Erratum to "Characterizing eParticipation" [Int. J. Inf. Manage. 27 (6) (2007) 406-421] (DOI:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2007.08.002);Characterizing eParticipation

International Journal of Information Management

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 406-421

  Sanford, Clive ^a   Rose, Jeremy ^a  

^a AALBORG UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

eDemocracy; eGovernance; eParticipation; Literature review

Indexed keywords

CURRICULA; E-LEARNING; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION;

ACADEMIC THEORIES; CATEGORIZATION SCHEME; EDEMOCRACY; EGOVERNANCE; EPARTICIPATION; LITERATURE REVIEW;

COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK;

EID: 35648929361     PISSN: 02684012     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2007.11.005     Document Type: Erratum

References (138)

1. Abbott J.P. Democracy@internet.asia? The challenges to the emancipatory potential of the net: Lessons from China and Malaysia. Third World Quarterly 22 1 (2001) 99-114
2. Aikens G.S. A personal history of Minnesota Electronic Democracy, 1994. Journal of Government Information 25 1 (1998) 1-9
3. Ainsworth S., Hardy C., and Harley B. Online consultation: e-Democracy and e-resistance in the case of the development gateway. Management Communication Quarterly 19 1 (2005) 120-145
4. Al-Kodmany K. Public participation: Technology and democracy. Journal of Architectural Education 53 4 (2000) 220-228
5. Albrecht S. Whose voice is heard in online deliberation? A study of participation and representation in political debates on the Internet. Information, Communication and Society 9 1 (2006) 62-82
6. Astrom J. Should democracy be quick, strong, or thin?. Communications of the ACM 44 1 (2001) 49-51
7. Barber B. Strong democracy (1984), University of California Press, Berkeley
8. Bekkers V. Virtual policy communities and responsive governance: Redesigning on-line debates. Information Polity 9 3/4 (2004) 193-203
9. Belanger, F., & Carter, L. (2006). The effects of the digital divide on e-government: An empirical evaluation. In Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Kauai, Hawaii.
10. Bell D. Teletext and technology: New networks of knowledge and information in postindustrial society. In: Bell D. (Ed). The winding passage: Essays and sociological journeys, 1960-1980 (1977), Basic, New York 34-65
11. Berman J., and Witzner D.J. Technology and democracy. Social Research 64 3 (1997) 1313-1319
12. Best S.J., and Krueger B.S. Analyzing the representativeness of Internet political participation. Political Behavior 27 2 (2005) 183-216
13. Bimber B. Information and political engagement in America: The search for effects of information technology at the individual level. Political Research Quarterly 54 1 (2001) 53-67
14. Bingham L.B., Nabatchi T., and O'Leary R. The new governance: Practices and processes for stakeholder and citizen participation in the work of government. Public Administration Review 65 5 (2005) 547-558
15. Boland R. Phenomenology: A preferred approach to research in information systems. In: Mumford E., Hirschheim R.A., Fitzgerald G., and WoodHarper T. (Eds). Research methods in information systems (1985), North-Holland, Amsterdam 193-201
16. Bourdieu P. Distinction (1992), Routledge, London
17. Carlitz R.D., and Gunn R.W. Online rulemaking: a step toward e-governance. Government Information Quarterly 19 4 (2002) 389-405
18. Castells M. The rise of the network society, the information age: Economy, society and culture Vol. 1 (1996), Blackwell, Oxford, UK
19. Chadwick A. Bringing e-democracy back in-Why it matters for future research on e-governance. Social Science Computer Review 21 4 (2003) 443-455
20. Chadwick A., and May C. Interaction between states and citizens in the age of the Internet: e-Government in the United States, Britain, and the European Union. Governance-An International Journal of Policy and Administration 16 2 (2003) 271-300
21. Chang W.-Y. Online civic participation and political empowerment: Online media and public opinion formation in Korea. Media, Culture and Society 27 6 (2005) 925-935
22. Curwell S., Deakin M., Cooper I., and Paskaleva-Shapira K. Citizens' expectations of information cities: Implications for urban planning and design. Building Research and Information 33 1 (2005) 55-66
23. Dahlberg L. The Internet and democratic discourse: Exploring the prospects of online deliberative forums extending the public sphere. Information, Communication and Society 4 4 (2001) 615-633
