Systematic distortions of perceived planar surface motion in active vision

Journal of Vision

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 2010, Pages

  Fantoni, Carlo ^a   Caudek, Corrado ^b   Domini, Fulvio ^a,c  

^a ISTITUTO ITALIANO DI TECNOLOGIA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

^c BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

3D shape and surface perception; Active vision; MotionV3D; Optic flow

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME;

DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; MOVEMENT; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; VISION DISPARITY; VISION, BINOCULAR;

EID: 79955160805     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/10.5.12     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Bennur, S., & Gold, J. I. (2008). Right way neurons. Nature Neuroscience, 11, 1121-1122.
2. Braunstein, M. L., & Tittle, J. S. (1988). The observerrelative velocity field as the basis for effective motion parallax. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 582-590.
3. Buizza, A., Leger, A, Droulez, J., Bertoz, A., & Schmid, R. (1980). Influence of otolithic stimulation by horizontal linear head acceleration in optokinetic nystagmus and visual motion perception. Experimental Brain Research, 71,406-410.
4. Caudek, C., & Domini, F. (1998). Perceived orientation of axis of rotation in structure-from-motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 609-621.
5. Caudek, C., Domini, F., & Di Luca, M. (2002). Short-term temporal recruitment in structure from motion. Vision Research, 10, 1213-1233.
6. Caudek, C., & Proffitt, D.R. (1993). Depth perception in motion parallax and stereokinesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 32-47.
7. Caudek, C., & Rubin, N. (2001). Segmentation in structure from motion: Modelling and psychophysics. Vision Research, 41, 2715-2732.
8. Colas, F., Droulez, J., Wexler, M., & Bessière, P. (2007) A unified probabilistic model of the perception of three-dimensional structure from optic flow. Biological Cybernetics, 97, 461-477.
9. Cornilleau-Pérès, V., & Droulez, J. (1994). The visual perception of three-dimensional shape from selfmotion and object motion. Vision Research, 34, 2331-2336.
10. Cornilleau-Pérès, V., Wexler, M., Droulez, J., Marin, E., Miege, C., & Bourdoncle, B. (2002). Visual perception of planar orientation: Dominance of static depth cues over motion cues. Vision Research, 42, 1403-1412.
11. Dijkstra, T. M., Cornilleau-Pérès, V., Gielen, C. C., & Droulez, J. (1995). Perception of three-dimensional shape from ego- and object-motion: Comparison between small- and large-field stimuli. Vision Research, 35, 453-462.
12. Di Luca, M., Domini, F., & Caudek, C. (2004). Spatial integration in structure from motion. Vision Research, 44, 3001-3013.
13. Domini, F., & Caudek, C. (1999). Perceiving surface slant from deformation of optic flow. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 426-444.
14. Domini, F., & Caudek, C. (2003a). 3D Structure perceived from dynamic information: A new theory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 444-449.
15. Domini, F., & Caudek, C. (2003b). Recovering slant and angular velocity from a linear velocity field: Modeling and psychophysics. Vision Research, 43, 1753-1764.
16. Domini, F., & Caudek, C. (2010a). Matching perceived depth from disparity and from velocity: Modeling and psychophysics. Acta Psychologica, doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.10.003
17. Domini, F., & Caudek, C. (2010b). Combining image signals before 3D reconstruction: The intrinsic constraint model of cue integration. In J. Trommershäuser, M. S. Landy, & K. Körding (Eds.), Sensory cue integration. New York: Oxford University Press.
18. Domini, F., Caudek, C., & Proffitt, D. R. (1997). Misperceptions of angular velocities influence the perception of rigidity in the kinetic depth effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1111-1129.
