The visual perception of 3D shape

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 115-121

  Todd, James T ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS; VISUAL COMMUNICATION;

OPTICAL STIMULATION; VISUAL PERCEPTIONS;

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS;

ACCOMMODATION; BINOCULAR CONVERGENCE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; REVIEW; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL SYSTEM;

DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HUMANS; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTUAL DISTORTION; PSYCHOPHYSICS;

EID: 1542315425     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.01.006     Document Type: Review

References (59)

1. Gibson J.J. The Perception of the Visual World. 1950;Haughton Mifflin.
2. Malik J., Rosenholtz R. Computing local surface orientation and shape from texture for curved surfaces. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 23:1997;149-168.
3. Tse P.U. A contour propagation approach to surface filling-in and volume formation. Psychol. Rev. 109:2002;91-115.
4. Belhumeur P.N., et al. The bas-relief ambiguity. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 35:1999;33-44.
5. Koenderink J.J., van Doorn A.J. Affine structure from motion. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A. 8:1991;377-385.
6. Ullman S. The Interpretation of Visual Motion. 1979;MIT Press.
7. Longuet-Higgins H.C. A computer algorithm for reconstructing a scene from two projections. Nature. 293:1981;133-135.
8. Richards W.A. Structure from stereo and motion. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A. 2:1985;343-349.
9. Todd J.T., Norman J.F. The visual perception of 3-D shape from multiple cues: are observers capable of perceiving metric structure? Percept. Psychophys. 65:2003;31-47.
10. Hecht H., et al. Compression of visual space in natural scenes and in their photographic counterparts. Percept. Psychophys. 61:1999;1269-1286.
11. Koenderink J.J., et al. Direct measurement of the curvature of visual space. Perception. 29:2000;69-80.
12. Koenderink J.J., et al. Papus in optical space. Percept. Psychophys. 64:2002;380-391.
13. Loomis J.M., Philbeck J.W. Is the anisotropy of perceived 3-D shape invariant across scale? Percept. Psychophys. 61:1999;397-402.
14. Norman J.F., et al. The visual perception of 3D length. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 22:1996;173-186.
15. Koenderink J.J., et al. Surface range and attitude probing in stereoscopically presented dynamic scenes. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 22:1996;869-878.
16. Koenderink J.J., et al. Pictorial surface attitude and local depth comparisons. Percept. Psychophys. 58:1996;163-173.
17. Koenderink J.J., et al. The visual contour in depth. Percept. Psychophys. 59:1997;828-838.
18. Koenderink J.J., et al. Ambiguity and the 'mental eye' in pictorial relief. Perception. 30:2001;431-448.
19. Todd J.T., et al. Effects of changing viewing conditions on the perceived structure of smoothly curved surfaces. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 22:1996;695-706.
20. Todd J.T., et al. Perception of doubly curved surfaces from anisotropic textures. Psychol. Sci. 15:2004;40-46.
21. Cornelis, E.V.K. et al. Mirror reflecting a picture of an object: what happens to the shape percept? Percept. Psychophys. (in press).
22. Todd J.T., et al. Effects of texture, illumination and surface reflectance on stereoscopic shape perception. Perception. 26:1997;807-822.
23. Gibson J.J. The perception of visual surfaces. Am. J. Psychol. 63:1950;367-384.
24. Gibson J.J. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. 1979;Haughton Mifflin.
25. Koenderink J.J. What does the occluding contour tell us about solid shape? Perception. 13:1984;321-330.
26. Hoffman D.D., Richards W.A. Parts of recognition. Cognition. 18:1984;65-96.
27. Siddiqi K., et al. Parts of visual form: psychological aspects. Perception. 25:1996;399-424.
28. Singh M., Hoffman D.D. Completing visual contours: the relationship between relatability and minimizing inflections. Percept. Psychophys. 61:1999;943-951.
