The relation between disparity and velocity signals of rigidly moving objects constrains depth order perception

Vision Research

Volumn 47, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 1335-1349

  Di Luca, Massimiliano ^a   Domini, Fulvio ^a   Caudek, Corrado ^b  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cue integration; Disparity; Motion; Rigidity constraint; Vision

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BINOCULAR CONVERGENCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; LUMINANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMETRY; RETINA IMAGE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VELOCITY; VISION; VISUAL ORIENTATION;

CUES; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MOTION PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMETRICS; ROTATION; VISION DISPARITY; VISION, BINOCULAR;

EID: 34047266606     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.10.029     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Aloimonos J. Shape from texture. Biological Cybernetics 58 (1988) 345-360
2. Backus B.T., Banks M.S., van Ee R., and Crowell J.A. Horizontal and vertical disparity, eye position, and stereoscopic slant perception. Vision Research 39 (1999) 1143-1170
3. Brooks M.J., and Horn B.K.P. Shape and source from shading. Proceedings of the Joint Conference in Artificial Intelligence (1985) 932-936
4. Brown, C., Ballard, D., Rainero, E. (1983). Constraint propagation in shape from shading - Proc. Image Understanding Workshop, 1983.
5. Bülthoff H.H. Shape from X: Psychophysics and computation. In: Landy M.S., and Movshon J.A. (Eds). Computational models of visual processing (1991), The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, US 305-330
6. Caudek C., and Domini F. Perceived orientation of axis of rotation in structure-from-motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24 (1998) 609-621
7. Caudek C., Domini F., and Di Luca M. Short-term temporal recruitment in structure from motion. Vision Research 42 (2002) 1213-1223
8. Caudek C., and Proffitt D.R. Depth perception in motion parallax and stereokinesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 19 (1993) 32-47
9. Caudek C., and Rubin N. Segmentation in structure from motion: Modeling and psychophysics. Vision Research 41 (2001) 2715-2732
10. Cutting, J. E., Vishton, P. M. (1995). Perceiving layout and knowing distances: The integration, relative potency, and contextual use of different information about depth IN Perception of space and motion. Handbook of perception and cognition (2nd ed.). Epstein, W. and Rogers, S. Eds. San Diego, CA, US, Academic Press, Inc., 69-117.
11. Domini F., and Caudek C. Perceiving surface slant from deformation of optic flow. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25 (1999) 426-444
12. Domini F., Caudek C., and Proffitt D.R. Misperceptions of angular velocities influence the perception of rigidity in the Kinetic Depth Effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 23 (1997) 1111-1129
13. Domini F., Caudek C., and Richman S. Distortions of depth-order relations and parallelism in structure from motion. Perception & Psychophysics 60 (1998) 1164-1174
14. Domini F., Caudek C., Turner J., and Favretto A. Discriminating constant from variable angular velocities in structure from motion. Perception & Psychophysics 60 (1998) 747-760
15. Domini F., Caudek C., and Skirko P. Temporal integration of motion and stereo cues to depth. Perception & Psychophysics 65 (2003) 48-57
16. Domini F., Caudek C., and Tassinari H. Stereo and motion information are not independently processed by the visual system. Vision Research 46 (2006) 1707-1723
17. Farell B., Li S., and McKee S.P. Coarse scales, fine scales, and their interactions in stereo vision. Journal of Vision 4 (2004) 488-499
18. Farell B., Li S., and McKee S.P. Disparity increment thresholds for gratings. Journal of Vision 4 (2004) 156-168
19. Fernández J.M., Watson B., and Qian N. Computing relief structure from motion with a distributed velocity and disparity representation. Vision Research 42 (2002) 883-898
20. Gårding J. Direct estimation of shape from texture. IEEE Trans Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 15 (1993) 1202-1208
21. Grimson W.E.L. A computer implementation of a theory of human stereo vision, Philosophical transactions of the royal society of london. Series B, Biological sciences v292 (1981) 217-253
