3-D structure perceived from dynamic information: A new theory

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 7, Issue 10, 2003, Pages 444-449

  Domini, Fulvio ^a   Caudek, Corrado ^b  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TRIESTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IMAGE ANALYSIS; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; PROBABILISTIC LOGICS;

IMAGE MOVEMENT;

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS;

ACCOMMODATION; ALGORITHM; AMBIGUITY; ASSOCIATION; BRAIN FUNCTION; COLOR VISION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; EMPIRICISM; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; OPTIC NERVE; PREDICTION; PROBABILITY; PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY; RETINA IMAGE; REVIEW; SIMULATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; THEORETICAL STUDY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

EID: 0141756301     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2003.08.007     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Proffitt D.R., Caudek C. Depth perception and perception of events. Healy A.F., Proctor R.W. Experimental Psychology: Handbook of Psychology. 2002;213-236 Wiley.
2. Wallach H., O'Connell D.N. The kinetic depth effect. J. Exp. Psychol. 45:1953;205-217.
3. Todd J.T. The visual perception of 3D structure. Arbib M.A. The Handbook of Brain Theory and Neural Networks. 2002;MIT Press.
4. Todd J.T. Theoretical and biological limitations on the visual perception of three-dimensional structure from motion. Watanabe T. High-Level Motion Processing: Computational, Neurophysiological and Psychophysical Perspectives. 1998;359-380 MIT Press.
5. Todd J.T., et al. The intrinsic geometry of perceptual space: its metrical, affine and projective properties. Killeen P.R., Uttal W.R. Fechner Day 99: The End of 20th Century Psychophysics. 1999;169-175 The International Society for Psychophysics, Tempe AZ.
6. Ullman S. The Interpretation of Visual Motion. 1979;MIT Press.
7. Longuet-Higgins H.C., Prazdny K. The interpretation of a moving retinal image. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 208:1980;385-397.
8. Bennett B.M., et al. Structure from two orthographic views of rigid motion. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A. 6:1989;1052-1069.
9. Ullman S. Maximizing rigidity: the incremental recovery of 3-D structure from rigid and nonrigid motion. Perception. 13:1984;255-274.
10. Koenderink J.J., van Doorn A.J. Affine structure from motion. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A. 8:1991;377-385.
11. Todd J.T., Bressan P. The perception of 3-dimensional affine structure from minimal apparent motion sequences. Percept. Psychophys. 48:1990;419-430.
12. Domini F., et al. Distortions of depth-order relations and parallelism in structure from motion. Percept. Psychophys. 60:1998;1164-1174.
13. Domini F., Braunstein M.L. Recovery of 3D structure from motion is neither Euclidean nor affine. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 24:1998;1273-1295.
14. Domini F., Caudek C. Perceiving surface slant from deformation of optic flow. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 25:1999;426-444.
15. Domini F., Caudek C. Recovering slant and angular velocity from a linear velocity field: Modeling and psychophysics. Vision Res. 43:2003;1753-1764.
16. Gibson J.J. Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. 1979;Erlbaum.
17. Koenderink J.J. Optic flow. Vision Res. 26:1986;161-180.
18. Tittle J.S., et al. The systematic distortion of perceived 3D structure from motion and binocular stereopsis. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 21:1995;663-678.
19. Liter J.C., et al. Inferring structure from motion in two-view and multiview displays. Perception. 22:1993;1441-1465.
20. Hogervorst M.A., Eagle R.A. The role of perspective effects and accelerations in perceived three-dimensional structure-from-motion. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 26:2000;934-955.
21. Domini F., et al. Misperceptions of angular velocities influence the perception of rigidity in the kinetic depth effect. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 23:1997;1111-1129.
22. Vanduffel W., et al. Extracting 3D from motion: differences in human and monkey intraparietal cortex. Science. 298:2002;413-415.
23. Orban G.A., et al. Human cortical regions involved in extracting depth from motion. Neuron. 24:1999;929-940.
24. Morrone C., et al. A cortical area that responds specifically to optic flow, revealed by fMRI. Nat. Neurosci. 3:2000;1322-1328.
25. Sugihara H., et al. Response of MSTd neurons to simulated 3D orientation of rotating planes. J. Neurophysiol. 87:2002;273-285.
26. Lagae L., et al. Responses of macaque STS neurons to optic flow components: a comparison of areas MT and MST. J. Neurophysiol. 71:1994;1597-1626.
27. Cornilleau-Pérès V., Gielen C.C.A.M. Interactions between self-motion and depth perception in the processing of optic flow. Trends Neurosci. 19:1996;196-202.
28. Wexler M., et al. Self-motion and the perception of stationary objects. Nature. 409:2001;85-88.
29. Peh C.H., et al. Absolute distance perception during in-depth head movement: calibrating optic flow with extra-retinal information. Vision Res. 42:2002;1991-2003.
30. Hildreth E.C., et al. The perceptual buildup of three-dimensional structure from motion. Percept. Psychophys. 48:1990;19-36.
31. Grzywacz N.M., Hildreth E.C. Incremental rigidity scheme for recovering structure from motion: position-based versus velocity-based formulations. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A. 4:1987;503-518.
32. Caudek C., Domini F. Perceived orientation of axis of rotation in structure-from-motion. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 24:1998;609-621.
33. Domini F., et al. Discriminating constant from variable angular velocities in structure from motion. Percept. Psychophys. 60:1998;747-760.
34. Caudek C., Rubin N. Segmentation in structure from motion: modeling and psychophysics. Vision Res. 41:2001;2715-2732.
35. Domini F., et al. Temporal integration of motion and stereo cues to depth. Percept. Psychophys. 65:2003;48-57.
36. Caudek C., et al. Short-term temporal recruitment in structure from motion. Vision Res. 42:2002;1213-1223.
37. Domini F., et al. Temporal integration in structure from motion. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 28:2002;816-838.