24. In: Davis J., Hirschl T., and Stack M. (Eds). Cutting edge: Technology, information capitalism, and social revolution (1997), Verso, New York
25. de Tocqueville A. Democracy in America Vol. 2 (1945), Vintage Books, New York
26. Deetz S. Describing differences in approaches to organization science: Rethinking Burrell and Morgan and their legacy. Organization Science 7 2 (1996) 191-207
27. DiMaggio P., Hargittai E., Neuman W.R., and Robinson J.P. Social implications of the Internet. Annual Review of Sociology 27 1 (2001) 307-336
28. Drechsler W., and Madise U. e-Voting in Estonia. TRAMES 6 3 (2002) 234-244
29. Dretske F. Knowledge and the flow of information (1981), The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
30. Dutta-Bergman M.J. Access to the Internet in the context of community participation and community satisfaction. New Media and Society 7 1 (2005) 89-109
31. Dutton W., Steckenrider J., Rosschristensen D., and Lynch L. Electronic participation by citizens in United-States local-government. Information Age 6 2 (1984) 78-97
32. Evans A.J., Kingston R., and Carver S. Democratic input into the nuclear waste, disposal problem: The influence of geographical data on decision making examined through a Web-based GIS. Journal of Geographical Systems 6 2 (2004) 117-132
33. Fernandez-Maldonado A.M. Virtual cities as a tool for democratization in developing countries. Knowledge, Technology and Policy 18 1 (2005) 43-61
34. Foucault M. The archaeology of knowledge (1989), Routledge, London
35. Fulla, S., & Welch, E. (2002). Framing virtual interactivity between government and citizens: A study of feedback systems in the Chicago Police Department. In Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii international conference on system sciences.
36. George C. The Internet's political impact and the penetration/participation paradox in Malaysia and Singapore. Media Culture and Society 27 6 (2005) 903-920
37. Gibson R. Elections online: Assessing Internet voting in light of the Arizona Democratic Primary. Political Science Quarterly 116 4 (2001) 561-583
38. Giddens A. The constitution of society (1984), Polity Press, Cambridge
39. Gimmler A. Deliberative democracy, the public sphere and the Internet. Philosophy and Social Criticism 27 4 (2001) 21-39
40. Gronau, N., Weber, E., & Uslar, M. (2005). Institutionalization of a general electronic democracy through electronic democratic parties-A general concept with focus on Germany. In HICSS'05. Proceedings of the 38th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences.
41. Grönlund A. Emerging infrastructures for e-democracy. e-Service Journal 2 1 (2003) 62-89
42. Grönlund A. Emerging electronic infrastructures-Exploring democratic components. Social Science Computer Review 21 1 (2003) 55-72
43. Grönlund, A. (2005). What's in a field-exploring the egovernment domain. In Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii international conference on system science-2005. New York: IEEE (January 3-6).
44. Gross, T. (2000). Technological support for e-democracy: History and perspectives. In The 11th international workshop on database an expert systems application-DEXA 2000 (pp. 391-395), Greenwich, UK.
45. Gustafsson P. The order of e-democracy. e-Service Journal 2 1 (2002) 114
46. Habermas J. The theory of communicative action Vol. 1 (1984), Beacon, Boston
47. Habermas J. Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy (1996), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
48. Held D. Models of democracy (1996), Blackwell, Oxford
49. Hemingway C.J. Towards a socio-cognitive theory of information systems: An analysis of key philosophical and conceptual issues. Information systems: Current issues and future changes (1998), Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press, New York
50. Hoff J., Lofgren K., and Torpe L. The state we are in: e-Democracy in Denmark. Information Polity 8 1/2 (2003) 49-66
51. Howard P.N. Deep democracy thin citizenship: The impact of digital media in political campaign strategy. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 597 (2005) 153-170
52. Huang E. Flying freely but in the cage-An empirical study of using Internet for the democratic development in China. Information Technology for Development 8 3 (1998) 145-162
53. Hudson-Smith A., Evans S., and Batty M. Building the virtual city: Public participation through e-democracy. Knowledge, Technology and Policy 18 1 (2005) 62-85
54. Jaeger P.T. The social impact of an accessible e-democracy. Journal of Disability Policy Studies 15 1 (2004) 19-26
