narrative on the Virtual State. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
16. Fu, J. R., Chao, W. P., & Farn, C. K. (2004). Determinants of taxpayers' adoption of electronic filing methods in Taiwan: An exploratory study. Journal of Government Information, 30(5-6), 658-683.
17. Gauld, R., Gray, A., & McComb, S. (2009). How responsive is E- Government? Evidence from Australia and New Zealand. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 69-74.
18. Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research. Educational Researcher, 5(10), 3-8.
19. Griffin, D., Foster, A., & Halpin, E. (2003). Joined-up e-Government: an exploratory study of UK local government progress. Canadian Journal Of Information And Library Science - Revue Canadienne Des Sciences De L'Information Et De Bibliotheconomie, 27(3), 132-133.
20. Grimsley, M., & Meehan, A. (2007). e-Government information systems: Evaluation-led design for public value and client trust. European Journal of Information Systems, 16, 134-148.
21. Grönlund, Å. (2003). Emerging electronic infrastructures: Exploring democratic components. Social Science Computer Review, 21(1), 55-72.
22. Grönlund, Å., & Andersson, A. (2006). e-Gov Research Quality Improvements Since 2003: More Rigor, but Research (Perhaps) Redefined, In M.A. Wimmer et al. (Eds.), EGOV 2006. Lecture Notes on Computer Science, 4084, 1-12.
23. Hackney, R., Jones, S., & Lösch, A. (2007). Towards an e-Government efficiency agenda: the impact of information and communication behaviour on e-Reverse auctions in public sector procurement. European Journal of Information Systems, 16, 178-191.
24. Heeks, R. (Ed.) (1999). Reinventing Government in the Information Age: International Practice in IT-enabled Public Sector Reform. London: Routledge.
25. Heeks, R. & Savita, B. (2007). Analyzing e-government research: Perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice. Government Information Quarterly, 24(2), 243-265.
26. Holden, S. H., & Fletscher, P. D. (2005). The Virtual Value Chain and E-Government Partnership: Non-Monetary Agreements in the IRS E- File program. International Journal of Public Administration, 28(7/8), 643-664.
27. Holden, S. H., Norris, D. F., Fletscher, P. D. (2003). Electronic Government at the Local Level. Public Performance & Management Review, 26(4), 325-344.
28. Holliday, I., & Kwok, R. C. W. (2004). Governance in the information age: building e-government in Hong Kong. New Media & Society, 6(4), 549-570.
29. Holliday, I., & Yep, R. (2005). E-government in China. Public Administration And Development, 25(3), 239-249.
30. Hsu, F. M., Chen, T. Y., & Wang, S. (2009). Efficiency and satisfaction of electronic records management systemsine-governmentinTaiwan. The Electronic Library, 27(3), 461-473.
31. Joia, L. A. (2004). Developing Government-to-Government enterprises in Brazil: a heuristic model drawn from multiple case studies. International Journal of Information Management, 24(2),147-166.
32. Kamal, M. M., Weerakkody, V., & Jones, S. (2009). The case of EAI in facilitating e-Government services in a Welsh authority. International Journal of Information Management, 29(2), 161-165.
33. Kim, S., Kim, H. J., & Lee, H. (2009). An institutional analysis of an e- government system for anti-corruption: The case of OPEN. Government Information Quarterly, 26(1), 42-50.
34. Koh, C. E., Ryan, S., & Prybutok, V. R. (2005). Creating value through managing knowledge in an e-government to constituency (G2C) environment. Journal Of Computer Information Systems, 45(4), 32-41.
35. Kraemer, K. L., & King, J. L. (2003). Information Technology and Administrative Reform: Will the Time After E-Government Be Different? Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations. I.T. in Government. Paper 337. http://repositories.cdlib.org/crito/government/337.
36. Kumar, R., & Best, M. L. (2006). Impact and sustainability of e-government services in developing countries: Lessons learned from Tamil Nadu, India. The Information Society, 22(1), 1-12.