19. Domini, F., Caudek, C., & Shirko, P. (2003). Temporal integration of motion and stereo cues to depth. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 48-57.
20. Domini, F., Caudek, C., Turner, J., & Favretto, A. (1998). Discriminating constant from variable angular velocities in structure from motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 747-760.
21. Domini, F., Vuong, Q. C., & Caudek, C.(2002). Temporal integration in structure from motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 816-838.
22. Dyde, R. T., & Harris, L. R. (2008). The influence of retinal and extra-retinal motion cues on perceived object motion during self-motion. Journal of Vision, 8(14):5, 1-10, http://journalofvision.org/content/8/14/5, doi:10.1167/8.14.5.
23. Eagle, R. A., & Hogervorst, M. A. (1999). The role of perspective information in the recovery of 3D structurefrom-motion. Vision Research, 39, 1713-1722.
24. Fantoni, C. (2008). 3D surface orientation based on a novel representation of the orientation disparity field. Vision Research, 48, 2509-2522.
25. Ferman, L., Collewijn, H., Jansen, T. C., & van den Berg, B. (1987). Human gaze stability in the horizontal, vertical and torsional direction during voluntary head movements, evaluated with a three dimensional scleral induction coil technique. Vision Research, 27, 811-828.
26. Gogel, W. C., & Tietz, J. D. (1973). Absolute motion parallax and the specific distance tendency. Perception & Psychophysics, 13, 284-292.
27. Gu, Y., Angelaki, D. E., & DeAngelis, G. C. (2008). Neural correlates of multisensory cue integration in macaque MSTd. Nature Neuroscience, 11, 1201-1210.
28. Gu, Y., DeAngelis, G. C., & Angelaki, D. E. (2007). A functional link between area MSTd and heading perception based on vestibular signals. Nature Neuroscience, 10, 1038-1047.
29. Hay, J. C., & Sawyer, S. (1969). Position constancy and binocular convergence. Perception & Psychophysics, 5, 310-312.
30. Hogervorst, M. A., & Eagle, R. A. (2000). The role of perspective effects and accelerations in perceived three-dimensional structure-from-motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 934-955.
31. Jaekl, P. M., Jenkin, M. R., & Harris, L. R. (2005). Perceiving a stable world during active rotational and translational head movements. Experimental Brain Research, 163, 388-399.
32. Knill, D. C. (2007). Robust cue integration: A Bayesian model and evidence from cue-conflict studies with stereoscopic and figure cues to slant. Journal of Vision, 7(7):5, 1-24, http://journalofvision.org/content/7/7/5, doi:10.1167/7.7.5.
33. Koenderink, J. J. (1986). Optic flow. Vision Research, 26, 161-180.
34. Koenderink, J. J., & van Doorn, A. J. (1975). Invariant properties of the motion parallax field due to the movement of rigid bodies relative to an observer. Optica Acta, 22, 773-791.
35. Koenderink, J. J., & van Doorn, A. J. (1978). How an ambulant observer can construct a model of the environment from the geometrical structure of the visual inflow. Kybernetik, 224-247.
36. Landy, M. S., Maloney, L. T., Johnston, E. B.,&Young, M. (1995). Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: In defense of weak fusion. Vision Research, 35, 389-412.
37. Liu, S., & Angelaki, D. E. (2009). Vestibular signals in macaque extrastriate visual cortex are functionally appropriate for heading perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 8936-8945.
38. Longuet-Higgins, H. C. (1981). A computer algorithm for reconstructing a scene from two projections. Nature, 293, 133-135.
39. Longuet-Higgins, H. C. (1984). The visual ambiguity of a moving plane. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 223, 165-175.
40. Longuet-Higgins, H. C., & Prazdny, K. (1980). The interpretation of a moving retinal image. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 208, 385-397.
41. Mayhew, J. E. W., & Longuet-Higgins, H. C. (1982). A computational model of binocular depth perception. Nature, 297, 376-379.
42. Naji, J., & Freeman, T. (2004). Perceiving depth order during pursuit eye movement. Vision Research, 44, 3025-3034.