55. Jensen J.L. Public spheres on the Internet: Anarchic or government-sponsored-A comparison. Scandinavian Political Studies 26 4 (2003) 349-374
56. Jensen J.L. Virtual democratic dialogue? Bringing together citizens and politicians. Information Polity 8 1/2 (2003) 29-47
57. Johnson T.J., and Kaye B.K. Wag the blog: How reliance on traditional media and the Internet influence credibility perceptions of Weblogs among blog users. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 81 3 (2004) 622-642
58. Kakabadse A., Kakabadse N.K., and Kouzmin A. Reinventing the Democratic Governance Project through information technology? A growing agenda for debate. Public Administration Review 63 1 (2003) 44-60
59. Kampen J.K., and Snijkers K. e-Democracy: A critical evaluation of the ultimate e-dream. Social Science Computer Review 21 4 (2003) 491-496
60. Kangas J., and Store R. Internet and teledemocracy in participatory planning of natural resources management. Landscape and Urban Planning 62 2 (2003) 89-101
61. Kant I. The metaphysics of morals. In: Kant I. (Ed). Practical philosophy (1996), University Press, Cambridge 353-603
62. Kenski K. To I-Vote or not to I-Vote? Opinions about Internet voting from Arizona voters. Social Science Computer Review 23 3 (2005) 293-303
63. Klein H.K. Tocqueville in cyberspace: Using the Internet for citizen associations. Information Society 15 4 (1999) 213-220
64. Koch A. Cyber citizen or Cyborg citizen: Baudrillard, political agency, and the commons in virtual politics. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 20 2/3 (2005) 159-175
65. Kosmopoulos A. Aspects of regulatory and legal implications on e-voting. In: Wang S., et al. (Ed). Conceptual modeling for advanced application domains. Lecture notes in computer science Vol. 3289 (2004), Springer, Berlin 589-600
66. Lamb, C., Berntsen, D., & Kueppers, S. (2004). e-Participation in the planning process. In Proceedings of the eighth international conference on information visualisation (IV'04) (pp. 701-706).
67. Latour B. Reassembling the social: An introduction to Actor-Network-Theory (2005), Oxford University Press, Oxford
68. Lourenco, R. P., & Costa, J. P. (2006). Discursive e-democracy support. In HICSS'06. Proceedings of the 39th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences.
69. Luhrs R., Albrecht S., Lubcke M., and Hohberg B. How to grow? Online consultation about growth in the city of Hamburg: Methods, techniques, success factors. In: Traunmüller R. (Ed). EGOV 2003. Lecture notes in computer science Vol. 2739 (2003), Springer, Berlin 79-84
70. Lusoli W., and Ward S. Digital rank-and-file: Party activists perceptions and use of the Internet. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 6 (2004) 453-470
71. Macintosh, A. (2004). Characterizing e-participation in policy-making. In Proceedings of the 37th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences (pp. 117-126).
72. Macintosh, A., McKay-Hubbard, A., & Shell, D. (2005). Using weblogs to support local democracy. In M. Böhlen, et al. (Eds.), TCGOV 2005: IFIP international federation for information processing, Lecture notes in artificial intelligence (Vol. 3416), (pp. 1-12).
73. Macintosh A., Robson E., Smith E., and Whyte A. Electronic democracy and young people. Social Science Computer Review 21 1 (2003) 43-54
74. Macintosh A., and Smith E. Citizen participation in public affairs. In: Traunmüller R., and Lenk K. (Eds). EGOV 2002. Lecture notes in computer science Vol. 2456 (2002), Springer, Berlin 256-263
75. Mahrer H., and Krimmer R. Towards the enhancement of e-democracy: Identifying the notion of the 'middleman paradox'. Information Systems Journal 15 1 (2005) 27-42
76. Markus M.L., and Robey D. Information technology and organization change: Causal structure in theory and research. Management Science 4 5 (1988) 583-598
77. Masters, Z., Macintosh, A., & Smith, E. (2004). Young people and e-democracy: Creating a culture of participation. In R. Traunmüller (Ed.), EGOV 2004, Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 3183), (pp. 15-22).
78. McFall B., and Williams S. Systems language for e-democracy: Personal resource systems management (PRSM), a model and action research. Systemic Practice and Action Research 17 4 (2004) 353-371
79. Moreno-Jimenez, J. M., & Polasek, W. (2003). e-Democracy and knowledge. A multicriteria framework for the new democratic era. Economics series (Vol. 142). Vienna: Department of Economics and Finance, Institute for Advanced Studies.
