The virtual value chain and e-government partnership: Non-monetary agreements in the irs e-file program

International Journal of Public Administration

Volumn 28, Issue 7-8, 2005, Pages 643-664

  Holden, Stephen H ^a   Fletcher, Patricia D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE COUNTY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84969447862     PISSN: 01900692     EISSN: 15324265     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1081/PAD-200064223     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Stafford, T.F., 2003. E-Services. Communications of the ACM, 46 (6): 27–28.
2. Porter, M.E., 1985. Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Performance, NY: Free Press.
3. Porter, M.E., and Millar, V.E., 1985. How Information Gives You Competitive Advantage. Harvard Business Review, 63 (4): 149–160.
4. Rayport, J.F., and Sviokla, J.J., 1994. Managing in the Marketspace. Harvard Business Review, 72 (6): 141–150.
5. Rayport, J.F., and Sviokla, J.J., 1995. Exploiting the Virtual Value Chain. Harvard Business Review, 73 (6): 75–85.
6. Schwartz, A., 2000. Mirror, Mirror on the Web. Federal Computer Week, June 9
7. Linder, S.H., and Rosenau, P.V., 2000. “ Matting the Terrain of Public–Private Partnership ”. In Public–Private Policy Partnerships, Edited by: Rosenau, P.V., Boston: MIT Press.
8. Di Maio, A. It Is Time for Online Partners. Gartner. 2002 http://www.gartner.com/resources/110900/110978/110978.pdf
9. Office of Management and Budget. 2000. Management of Federal Information Resources, Washington, DC: Office of Management and Budget; November 28.
10. Coalition for Networked Information. 1997. Access to and Services for Federal Information in the Network Environment, Washington, DC: Coalition for Networked Information.
11. Pardo, T.A. Realizing the Promise of Digital Government: It’s More Than Building a Web Site. 2000 http://www.cisp.org/imp/october_2000/10_00pardo.htm
12. Software Information Industry Association. 2001. Promoting Public–Private Cooperation in eGovernment, Not Competition, Washington, DC: Congressional Internet Caucus.
13. Fletcher, P.D., 2002. The Government Paperwork Elimination Act: Operating Instructions for an Electronic Government. International Journal of Public Administration, 25 (5): 723–736.
14. West, D.M. State and Federal E-Government in the United States, 2003. Taubman Center for Public Policy, Brown University. 2003 http://www.insidepolitics.org/egovt03us.pdf
15. Quick, S., 2003. International E-Government. Brand Strategy, 167: 29
16. Council for Excellence in Government. 2003. The New E-Government Equation: Ease, Engagement, Privacy and Protection, Washington, DC: Council for Excellence in Government; April.
17. Nielsen/NetRatings. 2003. More Than One Third of All Online Users Log On To Government Sites. Nielsen/NetRatings. 2003. (accessed July 23 2003)
18. Layne, K., and Lee, J., 2001. Developing Fully Functional E-government: A Four Stage Model. Government Information Quarterly, 18 (2): 122–136.
19. United Nations. 2002. Benchmarking E-government: A Global Perspective, New York: United Nations Division for Public Economics and Public Administration.
20. Hiller, J.S., and Bélanger, F., 2001. “ Privacy Strategies for Electronic Government ”. In E-Government 2001, Edited by: Abramson, M.A, and G.E., Means. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
21. Lacijan, C., and Crockett, A., 2000. Making Electronic Filing a Value Proposition for Tax Practicitioners. Journal of Tax Practice and Procedure, 2 (2): 25–36.
22. Venkatraman, N., and Kambril, A., 1991. The Check’s Not in the Mail: Strategies for Electronic Integration in Tax Return Filing. Sloan Management Review,: 33–43.
23. Internal Revenue Service. IRS Sets New Tax Filing Season Records. Internal Revenue Service. 2003 http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0, id=109446, 00.html
24. Internal Revenue Service. 2000. A Strategy For Growth, Washington, DC: Internal Revenue Service. Report No.: IRS Publication 3187
25. Internal Revenue Service. 2001. Handbook for Authorized IRS e-file Providers of Individual Tax Returns, Washington, DC: Internal Revenue Service. January 21. Publication 1345 (Rev 1–2001)
26. IRS Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998. Pub. L. 105–206
27. National Commission on the Restructuring the Internal Revenue Service. 1997. A Vision for a New IRS, Washington, DC: House of Representatives.
28. University of Michigan. ASCI: Federal Government Scores. University of Michigan. 2002. http://www.theacsi.org/government.htm
29. General Accounting Office. 1996. Tax Administration: Electronic Filing Fall Short of Expectations, Washington, DC: General Accounting Office. Report No.: GGD–96–12
30. General Accounting Office. 1999. High-Risk Series, Washington, DC: General Accounting Office. Report No.: GAO/HR–99–01
31. Department of Commerce. 2002. A Nation Online: How Americans are Expanding Their Use of the Internet, Washington, DC: Department of Commerce.
32. Office of Management and Budget. 2003. Managing Information Collection and Dissemination, Washington, DC: Office of Management and Budget.
33. Internal Revenue Service. Individual Tax Statistics–Filing Season/TPUS. 2002 http://www.irs.gov/taxstats/article/0, id=96629, 00.html
34. Bozeman, B., 2002. Government Management of Information Mega-Technology: Lessons from the Internal Revenue Service’s Tax Systems Modernization, Arlington, VA: The PricewaterhouseCoopers Endowment for the Business of Government.
35. Federal Computer Week. 2000 Federal 100 Awards. 2000 http://www.fcw.com/events/fed100/2000/intro.asp (http://www.fcw.com/events/fed100/2000/intro.asp)