Managing stakeholder interests in e-government implementation: Lessons learned from a Singapore e-government project

Journal of Global Information Management

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 31-53

  Tan, Chee Wee ^a   Pan, Shan L ^b   Lim, Eric T K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Convergence; e governance; e government; Stakeholder interests

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; MANAGERS; PUBLIC POLICY; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; STRATEGIC PLANNING; TAXATION;

CIVIL ADMINISTRATION; CONVERGENCE; E-GOVERNANCE; E-GOVERNMENT; PUBLIC MANAGEMENT; STAKEHOLDER INTERESTS; STAKEHOLDER MANAGEMENT;

GOVERNMENT DATA PROCESSING;

EID: 10444228891     PISSN: 10627375     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/jgim.2005010102     Document Type: Review

References (89)

1. Agle, B.R., Mitchell, R.K., & Sonnenfeld, J.A. (1999). Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 507-525.
2. th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications, (pp. 379-83).
3. Allen, B.A., Juillet, L., Paquet, G., & Roy, J. (2001). E-governance & government on-line in Canada: Partnerships, people & prospects. Government Information Quarterly, 18, 93-104.
4. Audia, P.G., Locke, E.A., & Smith, K.G. (2000). The paradox of success: An archival and a laboratory study of strategic persistence following radical environmental change. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 837-53.
5. Backus, M. (2001). E-governance in developing countries. IICD Research Brief - No 1.
6. Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D.K., & Mead, M. (1987). The case research strategy in studies of information systems. MIS Quarterly, 11(3), 369-86.
7. Berman, S.L., Wicks, A.C., Kotha, S., & Jones, T.M. (1999). Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 488-506.
8. Blair, M.M. (1995). Ownership and control. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
9. Boyatzis, R.E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. CA: Sage Publication.
10. Caroll, A.B. (1989). Business and society. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western.
11. Clarkson, M.B.E. (1995). A risk based model of stakeholder theory. University of Toronto.
12. Comte, A. (1971). A general view of positivism. Dubuque, IA: Brown Reprints.
13. Coursey, D., & Bozeman, B. (1990). Decision making in public and private organizations: A test of alternative concepts of "publicness. " Public Administrative Review, 50(5), 525-35.
14. th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA'00), Greenwich, London.
15. Davis, J.H., Schoorman, F.D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22, 20-47.
16. Demb, A., & Neubauer, F.F. (1992). The corporate board: Confronting the paradoxes. Long Range Planning, 25(3), 9-20.
17. Donaldson, L., & Davis, J.H. (1994). Boards and company performance- Research challenges the conventional wisdom. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 2(3), 151-60.
18. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L.E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65-91.
19. Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14, 57-74.
20. Eisenhardt, K.M. (1991). Better stories and better constructs. Academy of Management Review, 16(3), 620-7.
21. Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 87-104). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22. Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
23. Frey, B.S. (1997). On the relationship between intrinsic and extrinsic work motivation. International Journal of Industrial Organizations, 15, 427-439.
24. Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 191-205.
25. Ghoshal, S., & Moran, P. (1996). Bad for practice: A critique of the transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review, 21, 13-47.
26. Greenley, G.E., & Foxall, G.R. (1998). External moderations of associations among stakeholder orientations and company performance. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 15(1), 51-69.
27. Gregory, R.J. (1999) Social capital theory and administrative reform: Maintaining ethical theory in public service. Public Administration Review, 59(1), 63-75.
28. Guillaume, G. (1999). L'empire de Réseaux. Paris: Descartes & Cie.
29. Hambrick, D.C., & D'Aveni, R.A. (1988). Large corporate failures as downward spirals. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33, 1-23.
30. Haque, M.S. (2001) The diminishing publicness of public service under the current mode of governance. Public Administration Review, 61(1) 65-82.
31. Hawley, J.P., & Williams, A.T. (1996). Corporate governance in the United States: The rise of fiduciary capitalism, a review of the literature. Prepared for the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris.
32. Ho, A.T-K. (2002). Reinventing local governments and the e-government initiative. Public Administration Review, 62(4), 434-44.
33. IADB (Inter-American Development Bank). E-governance: E-government. ICT for Development. Retrieved June 20, 2004, from: http://www.iadb.org/ict4dev/governance.htm
34. Janis, I.L. (1982). Groupthink. Boston: Houghton, Mifflin.
35. Jensen, M.C., & Meckling, W.H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-60.
36. Kisfalvi, V. (2000). The threat of failure, the perils of success and CEO character: Sources of strategic persistence. Organizational Studies, 21, 611-639.
37. Kruckeberg, D., & Starck, K. (1998). Public relations and community: A reconstructed theory. New York: Praeger.
38. Lacity, M., & Janson, M.A. (1994). Understanding qualitative data: A framework of text analysis methods. Journal of Management Information System, 11(2), 137-55.
39. Lawson, G. (1998). NetState. London: Demos.
40. Lee, A.S. (1991). Integrating positivist and interpretive approaches to organizational research, Organizational Science, 2(4), 342-365.
41. th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA'OO), Greenwich, London.
42. Lindsey, D.H., Brass, D.J., & Thomas, J.B. (1995). Efficacy-performance spirals: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Review, 20, 645-678.
43. Markus, M.L. (1994). Electronic mail as the medium of managerial choice. Organizational Science, 5(4), 502-527.
44. nd ed.). New York: Free Press.
45. Milford, H.S. (2000). Racing to e-government: Using the Internet for citizen service delivery. Government Finance Review, 16(5), 21-2.