37. Lasswell, H. (1936). Who Gets What, When, How. New York: Whittlesey House.
38. Lim, J. H., & Tang, S. (2007). Urban E-Government Initiatives and Environmental Decision Performance in Korea. J Public Adm Res Theory, 1-30.
39. Margetts, H. (1999). Information Technology in Government: Britain and America. London: Routledge.
40. Maumbe, B. M., Owei, V., & Alexander, H. (2008). Questioning the Pace and Pathway of E-Government Development in Africa: A Case Study of South Africa's Cape Gateway Project. Government Information Quarterly, 25(4), 757-777.
41. Maureen Brown, M. (2007). Understanding E-Government Benefits: An Examination of Leading-Edge Local Governments. The American Review of Public Administration, 37(2), 178-197.
42. Medaglia, R. (2007). The Challenged Identity of a Field: the State of the Art of eParticipation Research. Information Polity. An International Journal of Government and Democracy in the Information Age, 12(3), 169-181.
43. McGregor, M. A., & Holman, J. (2004). Communication technology at the Federal Communications Commission: E-government in the public interest? Government Information Quarterly, 21(3), 268-283.
44. Mirchandani, D., Johnson Jr., J., & Joshi, K. (2008). Perspectives of citizens towards e-government in Thailand and Indonesia: A multigroup analysis. Information Systems Frontiers, 10(4), 483-497.
45. Mitra, R., & Gupta, M. (2008). A contextual perspective of performance assessment in eGovernment: A study of Indian Police Administration. Government Information Quarterly, 25(2), 278-302.
46. Moon, M. J., & Norris, D. F. (2005). Does managerial orientation matter? The adoption of reinventing government and e-government at the municipal level. Information Systems Journal, 15(1), 43-60.
47. Morgeson, F. V., & Mithas, S. (2009). Does E-Government Measure Up to E-Business? Comparing End User Perceptions of U.S. Federal Government and E-Business Web Sites. Public Administration Review, 69,740-752.
48. Ni, A. Y., & Ho, A. T. K. (2005). Challenges in e-government development: Lessons from two information kiosk projects. Government Information Quarterly, 22(1), 58-74.
49. Norris, D. F., & Moon, M. J. (2005). Advancing E-Government at the Grassroots: Tortoise or Hare? Public Administration Review, 65(1), 64-75.
50. O'Toole, K. (2007). E-governance in Australian Local government: Spinning a Web around Community. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 3(4), 58-83.
51. Parrish Jr, J. L. & Courtney, J. F. (2007). Electronic Records Management in Local Government Agencies: The Case of the Clerk of Courts Office in Lake County Florida. Information Systems Management, 24(3), 223-229.
52. Prybutok, V. R., Zhang, X., & Ryan, S. D. (2008). Evaluating leadership, IT quality, and net benefits in an e-government environment. Information & Management, 45(3), 143-152.
53. Reddick, C. G. (2005). Citizen interaction with e-government: From the streets to servers? Government Information Quarterly, 22(1), 38-57.
54. Reddick, C. G. (2006). Information Resource Managers and E-government Effectiveness: A Survey of Texas State Agencies. Government Information Quarterly, 23(2), 249-266.
55. Reddick, C. G. (2009). Factors that Explain the Perceived Effectiveness of E-Government: A Survey of United States City Government Information Technology Directors. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 5(2), 1-15.
56. Reddick, C. G., & Frank, H. A. (2007). The perceived impacts of e-government on U.S. cities: A survey of Florida and Texas City managers. Government Information Quarterly, 24(3), 576-594.
57. Reece, B. (2006). E-Government Literature Review. Journal of E-Government 3(1), 69-76.
58. Rodriguez Bolivar, M. P., Caba Perez, C., & Lopez Hernandez, A. M. (2007). E-Government and Public Financial Reporting: The Case of Spanish Regional Governments. The American Review of Public Administration, 37(2), 142-177.