22. Hildreth E.C., Grzywacz N.M., and Adelson E.H. The perceptual buildup of three-dimensional structure from motion. Perception & Psychophysics 48 (1990) 19-36
23. Hillis J.M., Watt S.J., Landy M.S., and Banks M.S. Slant from texture and disparity cues: Optional cue combination. Journal of Vision 4 (2004) 1-3
24. Hogervorst M.A., and Eagle R.A. The role of perspective effects and accelerations in perceived three-dimensional structure-from-motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26 (2000) 934-955
25. Horn B.K.P. The psychology of computer vision, chap. obtaining shape from shading information (1975), McGraw-Hill, New York
26. Johnston E.B., Cumming B.G., and Landy M.S. Integration of stereopsis and motion shape cues. Vision Research 34 (1994) 2259-2275
27. Kham K., and Blake R. Depth capture by kinetic depth and by stereopsis. Perception 29 (2000) 211-220
28. Koenderink J.J., and van Doorn A. Affine structure from motion. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 8 (1991) 377-385
29. Landy M.S., Maloney L.T., Johnston E.B., and Young M. Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: In defense of weak fusion. Vision Research 35 (1995) 389-412
30. Lappin J.S., and Craft W.D. Foundations of spatial vision: From retinal images to perceived shapes. Psychological Review 107 (2000) 6-38
31. Liter J.C., and Braunstein M.L. The relationship of vertical and horizontal velocity gradients in the perception of shape, rotation, and rigidity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24 (1998) 1257-1272
32. Liu Y., and Huang T.S. Estimation of rigid body motion using straight line correspondences. Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing 43 (1988) 37-52
33. Marr D. Vision (1982), W.H. Freeman Co
34. McKee S.P., Verghese P., and Farell B. Stereo sensitivity depends on stereo matching. Journal of Vision 5 (2005) 783-792
35. McKee S.P., Welch L., Taylor D.G., and Bowne S.F. Finding the common bond: Stereoacuity and the other hyperacuities. Vision Research 30 (1990) 879-891
36. Pentland A.P. Finding the illuminant direction. Journal of the Optical Society of America 72 (1982) 448-455
37. Pentland A. Shape information from shading: a theory about human perception. Spatial Vision 4 (1989) 165-182
38. Richards W. Structure from stereo and motion. Journal of the Optical Society of America A: Optics and Image Science 2 (1985) 343-349
39. Tassinari, H., Domini, F., Caudek, C. (in press). The Intrinsic Constraint Model for Stereo-Motion Integration, submitted to Perception.
40. Tittle J.S., and Braunstein M.L. Recovery of 3-D shape from binocular disparity and structure from motion. Perception & Psychophysics 54 (1993) 157-169
41. Todd J.T., and Bressan P. The perception of 3-dimensional affine structure from minimal apparent motion sequences. Perception & Psychophysics 48 (1990) 419-430
42. Todd J.T., and Norman J.F. The visual perception of 3-D shape from multiple cues: are observers capable of perceiving metric structure?. Perception & Psychophysics 65 (2003) 31-47
43. Todd J.T., Tittle J.S., and Norman J.F. Distortions of three-dimensional space in the perceptual analysis of motion and stereo. Perception 24 (1995) 75-86
44. Tsai T.S., and Huang R.Y. Uniqueness and estimation of 3D motion parameters of rigid objects with curved surfaces. IEEE Trans Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 6 (1984) 13-27
45. Ullman S. The interpretation of visual motion (1979), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
46. Ullman S. Maximizing rigidity: The incremental recovery of 3-D structure from rigid and nonrigid motion. Perception 13 (1984) 255-274
47. Verghese P., McKee S.P., and Grzywacz N.M. Stimulus configuration determines the detectability of motion signals in noise. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 17 (2000) 1525-1534
48. Wichmann F.A., and Hill N.J. The psychometric function. I. Fitting, sampling and goodness-of-fit. Perception & Psychophysics 63 (2001) 1293-1313
49. Wichmann F.A., and Hill N.J. The psychometric function. II. Bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling. Perception & Psychophysics 63 (2001) 1314-1329
50. Witkin. Recovering surface shape and orientation from texture. Artificial Intelligence 7 (1981) 17-45