80. Moreno-Jimenez, J. M., & Polasek, W. (2005). e-Cognocracy and the participation of immigrants in e-governance. Economics series (Vol. 169). Vienna: Department of Economics and Finance, Institute for Advanced Studies.
81. Mumpower J. Selecting and evaluating tools and methods for public participation. International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management 1 1 (2001) 66-77
82. Myles J. Community networks and cultural intermediaries: The politics of community net development in Greater Manchester. Media Culture and Society 26 4 (2004) 467-490
83. Ogden M.R. Politics in a parallel universe-is there a future for cyberdemocracy. Futures 26 7 (1994) 713-729
84. Olsson A.R. Electronic democracy and power. In: Traunmüller R. (Ed). EGOV 2004. Lecture notes in computer science Vol. 3183 (2004), Springer, Berlin 7-14
85. Oravec J.A. Preventing e-voting hazards: The role of information professionals. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing (2005) i-iv
86. Padget J. e-Government and e-democracy in Latin America. Intelligent Systems, IEEE (see also IEEE Intelligent Systems and Their Applications) 20 1 (2005) 94-96
87. Päivärinta T. The concept of genre within the critical approach to information systems development. Information and Organization 11 (2001) 207-234
88. Papacharissi Z. Democracy online: Civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups. New Media and Society 6 2 (2004) 259-283
89. Paralic, J., & Sabol, T. (2001). Implementation of e-government using knowledge-based system. In 12th international workshop on database and expert systems applications (pp. 364-368).
90. Paralic J., Sabol T., and Mach M. A system to support e-democracy. In: Traunmüller R., and Lenk K. (Eds). EGOV 2002. Lecture notes in computer science Vol. 2456 (2002), Springer, Berlin 288-291
91. Paralic J., Sabol T., and Mach M. First trials in webocracy. In: Traunmüller R. (Ed). EGOV 2003. Lecture notes in computer science Vol. 2739 (2003), Springer, Berlin 69-74
92. Park H.S. Case study: Public consensus building on the Internet. Cyberpsychology and Behavior 5 3 (2002) 233-239
93. Pejout N. The communication of communication. An illustration: The South African rhetorical promotion of ICTs. Politikon: South African Journal of Political Studies 31 2 (2004) 185-199
94. Polat R.K. The Internet and political participation-Exploring the explanatory links. European Journal of Communication 20 4 (2005) 435-459
95. Potekar, S. D., & Giragaonkar, K. P. (2004). Application of ICT for better decision making in egovernance. In Proceedings of the international conference on information and communication technologies: From theory to applications, April 19-23.
96. Premfors R. Den starka demokratin (The strong democracy) (2000), Atlas, Stockholm
97. Prosser A., Kofler R., and Krimmer R. Deploying electronic democracy for public corporations. In: Traunmüller R. (Ed). EGOV 2003. Lecture notes in computer science Vol. 2739 (2003), Springer, Berlin 234-239
98. Putnam R.D. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community (2000), Simon & Schuster, New York
99. Quinn R.E., and Rohrbaugh J.W. A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: Towards a competing values approach to organizational effectiveness. Management Science 29 (1983) 363-377
100. Ranerup A. Factors affecting discussions in on-line forums in local government. SIGGROUP Bulletin 20 2 (1999) 11-13
101. In: Renn O., Webler T., and Wiedemann P. (Eds). Fairness and competence in citizen participation (1994), Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press, Dordrecht
102. Robinson J., Barth K., and Kohut A. Social impact research: Personal computers, mass media, and use of time. Social Science Computer Review 15 1 (1997) 65-82
103. Roeder, S., Poppenborg, A., Michaelis, S., Marker, O., et al. (2005). Public budget dialogue-An innovative approach to e-participation. In M. Böhlen, et al. (Eds.), TCGOV 2005, IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, Lecture notes in artificial intelligence, (Vol. 3416), (pp. 48-56).
104. Rogers E.M. Diffusion of innovations (1995), Free Press, New York
105. Rose J., and Sæbø O. Democracy squared: Designing on-line political communities to accommodate conflicting interests. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, E-Government Special Issue 17 2 (2005) 133-168
106. Rosenblatt A.J. On-line polling-Methodological limitations and implications for electronic democracy. Harvard International Journal of Press-Politics 4 2 (1999) 30-44
107. Rushkoff D. The promise and peril of Internet democracy. Tikkun 19 2 (2004) 24