46. Mitchell, R.K., Agle, B.R., & Wood, D.J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-86.
47. Monks, R.A.G., & Minow, N. (1995). Corporate governance. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
48. Moon, M.J. (2002). The evolution of e-government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality? Public Administration Review, 62(4), 424-33.
49. Moon, M.J., & Bretschneider S. (2002). Does the perception of red tape constrain IT innovativeness in organizations? Unexpected results from simultaneous equation model and implications. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11(3), 327-52.
50. Nadler, D., & Tushman, M. (1997). Competing by design: The power of organization architecture. New York: Oxford University Press.
51. Ngwenyama, O.K., & Lee, A.S. (1997). Communication richness in electronic mail: Critical social theory and the contextuality of meaning. MIS Quarterly, 21(2), 145-67.
52. Norris, P. (1999). Who surfs? New technology, old voters, and virtual democracy. In E.C. Kamarck, & J.S. Nye (Eds.), Democracy.com? Governance in networked world (pp. 71-94). Hollis, NH: Hollis Publishing Company.
53. Numagami, T. (1998). The infeasibility of invariant laws in management studies: A reflective dialogue in defense of case studies. Organization Science, 9(1), 2-15.
54. Orlikowski, J.W., & Baroudi, J.J. (1991). Studying information technology in organizations: Research approaches and assumptions. Information Systems Research, 2(1) 1-28.
55. Orlikowski, W. (1993). Case told as organisational change: Investigating incremental and radical Changes in system development. MIS Quarterly, 7(3), 309-40.
56. th Pacific Conference on Information Systems (PACIS 2002), Tokyo, Japan.
57. th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2002), Hawaii.
58. Pardo, T.A., Scholl, H.J., Cook, M.E., Connelly, D.R., & Dawes, S.S. (2000). New York State central accounting system stakeholder need analysis. Albany, NY: Central for Technology in Government.
59. Paré, G., & Elam, JJ. (1997). Using case study research to build theories of IT implementation. In A.S. Lee, J. Leibenau, & J.I. DeGross (Eds.), Information systems and qualitative research (pp. 542-568). London: Chapman and Hall.
60. Parkhe, A. (1993). Messy research, methodological predispositions, and theory development in international joint ventures. Academy of Management Review, 8(2), 227-268.
61. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G.R. (1978). The knowledge-doing gap: How smart companies turn knowledge into action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
62. Prahalad, C.K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2000). Co-opting customer competence. Harvard Business Review, 78(1), 79-87.
63. Schiavo-Ocampo, S., & Sundaram, P. (2001). To serve and preserve: Improving public administration in a competitive world. Manila, Philippines: Asian Development Bank.
64. Schleifer, A., & Vishny, R.W. (1996). A survey of corporate governance [Working Paper]. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
65. Schneiderman, B., & Rose, A. (1996). Social impact statements; Engaging public participation in information technology design. Proceedings of the Symposium on Computers and the Quality of Life.
66. Scholl, H. (2001). Applying stakeholder theory to e-government. In B. Schmid, K. Stanoevska-Slabeva, & V. Tschammer (Eds.), Towards the e-society: E-commerce, e-business, and e-government (pp. 735-747). MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
67. Scott, S.G., & Lane, V.R. (2000). A stake-holder approach to organizational identity. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 43-62.
68. Seavey, A.C. (1996). Final thoughts on interesting times. Journal of Government Information, 23(4), 515-520.
69. Stiglitz, J., Orszag, P., & Orszag, J. (2000). The role of government in a digital age. Retrieved April 16, 2002, from: http://www.ccianet.org/digital_age/report.pdf
70. Stratford, J.S., & Stratford, J. (2000). Computerized and networked government information. Journal of Government Information, 27, 385-389.
71. Strauss, A.L., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. London: Sage.
72. Sundaramurthy, C. (2000). Antitakeover provisions and shareholder value implications: A review and a contingency framework. Journal of Management, 26,1005-1030.
73. Sundaramurthy, C., & Lewis, M. (2003). Control and collaboration: Paradoxes of governances. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 397-15.
74. Tannenbaum, A.S. (1967). Control in organizations. New York: McGraw-Hill.
75. Tapscott, D. (1996). Digital economy. New York: McGraw-Hill.
76. Taylor, S., & Bogdan, R. (1984). Introduction to qualitative research methods. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
77. th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Pubic Administration.
78. Thomas, K.W., & Velthouse, B.A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An "interpretive" model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15, 666-681.
79. Traunmuller, R., & Wimmer, M. (2000, September 6-8). Process-collaboration-norms-knowledge: Signposts for administrative application development. Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA'00), London.
80. Tricker, R.I. (1994). International corporate governance. Singapore: Simon & Schuster.
81. Turnbull, S. (1997). Stakeholder co-operation. Journal of Co-operative Studies, 29(3), 18-52.
82. von Hoffman, C. (1999, November 15). The making of e-government. COI Enterprise Magazine.
83. Walsham, G. (1993). Interpreting infor motion systems in organizations. Chichester, West Sussex, UK, New York:Wiley.
84. Walsham, G. (1995). Interpretive case studies in IS research: Nature and method. European Journal of Information Systems, 4, 74-81.
85. Wescott, C. (2002). E-government in the Asia Pacific region. Retrieved March 27, 2002, from: http://www.adb.org/Documents/Papers/E_Government/default.asp
86. Westphal, J.D. (1999). Collaboration in the boardroom:Behavioral and performance consequences of CEO-board social ties. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 7-24.
87. th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications.
88. th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2002). Hawaii.
89. Yin, R.K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. London: Sage.