3D surface orientation based on a novel representation of the orientation disparity field

Vision Research

Volumn 48, Issue 25, 2008, Pages 2509-2522

  Fantoni, Carlo ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRIESTE   (Italy)

^b ISTITUTO ITALIANO DI TECNOLOGIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Binocular vision; Computational modeling; Inverse optic; Orientation disparity; Planar surface orientation; Stereopsis

Indexed keywords

ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; IMAGE ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL ORIENTATION;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; ORIENTATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; VISION DISPARITY; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 54849407547     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.08.015     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Arditi A. The dependence of the induced effect on orientation and a hypothesis concerning disparity computation in general. Vision Research 22 (1982) 329-336
2. Backus B.T., and Banks M.S. Estimator reliability and distance scaling in stereoscopic slant perception. Perception 28 (1999) 217-242
3. Backus B.T., Banks M.S., van Ee R., and Crowell J.A. Horizontal and vertical disparity, eye position, and stereoscopic slant perception. Vision Research 39 (1999) 1143-1170
4. Blakemore C., Fiorentini A., and Maffei L. A second neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination. Journal of Psychology (London) 226 (1972) 725-749
5. Bradshaw M.F., and Rogers B.J. Sensitivity to stereoscopic corrugations as a function of corrugation frequency. Vision Research 39 (1999) 3049-3056
6. Braunstein M.L. Motion and texture as sources of slant information. Journal of Experimental Psychology 78 (1968) 247-253
7. Braunstein M.L., Liter J.C., and Tittle J.S. Recovering three-dimensional shape from perspective translations and orthographic rotations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performances 19 (1993) 598-614
8. Bridge H., and Cumming B.G. Response of Macaque V1 neurons to binocular orientation differences. The Journal of Neuroscience 21 18 (2001) 7293-7302
9. Caganello R., and Rogers B.J. Anisotropies in the perception of stereoscopic surfaces: The role of orientation disparity. Vision Research 33 (1993) 2189-2201
10. Clocksin W.F. Perception of surface slant and edges labels from optical flow: A computational approach. Perception 9 (1980) 253-269
11. Domini F., and Braunstein M.L. Recovery of 3D structure from motion is neither Euclidean nor affine. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performances 24 (1998) 1273-1295
12. Domini F., and Caudek C. Perceiving surface slant from deformation of optic flow. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performances 25 (1999) 426-444
13. Domini F., Caudek C., and Gerbino W. Perception of surface attitude in structure from motion displays. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science (1995) 36-1694 [ARVO abstract]
14. Fantoni, C., & Gerbino, W. (2006). 3D surface orientation based on orientation disparity alone. Journal of Vision, 6(6):645, 645a, http://journalofvision.org/6/6/645/, 10.1167/6.6.645.
15. Freeman T.C.A., Harris M.G., and Meese T.S. On the relationship between deformation and perceived surface slant. Vision Research 36 (1996) 317-322
16. Garding J. Shape from texture and contour by weak isotropy. Artificial Intelligence 64 (1993) 243-297
17. Garding J., Porrill J., Mayhew J.E.W., and Frisby J.P. Stereopsis, vertical disparity and relief transformations. Vision Research 35 (1995) 703-722
18. Gerbino W. Percezione. In: Legrenzi P. (Ed). Manuale di psicologia generale. 2nd ed. (1997), il Mulino, Bologna
19. Gibson J.J. The perception of visible world (1950), Houghton Mifflin, Boston
20. Gillam B., Flagg T., and Finlay D. Evidence for disparity change as the primary stimulus for stereoscopic processing. Perception & Psychophysics 36 (1984) 559-564
21. Gillam B., and Rogers B.J. Orientation disparity, deformation and stereoscopic slant perception. Perception 20 (1991) 441-448
22. Gillam B., and Ryan C. Perspective, orientation disparity, and anisotropy in stereoscopic slant perception. Perception 21 (1992) 427-439
23. Grimson W. From image to surfaces. A computational study of the human early visual system (1981), MIT Press, Cambridge
24. Hanny P., von der Heydt R., and Poggio G.F. Binocular neuron responses to tilt in depth in the monkey visual cortex. Evidence for orientation disparity processing. Experimental Brain Research 41 (1980) A26
