The intrinsic constraint approach to cue combination: An empirical and theoretical evaluation

Journal of Vision

Volumn 8, Issue 8, 2008, Pages

  MacKenzie, Kevin J ^a,b   Murray, Richard F ^a   Wilcox, Laurie M ^a  

^a YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cue combination; Depth perception; Intrinsic constraint; Modified weak fusion

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DIFFERENTIAL THRESHOLD; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOPHYSICS;

ADULT; CUES; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DIFFERENTIAL THRESHOLD; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 44849104874     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/8.8.5     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436.
2. Byron, F. W., & Fuller, R. W. (1992). Mathematics of classical and quantum physics. New York: Dover Publications, Inc.
3. Domini, F., & Caudek, C. (2007, August 27-31). A novel approach to the problem of cue integration. European Conference on Visual Perception, Arezzo, Italy.
4. Domini, F., Caudek, C., & Tassinari, H. (2006). Stereo and motion information are not independently processed by the visual system. Vision Research, 46, 1707-1723.
5. Ernst, M. O., & Banks, M. S. (2002). Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature, 415, 429-433.
6. Hillis, J. M., Watt, S. J., Landy, M. S., & Banks, M. S. (2004). Slant from texture and disparity cues: Optimal cue combination. Journal of Vision, 4(12):1, 967-992, http://journalofvision.org/ 4/12/1/, doi:10.1167/4.12.1.
7. Jacobs, R. A. (1999). Optimal integration of texture and motion cues to depth. Vision Research, 39, 3621-3629.
8. Johnston, E. B., Cumming, B. G., & Landy, M. S. (1994). Integration of stereopsis and motion shape cues. Vision Research, 34, 2259-2275.
9. Krueger, L. E. (1989). Reconciling Fechner and Stevens: Toward a unified psychophysical law. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 251-320.
10. Landy, M. S., Maloney, L. T., Johnston, E. B., & Young, M. (1995). Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: In defense of weak fusion. Vision Research, 35, 389-412.
11. Maloney, L. T., & Landy, M. S. (1989). A statistical framework for robust fusion of depth information. In W. A. Pearlman (Ed.), Visual communications and image processing: IV. Proceedings of the SPIE (vol. 1199, pp. 1154-1163).
12. McKee, S. P., Levi, D. M., & Bowne, S. F. (1990). The imprecision of stereopsis. Vision Research, 30, 1763-1779.
13. Newman, E. B. (1933). The validity of the just noticeable difference as a unit of psychological magnitude. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science, 36, 172-175.
14. Oruç, I., Maloney, L. T., & Landy, M. S. (2003). Weighted linear cue combination with possibly correlated error. Vision Research, 43, 2451-2468.
15. Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437-442.
16. Stevens, S. S. (1961). To Honor Fechner and Repeal His Law: A power function, not a log function, describes the operating characteristic of a sensory system. Science, 133, 80-86.
17. Todd, J. T. (2004). The visual perception of 3D shape. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 115-121.
18. Young, M. J., Landy, M. S., & Maloney, L. T. (1993). A perturbation analysis of depth perception from combinations of texture and motion cues. Vision Research, 33, 2685-2696.