Factors that explain the perceived effectiveness of e-government: A survey of United States city government information technology directors

International Journal of Electronic Government Research

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 1-15

  Reddick, Christopher G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

Author keywords

E government; Local government; Management; Performance; Survey

Indexed keywords

FACTOR ANALYSIS; MANAGEMENT; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SURVEYING; SURVEYS;

E-GOVERNMENT ADOPTIONS; E-GOVERNMENTS; EXPLORATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS; GOVERNMENT INFORMATION; LOCAL GOVERNMENT; PERFORMANCE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SECURITY AND PRIVACY;

GOVERNMENT DATA PROCESSING;

EID: 70349286483     PISSN: 15483886     EISSN: 15483894     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4018/jegr.2009040101     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Anthopoulos, L.G., Siozos, P., & Tsoukalas, I.A. (2006). Applying Participatory Design and Collaboration in Digital Public Services for Discovering and Re-designing E-Government Services. Government Information Quarterly, 24(2), 353-376.
2. Belanger, F., & Hiller, J.S. (2006). A Framework for E-government: Privacy Implications. Business Process Management Journal, 12(1), 48-60.
3. Bertot, J.C. (1997). The impact of Federal IRM on agency missions: Findings, issues, and recommendations. Government Information Quarterly. 14(3), 235-253.
4. Bertot, J.C., & McClure, C.R. (1997). Key issues affecting the development of federal IRM: A view from the trenches. Government Information Quarterly, 14(3), 271-290.
5. Bovens, M., & Zouridis, S. (2002). From Street-Level to System-Level Bureaucracies: How Information and Communication Technology is Transforming Administrative Discretion and Constitutional Control, Public Administration Review, 62(2), 174-184.
6. Bozeman, B., & Bretschneider, S. (1986). Public management information systems: Theory and prescription. Public Administration Review. 46, 475-487.
7. Brown, M.M. (2007). Understanding E-Govern-ment Benefits: An Examination of Leading-Edge Local Governments. American Review of Public Administration, 37(2), 178-197.
8. Buehler, M. (2000). U.S. Federal government CIOs: Information technology's new managers - preliminary findings. Government Information Quarterly. 27, 29-45.
9. Carter, L., & Belanger, F. (2004). The Influence of Perceived Characteristics of Innovating on e-Govern-ment Adoption. Electronic Journal of E-government, 2(1), 11-20.
10. Chan, M., Woon, I., & Kankanhalli, A. (2005). Perceptions of Information Security in the Workplace: Linking Information Security Climate to Compliant Behavior. Journal of Information Privacy & Security, 1(3), 18-41.
11. Chang, S.E., & Ho, C.B. (2006). Organizational Factors to the Effectiveness of Implementing Information Security Management. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 106(3), 345-361.
12. Chang, S.E., & Lin, C-S. (2007). Exploring Organizational Culture for Information Security Management. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 107(3), 438-458.
13. Fletcher, P.D. (1997). Local governments and IRM: Policy emerging from practice. Government Information Quarterly. 14(3), 313-324.
14. Garson, G.D. (2006). Public Information Technology and E-Governance: Managing the Virtual State. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.
15. Gil-Garcia, J.R., Chengalur-Smith, I., & Duchessi, P. (2007). Collaborative e-Government: Impediments and Benefits of Information-Sharing Projects in the Public Sector. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(2), 121-133.
16. Green, K.R. (1982). Municipal Administrators' Receptivity to Citizens' and Elected Officials' Contacts. Public Administration Review, 42(4), 346-353.
17. Hirlinger, M.W. (1992). Citizen-Initiated Contacting of Local Government Officials: A Multivariate Explanation. Journal of Politics. 54(2), 553-564.
18. Ho, A.T.K. (2002). Reinventing local governments and the e-government initiative', Public Administration Review, 62(4), 434-444.
19. Holden, S.H., Norris, D.F., & Fletcher, P.D. (2003). Electronic government at the local level: Progress to date and future issues. Public Performance & Management Review, 26(4), 325-344.
20. Hong, K-S., Chi, Y-P., Chao, L.R., & Tang, J-H. (2006). An Empirical Study of Information Security Policy on Information Security Evaluation in Taiwan. Information Management & Computer Security, 14(2), 104-115.
21. Janssen, M., & Kuk, G. (2007). E-government Business Models for Public Service Networks. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 3(3), 54-71.
22. Jones, B.D., Greenberg, S.R., Kaufman, C., & Drew, J. (1977). Bureaucratic Response to Citizen-Initiated Contacts: Environmental Enforcement in Detroit. American Political Science Review. 71(1), 148-165.
23. Kankanhalli, A., Teo, H-H., Tan, B.C.Y., & Wei, K-K. (2003). An Integrative Study of Information Systems Security Effectiveness. International Journal of Information Management, 23(2), 139-154.
24. Kim, H.J., Lee, J., & Kim, S. (2008). Linking Local E-government Development Stages to Collaboration Strategy. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 4(3), 36-56.
25. Knapp, K.J., Marshall, T.E., Rainer, R. K., & Ford, F.N. (2006). Information Security: Management's Effect on Culture and Policy, Information Management & Computer Security, 14(1), 24-36.
26. Lim, E., Tan, C-W., & Pan, S-L. (2007). E-govern-ment Implementation: Balancing Collaboration and Control in Stakeholder Management. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 3(2), 1-28.
