Computer-supported collaboration scripts: Perspectives from educational psychology and computer science

Technology-Enhanced Learning: Principles and Products

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 155-173

  Weinberger, Armin ^a   Kollar, Ingo ^b   Dimitriadis, Yannis ^c   Mäkitalo Siegl, Kati ^d   Fischer, Frank ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF VALLADOLID   (Spain)

^d UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

Author keywords

Adaptivity; Collaboration script; Computer supported collaborative learning (CSCL); External script; Formalisation; Internal script; Modelling; Scripting

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955230921     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-9827-7_10     Document Type: Chapter

References (71)

1. ADL (2004). Shamble content object reference model 3rd edition. Overview, 2004. Retrieved May 7, 2008 from http://www.adlnet.gov/downloads
2. Aronson. B., Blaney, N., Stephan. C., Sikes. J., & Snapp, M. (1978). The jigsaw classroom. Beverly Hills. CA: Sage.
3. Berge, O., & Slotta, J. (2007). Learning technology standards and inquiry-based learning. In A. Koohung & K. Haarman (Eds.), Learning objects and instmctional design (pp. 327-358). Santa Rosa. CA: Information Science Press.
4. Bote-Lorenzo, M., Gomez-Sanchez, E., Vega-Gorgojo, G., Dimitriadis, Y. A., Asensio-Perez, J. I., & Jorrin-Abelian, I. M. (2008). Gridcole: A tailorable grid service based system that supports scripted collaborative learning. Computers and Education, 51, 155-172.
5. Botturi, L., & Stubbs, T. (2008). Handbook of visual languages for instructional design: Theories and practices. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
6. Brophy, J., & Good, T. (1986). Teacher behaviour and student achievement. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd edn.) (pp. 328-375). New York: Macmillan.
7. Caeiro-Rodríguez, M., Anido-Rifón, L., & Llamas-Nistal, M. (2003). A critical analysis of IMS Learning Design. In B. Wasson, L. Anido, & U. Hoppe (Eds.), Designing for change in networked learning environments. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning 2003 (pp. 363-367). Bergen, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
8. Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64, 1-35.
9. Crook, C. (2000). Motivation and the ecology of collaborative learning. In R. Joiner, K. Littleton, D. Faulkner, & D. Miell (Eds.), Rethinking collaborative learning (pp. 161-178). London: Free Association Books.
10. Cutler, R. H. (1995). Distributed presence and community in cyberspace. Interpersonal Communication and Technology: A Journal for the 21st Century, 3, 12-32.
11. Dillenbourg, R (1999). What do you mean by "collaborative learning"? In R Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1-24). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
12. Dillenbourg, R (2002). Over-scripting CSCL: The risks of blending collaborative learning with instructional design. In R A. Kirschner (Ed.), Three worlds of CSCL: Can we support CSCL? (pp. 61-91). Heerlen, The Netherlands: Open Universiteit Nederland.
13. Dillenbourg, R, & Jermann, R (2007). Designing integrative scripts. In F. Fischer, I. Kollar, H. Mandl, & J. M. Haake (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives (pp. 275-301). New York: Springer.
14. Dillenbourg, R, & Tchounikine, R (2007). Flexibility in macro-scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23, 1-13.
15. Donmez, R, Rose, C. R., Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2005). Supporting CSCL with automatic corpus analysis technology. In T. Koschmann, D. Suthers, & T. W. Chan (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning - CSCL 2005 (pp. 125-134). Taipei, Taiwan: Erlbaum.
16. Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Knowledge convergence in computer-supported collaborative learning: The role of external representation tools. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14, 405-441.
17. Fischer, F., Kollar I., Mandl, H., & Haake, J. M. (Eds.) (2007). Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives. New York: Springer.
18. Fischer, F., Weinberger, A., Kobbe, L., Dillenbourg, R, Haklänen, R, & Harrer, A. (2007). Computer-supported collaboration scripts. Workshop at the CSCL Alpine Rendezvous. Retrieved May 2007, from http://craftwww.epfl.ch/ events/alpine/programme/programme-w1.html
19. Hakkinen, R, & Makitalo-Siegl, K. (2007). Educational perspectives on scripting CSCL. In F. Fischer, I. Kollar, H. Mandl, & J. M. Haake (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational and educational approaches (pp. 263-271). New York: Springer.
20. Harrer, A. (2006). Report on the formalization of collaboration scripts (Tech. Rep. No. D.29.6.1). [n. p.]: Kaleidoscope Network of Excellence. Retrieved May 07, 2008, from http://www.noekaleidoscope.org/intra/docs/full- deliverables/D29-06-01-F.pdf.
21. Harrer, A., Malzahn, N., & Roth, B. (2006). The remote control approach. How to apply scaffolds to existing collaborative learning environments. In Y. A. Dimitriadis, I. Zigurs, & E. Gomez-Sanchez (Eds.), Groupware: Design, implementation, and use. Proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Groupware (CRIWG 2006). Lecture notes in computer science (pp. 118-131). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