59. Rose, J., & Sanford, C. (2007). Mapping eParticipation Research: Four Central Challenges. The Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 20(55), 909-943.
60. Sanford, C., & Rose, J. (2007). Characterizing eParticipation. International Journal of Information Management, 27(6), 406-421.
61. Shackleton, P., Fisher, J., & Dawson, L. (2004). Internal and External Factors Impacting on E-Government Maturity: a Local Government Case Study. Journal of Information Technology Cases and Applications, 6(4), 36.
62. Shulman, S. W. (2003). An experiment in digital government at the United States National Organic Program. Agriculture And Human Values, 20(3), 253-265.
63. Swan, J., Scarbrough, H., & Preston, J. (1999). Knowledge Management: The next fad to forget people? Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Copenhagen, Denmark, 668-678.
64. Sæbø, Ø., Rose, J., & Flak, L. S. (2008). The shape of eParticipation: Characterizing an emerging research area. Government Information Quarterly, 25(3), 400-428.
65. Tan, C. W., & Pan, S. L. (2003). Managing e-transformation in the public sector: an e-government study of the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (IRAS). European Journal of Information Systems, 12(4), 269-281.
66. Tan, C. W., Pan, S. L., & Lim, E. T. K. (2005). Managing Stakeholder Interests in e-Government Implementation: Lessons Learned from a Singapore e-Government Project. Journal of Global Information Management, 13(1), 31-53.
67. Tapscott, D. (1996). The Digital Economy: Promise and Peril in the Age of Networked Intelligence. London-New York: Osborne McGraw-Hill.
68. Thomas, J. C., & Streib, G. (2005). E-Democracy, E-Commerce, and E-Research: Examining the Electronic Ties Between Citizens and Governments. Administration & Society, 37(3), 259-280.
69. Thompson, D. V., Rust, R. T., & Rhoda, J. (2005). The business value of e-government for small firms. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 16(3-4), 385-407.
70. Titah, R., & Barki, H. (2006). E-Government Adoption and Acceptance: A Literature Review. International Journal of Electronic Government Research 2(3), 23-57.
71. Tolbert, C. J., & Mossberger, K. (2006). The Effects of E-Government on Trust and Confidence in Government. Public Administration Review, 66(3),354-369.
72. Torres, L., Pina, V., & Royo, S. (2005). E-government and the transformation of public administrations in EU countries. Beyond NPM or just a second wave of reforms? Online Information Review, 29(5), 531-553.
73. Wang, Y., & Liao, Y. (2008). Assessing eGovernment systems success: A validation of the DeLone and McLean model of information systems success. Government Information Quarterly, 25(4), 717-733.
74. Weizenbaum, J. (1976). Computer Power and Human reason. San Francisco, CA: Peter Freeman.
75. Welch, E. W., & Fulla, S. (2005). Virtual interactivity between government and citizens: The Chicago Police Department's Citizen ICAM application demonstration case. Political Communication, 22(2), 215-236.
76. Welch, E. W., Hinnant, C. C., & Moon, M. J. (2005). Linking Citizen Satisfaction with E-Government and Trust in Government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(3), 371-391.
77. Welch, E. W., & Pandey, S. K. (2007). E-Government and Bureaucracy: Toward a Better Understanding of Intranet Implementation and Its Effect on Red Tape. J Public Adm Res Theory, 17(3), 379-404.
78. West, D. M. (2004). E-government and the Transformation of Service Delivery and Citizen Attitudes. Public Administration Review, 64(1), 15-27.
79. Wong, W., & Welch, E. (2004). Does E-Government Promote Accountability? A Comparative Analysis of Website Openness and Government Accountability. Governance: An International Journal Of Policy, Administration and Institutions, 17(2), 275-297.
80. Yildiz, M. (2007). E-Government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward. Government Information Quarterly, 24(3), 646-665.