Random discrete competing events vs. dynamic bistable switches in cell proliferation in differentiation

Journal of Theoretical Biology

Volumn 267, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 341-354

  Golubev, A ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

Cell cycle; Cell differentiation; Cell proliferation; Discrete event modelling; Restriction point

Indexed keywords

TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR;

CELL ORGANELLE; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY; MODELING; PROBABILITY; STOCHASTICITY;

ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE PHASE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL FUNCTION; CELL INTERACTION; CELL PROLIFERATION; DYNAMIC BISTABLE SWITCH; GENE CONTROL; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NONHUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; PROMOTER REGION; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; RANDOM DISCRETE COMPETING EVENT; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STOCHASTIC MODEL;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; CELL CYCLE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CYCLIN E; E2F TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEXES; PROBABILITY; PROMOTER REGIONS, GENETIC; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS;

EID: 77956668964     PISSN: 00225193     EISSN: 10958541     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.08.032     Document Type: Article

References (102)

1. Aguda B.D., Kima Y., Piper-Hunter M.G., Friedman A., Marsh C.B. MicroRNA regulation of a cancer network: consequences of the feedback loops involving miR-17-92, E2F, and Myc. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105:19678-19683.
2. Alfieri R., Barberis M., Chiaradonna F., et al. Towards a systems biology approach to mammalian cell cycle: modeling the entrance into S phase of quiescent fibroblasts after serum stimulation. BMC Bioinformatics 2009, 10(Suppl 12):16. 10.1186/1471-2105-10-S12-S16.
3. Avery S.V. Microbial cell individuality and the underlying sources of heterogeneity. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2006, 4:577-587.
4. Blais A., Dynlacht B.D. E2F-associated chromatin modifiers and cell cycle control. Curr. Opinion Cell Biol. 2007, 19:658-662.
5. Blake W.J., Kaern M., Cantor C.R., Collins J.J. Noise in eukaryotic gene expression. Nature 2003, 22:633-637.
6. Blossey R., Giuraniuc C.V. Mean-field versus stochastic models for transcriptional regulation. Phys. Rev. E (Stat., Nonlinear, Soft Matter Phys.) 2008, 78:031909-1-031909-9. 2008.
7. Bracken A.P., Ciro M., Cocito A., Helin K. E2F target genes: unraveling the biology. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2004, 29:409-417.
8. Brooks R.F., Riddle P.N. The 3T3 cell cycle at low proliferation rates. J. Cell Sci. 1988, 90:601-612.
9. Cain S.J., Chau P.C. Transition probability cell cycle model. Part II-non-balanced growth. J. Theor. Biol. 1997, 185:69-79.
10. Caldon C.E., Musgrove E.A. Distinct and redundant functions of cyclin E1 and cyclin E2 in development and cancer. Cell Div. 2010, 5:2-13.
11. Calegari F., Huttner W.B. An inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinases that lengthens, but does not arrest, neuroepithelial cell cycle induces premature neurogenesis. J. Cell Sci. 2003, 116:4947-4955.
12. Chambers I., Silva J., Colby D., Nichols J., Nijmeijer B., Robertson M., Vrana J., Jones K., Grotewold L., Smith A. Nanog safeguards pluripotency and mediates germline development. Nature 2007, 450:1230-1235.
13. Chang H.H., Hemberg M., Barahona M., Ingber D.E., Huang S. Transcriptome-wide noise controls lineage choice in mammalian progenitor cells. Nature 2008, 453:544-547.
14. Chelly J., Concordet J.-P., Kaplan J.-C., Kahn A. Illegitimate transcription: transcription of any gene in any cell type. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1989, 86:2617-2621.
15. Chen D., Pacal M., Wenzel P., Knoepfler P.S., Leone G., Bremner R. Division and apoptosis of E2f-deficient retinal progenitors. Nature 2009, 462:925-930.
16. Chicas A., Wang X., Zhang C., McCurrach M., Zhao Z., Mert O., Dickins R.A., Narita M., Zhang M., Lowe S.W. Dissecting the unique role of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor during cellular senescence. Cancer Cell 2010, 17:376-387.
17. Chong J.-L., Wenzel P.L., Saenz-Robles M.T., et al. E2f1-3 switch from activators in progenitor cells to repressors in differentiating cells. Nature 2009, 462:930-934.
18. Cobrinik D. Pocket proteins and cell cycle control. Oncogene 2005, 24:2796-2809.