43. Ono, H., & Steinbach, M. J. (1990). Monocular stereopsis with and without head movement. Perception and Psychophysics, 48, 179-187.
44. Ono, M. E., Rivest, J., & Ono, H. (1986). Depth perception as a function of motion parallax and absolute-distance information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 331-337.
45. Oosterhoff, F. H., van Damme, W. M., & van de Grind, W. A. (1993). Active exploration of three-dimensional objects is more reliable than passive observation. Perception, 22, 99.
46. Oruç, I., Maloney, L. T., & Landy, M. S. (2003). Weighted linear cue combination with possibly correlated error. Vision Research, 43, 2451-2468.
47. Panerai, F., Cornilleau-Pérès, V., & Droulez, J. (2002). Contribution of extraretinal signals to the scaling of object distance during self-motion. Perception and Psychophysics, 64, 717-731.
48. Peh, C.-H., Panerai, F., Droulez, J., Cornilleau-Pérès, V., & Cheong, L.-F. (2002). Absolute distance perception during in-depth head movement: Calibrating optic flow with extra-retinal information. Vision Research, 42, 1991-2003.
49. Rogers, B., & Graham, M. (1979). Motion parallax as an independent cue for depth perception. Perception, 8, 125-134.
50. Rogers, B., & Graham, M. (1982). Similarities between motion parallax and stereopsis in human depth perception. Vision Research, 22, 261-270.
51. Rogers, B. J., & Collett, T. S. (1989). The appearance of surfaces specified by motion parallax and binocular disparity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 41, 697-717.
52. Rogers, S., & Rogers, B. J. (1992). Visual and nonvisual information disambiguate surfaces specified by motion parallax. Perception & Psychophysics, 52, 446-452.
53. Todd, J. T., & Bressan, P. (1990). The perception of 3-dimensional affine structure from minimal apparent motion sequences. Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 419-430.
54. Todd, J. T., & Perotti, V. J. (1999). The visual perception of surface orientation from optical motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1577-1589.
55. Tyler, C. W. (1974). Induced stereomovement. Vision Research, 14, 609-613.
56. Ullman, S. (1979). The interpretation of visual motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
57. van Boxtel, J. J. A., Wexler, M., & Droulez, J. (2003). Perception of plane orientation from self-generated and passively observed optic flow. Journal of Vision, 3(5):1, 318-332, http://journalofvision.org/content/3/5/1, doi:10.1167/3.5.1.
58. van Damme, W. J., & van de Grind, W. A. (1996). Nonvisual information in structure-from-motion. Vision Research, 36, 3119-3127.
59. Wallach, H., & O'Connell, D. N. (1953). The kinetic depth effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45, 205-217.
60. Wallach, H., Stanton, L., & Becker, D. (1974). The compensation for movement-produced changes in object orientation. Perception & Psychophysics, 15, 339-343.
61. Wallach, H., Yablick, G. S., & Smith, A. (1972). Target distance and adaptation in distance perception in the constancy of visual direction. Perception & Psychophysics, 12, 139-145.
62. Wexler, M. (2003). Voluntary head movement and allocentric perception of space. Psychological Science, 14, 340-346.
63. Wexler, M., Lamouret, I., & Droulez, J. (2001). The stationarity hypothesis: An allocentric criterion in visual perception. Vision Research, 41, 3023-3037.
64. Wexler, M., Panerai, F., Lamouret, I., & Droulez, J. (2001). Self-motion and the perception of stationary objects. Nature, 409, 85-88.
65. Wexler, M., & van Boxtel, J. J. (2005). Depth perception by the active observer. Trends in Cognitive Science, 9, 431-438.
66. Wright, D. B., Horry, R., & Skagerberg, E. M. (2009). Functions for traditional and multilevel approaches to signal detection theory. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 257-267.
67. Wright, D. B., & London, K. (2009). Multilevel modeling: Beyond the basic applications. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 41, 257-267.