25. Harris M.G., Freeman T.C.A., and Hughes J. Retinal speeds gradients and the perception of surface slant. Vision Research 32 (1992) 587-590
26. Hay J.C. Optical motions and space perception - an extension of Gibson's analysis. Psychological Review 73 (1966) 550-565
27. Horn B., and Schunck B. Determining optical flow. Artificial Intelligence 17 (1981) 185-204
28. Howard I.P., and Kaneko H. Relative shear disparities and the perception of surface inclination. Vision Research 34 (1994) 2505-2517
29. Howard I.P., and Kaneko H. Relative size disparities and the perception of surface slant. Vision Research 13 (1996) 1919-1930
30. Ji H., and Fermuller C. Noise cause slant underestimation in stereo and motion. Vision Research 46 (2006) 3105-3120
31. Jones, D. G., & Malik, J. (1991). Determining three-dimensional shape from orientation and spatial frequency disparities II-using corresponding image patches. Computer Science Division, University of California Berkeley, Technical Report No. UCB-CSD, 91-657.
32. Knill D.C. Perception of surface contours and surface shape: From computation to psychophysics. Journal of the Optical Society of America 9 (1992) 1449-1464
33. Koenderink J.J. Optic flow. Vision Research 26 (1986) 161-180
34. Koenderink J.J., and van Doorn A.J. Invariant properties of the motion parallax field due to the movement of rigid bodies relative to an observer. Optica Acta 22 (1975) 773-791
35. Koenderink J.J., and van Doorn A.J. Geometry of binocular vision and a model for stereopsis. Biological Cybernetics 21 (1976) 29-35
36. Longuet-Higgins H.C. The visual ambiguity of a moving plane. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 223 (1984) 165-175
37. Longuet-Higgins H.C., and Prazdny K. The interpretation of a moving retinal image. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 208 (1980) 385-397
38. Marr D. Vision (1980), Freeman, San Francisco
39. Marr D., and Poggio T. A computational theory of human stereo vision. Proceeding of the Royal Society, London B204 (1979) 301-328
40. Mitchison G.J., and McKee S.P. Mechanisms underlying the anisotropy of stereoscopic tilt perception. Vision Research 30 (1990) 1781-1791
41. Morgan M.J., and Castet E. The aperture problem in stereopsis. Vision Research 39 (1997) 2737-2744
42. Nelson J.I., Kato H., and Bishop P.O. Discrimination of orientation and position disparities by binocularly activated neurons in cat striate cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology 40 (1977) 260-283
43. Ninio J. Orientational versus horizontal disparity in the stereoscopic appreciation of depth. Perception 10 (1985) 403-410
44. Rogers B.J., and Bradshaw M.F. Disparity scaling and the perception of frontoparallel surfaces. Perception 24 (1995) 155-179
45. Rogers B., and Graham M. Similarities between motion parallax and stereopsis in human depth perception. Vision Research 22 (1982) 261-270
46. Rogers B.J., and Graham M. Anisotropies in the perception of three-dimensional surfaces. Science 221 (1983) 1409-1411
47. Stevens K.A. The visual interpretation of surface contours. Artificial Intelligence 17 (1981) 47-73
48. Stevens K.A. The information content of texture gradients. Biological Cybernetics 42 (1981) 95-105
49. Stevens K.A. Slant-tilt: The visual encoding of surface orientation. Biological Cybernetics 46 (1983) 183-195
50. Stevens K.A. Surface tilt (the direction of slant): A neglected psychophysical variable. Perception & Psychophysics 33 3 (1983) 241-250
51. Todd J.T., and Perotti V.J. The visual perception of surface orientation from optical motion. Perception & Psychophysics 61 8 (1999) 1577-1589
52. Ullman S. The interpretation of visual motion (1979), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
53. Ullman S. The optical flow of planar surfaces. Spatial Vision 1 (1986) 263-276
54. van Ee R., and Erkelens C.J. Binocular perception of slant about oblique axes to a visual frame of reference. Perception 24 (1995) 299-314 1995
55. van Ee R., and Erkelens C.J. Temporal aspects of binocular slant perception: An evaluation and extension of Howard and Kaneko's theory. Vision Research 38 (1998) 3871-3882
56. van Ee R., and Schor C.M. Unconstrained stereoscopic matching of lines. Vision Research 40 (2000) 151-162
57. von Helmholtz, H. (1962). Physiological optics. J.P.C. Southall for the Optical Society of America 1924, Translated. New York: Dover.
58. Wallach H., and Bacon J. Two forms of retinal disparity. Perception & Psychophysics 19 (1976) 375-382
59. Wildes R.P. Direct recovery of three-dimensional scene geometry from binocular stereo disparity. IEEE Transaction on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 13 (1991) 761-774