19. Conradie R., Bruggeman F.J., Ciliberto A., Csikasz-Nagy A., Novak B., Westerhoff H.V., Snoep J.L. Restriction point control of the mammalian cell cycle via the cyclin E/Cdk2:p27 complex. FEBS J. 2010, 277:357-367.
20. Coulon A., Gandrillon O., Beslon G. On the spontaneous stochastic dynamics of a single gene: complexity of the molecular interplay at the promoter. BMC Syst. Biol. 2010, 4:2. 10.1186/1752-0509-4-2.
21. Csikasz-Nagy A., Battogtokh D., Chen K.C., Novak B., Tyson J.J. Analysis of a generic model of eukaryotic cell-cycle regulation. Biophys. J. 2006, 90:4361-4379.
22. David-Pfeuty T. The flexible evolutionary anchorage-dependent Pardee's restriction point of mammalian cells: how its deregulation may lead to cancer. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2006, 1765:38-66.
23. Di Ventura B., Lemerle C., Michalodimitrakis K., Serrano L. From in vivo to in silico biology and back. Nature 2006, 443:527-533.
24. Ekholm S.V., Zickert P., Reed S.I., Zetterberg A. Accumulation of cyclin E is not a prerequisite for passage through the restriction point. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2001, 21:3256-3265.
25. El Messaoudi S., Fabbrizio E., Rodriguez C., et al. Coactivator-associated arginine methyltransferase 1 (CARM1) is a positive regulator of the cyclin E1 gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103:13351-13356.
26. Ewald R., Maus C., Rolfs A., Uhrmacher A. Discrete event modelling and simulation in systems biology. J. Simulation 2007, 1:81-96.
27. Ezhevsky S.A., Ho A., Becker-Hapak M., Davis P.K., Dowdy S.F. Differential regulation of retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein by G1 cyclin-dependent kinase complexes in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2001, 21:4773-4784.
28. Fedoroff N., Fontana W. Small numbers of big molecules. Science 2002, 297:1129-1131.
29. Flores-Delgado G., Liu C.W.Y., Sposto R., Berndt N. A limited screen for protein interactions reveals new roles for protein phosphatase 1 in cell cycle control and apoptosis. J. Proteome Res. 2007, 6:1165-1175.
30. Flowers S., Nagl N.G., Beck G.R., Moran E. Antagonistic roles for BRM and BRG1 SWI/SNF complexes in differentiation. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284:10067-10075.
31. Frolov M.V., Huen D.S., Stevaux O., Dimova D., Balczarek-Strang K., Dyson N.J. Functional antagonism between E2F family members. Genes & Development 2001, 15:2146-2160.
32. Garriga J., Jayaraman A.L., Limón A., et al. A dynamic equilibrium between CDKs and PP2A modulates phosphorylation of pRB, p107 and p130. Cell Cycle 2004, 3:1320-1330.
33. Gillespie D.T. Stochastic simulation of chemical kinetics. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2007, 58:35-55.
34. Golubev A.G. Carcinogenesis, embryogenesis and aging from the viewpoint of the assessment of cell proliferation and differentiation as a stochastic process. Eksp. Onkol. 1984, 6(5):10-15. (in Russian.).
35. Golubev A.G. Accidental necessity, initiation of transcription, cell differentiation, and necessary accidents. Biochemistry (Moscow) 1996, 61:1303-1319.
36. Golubev A. Exponentially modified Gaussian (EMG) relevance to distributions related to cell proliferation and differentiation. J. Theor. Biol. 2010, 262:257-266.
37. Golubev A., Khrustalev S., Butov A. An in silico investigation into the causes of telomere length heterogeneity and its implications for the Hayflick limit. J. Theor. Biol. 2003, 225:153-170.
38. Haberichter T., Madge B., Renee A.C., et al. A systems biology dynamical model of mammalian G1 cell cycle progression. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2007, 3:84. 10.1038/msb4100126.
39. Halley J.D., Winkler D.A., Burden F.R. Toward a Rosetta stone for the stem cell genome: stochastic gene expression, network architecture, and external influences. Stem Cell Res. 2008, 1:157-168.
40. Hallstrom T.C., Nevins J.R. Balancing the decision of cell proliferation and cell fate. Cell Cycle 2009, 8:532-535.
41. Hu J., Sealfon S.C., Hayot F., Jayaprakash C., Kumar M., Pendleton A.C., Ganee A., Fernandez-Sesma A., Moran T.M., Wetmur J.G. Chromosome-specific and noisy IFNB1 transcription in individual virus-infected human primary dendritic cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007, 35:5232-5241.
42. Huang S. Non-genetic heterogeneity of cells in development: more than just noise. Development 2009, 136:3853-3862.
43. Hume D.A. Probability in transcriptional regulation and its implications for leukocyte differentiation and inducible gene expression. Blood 2000, 96:2323-2328.
44. Johnson D.G., Ohtani K., Nevins J.R. Autoregulatory control of E2F1 expression in response to positive and negative regulators of cell cycle progression. Genes Dev. 1994, 8:1514-1525.