22. Hernandez-Leo, D. (2007). A pattern-based design process for the creation of CSCL macro-scripts computationally represented with IMS-LD. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
23. Hernández-Leo, D., Harrer, A., Dodero J. M., Asensio-Pérez, J. I., & Burgos, D. (2007). A framework for the conceptualization of approaches to "Create-by-Reuse" of learning design solutions. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 13, 991-1001.
24. Hernandez-Leo, D., Villasclaras-Fernandez, E. D., Jorím- Abellán, I. M., Asensio-Pérez, J. I., Dimitriadis, Y., Ruiz-Requies, I., et al. (2006). COLLAGE, a collaborative learning design editor based on patterns. Educational Technology and Society, 9, 58-71.
25. IMS (2003). IMS learning design specification. Retrieved April 2007 from http://www.imsglobal.org/learningdesign
26. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2002). Social interdependence theory and university instruction - Theory into practice. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 61, 119-129.
27. De Jong, F., Kolloffel, B., Van Der Meijden, H., Kleine Staarman, J., & Janssen, J. (2005). Regulative processes in individual, 3D and computer supported cooperative learning contexts. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 645-670.
28. Kerr, N. (1983). The dispensability of member effort and group motivation losses: Free-rider effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 78-94.
29. King, A. (1999). Discourse patterns for mediating peer learning. In A. M. O'Donnell & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 87-115). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. King, A. (2007). Scripting collaborative learning processes: A cognitive perspective. In F. Fischer, I. Kollar, H. Mandl, & J. M. Haake (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning: Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives (pp. 13-37). New York: Springer.
31. Kirschner, R A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75-86.
32. Kobbe, L., Weinberger, A., Dillenbourg, R, Harrer, A., Hämäläinen, R., Häkkinen, R, et al. (2007). Specifying computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2, 211-224.
33. Kollar, I. (2006). Webbasiertes Forschencles Lernen in der Biologie. Effekte internaler und externaler Kooperationsskripts auf Prozesse und Ergebnisse des gemeinsamen Argumentierens [Web-based inquiry learning in biology. Effects of internal and external collaboration scripts on processes and outcomes of collaborative argumentation]. Berlin, Germany: Logos.
34. Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (2006). Supporting self-regulated learners for a while and what computers can contribute. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 35, 425-435.
35. Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Hesse, F. W. (2006). Collaboration scripts - a conceptual analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 159-185.
36. Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Slotta, J. D. (2007). Internal and external scripts in computer-supported collaborative inquiry learning. Learning and Instruction, 17, 708-721.
37. Kolodner, J. (2007). The roles of scripts in promoting collaborative discourse in learning by design. In F. Fischer, I. Kollar, H. Mandl, J. M. Haake (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported learning of knowledge: Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives (pp. 237-262). New York: Springer.
38. Latane, B., Williams, K, & Harkins, S. (1979). Social loafing. Psychology Today, 110, 104-106.
39. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
40. Learning Technology Standards Observatory (2007). Educational modelling languages. Retrieved August 2007 from http://www.cen-ltso.net/Users/main. aspx?put=196.
41. Mäkitalo, K, Pöysä, J., Järvelä, S., & Häkkinen, P. (2005). Mechanisms of grounding processes in online conferences: A case study in teacher education. In R. Nata (Ed.), Issues in higher education (pp. 115-146). New York: Nova Science.
42. Mäkitalo, K, Weinberger, A., Häkkinen, P., Järvelä, S., & Fischer, F. (2005). Epistemic cooperation scripts in online learning environments: Fostering learning by reducing uncertainty in discourse? Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 603-622.
43. O'Donnell, A. M., & King, A. (Eds.). (1999). Cognitive perspectives on peer learning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
44. O'Donnell, A. N., & Dansereau, D. F. (1992). Scripted cooperation in student dyads: A method for analyzing and enhancing academic learning and performance. In R. Hertz-Lazarowitz & N. Miller (Eds.), Interactions in cooperative groups. The theoretical anatomy of group learning (pp. 120-141). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
45. Pea, R. D. (2004). The social and technological dimension of scaffolding and related theoretical concepts for learning, education, and human activity. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 423-451.
46. Perkins, D. N. (1993). Person-plus: A distributed view of thinking and learning. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 88-110). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
