The visual perception of surface orientation from optical motion

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 61, Issue 8, 1999, Pages 1577-1589

  Todd, James T ^a   Perotti, Victor J ^b  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HUMAN; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; VISUAL ILLUSION;

ATTENTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS;

EID: 0033219778     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03213119     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. BENNETT, B., HOFFMAN, D., NICOLA, J., & PRAKASH, C. (1989). Structure from two orthographic views of rigid motion. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 6, 1052-1069.
2. BRAUNSTEIN, M. L., LITER, J. C., & TITTLE, J. S. (1993). Recovering three-dimensional shape from perspective translations and orthographic rotations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 598-614.
3. CORNILLEAU-PÉRÈs, V., & DROULEZ, J. (1989). Visual perception of curvature: Psychophysics of curvature detection induced by motion parallax. Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 351-364.
4. DIJKSTRA, T. M. H., SNOEREN, P. R., & GIELEN, C. C. A. M. (1994). Extraction of three-dimensional shape from optic flow: A geometric approach. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 11, 2184-2196.
5. DOMINI, F., & CAUDEK, C. (1999). Perceiving surface slant from deformation of optic flow. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 426-444.
6. DOMINI, F., CAUDEK, C., & GERBINO, W. (1995). Perception of surface attitude in SFM displays. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 36, s360.
7. EAGLE, R. A., & BLAKE, A. (1995). Two-dimensional constraints on three-dimensional structure from motion tasks. Vision Research, 35, 2927-2941.
8. KOENDERINK, J. J., & VAN DOORS, A. J. (1977). How an ambulant observer can construct a model of the environment from the geometrical structure of the visual inflow. In G. Hauske & F. Butenandt (Eds.). Kybernetik (pp. 224-247). Munich: Oldenburg.
9. KOENDERINK, J. J., & VAN DOORN, A. J. (1991). Affine structure from motion. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 8, 377-385.
10. LITER, J. C., & BRAUNSTEIN, M. L. (1998). The relationship of vertical and horizontal velocity gradients in the perception of shape, rotation and rigidity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1257-1272.
11. LITER, J. C., BRAUNSTEIN, M. L., & HOFFMAN, D. D. (1993). Inferring structure from motion in two-view and multi-view displays. Perception, 22, 1441-1465.
12. LOOMIS, J. M., & EBY, D. W. (1988). Perceiving structure from motion: Failure of shape constancy. In Proceedings from the Second International Conference on Computer Vision (pp. 383-391). Washington, DC: IEEE.
13. LOOMIS, J. M., & EBY, D. W. (1989). Relative motion parallax and the perception of structure from motion. In Proceedings from the Workshop on Visual Motion (pp. 204-211). Washington, DC: IEEE.
14. NORMAN, J. F. & LAPPIN, J. S. (1992). The detection of surface curvatures defined by optical motion. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 386-396.
15. NORMAN, J. F., & TODD, J. T. (1993). The perceptual analysis of structure from motion for rotating objects undergoing affine stretching transformations. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 279-291.
16. NORMAN, J. F., & TODD, J. T. (1995). Perception of 3-D structure from contradictory optical patterns. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 826-834.
17. PEROTTI, V. J., TODD, J. T., LAPPIN, J. S., & PHILLIPS, F. (1998). The perception of surface curvature from optical motion. Perception & Psychophvsics, 60, 377-388.
18. PEROTTI, V. J., TODD, J. T., & NORMAN, J. F. (1996). The visual perception of rigid motion from constant flow fields. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 666-679.
19. PEROTTI, V. J., TODD, J. T., TITTLE, J. S., & NORMAN, J. F. (1994). Perception of 3D form from instantaneous flow components. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 35, 1317.
20. SNOWDEN, R. J., & BRADDICK, O. J. (1991). The temporal integration and resolution of velocity signals. Vision Research, 31, 907-914.
21. TITTLE, J. S., TODD, J. T., PEROTTI, V. J., & NORMAN, J. F. (1995). Systematic distortion of perceived three-dimensional structure from motion and binocular stereopsis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 663-678.
22. TODD, J. T. (1981). Visual information about moving objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 7, 795-810.
23. TODD, J. T., & BRESSAN, P. (1990). The perception of 3-dimensional affine structure from minimal apparent motion sequences. Perception & Psychophysics, 48, 419-430.
24. TODD, J. T., & NORMAN, J. F. (1991). The visual perception of smoothly curved surfaces from minimal apparent motion sequences. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 509-523.
25. ULLMAN, S. (1977). The interpretation of visual motion. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
26. ULLMAN, S. (1979). The interpretation of visual motion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. ULLMAN, S. (1983). Recent computational studies in the interpretation of structure from motion. In J. Beck & A. Rosenfeld (Eds.), Human and machine vision (pp. 459-480). New York: Academic Press.
28. WERKHOVEN, P., SNIPPE, H., & TOET, A. (1992). Visual processing of optical acceleration. Vision Research, 32, 2313-2329.