Phonological ambiguity and context sensitivity: On sublexical clustering in visual word recognition

Journal of Memory and Language

Volumn 49, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 375-395

  Martensen, Heike ^a   Maris, Eric ^b   Dijkstra, Ton ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Dutch; Pronunciation; Spelling sound consistency; Sublexical units; Visual segmentation; Visual word recognition

Indexed keywords

EID: 0141649380     PISSN: 0749596X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00068-8     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Andrews, S. (1982). Phonological recoding: Is the regularity effect consistent? Memory & Cognition, 10, 565-575.
2. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & van Rijn, H. (1993). CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM) [Computer Software]. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.
3. Bradley, L., & Bryant, P. E. (1983). Categorising sounds and learning to read - A causal connection. Nature, 301, 419-521.
4. Bowey, J. A. (1996). Phonological recoding of nonword orthographic rime primes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 117-131.
5. Brown, G. D. A. (1987). Resolving inconsistency: A computational model of word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 23, 1-23.
6. Coltheart, M., Besner, D., Jonasson, J. T., & Davelaar, E. (1979). Phonological encoding in the lexical decision task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 31, 489-507.
7. Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, A., & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100, 589-608.
8. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A Dual Route Cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256.
9. Coltheart, M., & Rastle, K. (1994). Serial processing in reading aloud: Evidence for dual-route models of reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1197-1211.
10. Cortese, M. J. (1998). Revisiting serial position effects in reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 652-665.
11. Cortese, M. J., & Simpson, G. B. (2000). Regularity effects in word naming: What are they? Memory & Cognition, 28, 1269-1276.
12. Dijkstra, A., Schreuder, R., & Frauenfelder, U. H. (1989). Grapheme context effects on phonemic processing. Language and Speech, 32, 89-108.
13. Glushko, R. J. (1979). The organization and synthesis of orthographic knowledge in reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 674-691.
14. Goswami, U. (1986). Children's use of analogy in learning to read: A developmental study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 42, 73-83.
15. Goswami, U. (1988). Orthographic analogies and reading development. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40 A, 239-268.
16. Goswami, U. (1991). Learning about spelling sequences in reading: The role of onsets and rimes. Child Development, 62, 1110-1123.
17. Jared, D. (1997). Spelling-sound consistency affects the naming of high-frequency words. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 505-529.
18. Jared, D., McRae, K., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1990). The basis of consistency effects in word naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 687-715.
19. Kay, J., & Bishop, D. (1987). Anatomical differences between nose, palm, and foot, or, the body in question: Further dissection of the processes of sub-lexical spelling-sound translation. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of reading (pp. 449-469). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Kinoshita, S., & Woolams, A. (2002). The masked onset priming effect in naming: Computation of phonology or speech planning? Memory & Cognition, 30, 237-245.
21. Martensen, H., Maris, E., & Dijkstra, T. (2000). When does inconsistency hurt. On the relation between consistency effects and reliability. Memory & Cognition, 28, 648-656.
22. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375-407.
23. Meier, A. (1991). The time course of phonological encoding in language production: Phonological Encoding inside a syllable. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 69-89.
24. Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56-115.
25. Pring, L. (1981). Phonological codes and functional spelling units: Reality and implications. Perception & Psychophysics, 30, 573-578.
26. Rastle, K., & Coltheart, M. (1998). Whammies and double whammies: The effect of length on nonword reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 277-282.
27. Seidenberg, M. S., Waters, G., Barnes, M. A., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1984). When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition? Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 383-404.
28. Seidenberg, M. S. (1987). Sublexical structures in visual word recognition: Access units or orthographic redundancy? In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and Performance XII: The Psychology of Reading (pp. 245-263). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
30. Taraban, R., & McClelland, J. L. (1987). Conspiracy effects in word pronunciation. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 603-631.
31. Treiman, R. (1986). The division between onsets and times in English syllables. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 608-631.
32. Treiman, R., & Chafetz, J. (1987). Are there onset- and rime-like units in printed words. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance XII: The psychology of Reading (pp. 281-298). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Treiman, R., & Danis, C. (1988). Short-term memory errors for spoken syllables are affected by the linguistic structure of the syllables. Journal of Experimental psychology. Learning, Memorly, and Cognition, 14, 145-152.
34. Treiman, R., Mullenix, J., Bijeljac-Babic, R., & Richmond-Welty, E. D. (1995). The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography. Journal of Experimental psychology: General, 124, 107-136.
35. Waters, G., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1985). Spelling-sound effects in reading: Time-course and decision criteria. Memory & Cognition, 13, 557-572.
36. Ziegler, J. C., Stone, G. O., & Jacobs, A. M. (1997). What is the pronunciation for -ough and the spelling for /u/? A database for computing feedforward and feedback consistency in English.. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 29, 600-618.
37. Zorzi, M., Houghton, G., & Butterworth, B. (1998). Two routes or one in reading aloud. A connectionist dual-process model. Journal of Experimental psychology. Human Perception and performance, 24, 1131-1161.