Analyzing e-government research: Perspectives, philosophies, theories, methods, and practice

Government Information Quarterly

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 243-265

  Heeks, Richard ^a   Bailur, Savita ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33947651184     PISSN: 0740624X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2006.06.005     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Al-Sebie M., and Irani Z. E-government: Defining boundaries and lifecycle maturity. In: Bannister F., and Remenyi D. (Eds). 3rd European conference on e-Government (2003), MCIL, Reading, UK 19-29 (For example)
2. Avgerou C. Information systems: What sort of science is it?. Omega 28 (2000) 567-579 (For example)
3. Benbasat, I., & Weber, R., 1996. Rethinking "diversity" in information systems research. Information Systems Research, 7(4), 389-399 (p. 394).
4. Benbasat I., and Zmud R. Empirical research in information systems: The practice of relevance. MIS Quarterly 23 1 (1999) 3-16
5. Burrell G., and Morgan G. Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis (1979), Heinemann, London For example
6. Dawes S.S. Opportunities for digital government research (2001, May 21-23), National Conference for Digital Government Research., Los Angeles, CA Paper presented at dg.o.2001
7. Easterby-Smith M., Thorpe R., and Lowe A. Management research: An introduction. 2nd ed. (2002), Sage Publications, London
8. Flynn D., and Gregory P. The use of social theories in 20 years of WG8.2 empirical research. In: Kaplan B., Truex D.P., Wastell D., Wood-Harper A.T., and DeGross J.I. (Eds). Information systems research: Relevant theory and informed practice (2004), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA 365-388 (For example)
9. See also:Fountain, J.E., 2003. Information, institutions and governance: Advancing a basic social science research program for digital government, Research Working Paper 03-004. Cambridge, MA: Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
10. Galliers R. Research issues in information systems. Journal of Information Technology 8 (1993) 92-98
11. Gill J., and Meier K.J. Public administration research and practice: A methodological manifesto. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10 1 (2000) 157-199
12. Gronlund A., and Horan T. Introducing e-gov: History, definitions and issues. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 15 (2005) (May), Article 39
13. Guba E.G. The alternative paradigm dialog. In: Guba E.G. (Ed). The paradigm dialog (2002), Sage Publications., Newbury Park, CA 17-27
14. Harmon M.M., and Mayer R.T. Organization theory for public administration (1986), Little, Brown & Co., Boston MA
15. Heeks R.B. Explaining success and failure of e-government. In: Remenyi D., and Bannister F. (Eds). European conference on e-Government (2001), MCIL, Reading, UK 163-174
16. Heeks R.B. What did Giddens and Latour ever do for us? Academic writings on information systems and development. Information Technology in Developing Countries 11 1 (2001)
17. Heeks R.B. eGovernment in Africa: Promise and practice. Information Polity 7 2-3 (2003) 97-114
18. Heeks R.B. Implementing and managing eGovernment: An international text (2006), Sage Publications, London
19. Heeks, R.B. (in press). Application and impact of eGovernment: An international text. London: Sage Publications.
20. Jankowicz A.D. Business research projects. 3rd ed. (2000), Business Press, London
21. Kettl D.F. Public administration at the millennium: The state of the field. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10 1 (2000) 7-34
22. King J.L. Editorial notes. Information Systems Research 4 4 (1993) 291-298
23. King N. Template analysis. In: Symon G., and Cassell C. (Eds). Qualitative methods and analysis in organizational research (1998), Sage Publications, London 118-134
24. Korac-Boisvert N., and Kouzmin A. Transcending soft-core IT disasters in public sector organizations. Information Infrastructure and Policy 4 2 (1995) 131-161
25. Landry M., and Banville C.A. A disciplined methodological pluralism for MIS research. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies 2 2 (1992) 77-97 cited in
26. Vessey I., Ramesh V., and Glass R.L. Research in information systems: An empirical study of diversity in the discipline and its journals. Journal of Management Information Systems 19 2 (2002) 129-174
27. Lowery D., and Evans K.G. The iron cage of methodology. Administration & Society 36 3 (2004) 306-327
28. In: Myers M.D., and Avison D. (Eds). Qualitative Research in Information Systems. (2002), Sage Publications, London
29. Neuendorf K.A. The content analysis handbook (2002), Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA
30. Orlikowski W.J., and Baroudi J.J. Studying information technology in organizations: Research approaches and assumptions. Information Systems Research 2 1 (1991) 1-28
31. Rademacher R. The changing profile of information systems research: 1995-2000. Journal of Computer Information Systems 42 1 (2001) 13-16 (For example)
32. Rose, J., & van Rossum, M., (2005). A roadmap for European research in learning and knowledge creation in e-government. In F. Bannister (Ed.), 5th European conference on e-Government (pp. 343-348). Reading, UK: MCIL, p.347.
33. Rowe C. People and chips (1990), Paradigm Publishing, London
34. Sahay S., and Walsham G. Information technology in developing countries: A need for theory building. Information Technology for Development 6 3/4 (1995) 111-124
35. Swanson E.B., and Ramiller N. Information systems research thematics: Submissions to a new journal. Information Systems Research 4 4 (1993) 299-330
36. Tian J., and Tianfield H. Some perspectives of e-government. In: Bannister F., and Remenyi D. (Eds). 3rd European conference on e-Government (2003), MCIL, Reading, UK 427-437
37. Walsham G. The emergence of interpretivism in IS research. Information Systems Research 6 4 (1995) 376-394