Inconsistency of perceived 3D shape

Vision Research

Volumn 50, Issue 16, 2010, Pages 1519-1531

  Di Luca, M ^a,b   Domini, F ^b,d   Caudek, C ^c  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

^b BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

^d ISTITUTO ITALIANO DI TECNOLOGIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

3D shape; Cue integration; Curvature; Depth; Perception; Representation; Slant

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NORMAL HUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; VOLUNTEER;

CUES; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; SENSORY THRESHOLDS;

EID: 77954312497     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.05.006     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Baayen R.H. Analyzing linguistic data. A practical introduction to statistics using R 2008, Cambridge University Press.
2. Beardsley P.A., Reid I.D., Zisserman A., Murray D.W. Active visual navigation using non-metric structure. Proceedings of the 5th international conference on computer vision 1995, 58-65. IEEE Computer Society Press, Boston.
3. Bizo L.A., Chu J.Y.M., Sanabria F., Killeen P.R. The failure of Weber's law in time perception and production. Behavioural Processes 2006, 71:201-210.
4. Bradshaw M.F., Parton A.D., Glennerster A. The task-dependent use of binocular disparity and motion parallax information. Vision Research 2000, 40:3725-3734.
5. Brenner E., van Damme W. Perceived distance, shape and size. Vision Research 1999, 39:975-986.
6. Bülthoff H.H., Yuille A. Shape-from-X: Psychophysics and computation. Proceedings of the SPIE 1990, 1383:165-172.
7. Caudek C., Domini F. Perceived orientation of axis of rotation in structure-from-motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1998, 24:609-621.
8. Caudek C., Domini F., Di Luca M. Short-term temporal recruitment in structure from motion. Vision Research 2002, 42:1213-1223.
9. Caudek C., Proffitt D.R. Depth perception in motion parallax and stereokinesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1993, 19:32-47.
10. Caudek C., Rubin N. Segmentation in structure from motion: Modeling and psychophysics. Vision Research 2001, 41:2715-2732.
11. Christou C., Koenderink J.J., van Doorn A.J. Surface gradients, contours and the perception of surface attitude in images of complex scenes. Perception 1996, 25:701-713.
12. Cornilleau-Pérès V., Wexler M., Droulez J., Marin E., Miege C., Bourdoncle B. Visual perception of planar orientation: Dominance of static depth cues over motion cues. Vision Research 2002, 42:1403-1412.
13. Curran W., Johnston A. The effect of light source position on perceived curvature. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science 1994, 35/4:1741.
14. Curran W., Johnston A. The effect of illuminant position on perceived curvature. Vision Research 1996, 36:1399-1410.
15. Cutting J.E., Vishton P.M. Perceiving layout and knowing distances: The integration, relative potency, and contextual use of different information about depth. Handbook of perception and cognition 1995, Vol. XIX:69-117. Academic Press, Inc, San Diego, CA, US. 2nd ed.
16. Dijkstra T.M., Cornilleau-Pérès V., Gielen C.C., Droulez J. Perception of three-dimensional shape from ego- and object-motion: Comparison between small- and large-field stimuli. Vision Research 1995, 35:453-462.
17. Di Luca M., Domini F., Caudek C. Spatial integration in structure from motion. Vision Research 2004, 44:3001-3013.
18. Di Luca M., Domini F., Caudek C. The relation between disparity and velocity signals of rigidly moving objects constrains depth order perception. Vision Research 2007, 47:1335-1349.
19. Domini, F., & Caudek, C. (2010). Combining image signals before 3D reconstruction: The Intrinsic constraint model of cue integration. In Trommershäuser, J., Landy, M. S. & Körding, K. (Eds.), Sensory cue integration. New York: Oxford University Press.
20. Domini F., Braunstein M.L. Recovery of 3d structure from motion is neither euclidean nor affine. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1998, 24:1273-1295.