108. Saebo, O., & Paivarinta, T. (2005). Autopoietic cybergenres for e-democracy? Genre analysis of a web-based discussion board. In HICSS'05. Proceedings of the 38th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences.
109. Schaupp L.C., and Lemuria C. e-Voting: From apathy to adoption. Journal of Enterprise Information Management 18 5/6 (2005) 586-601
110. Schiller H. Information inequality: The deepening social crisis in America (1996), Routledge, New York
111. Seaton J. The Scottish Parliament and e-democracy. Aslib Proceedings 57 4 (2005) 333-337
112. Siapera E. Minority activism on the web: Between deliberative democracy and multiculturalism. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 31 3 (2005) 499-519
113. Sipior J.C., and Ward B.T. Bringing the digital divide for e-government inclusion: A United States case study. Electronic Journal of e-Government 3 3 (2005) 137-146
114. Smith A.D., and Clark J.S. Revolutionising the voting process through online strategies. Online Information Review 29 5 (2005) 513-530
115. Smith, E., & Macintosh, A. (2003). E-voting: Powerful symbol of e-democracy. In Electronic government proceedings, 2003, (pp. 240-245).
116. Snellen I. ICTs, bureaucracies, and the future of democracy. Communications of the ACM 44 1 (2001) 45-48
117. Snider J.H. Should the public meeting enter the information age?. National Civic Review 92 3 (2003) 20-29
118. Snow D., Rochford Jr. E., Worden S., et al. Frame alignment processes, micromobilization, and movement participation. American Sociological Review 51 (1986) 464-481
119. Stromer-Galley J. On-line interaction and why candidates avoid it. Journal of Communication 50 4 (2000) 111-132
120. Svensson J., and Leenes R. e-Voting in Europe: Divergent democratic practice. Information Polity 8 1/2 (2003) 3-15
121. Tambouris E., and Gorilas S. Evaluation of an e-democracy platform for European cities. In: Traunmüller R. (Ed). EGOV 2003. Lecture notes in computer science Vol. 2739 (2003), Springer, Berlin 43-48
122. Taylor C. Social theory as practice. In: Taylor C. (Ed). Philosophy and the human sciences: Philosophical papers Vol. 2 (1985), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 91-115
123. Thomas J.C. Public participation in public decisions: New skills and strategies for public managers (1995), Josey-Bass, San Francisco
124. Turoff, M., Hiltz, S. R., Hee-Kyung, C., Zheng, L., et al. (2002). Social decision support systems (SDSS). In Proceedings of the 35th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences.
125. van Dijk J. Models of democracy and concepts of communication. In: Hacker K.L., and van Dijk J. (Eds). Digital democracy: Issues of theory and practice (2000), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 30-53
126. Verba S., Schlozman K.L., and Brady H.E. Voice and equality (1995), Harvard University Press, Cambridge
127. Waddell C.D. 'Electronic Curbcuts': The ADA in cyberspace. Human Rights: Journal of the Section of Individual Rights and Responsibilities 27 1 (2000) 22-24
128. Watson R.T., and Mundy B. A strategic perspective of electronic democracy. Communications of the ACM 44 1 (2001) 27-30
129. Weber M. The theory of social and economic organization (1947), The Free Press, New York, NY
130. Webster J., and Watson R.T. Editorial: Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly 26 2 (2002) xiii-xxiii
131. Wenger E. Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity (1998), Cambridge University Press, New York
132. Westholm H. e-Democracy goes ahead. The Internet as a tool for improving deliberative policies?. In: Traunmüller R., and Lenk K. (Eds). EGOV 2002. Lecture notes in computer science Vol. 2456 (2002), Springer, Berlin 240-247
133. Whitley R. The development of management studies as a fragmented adhocracy. Social Science Information 23 (1984) 775-818
134. Whyte A., and Macintosh A. Transparency and teledemocracy: Issues from an 'e-consultation'. Journal of Information Science 27 4 (2001) 187-198
135. Whyte A., and Macintosh A. Analysis and Evaluation of e-Consultations. e-Service Journal 2 1 (2003) 9-34
136. Xenakis A., and Macintosh A. Using business process re-engineering (BPR) for the effective administration of electronic voting. Electronic Journal of e-Government 3 2 (2005) 91-98
137. Zhao, Y., & Lin, H. (2002). Participatory decision-making for ecological planning. In Proceedings of the third international conference on web information systems engineering (pp. 40-46).
138. Zheng Y., and Wu G. Information technology, public space, and collective action in China. Comparative Political Studies 38 5 (2005) 507-536