47. Pfister, H. R. (2005). How to support synchronous net-based learning discourses: Principles and perspectives. In R. Bromme. F. Hesse. & H. Spada (Eds.), Barriers and biases in computermediated knowledge communication (pp. 39-57). New York: Springer.
48. Quintana. C., Reiser. B. J., Davis. E. A., Krajcik. J., Fretz, E., Duncan. R. G., et al. (2004). A scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry. The Journal of the learning Sciences, 13, 337-387.
49. Renkl, A. (1997). Lernen clutch Lehren - Zentrale Wirkmechanismen beim kooperativen Lernen [Learning through teaching - central mechanisms in cooperative learning]. Wiesbaden. Germany: Deutscher Universitats-Verlag.
50. Rourke, L., & Anderson. T. (2002). Exploring social communication in computer conference. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 13, 259-275.
51. Rovai, A. P. (2000). Building and sustaining community in asynchronous learning networks. The Internet and Higher Education, 3, 285-297.
52. Salomon. G., & Perkins. D. N. (1998). Individual and social aspects of learning. Review of Research in Education, 23, 1-24.
53. Schank, R. C., & Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding. An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale. NJ: Erlbaum.
54. Schwarz. B. B., Neuman. Y., Gil. J., & Ilya. M. (2003). Construction of collective and individual knowledge in argumentative activity. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 219-256.
55. Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice-Hall.
56. Slotta, J. D., & Aleahmad, T. (in press). Challenges to technology enhanced learning - the case for open source and content communities. International Journal of Science Education.
57. Stahl. G., Koschmann, T., & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.). The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 409-425). Cambridge. MA: Cambridge University Press.
58. Stegmann, K, Weinberger. A., & Fischer. F. (2007). Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction with computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2, 421-447.
59. Suchman, L. A. (1988). Representing practice in cognitive science. Human Studies, 11, 305-325.
60. Suchman, L. A. (2003). Writing and reading: A response to comments on "plans and situated actions". The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 299-306.
61. Vantroys, T., & Peter. Y. (2003). COW. a flexible platform for the enactment of learning scenarios. In J. Favela & D. Decouchant (Eds.), Groupware: Design, implementation, and use. Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Groupware (CRIWG 2003). Lecture notes in computer science (pp. 168-182). Berlin. Germany: Springer.
62. Vignollet, L., David. J. P., Ferraris, C., Martel. C., & Lejeune, A. (2006). Comparing educational modelling languages on a case study. In R. Kinshuk, P. Koper, P. Kommers, P. A. Kirschner, D. G. Sampson. & W. Didderen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies ICALT-2006 (pp. 1149-1150). Kerkrade, The Netherlands: IEEE Computer Society.
63. Vygotsky. L. S. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press.
64. Wecker, C., & Fischer. F. (2007 August). Fading process-related support: The role of distributed monitoring for the acquisition of cognitive skills. Paper presented at the 12th Biennial Conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction. Budapest. Hungary.
65. Weinberger. A., & Fischer. F. (2004). Motivation. In J. Haake, G. Schwabe & M. Wessner (Eds.), CSCL-Kompendium. Lehr- und Handbuch zum computerunterstiitzten kooperativen Lernen (pp. 252-257). München, Germany: Oldenbourg.
66. Weinberger. A., Stegmann. K, & Fischer. F. (2007a September). Inwieweit beeinflussen sich Lernpartner gegenseitig beim computerunterstutzten kooperativen Lernen im Hinblick auf ihre Motivation? [To what extent do learning partners influence each others' motivation in computer-supported collaborative learning?]. Paper presented at the 11th Fachtagung Padagogische Psychologie, Berlin. Germany.
67. Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., & Fischer, F. (2007b August). Role scripts for improving group learning beyond individual learning: Does it work? Paper presented at the 12th Biennial Conference of the European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction. Budapest, Hungary.
68. Weinberger, A., Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Epistemic and social scripts in computersupported collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 33, 1-30.
69. Weinberger, A., Stegmann, K., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2007). Scripting argumentative knowledge construction in computer-supported learning environments. In F. Fischer, I. Kollar, H. Mandl, & J. M. Haake (Eds.), Scripting computer-supported learning. Cognitive, computational and educational perspectives (pp. 191-211). New York: Springer.
70. Weinberger, A., Clark, D. B., Hakkinen, P., Tamura, Y., & Fischer, F. (2007). Argumentative knowledge construction in online learning environments in and across different cultures: A collaboration script perspective. Research in Comparative and International Education, 2, 68-79.
71. Wellman, B. (1999). The network community: An introduction. In B. Wellman (Ed.), Networks in the global village: Life in contemporary communities (pp. 1-47). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.