21. Domini F., Caudek C. Perceiving surface slant from deformation of optic flow. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1999, 25:426-444.
22. Domini F., Caudek C. Recovering slant and angular velocity from a linear velocity field: Modeling and psychophysics. Vision Research 2003, 43:1753-1764.
23. Domini F., Caudek C. 3-D structure perceived from dynamic information: A new theory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2003, 7:444-449.
24. Domini F., Caudek C. The intrinsic constraint model and Fechnerian sensory scaling. Journal of Vision 2009, 9(2):1-15.
25. Domini F., Caudek C. Matching perceived depth from disparity and from velocity: Modeling and psychophysics. Acta Psychologica 2010, 133:81-89.
26. Domini F., Caudek C., Proffitt D.R. Misperceptions of angular velocities influence the perception of rigidity in the kinetic depth effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1997, 23:1111-1129.
27. Domini F., Caudek C., Richman S. Distortions of depth-order relations and parallelism in structure from motion. Perception & Psychophysics 1998, 60:1164-1174.
28. Domini F., Caudek C., Tassinari H. Stereo and motion information are not independently processed by the visual system. Vision Research 2006, 46:1707-1723.
29. Durgin F.H., Proffitt D.R., Olson T.J., Reinke K.S. Comparing depth from motion with depth from binocular disparity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1995, 21:679-699.
30. Erens R.G., Kappers A.M., Koenderink J.J. Perception of local shape from shading. Perception & Psychophysics 1993, 54:145-156.
31. Fantoni C. 3D surface orientation based on a novel representation of the orientation disparity field. Vision Research 2008, 48:2509-2522.
32. Fantoni, C., Caudek, C., & Domini, F. (2010). Systematic distortions of perceived planar surface motion in active vision. Journal of Vision, 10(5):12, 1-20.
33. Faugeras O. Stratification of three-dimensional vision: Projective, affine, and metric representations. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 1995, 12:465-484.
34. Foley J.D., Van Dam A. Fundamentals of interactive computer graphics 1983, Addison Wesley, Reading, MA.
35. Gårding J., Porill J., Mayhew J.E.W., Frisby J.P. Stereopsis, vertical disparity and relief transformations. Vision Research 1995, 35:703-722.
36. Glennerster A., Rogers B., Bradshaw M. Stereoscopic depth constancy depends on the subject's task. Vision Research 1996, 36:3441-3456.
37. Hecht H., van Doorn A., Koenderink J.J. Compression of visual space in natural scenes and in their photographic counterparts. Perception & Psychophysics 1999, 61:1269-1286.
38. Helbig H.B., Ernst M.O. Knowledge about a common source can promote visual-haptic integration. Perception 2007, 36:1523-1533.
39. Hoffman D.M., Girshick A.R., Akeley K., Banks M.S. Vergence-accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue. Journal of Vision 2008, 8(3):1-30.
40. Horn B.K.P. Robot vision 1986, McGraw Hill, New York.
41. Johnston E.B. Systematic distortion of shape from stereopsis. Vision Research 1991, 31:1351-1360.
42. Johnston A., Passmore P.J. Shape from shading. i: Surface curvature and orientation. Perception 1994, 23:169-189.
43. Johnston A., Passmore P.J. Shape from shading. ii: Geodesic bisection and alignment. Perception 1994, 23:191-200.
44. Kersten D., Mamassian P., Yuille A.L. Object perception as Bayesian inference. Annual Review of Psychology 2004, 55:271-304.
45. Koenderink J.J. Optic flow. Vision Research 1986, 26:161-179.
46. Koenderink J.J. Solid shape 1990, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England.
47. Koenderink J.J., van Doorn A.J. Affine structure from motion. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 1991, 8:377-385.
48. Koenderink J.J., van Doorn A.J., Kappers A.M.L. Surface perception in pictures. Perception & Psychophysics 1992, 52:487-496.
49. Koenderink J.J., van Doorn A.J., Kappers A.M. Pictorial surface attitude and local depth comparison. Perception & Psychophysics 1996, 58:163-173.
