Eye movements and morphological segmentation of compound words: There is a mouse in mousetrap

European Journal of Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 16, Issue 1-2, 2004, Pages 285-311

  Andrews, Sally ^a   Miller, Brett ^b   Rayner, Keith ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPREHENSION; CONFERENCE PAPER; EYE FIXATION; EYE MOVEMENT; GAZE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; READING; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RESPONSE TIME; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 1642499346     PISSN: 09541446     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09541440340000123     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (52)

1. Andrews, S. (1986). Morphological influences on lexical access: Lexical or nonlexical effects? Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 726-740.
2. Andrews, S., & Davis, C. (1999). Interactive activation accounts of morphological decomposition: Finding the trap in mousetrap? Brain and Language, 68, 355-361.
3. Andrews, S., & Scarratt, D. R. (1998). Rule and analogy mechanisms in reading nonwords: Hough dou peapel rede gnew wirds? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1052-1086.
4. Baayen, R. H., Dijkstra, T., & Schreuder, R. (1997). Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel route model. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 94-117.
5. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & van Rijn, H. (1993). The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM). Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
6. Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 340-357.
7. Caramazza, A., Laudanna, A., & Romani, C. (1988). Lexical access and inflectional morphology. Cognition, 28, 297-332.
8. Clark, H. (1973). The language-as-fixed fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 335-359.
9. Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel distributed processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100, 589-608.
10. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
11. Davis, C. (2000). The self organising lexical acquisition and recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New South Wales, Australia.
12. De Groot, A. (1984). Primed lexical decision: Combined effects of the proportion of related prime-target pairs and the stimulus-onset asynchrony of prime and target. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36A, 253-280.
13. Dell, G. (1986). A spreading activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93, 283-321.
14. Fowler, C. A., Napps, S. E., & Feldman, L. B. (1985). Relations among regular and irregular morphologically related words in the lexicon as revealed by repetition priming. Memory and Cognition, 13, 241-255.
15. Gimson, A. C. (1980). An introduction to the pronunciation of English (3rd ed.). London: Arnold.
16. Giraudo, H., & Grainger, J. (2001). Priming complex words: Evidence of supralexical representations of morphology. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 127-131.
17. Grainger, J., & Jacobs A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518-565.
18. Henderson, L. (1982). Orthography and word recognition in reading. London: Academic Press.
19. Henderson, L. (1985). Towards a psychology of morphemes. In A. W. Ellis (Ed.), Progress in the psychology of language, Vol. 1. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
20. Hyönä, J., & Pollatsek, A. (1998). Reading Finnish compound words: Eye fixations are affected by component morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1612-1627.
21. Inhoff, A. W. (1989). Lexical access during eye fixations in reading: Are word access codes used to integrate lexical information across interword fixations? Journal of Memory and Language, 28, 444-461.
22. Inhoff, A. W., Briihl, D., & Schwartz, J. (1996). Compound word effects differ in reading, on-line naming, and delayed naming tasks. Memory and Cognition, 24, 466-476.
23. Juhasz, B. J., Starr, M. S., Inhoff, A. W., & Placke, L. (2003). The effects of morphology on the processing of compound words: Evidence from lexical decision, naming, and eye fixations. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 223-244.
24. Kello, C. T., & Plaut, D. C. (2000). Strategic control in word reading: Evidence from speeded responding in the tempo-naming task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 719-750.
25. Kučera, H., & Francis, W. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
26. Lima, S. D., & Pollatsek, A. (1983). Lexical access via an orthographic code? The basic orthographic syllabic structure reconsidered. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 310-333.
27. Marslen-Wilson, W., Tyler, L., Waksler, R., & Older, L. (1994). Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychological Review, 101, 3-33.
28. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
29. Morrison, R. E. (1984). Manipulation of stimulus onset delay in reading: Evidence for parallel programming of saccades. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 667-682.
30. Mozer, M. C. (1987). Early parallel processes in reading: A connectionist approach. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
31. Niemi, J., Laine, M., & Tuominen, J. (1994). Cognitive morphology in Finnish: Foundations of a new model. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 423-446.
32. Niswander, E., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2000). The processing of derived and inflected suffixed words during reading. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 389-420.
33. Pillon, A. (1998). A pseudo-prefixation effect in visual word recognition: A true-neither strategic nor orthographic-morphemic effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51A, 85-120.
34. Plaut, D. C., & Gonnerman, L. M. (2000). Are non-semantic morphological effects incompatible with a distributed connectionist approach to lexical processing? Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 445-485.
35. Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
36. Pollatsek, A., Hyönä, J., & Bertram, R. (2000). The role of morphological constituents in reading Finnish compound words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 820-833.
37. Rayner, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 95, 618-660.
38. Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372-422.
39. Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1989). The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
40. Rayner, K., Slowiaczek, M. L., Clifton, C., & Bertera, J. H. (1983). Latency of sequential eye movements: Implications for reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 912-922.
41. Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D. L., & Rayner, K. (1998). Toward a model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105, 125-157.
42. Sandra, D. (1990). On the representation and processing of compound words: Automatic access to constituent morphemes does not occur. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42A, 529-567.
43. Shoolman, N., & Andrews, S. (2003). Racehorses, reindeers and sparrows: Using masked priming to investigate morphological influences on compound word identification. In S. Kinoshita & S. J. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: The state of the art (pp. 241-278). New York: Psychology Press.
44. Taft, M. (1979a). Lexical access via an orthographic code: The basic orthographic syllabic structure (BOSS). Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 21-39.
45. Taft, M. (1979b). Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect. Memory and Cognition, 7, 263-272.
46. Taft, M. (1985). The decoding of words in lexical access: A review of the morphographic approach. In D. Besner, T. G. Waller, & G. E. MacKinnon (Eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice, Vol. 5. New York: Academic Press.
47. Taft, M. (1991). Reading and the mental lexicon. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
48. Taft, M. (1994). Interactive activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 271-294.
49. Taft, M. (2003). Morphological representation as a correlation between form and meaning. In E. Assink & D. Sandra (Eds.), Reading complex words. Amsterdam: Kluwer.
50. Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1975). Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 638-647.
51. Taft, M., & Forster, K. I. (1976). Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 607-620.
52. Wickens, T., & Keppel, G. (1973). On the choice of design and test statistic in the analysis of experiments with sampled materials. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 296-309.