29. Biederman I. Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. Psychol. Rev. 94:1987;115-147.
30. Malik J. Interpreting line drawings of curved objects. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 1:1987;73-103.
31. Huffman D.A. Realizable configurations of lines in pictures of polyhedra. Machine Intelligence. 8:1977;493-509.
32. Mackworth A.K. Interpreting pictures of polyhedral scenes. Artif. Intell. 4:1973;121-137.
33. Hummel J.E., Biederman I. Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. Psychol. Rev. 99:1992;480-517.
34. Norman, J.F. et al. Perception of 3D shape from specular highlights and deformations of shading. Psychol. Sci. (in press).
35. Dean P. Effects of inferotemporal lesions on the behavior of monkeys. Psychol. Bull. 83:1976;41-71.
36. Ungerleider L.G., Mishkin M. Two cortical visual systems. Ingle D.J., et al. Analysis of Visual Behavior. 1982;549-586 MIT press.
37. Kriegeskorte N., et al. Human cortical object recognition from a visual motion flowfield. J. Neurosci. 23:2003;1451-1463.
38. Murray S.O., et al. Processing shape, motion and three-dimensional shape-from-motion in the human cortex. Cereb. Cortex. 13:2003;508-516.
39. Orban G.A., et al. Human cortical regions involved in extracting depth from motion. Neuron. 24:1999;929-940.
40. Paradis A.L., et al. Visual perception of motion and 3-D structure from motion: an fMRI study. Cereb. Cortex. 10:2000;772-783.
41. Corbetta M., et al. Selective and divided attention during visual discriminations of shape, color, and speed: functional anatomy by positron emission tomography. J. Neurosci. 11:1991;2383-2402.
42. Peuskens, H. et al. Attention to 3D shape, 3D motion and texture in 3D structure from motion displays. J. Cogn. Neurosci. (in press).
43. Shikata E., et al. Surface orientation discrimination activates caudal and anterior intraparietal sulcus in humans: an event-related fMRI study. J. Neurophysiol. 85:2001;1309-1314.
44. Taira M., et al. Cortical areas related to attention to 3D surface structures based on shading: an fMRI study. Neuroimage. 14:2001;959-966.
45. Kourtzi Z., Kanwisher N. Cortical regions involved in perceiving object shape. J. Neurosci. 20:2000;3310-3318.
46. Kourtzi Z., Kanwisher N. Representation of perceived object shape by the human lateral occipital complex. Science. 293:2001;1506-1509.
47. Taira M., et al. Parietal neurons represent surface orientation from the gradient of binocular disparity. J. Neurophysiol. 83:2000;3140-3146.
48. Tsutsui K., et al. Integration of perspective and disparity cues in surface-orientation-selective neurons of area CIP. J. Neurophysiol. 86:2001;2856-2867.
49. Tsutsui K., et al. Neural correlates for perception of 3D surface orientation from texture gradient. Science. 298:2002;409-412.
50. Xiao D.K., et al. Selectivity of macaque MT/V5 neurons for surface orientation in depth specified by motion. Eur. J. Neurosci. 9:1997;956-964.
51. Janssen P., et al. Macaque inferior temporal neurons are selective for disparity-defined three-dimensional shapes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96:1999;8217-8222.
52. Janssen P., et al. Three-dimensional shape coding in inferior temporal cortex. Neuron. 27:2000;385-397.
53. Janssen P., et al. Selectivity for 3D shape that reveals distinct areas within macaque inferior temporal cortex. Science. 288:2000;2054-2056.
54. Janssen P., et al. Macaque inferior temporal neurons are selective for three-dimensional boundaries and surfaces. J. Neurosci. 21:2001;9419-9429.
55. Orban G.A., et al. Similarities and differences in motion processing between the human and macaque brain: evidence from fMRI. Neuropsychologia. 41:2003;1757-1768.
56. Vanduffel W., et al. Extracting 3D from motion: differences in human and monkey intraparietal cortex. Science. 298:2002;413-415.
57. Cipollo R., Giblin P. Visual Motion of Curves and Surfaces. 1999;Cambridge University Press.
58. Tarr M.J., Kriegman D.J. What defines a view? Vision Res. 41:2001;1981-2004.
59. Phillips F., et al. Perceptual representation of visible surfaces. Percept. Psychophys. 65:2003;747-762.