50. Landy M.S., Maloney L.T., Johnston E.B., Young M.J. Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: In defense of weak fusion. Vision Research 1995, 35:389-412.
51. Lappin J.S., Craft W.D. Foundations of spatial vision: From retinal images to perceived shapes. Psychological Review 2000, 107:6-38.
52. Liter J.C., Braunstein M.L., Hoffman D.D. Inferring structure from motion in two-view and multiview displays. Perception 1993, 22:441-1465.
53. MacKenzie K.J., Murray R.F., Wilcox L.M. The intrinsic constraint approach to cue combination: An empirical and theoretical evaluation. Journal of Vision 2008, 8(8):1-10.
54. Mather G. The use of image blur as a depth cue. Perception 1997, 26:1147-1158.
55. Self-organization, computational maps and motor control 1997, Elsevier. P. Morasso, V. Sanguineti (Eds.).
56. Pentland A.P. Finding the illuminant direction. Journal of the Optical Society of America 1982, 72:448-455.
57. R Development Core Team (2010). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. Available from: http://www.R-project.org.
58. Richards W. Structure from stereo and motion. Journal of the Optical Society of America A: Optics and Image Science 1985, 2:343-349.
59. Robert L., Zeller C., Faugeras O., Hebert M. Applications of non-metric vision to some visually-guided robotics tasks. Visual navigation: From biological systems to unmanned ground vehicles, advances in computer vision 1997, Vol. II. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Mahwah, New Jersey, USA, 89-134.
60. Shah, R., Domini, F., & Caudek, C. (submitted for publication). Do we perceive a flattened world on the monitor screen?
61. Tassinari H., Domini F., Caudek C. The intrinsic constraint model for stereo-motion integration. Perception 2008, 37:79-95.
62. Thaler L., Goodale M.A. Beyond distance and direction: The brain represents target locations non-metrically. Journal of Vision 2010, 10(3):1-27.
63. Tittle J.S., Todd J.T., Perotti V.J., Norman J.F. Systematic distortion of perceived three-dimensional structure from motion and binocular stereopsis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1995, 21:663-678.
64. Todd J.T. The visual perception of 3d shape. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2004, 8:115-121.
65. Todd J.T., Bressan P. The perception of 3-dimensional affine structure from minimal apparent motion sequences. Perception & Psychophysics 1990, 48:419-430.
66. Todd J.T., Koenderink J.J., van Doorn A.J., Kappers A.M. Effects of changing viewing conditions on the perceived structure of smoothly curved surfaces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1996, 22:695-706.
67. Todd J.T., Mingolla E. Perception of surface curvature and direction of illumination from patterns of shading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1983, 9:583-595.
68. Todd J.T., Norman J.F. The visual perception of smoothly curved surfaces from minimal apparent motion sequences. Perception & Psychophysics 1991, 50:509-523.
69. Todd J.T., Norman J.F. The visual perception of 3-d shape from multiple cues: Are observers capable of perceiving metric structure. Perception & Psychophysics 2003, 65:31-47.
70. Todd J.T., Perotti V.J. The visual perception of surface orientation from optical motion. Perception & Psychophysics 1999, 61:1577-1589.
71. Todd J.T., Thaler L., Dijkstra T.M.H., Koenderink J.J., Kappers A.M.L. The effects of viewing angle, camera angle and sign of surface curvature on the perception of 3D shape from texture. Journal of Vision 2007, 7(12):1-16.
72. Ullman S. The interpretation of visual motion 1979, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
73. van Boxtel J.J.A., Wexler M., Droulez J. Perception of plane orientation from self-generated and passively observed optic flow. Journal of Vision 2003, 3(5):318-332.
74. Watt S.J., Akeley K., Ernst M.O., Banks M.S. Focus cues affect perceived depth. Journal of Vision 2005, 5:834-862.
75. Wichmann F.A., Hill N.J. The psychometric function: II: Bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling. Perception & Psychophysics 2001, 63:1314-1329.