45. Kaern M., Elston T.C., Blake W.J., Collins J.J. Stochasticity in gene expression: from theories to phenotypes. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2005, 6:451-464.
46. Kar S., Baumann W.T., Paul M.R., Tyson J.J. Exploring the roles of noise in the eukaryotic cell cycle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106:6471-6476.
47. Kepler T.B., Elston T.C. Stochasticity in transcriptional regulation: origins, consequences, and mathematical representations. Biophys. J. 2001, 81:3116-3136.
48. Kholodenko B.N. Cell-signalling dynamics in time and space. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2006, 7:165-176.
49. Ko M.S. A stochastic model for gene induction. J. Theor. Biol. 1991, 153:181-194.
50. Krueger C., Morison I.M. Random monoallelic expression: making a choice. Trends Genet. 2008, 24:257-259.
51. Kupiec J.J. A probabilist theory for cell differentiation, embryonic mortality and DNA C-value paradox. Speculations in Sci. Technol. 1983, 6:471-478.
52. Kupiec J.J. A chance-selection model for cell differentiation. Cell Death Differ 1996, 3:385-390.
53. Kupiec J.J. The Origin of Individuals 2009, World Scientific.
54. Kuznetsov V.A., Knott G.D., Bonner R.F. General statistics of stochastic process of gene expression in eukaryotic cells. Genetics 2002, 161:1321-1332.
55. Laforge B., Guez D., Martinez M., Kupiec J.J. Modeling embryogenesis and cancer: an approach based on an equilibrium between the autostabilization of stochastic gene expression and the interdependance of cells for proliferation. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 2005, 89:93-120.
56. Lange C., Calegari F. Cdks and cyclins link G1 length and differentiation of embryonic, neural, and hematopoietic stem cells. Cell Cycle 2010, 9:1893-1900.
57. Lee H.Y., Perelson A.S. Modeling T cell proliferation and death in vitro based on labeling data: generalizations of the Smith-Martin cell cycle model. Bull. Math. Biol. 2008, 70:21-44.
58. Lei J. Stochasticity in single gene expression with both intrinsic noise and fluctuation in kinetic parameters. J. Theor. Biol. 2009, 256:485-492.
59. Li T., Chalifour L.E., Paudel H.K. Phosphorylation of protein phosphatase 1 by cyclin-dependent protein kinase 5 during nerve growth factor-induced PC12 cell differentiation. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282:6619-6628.
60. Li W., Kotoshiba S., Berthet C., Hilton M.B., Kaldis P. Rb/Cdk2/Cdk4 triple mutant mice elicit an alternative mechanism for regulation of the G1/S transition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106:486-491.
61. Lorenzini A., Tresini M., Austad S.N., Cristofalo V.J. Cellular replicative capacity correlates primarily with species body mass not longevity. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2005, 126:1130-1133.
62. Losick R., Desplan C. Stochasticity and cell fate. Science 2008, 320:65-68.
63. Macia J., Widder S., Sol R. Why are cellular switches Boolean? General conditions for multistable genetic circuits. J. Theor. Biol. 2009, 261:126-135.
64. McAdams H.H., Arkin A. Stochastic mechanisms in gene expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94:814-819.
65. McClellan K.A., Slack R.S. Specific in vivo roles for E2Fs in differentiation and development. Cell Cycle 2007, 6:2917-2927.
66. Miller J.P., Yeh N., Vidal A., Koff A. Interweaving the cell cycle machinery with cell differentiation. Cell Cycle 2007, 6:2932-2938.
67. Nagl N.G., Wang X., Patsialou A., Van Scoy M., Moran E. Distinct mammalian SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complexes with opposing roles in cell-cycle control. EMBO J. 2007, 26:752-763.
68. Nicolas E., Roumillac C., Trouche D. Balance between acetylation and methylation of histone H3 lysine 9 on the E2F-responsive dihydrofolate reductase promoter. Mol. Cell. Biol 2003, 23:1614-1622.
69. Novak B., Tyson J.J. A model for restriction point control of the mammalian cell cycle. J. Theor. Biol. 2004, 230:563-579.
70. Novick A., Weiner M. Enzyme induction as an all-or-none phenomenon. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1957, 43:553-566.
71. Pajalunga D., Mazzola A., Salzano A.M., Biferi M.G., De Luca G., Crescenzi M. Critical requirement for cell cycle inhibitors in sustaining nonproliferative states. J. Cell Biol. 2007, 176:807-818.
72. Pardee A.B. A restriction point for control of normal animal cell proliferation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1974, 71:1286-1290.
73. Paulsson J. Models of stochastic gene expression. Phys. Life Rev. 2005, 2:157-175.