27. McClure, C.R., & Bertot, J.C. (2000). The Chief Information Officer (CIO): Assessing its Impact. Government Information Quarterly, 17(1), 7-12.
28. McLoughlin, I., & Cornford, J. (2006). Transformational Change in the Local State? Enacting E-government in English Local Authorities. Journal of Management and Organization, 12(3), 195-208.
29. Milward, H. B., & Snyder, L.O. (1996). Electronic Government: Linking Citizens to Public Organizations Through Technology. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 6(2), 261-275.
30. Moon, D., Serra, G., & West, J.P. (1993). Citizens' Contacts with Bureaucratic and Legislative Officials. Political Research Quarterly. 46(4), 931-941.
31. Moon, M.J. (2002). The evolution of e-government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality? Public Administration Review, 62(4), 424-433.
32. Moon, M.J., & Norris, D.F. (2005). Does managerial orientation matter? The adoption of reinventinggovernment and e-government at the municipal level. Information Systems Journal. 15(1), 43-60.
33. Moon, M.J., & Welch, E.W. (2005). Same Bed, Different Dreams? A Comparative Analysis of Citizen and Bureaucratic Perspectives on E-Government. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 25(3), 243-264.
34. Norris, D.F., & Moon, M.J. (2005). Advancing e-government at the grassroots: Tortoise or Hare? Public Administration Review. 65(1), 64-75.
35. th Annual Digital Government Research Conference, 228, 173-182. http://www.dgsociety.org/docu- ments/p173-Pieterson.pdf last accessed October 12, 2007.
36. Reddick C.G., & Frank, H.A. (2007). E-Government and its influence on Managerial Effectiveness: A Survey of Florida and Texas City Managers. Financial Accountability & Management, 23(1), 1-26.
37. Reddick, C.G. (2005a). Citizen-Initiated Contacts with Ontario Local E-government: Administrators' Responses to Contacts. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 1(4), 45-62.
38. Reddick, C.G. (2005b). Citizen-Initiated Contacts with Government: Comparing Phones and Websites. Journal of E-Government, 2(1), 27-53.
39. Serra, G. (1995). Citizen-Initiated Contact and Satisfaction with Bureaucracy: A Multivariate Analysis. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 5(2), 175-188.
40. Sharp, E.B. (1984). Citizen-Demand Making in the Urban Context. American Journal of Political Science. 28(4), 654-670.
41. Snellen, I. (1998). Street-level Bureaucracy in an Information Age. In Public Administration in an Information Age: A Handbook, edited by Ig Snel-len and Wim van de Donk, 497-505. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
42. Snellen, I. (2002). Electronic Governance: Implications for Citizens, Politicians, and Public Servants. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 68(2), 183-198.
43. Streib, G., & Navarro, I. (2005). Citizen Demand for Interactive E-government: The Case of Georgia Consumer Services. American Review of Public Administration, 36(3), 288-300.
44. Tan, C-W., Pan, S.L., & Lim, E. (2007). Managing Stakeholder Interests in E-Government Implementation: Lessons Learned from a Singapore E-Govern-ment Project. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 3(1), 61-84.
45. Thomas, J.C. (1982). Citizen-initiated Contacts with Government Agencies: A Test of Three Theories. American Journal of Political Science. 26(3), 504-522.
46. Thomas, J.C., & Melkers, J. (1999). Explaining Citizen-Initiated Contacts with Municipal Bureaucrats: Lessons from the Atlanta Experience. Urban Affairs Review. 34(5), 667-690.
47. Thomas, J.C., & Melkers, J. (2000). Citizen Contacting of Municipal Officials: Choosing Between Appointed Administrators and Elected Leaders. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 11(1), 51-71.
48. Thomas, J.C., & Streib, G. (2003). The new face of government: Citizen-initiated contacts in the era of e-government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(1), 83-102.
49. Thomas, J.C., & Streib, G. (2005). E-Democracy, E-commerce, and E-Research: Examining the Electronic Ties between Citizens and Governments. Administration & Society, 37(3), 259-280.
50. Ugbah, S.D., & Umeh, O.J. (1993). Information resource management: An examination of individual and organizational attributes in state government agencies. Information Resources Management Journal. 6(1), 5-13.
51. Vedlitz, A., & Dyer, J.A. (1984). Bureaucratic Response to Citizen Contacts: Neighborhood Demands and Administrative Reaction in Dallas. The Journal of Politics. 46(4), 1207-1216.
52. Vedlitz, A., Dyer, J.A., & Durand, R. (1980). Citizen Contacts with Local Governments: A Comparative View. American Journal of Political Science. 24(1), 50-67.
53. Ward, M.A., & Mitchell, S. (2004). A comparison of the strategic priorities of public and private sectorinformation resource management executives. Gov-ernment Information Quarterly. 21, 284-304.
54. Welch, E.W., Hinnant, C.C., & Moon, M.J. (2004), Linking citizen satisfaction with e-government andtrust in government. Journal of Public AdministrationResearch and Theory, 15(3), 371-391.
55. Welp, Y., Urgell, F., & Aibar, E. (2007). From Bureaucratic Administration to Network Admin-istration? An Empirical Study on E-Government Focus on Catalonia. Public Organization Review, 7(4), 299-316.
56. West, D.M. (2004). E-government and the trans-formation of service delivery and citizen attributes, Public Administration Review, 61(1), 15-27.
57. Westerback, L.K. (2000). Toward best practices forstrategic information technology management. Gov-ernment Information Quarterly. 17(1), 27-41.
58. Yang, K., & Rho, S-Y. (2007). E-Government forBetter Performance: Promises, Realities, and Chal-lenges. International Journal of Public Administra-tion, 30(11), 1197-1217.