74. Pfeuty B., David-Pfeuty T., Kaneko K. Underlying principles of cell fate determination during G1 phase of the mammalian cell cycle. Cell Cycle 2008, 7:1-13.
75. Polager S., Ginsberg D. E2F-at the crossroads of life and death. Trends Cell Biol. 2008, 18:528-535.
76. Qu Z., Weiss J.N., MacLellan W.R. Regulation of the mammalian cell cycle: a model of the G1-to-S transition. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2003, 284:C349-C364.
77. Raj A., Peskin C.S., Tranchina D., Vargas D.Y., Tyagi S. Stochastic mRNA synthesis in mammalian cells. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4:e309.
78. Raj A., van Oudenaarden A. Nature, nurture, or chance: stochastic gene expression and its consequences. Cell 2008, 135:216-226.
79. Raj A., van Oudenaarden A. Single-molecule approaches to stochastic gene expression. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 2009, 38:255-270.
80. Raser J.M., O'Shea E.K. Noise in gene expression: origins, consequences, and control. Science 2005, 309:2010-2013.
81. Roberts J.M., Sherr C.J. Bared essentials of CDK2 and cyclin E. Nat. Genet. 2003, 35:9-10.
82. Ross I.L., Browne C.M., Hume D.A. Transcription of individual genes in eukaryotic cells occurs randomly and infrequently. Immunol. Cell Biol. 1994, 72:177-185.
83. Rubin S.M., Gall A.-L., Zheng N., Pavletich N.P. Structure of the Rb C-terminal domain bound to E2F1-DP1: a mechanism for phosphorylation-induced E2F release. Cell 2005, 123:1093-1106.
84. Salomoni P., Calegari.F. Cell cycle control of mammalian neural stem cells: putting a speed limit on G1. Trends Cell Biol. 2010, 20:233-243.
85. Sanchez I., Dynlacht B.D. New insights into cyclins, CDKs, and cell cycle control. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2005, 16:311-321.
86. Sasai M., Wolynes P.G. Stochastic gene expression as a many-body problem. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100:2374-2379.
87. Smith J.A., Martin L. Do cells cycle?. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1973, 70:1263-1267.
88. Swain P.S., Elowitz M.B., Siggia E.D. Intrinsic and extrinsic contributions to stochasticity in gene expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99:12795-12800.
89. Tyagi S., Chabes A.L., Wysocka J., Herr W. E2F activation of S phase promoters via association with HCF-1 and the MLL family of histone H3K4 methyltransferases. Mol. Cell 2007, 27:107-119.
90. Tashima Y., Hamada H., Okamoto M., Hanai T. Prediction of key factor controlling G1/S phase in the mammalian cell cycle using system analysis. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2008, 106:368-374.
91. cip1 function, in human MRC5 fibroblasts that overcome a telomere-independent crisis during immortalization. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279:43634-43645.
92. Till J.E., McCulloch E.A., Siminovitch L. A stochastic model of stem cell proliferation based on the growth of spleen colony-forming cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1964, 51:29-36.
93. Tkacik G., Callan J., Bialek W. Information capacity of genetic regulatory elements. Phys. Rev. E (Stat., Nonlinear, Soft Matter Phys.) 2008, 78:11910-11917.
94. Walczak A.M., Onuchic J.N., Wolynes P.G. Absolute rate theories of epigenetic stability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102:18926-18931.
95. Wells J., Boyd K.E., Fry C.J., Bartley S.M., Farnham P.J. Target gene specificity of E2F and pocket protein family members in living cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2000, 20:5797-5807.
96. Wirt S.E., Sage J. p107 in the public eye: an Rb understudy and more. Cell Div. 2010, 5:9. 10.1186/1747-1028-5-9.
97. Yamanaka S. Elite and stochastic models for induced pluripotent stem cell generation. Nature 2009, 460:49-52.
98. Yao G., Lee T.J., Mori S., Nevins J.R., You L. A bistable Rb-E2F switch underlies the restriction point. Nat. Cell Biol. 2008, 10:476-482.
99. Zhang X.P., Cheng Z., Liu F., Wang W. Linking fast and slow positive feedback loops creates an optimal bistable switch in cell signaling. Phys. Rev. E (Stat., Nonlinear, Soft Matter Phys.) 2007, 76:31924-31928.
100. Zhdanov V.P. Interplay of bistable kinetics of gene expression during cellular growth. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. Phys. 2009, 42:065102.
101. Zlokarnik G., Negulescu P.A., Knaupp T.E., Mere L., Burres N., Feng L., Whitney M., Roemer K., Tsien R.Y. Quantitation of transcription and clonal selection of single living cells with Β-lactamase as reporter. Science 1998, 279:84-88.
102. de Jong H. Modeling and simulation of genetic regulatory systems: a literature review. J.Comput. Biol. 2002, 9:67-103.